|
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 12:34:21 -0500, John H.
wrote: On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 09:14:35 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote: John H. wrote: On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 03:56:14 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: Somebody described Starbucks ass tasting like burnt water. I'd agree. Expensive burnt water at that. McDonalds isn't bad though.. They switched brands or something a few years back, and the new (?) stuff is much better. The old stuff was atrocious. Their sausage biscuit is the only thing on their menu worth buying, as far as I'm concerned. -- Ban idiots, not guns! McDonalds has very good salads. The Southwest is very good. And senior drink is less,than a buck. Locally is $0.75 for coffee. Some franchises are cheaper. And the bathrooms are normally very clean when traveling. My wife likes their salads - and the bathrooms. I've seen their senior coffees for anywhere between $.50 and $.85. If I'm on a long ride, they're a great place to stop for a break. I can eat a sausage and egg on a hamburger bun, if they will do it but I am not much of a muffin or biscuit guy. Too dry. McD doesn't have much on the lunch menu I like if I want more than a salad. I really like the S/E/C on a croissant at the Burger King but I suspect that is a heart attack in a bag. The thing seems to be dripping in butter. I am not really in love with any "fast food" fries. The best ones were at Sonny's BBQ but I haven't been there for a while. I imagine the health nuts may have changed the formula by now. I think they used to use lard. |
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
On 12/11/2015 1:39 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/11/15 1:33 PM, True North wrote: On Friday, 11 December 2015 13:34:30 UTC-4, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 12/11/2015 11:37 AM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 11:09:55 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/11/15 8:21 AM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 16:30:24 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:25:42 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/10/15 3:21 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:02:16 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/10/15 12:30 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:11:43 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 12/10/2015 8:00 AM, True North wrote: The John flushes.... You'll note he still hasn't answered the question eating meat, shoes, and gloves. Wonder why?" Why the rancor, Johnny? It's Christmas season, don't y'all know? Not if Harry can help it. Try and send a little Christmas spirit his way and see what happens. :-) Is there something rancorous about the question, "Do you eat meat, wear leather shoes, or leather gloves?" Maybe Don doesn't know what 'rancor' means....? -- Ban idiots, not guns! Why the sense of entitlement? ?? -- Ban idiots, not guns! You act as if you are *entitled* to get your questions or those questions of your buddies answered. You often repeat these questions many times and push for answers, sometimes a dozen times or more. My conclusion is that you somehow feel as if you are entitled to answers. You aren't. Don't need answers to make the point, which was done a dozen times or more! :) -- Ban idiots, not guns! The point is that some aren't playing your games. Of course not. It's hard to get out of the corners you and Don back yourself in to. Brash (and that's being charitable) statements, get called on them, and shut up. Works for me. -- Ban idiots, not guns! "It" has nothing to do with corners, but everything to do with your game-playing here. But...if it makes you feel better, what the hell...it's only you regurgitating and therefore of no matter. You make it sound as though I'm the only one asking questions you (or Don) can't/won't answer. You need to add a lot more names to that list. I think Luddite first asked the question about your Vietnam unit that searched and recovered dead soldiers. Hee, hee. I didn't "ask". I just commented that I had not heard of civilians in any official capacity searching for bodies while the war was going on. The John isn't interested in the facts but some of us appreciate the truth. Johnny loves to think he's the Donald Trump of the newsgroup, and that he can use his version of bluster to "demand" that other posters do as he wishes. It's sort of funny to watch once in a while. The truth isn't too much to ask, is it? |
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 14:29:32 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote:
On 12/11/2015 1:39 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/11/15 1:33 PM, True North wrote: On Friday, 11 December 2015 13:34:30 UTC-4, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 12/11/2015 11:37 AM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 11:09:55 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/11/15 8:21 AM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 16:30:24 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:25:42 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/10/15 3:21 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:02:16 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/10/15 12:30 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:11:43 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 12/10/2015 8:00 AM, True North wrote: The John flushes.... You'll note he still hasn't answered the question eating meat, shoes, and gloves. Wonder why?" Why the rancor, Johnny? It's Christmas season, don't y'all know? Not if Harry can help it. Try and send a little Christmas spirit his way and see what happens. :-) Is there something rancorous about the question, "Do you eat meat, wear leather shoes, or leather gloves?" Maybe Don doesn't know what 'rancor' means....? -- Ban idiots, not guns! Why the sense of entitlement? ?? -- Ban idiots, not guns! You act as if you are *entitled* to get your questions or those questions of your buddies answered. You often repeat these questions many times and push for answers, sometimes a dozen times or more. My conclusion is that you somehow feel as if you are entitled to answers. You aren't. Don't need answers to make the point, which was done a dozen times or more! :) -- Ban idiots, not guns! The point is that some aren't playing your games. Of course not. It's hard to get out of the corners you and Don back yourself in to. Brash (and that's being charitable) statements, get called on them, and shut up. Works for me. -- Ban idiots, not guns! "It" has nothing to do with corners, but everything to do with your game-playing here. But...if it makes you feel better, what the hell...it's only you regurgitating and therefore of no matter. You make it sound as though I'm the only one asking questions you (or Don) can't/won't answer. You need to add a lot more names to that list. I think Luddite first asked the question about your Vietnam unit that searched and recovered dead soldiers. Hee, hee. I didn't "ask". I just commented that I had not heard of civilians in any official capacity searching for bodies while the war was going on. The John isn't interested in the facts but some of us appreciate the truth. Johnny loves to think he's the Donald Trump of the newsgroup, and that he can use his version of bluster to "demand" that other posters do as he wishes. It's sort of funny to watch once in a while. The truth isn't too much to ask, is it? Apparently Don thinks there is a big difference between facts and truth. -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
|
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 12:34:24 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 12/11/2015 11:37 AM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 11:09:55 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/11/15 8:21 AM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 16:30:24 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:25:42 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/10/15 3:21 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:02:16 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/10/15 12:30 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:11:43 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 12/10/2015 8:00 AM, True North wrote: The John flushes.... You'll note he still hasn't answered the question eating meat, shoes, and gloves. Wonder why?" Why the rancor, Johnny? It's Christmas season, don't y'all know? Not if Harry can help it. Try and send a little Christmas spirit his way and see what happens. :-) Is there something rancorous about the question, "Do you eat meat, wear leather shoes, or leather gloves?" Maybe Don doesn't know what 'rancor' means....? -- Ban idiots, not guns! Why the sense of entitlement? ?? -- Ban idiots, not guns! You act as if you are *entitled* to get your questions or those questions of your buddies answered. You often repeat these questions many times and push for answers, sometimes a dozen times or more. My conclusion is that you somehow feel as if you are entitled to answers. You aren't. Don't need answers to make the point, which was done a dozen times or more! :) -- Ban idiots, not guns! The point is that some aren't playing your games. Of course not. It's hard to get out of the corners you and Don back yourself in to. Brash (and that's being charitable) statements, get called on them, and shut up. Works for me. -- Ban idiots, not guns! "It" has nothing to do with corners, but everything to do with your game-playing here. But...if it makes you feel better, what the hell...it's only you regurgitating and therefore of no matter. You make it sound as though I'm the only one asking questions you (or Don) can't/won't answer. You need to add a lot more names to that list. I think Luddite first asked the question about your Vietnam unit that searched and recovered dead soldiers. Hee, hee. I didn't "ask". I just commented that I had not heard of civilians in any official capacity searching for bodies while the war was going on. You should ask. Be interesting to see if you are 'entitled' to an answer. -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
John H. wrote:
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 14:29:32 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 12/11/2015 1:39 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/11/15 1:33 PM, True North wrote: On Friday, 11 December 2015 13:34:30 UTC-4, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 12/11/2015 11:37 AM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 11:09:55 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/11/15 8:21 AM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 16:30:24 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:25:42 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/10/15 3:21 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:02:16 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/10/15 12:30 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:11:43 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 12/10/2015 8:00 AM, True North wrote: The John flushes.... You'll note he still hasn't answered the question eating meat, shoes, and gloves. Wonder why?" Why the rancor, Johnny? It's Christmas season, don't y'all know? Not if Harry can help it. Try and send a little Christmas spirit his way and see what happens. :-) Is there something rancorous about the question, "Do you eat meat, wear leather shoes, or leather gloves?" Maybe Don doesn't know what 'rancor' means....? -- Ban idiots, not guns! Why the sense of entitlement? ?? -- Ban idiots, not guns! You act as if you are *entitled* to get your questions or those questions of your buddies answered. You often repeat these questions many times and push for answers, sometimes a dozen times or more. My conclusion is that you somehow feel as if you are entitled to answers. You aren't. Don't need answers to make the point, which was done a dozen times or more! ) -- Ban idiots, not guns! The point is that some aren't playing your games. Of course not. It's hard to get out of the corners you and Don back yourself in to. Brash (and that's being charitable) statements, get called on them, and shut up. Works for me. -- Ban idiots, not guns! "It" has nothing to do with corners, but everything to do with your game-playing here. But...if it makes you feel better, what the hell...it's only you regurgitating and therefore of no matter. You make it sound as though I'm the only one asking questions you (or Don) can't/won't answer. You need to add a lot more names to that list. I think Luddite first asked the question about your Vietnam unit that searched and recovered dead soldiers. Hee, hee. I didn't "ask". I just commented that I had not heard of civilians in any official capacity searching for bodies while the war was going on. The John isn't interested in the facts but some of us appreciate the truth. Johnny loves to think he's the Donald Trump of the newsgroup, and that he can use his version of bluster to "demand" that other posters do as he wishes. It's sort of funny to watch once in a while. The truth isn't too much to ask, is it? Apparently Don thinks there is a big difference between facts and truth. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Apparently don thinks there is little reason to play your little games here. -- Sent from my iPhone 6+ |
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
Keyser Söze
- show quoted text - "Apparently don thinks there is little reason to play your little games here." I wholeheartedly agree with this post. The John must be getting senile...he thinks he's back in the army barking orders that underlings were forced to obey. |
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
On 12/11/2015 5:21 PM, True North wrote:
Keyser Söze - show quoted text - "Apparently don thinks there is little reason to play your little games here." I wholeheartedly agree with this post. The John must be getting senile...he thinks he's back in the army barking orders that underlings were forced to obey. Individually, you two are pretty dumb. Teamed up you are incredibly so. |
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
|
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
True North wrote:
Keyser Söze - show quoted text - "Apparently don thinks there is little reason to play your little games here." I wholeheartedly agree with this post. The John must be getting senile...he thinks he's back in the army barking orders that underlings were forced to obey. Even as dumb as you are, you should know that you have to back up your statements. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:25 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com