On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:21:54 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 12/30/15 9:27 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/30/2015 9:21 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/30/15 6:11 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/30/2015 12:54 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/29/15 9:59 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 14:12:40 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Indeed, my narrow outlook on life prevents me from voting for
assholes
like Trump and Cruz.

Yet you would vote for a lying asshole like Clinton (pick one)

Pull the rooster boy


All politicians tell stretchers, even or especially your
libertarians. I
think Mrs. Clinton is far less of a liar than Trump, Cruz, Rubio,
Christie, and the rest of the GOP pack, and will not move the country
backwards.


It's more like making a course correction from where we are currently
heading.

Oh, really? It's a lot more than a course correction. It's lower taxes
for the rich, weakening of workplace safety standards, weakening of
environmental standards, more money wasted on the military, more
privatization of what should be public functions, draconian immigration
policies, more wars with boots on the ground, more exportation of
U.S.jobs, weakening of food and drug standards, further deterioration of
public schools and funding for them, attacks on societal gains made by
women and by various minorities -


Figured that would put a nickel in you. Ha.



I always appreciate a chance to tell the truth about the GOP's plans,
though, considering the audience here, I kept it simple.

===

You always welcome the chance to advocate for a bigger, more intrusive
government. Personally I'd like to see harsher penalties for tax
cheaters and dead beats.

On 12/30/15 10:35 AM, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:23:07 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 12/30/15 9:45 AM, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 09:27:59 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:

On 12/30/2015 9:21 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/30/15 6:11 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/30/2015 12:54 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/29/15 9:59 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 14:12:40 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Indeed, my narrow outlook on life prevents me from voting for assholes
like Trump and Cruz.

Yet you would vote for a lying asshole like Clinton (pick one)

Pull the rooster boy


All politicians tell stretchers, even or especially your libertarians. I
think Mrs. Clinton is far less of a liar than Trump, Cruz, Rubio,
Christie, and the rest of the GOP pack, and will not move the country
backwards.


It's more like making a course correction from where we are currently
heading.

Oh, really? It's a lot more than a course correction. It's lower taxes
for the rich, weakening of workplace safety standards, weakening of
environmental standards, more money wasted on the military, more
privatization of what should be public functions, draconian immigration
policies, more wars with boots on the ground, more exportation of
U.S.jobs, weakening of food and drug standards, further deterioration of
public schools and funding for them, attacks on societal gains made by
women and by various minorities -


Figured that would put a nickel in you. Ha.


I thought 'draconian immigration policies' was cute. My grandfather thought they were
pretty reasonable.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


Had they been stricter, we might have gotten a family of hard-working,
accomplished Mexicans, instead of a family of squirrel hunters.

Insulting my grandfather doesn't explain the 'draconian immigration policies'
comment. You must be referring to the immigration policies applicable to the Germans,
French, Dutch, etc., desiring to immigrate.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


Your boy Trump and several of the other GOP asshole wannabes want to
round up millions of illegals and... The "and" is significant, for
reasons you wouldn't comprehend.

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:21:54 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:


I always appreciate a chance to tell the truth about the GOP's plans,
though, considering the audience here, I kept it simple.

Only in the sense that you "simply" quoted the DNC talking points.

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:23:07 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Had they been stricter, we might have gotten a family of hard-working,
accomplished Mexicans, instead of a family of squirrel hunters.

Yeah but those hard working Mexicans would have put those lazy union
workers out of work.
We are seeing it here right now. Without the Mexicans, it is taking
the contractors about 2 extra months to build a house.

On 12/30/15 11:13 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:23:07 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Had they been stricter, we might have gotten a family of hard-working,
accomplished Mexicans, instead of a family of squirrel hunters.

Yeah but those hard working Mexicans would have put those lazy union
workers out of work.
We are seeing it here right now. Without the Mexicans, it is taking
the contractors about 2 extra months to build a house.


I wasn't aware that union workers were building tract houses in Florida.

On 12/30/15 11:11 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:21:54 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:


I always appreciate a chance to tell the truth about the GOP's plans,
though, considering the audience here, I kept it simple.

Only in the sense that you "simply" quoted the DNC talking points.


Really? I haven't read them. Hmmm.

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 11:44:24 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 12/30/15 11:11 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:21:54 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:


I always appreciate a chance to tell the truth about the GOP's plans,
though, considering the audience here, I kept it simple.

Only in the sense that you "simply" quoted the DNC talking points.


Really? I haven't read them. Hmmm.

Low information democrat? ;-)

BTW we all know that is bull**** since the talking points have not
changed much since the Carter administration. You probably have them
on a card in your wallet.

I notice you did not address any of the challenges to your recitation
of those talking points.

On 12/30/15 12:22 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 11:44:24 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 12/30/15 11:11 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:21:54 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:


I always appreciate a chance to tell the truth about the GOP's plans,
though, considering the audience here, I kept it simple.

Only in the sense that you "simply" quoted the DNC talking points.


Really? I haven't read them. Hmmm.

Low information democrat? ;-)

BTW we all know that is bull**** since the talking points have not
changed much since the Carter administration. You probably have them
on a card in your wallet.

I notice you did not address any of the challenges to your recitation
of those talking points.


Once again, I have not read or seen any Democratic talking points in
the issues in the upcoming election(s).

You are correct in that I did not "address" what you call challenges.

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 15:10:50 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 12/30/15 12:22 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 11:44:24 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 12/30/15 11:11 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:21:54 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:


I always appreciate a chance to tell the truth about the GOP's plans,
though, considering the audience here, I kept it simple.

Only in the sense that you "simply" quoted the DNC talking points.


Really? I haven't read them. Hmmm.

Low information democrat? ;-)

BTW we all know that is bull**** since the talking points have not
changed much since the Carter administration. You probably have them
on a card in your wallet.

I notice you did not address any of the challenges to your recitation
of those talking points.


Once again, I have not read or seen any Democratic talking points in
the issues in the upcoming election(s).

You are correct in that I did not "address" what you call challenges.

Getting backed into a corner continuously must be a bitch. Or, maybe Greg just wasn't
'entitled' to an answer, eh?

I have to admit, since our little discussion, you've done very well at squelching the
name-calling. Congratulations. I knew you could do it.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

John H. wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 15:10:50 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 12/30/15 12:22 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 11:44:24 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 12/30/15 11:11 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:21:54 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:


I always appreciate a chance to tell the truth about the GOP's plans,
though, considering the audience here, I kept it simple.

Only in the sense that you "simply" quoted the DNC talking points.


Really? I haven't read them. Hmmm.

Low information democrat? ;-)

BTW we all know that is bull**** since the talking points have not
changed much since the Carter administration. You probably have them
on a card in your wallet.

I notice you did not address any of the challenges to your recitation
of those talking points.


Once again, I have not read or seen any Democratic talking points in
the issues in the upcoming election(s).

You are correct in that I did not "address" what you call challenges.

Getting backed into a corner continuously must be a bitch. Or, maybe Greg just wasn't
'entitled' to an answer, eh?

I have to admit, since our little discussion, you've done very well at squelching the
name-calling. Congratulations. I knew you could do it.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


I'm sure your observation about "corners" pleases you, but as usual it is
totally inaccurate


--
Sent from my iPhone 6+