Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/29/15 7:57 PM, Califbill wrote:


Harry is a Nobody.

Nobody is Perfect.

Therefore Harry is Perfect.



Thank goodness you're not trying to be original or clever with
syllogisms, eh, Bilious?


I though the syllogism was Raheem appropriate, with a little modification.

On 12/29/15 9:03 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/29/15 7:57 PM, Califbill wrote:


Harry is a Nobody.

Nobody is Perfect.

Therefore Harry is Perfect.



Thank goodness you're not trying to be original or clever with
syllogisms, eh, Bilious?


I though the syllogism was Raheem appropriate, with a little modification.


Who or what is "Raheem"?

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/29/15 9:03 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/29/15 7:57 PM, Califbill wrote:


Harry is a Nobody.

Nobody is Perfect.

Therefore Harry is Perfect.



Thank goodness you're not trying to be original or clever with
syllogisms, eh, Bilious?


I though the syllogism was Raheem appropriate, with a little modification.


Who or what is "Raheem"?


He is a Rather, spell correctors brother.

Califbill billnews wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/29/15 9:03 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/29/15 7:57 PM, Califbill wrote:


Harry is a Nobody.

Nobody is Perfect.

Therefore Harry is Perfect.



Thank goodness you're not trying to be original or clever with
syllogisms, eh, Bilious?


I though the syllogism was Raheem appropriate, with a little modification.


Who or what is "Raheem"?


He is a Rather, spell correctors brother.



Try English.

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

Keyser Söze wrote:
Califbill billnews wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/29/15 9:03 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/29/15 7:57 PM, Califbill wrote:


Harry is a Nobody.

Nobody is Perfect.

Therefore Harry is Perfect.



Thank goodness you're not trying to be original or clever with
syllogisms, eh, Bilious?


I though the syllogism was Raheem appropriate, with a little modification.


Who or what is "Raheem"?


He is a Rather, spell correctors brother.



Try English.


Try thinking.

On 12/30/15 1:06 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
Califbill billnews wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/29/15 9:03 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/29/15 7:57 PM, Califbill wrote:


Harry is a Nobody.

Nobody is Perfect.

Therefore Harry is Perfect.



Thank goodness you're not trying to be original or clever with
syllogisms, eh, Bilious?


I though the syllogism was Raheem appropriate, with a little modification.


Who or what is "Raheem"?


He is a Rather, spell correctors brother.



Try English.


Try thinking.


I do think. Your comment still makes no sense. Are you trying to say
your comment was "rather appropriate," and a spell checker changed
rather to Raheem? That seems a stretch.

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/30/15 1:06 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
Califbill billnews wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/29/15 9:03 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/29/15 7:57 PM, Califbill wrote:


Harry is a Nobody.

Nobody is Perfect.

Therefore Harry is Perfect.



Thank goodness you're not trying to be original or clever with
syllogisms, eh, Bilious?


I though the syllogism was Raheem appropriate, with a little modification.


Who or what is "Raheem"?


He is a Rather, spell correctors brother.



Try English.


Try thinking.


I do think. Your comment still makes no sense. Are you trying to say
your comment was "rather appropriate," and a spell checker changed
rather to Raheem? That seems a stretch.


See, I knew you could think somewhat.