They're just thugs...
 

On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 09:33:26 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 11/15/15 8:27 AM, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 07:54:04 +0000, RGrew176
wrote:


;1048830 Wrote:
On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 12:16:40 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:
-
At this point I think WW III is inevitable. Just a matter of time.
Russia and maybe even China may end up being allies.-

I am not sure China really cares about this because they don't seem to
have a muslim problem. They have sense enough not to have "made in
China" bomb fragments in the rubble.
The idea that we would partner up with the russians to kill several
million muslims is not totally off the wall tho. They have far worse
islamic terrorism problems than we do and it is right on their
borders, not across an ocean.
I doubt it would actually accomplish much tho.

That is because they have pretty much banned Islam in China.

http://tinyurl.com/patk2fk

Smart moves.
--


Good grief...you righties really truly have your heads up your asses
when it comes to knowledge of the world and the way it is. If there is
an antidote for Fox News and crazy rightwingedness, you ought to take it
three times a day.

The PRC has *not* banned Islam. There are millions of Muslims in China,
there are Muslim schools, festivals, cultural activities, architectural,
ways to practice Muslim dietary laws.

The site RGrew176 cited is a right-wing, bat**** crazy christian site
run by a convert.

Wow, apparently you didn't bother to read the article.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

They're just thugs...
 

On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 8:33:30 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/15/15 8:27 AM, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 07:54:04 +0000, RGrew176
wrote:


;1048830 Wrote:
On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 12:16:40 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:
-
At this point I think WW III is inevitable. Just a matter of time.
Russia and maybe even China may end up being allies.-

I am not sure China really cares about this because they don't seem to
have a muslim problem. They have sense enough not to have "made in
China" bomb fragments in the rubble.
The idea that we would partner up with the russians to kill several
million muslims is not totally off the wall tho. They have far worse
islamic terrorism problems than we do and it is right on their
borders, not across an ocean.
I doubt it would actually accomplish much tho.

That is because they have pretty much banned Islam in China.

http://tinyurl.com/patk2fk

Smart moves.
--


Good grief...you righties really truly have your heads up your asses
when it comes to knowledge of the world and the way it is. If there is
an antidote for Fox News and crazy rightwingedness, you ought to take it
three times a day.

The PRC has *not* banned Islam. There are millions of Muslims in China,
there are Muslim schools, festivals, cultural activities, architectural,
ways to practice Muslim dietary laws.

The site RGrew176 cited is a right-wing, bat**** crazy christian site
run by a convert.

Say what you want but can, or will you prove it wrong?

They're just thugs...
 

On 11/15/15 12:28 PM, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 09:33:26 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 11/15/15 8:27 AM, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 07:54:04 +0000, RGrew176
wrote:


;1048830 Wrote:
On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 12:16:40 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:
-
At this point I think WW III is inevitable. Just a matter of time.
Russia and maybe even China may end up being allies.-

I am not sure China really cares about this because they don't seem to
have a muslim problem. They have sense enough not to have "made in
China" bomb fragments in the rubble.
The idea that we would partner up with the russians to kill several
million muslims is not totally off the wall tho. They have far worse
islamic terrorism problems than we do and it is right on their
borders, not across an ocean.
I doubt it would actually accomplish much tho.

That is because they have pretty much banned Islam in China.

http://tinyurl.com/patk2fk

Smart moves.
--


Good grief...you righties really truly have your heads up your asses
when it comes to knowledge of the world and the way it is. If there is
an antidote for Fox News and crazy rightwingedness, you ought to take it
three times a day.

The PRC has *not* banned Islam. There are millions of Muslims in China,
there are Muslim schools, festivals, cultural activities, architectural,
ways to practice Muslim dietary laws.

The site RGrew176 cited is a right-wing, bat**** crazy christian site
run by a convert.

Wow, apparently you didn't bother to read the article.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


I read the article and gave it the same credence I give that sort of
bull**** when it is reported on Fox.

They're just thugs...
 

On 11/15/15 12:48 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 8:33:30 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/15/15 8:27 AM, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 07:54:04 +0000, RGrew176
wrote:


;1048830 Wrote:
On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 12:16:40 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:
-
At this point I think WW III is inevitable. Just a matter of time.
Russia and maybe even China may end up being allies.-

I am not sure China really cares about this because they don't seem to
have a muslim problem. They have sense enough not to have "made in
China" bomb fragments in the rubble.
The idea that we would partner up with the russians to kill several
million muslims is not totally off the wall tho. They have far worse
islamic terrorism problems than we do and it is right on their
borders, not across an ocean.
I doubt it would actually accomplish much tho.

That is because they have pretty much banned Islam in China.

http://tinyurl.com/patk2fk

Smart moves.
--


Good grief...you righties really truly have your heads up your asses
when it comes to knowledge of the world and the way it is. If there is
an antidote for Fox News and crazy rightwingedness, you ought to take it
three times a day.

The PRC has *not* banned Islam. There are millions of Muslims in China,
there are Muslim schools, festivals, cultural activities, architectural,
ways to practice Muslim dietary laws.

The site RGrew176 cited is a right-wing, bat**** crazy christian site
run by a convert.

Say what you want but can, or will you prove it wrong?


Prove what? That the guy whose site it is is a convert to some sort of
christianity and has no particular "cred" on islam in China?

They're just thugs...
 

On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 12:11:08 PM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/15/15 12:48 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 8:33:30 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/15/15 8:27 AM, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 07:54:04 +0000, RGrew176
wrote:


;1048830 Wrote:
On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 12:16:40 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:
-
At this point I think WW III is inevitable. Just a matter of time.
Russia and maybe even China may end up being allies.-

I am not sure China really cares about this because they don't seem to
have a muslim problem. They have sense enough not to have "made in
China" bomb fragments in the rubble.
The idea that we would partner up with the russians to kill several
million muslims is not totally off the wall tho. They have far worse
islamic terrorism problems than we do and it is right on their
borders, not across an ocean.
I doubt it would actually accomplish much tho.

That is because they have pretty much banned Islam in China.

http://tinyurl.com/patk2fk

Smart moves.
--


Good grief...you righties really truly have your heads up your asses
when it comes to knowledge of the world and the way it is. If there is
an antidote for Fox News and crazy rightwingedness, you ought to take it
three times a day.

The PRC has *not* banned Islam. There are millions of Muslims in China,
there are Muslim schools, festivals, cultural activities, architectural,
ways to practice Muslim dietary laws.

The site RGrew176 cited is a right-wing, bat**** crazy christian site
run by a convert.

Say what you want but can, or will you prove it wrong?


Prove what? That the guy whose site it is is a convert to some sort of
christianity and has no particular "cred" on islam in China?

content Harry, content. can or will you disprove the article?

They're just thugs...
 

Tim wrote:
On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 12:11:08 PM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/15/15 12:48 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 8:33:30 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/15/15 8:27 AM, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 07:54:04 +0000, RGrew176
wrote:


;1048830 Wrote:
On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 12:16:40 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:
-
At this point I think WW III is inevitable. Just a matter of time.
Russia and maybe even China may end up being allies.-

I am not sure China really cares about this because they don't seem to
have a muslim problem. They have sense enough not to have "made in
China" bomb fragments in the rubble.
The idea that we would partner up with the russians to kill several
million muslims is not totally off the wall tho. They have far worse
islamic terrorism problems than we do and it is right on their
borders, not across an ocean.
I doubt it would actually accomplish much tho.

That is because they have pretty much banned Islam in China.

http://tinyurl.com/patk2fk

Smart moves.
--


Good grief...you righties really truly have your heads up your asses
when it comes to knowledge of the world and the way it is. If there is
an antidote for Fox News and crazy rightwingedness, you ought to take it
three times a day.

The PRC has *not* banned Islam. There are millions of Muslims in China,
there are Muslim schools, festivals, cultural activities, architectural,
ways to practice Muslim dietary laws.

The site RGrew176 cited is a right-wing, bat**** crazy christian site
run by a convert.

Say what you want but can, or will you prove it wrong?


Prove what? That the guy whose site it is is a convert to some sort of
christianity and has no particular "cred" on islam in China?

content Harry, content. can or will you disprove the article?


There are large Muslim regions in China. And they are major problems for
the Chinese. They have battled them a lot. Some regions want to set up
independent countries. China even banned Ramadan fasting at one time in
predominately Muslim regions.

They're just thugs...
 

On 11/15/15 1:14 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 12:11:08 PM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/15/15 12:48 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 8:33:30 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/15/15 8:27 AM, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 07:54:04 +0000, RGrew176
wrote:


;1048830 Wrote:
On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 12:16:40 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:
-
At this point I think WW III is inevitable. Just a matter of time.
Russia and maybe even China may end up being allies.-

I am not sure China really cares about this because they don't seem to
have a muslim problem. They have sense enough not to have "made in
China" bomb fragments in the rubble.
The idea that we would partner up with the russians to kill several
million muslims is not totally off the wall tho. They have far worse
islamic terrorism problems than we do and it is right on their
borders, not across an ocean.
I doubt it would actually accomplish much tho.

That is because they have pretty much banned Islam in China.

http://tinyurl.com/patk2fk

Smart moves.
--


Good grief...you righties really truly have your heads up your asses
when it comes to knowledge of the world and the way it is. If there is
an antidote for Fox News and crazy rightwingedness, you ought to take it
three times a day.

The PRC has *not* banned Islam. There are millions of Muslims in China,
there are Muslim schools, festivals, cultural activities, architectural,
ways to practice Muslim dietary laws.

The site RGrew176 cited is a right-wing, bat**** crazy christian site
run by a convert.

Say what you want but can, or will you prove it wrong?


Prove what? That the guy whose site it is is a convert to some sort of
christianity and has no particular "cred" on islam in China?

content Harry, content. can or will you disprove the article?


There are all sorts of non-religious sites that describe the status of
islam in china.

As for prove or disproves, here's one for you:

Prove the fellow you believe is your savior is the son of god.

They're just thugs...
 

On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 12:28:29 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 09:33:26 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 11/15/15 8:27 AM, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 07:54:04 +0000, RGrew176
wrote:


;1048830 Wrote:
On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 12:16:40 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:
-
At this point I think WW III is inevitable. Just a matter of time.
Russia and maybe even China may end up being allies.-

I am not sure China really cares about this because they don't seem to
have a muslim problem. They have sense enough not to have "made in
China" bomb fragments in the rubble.
The idea that we would partner up with the russians to kill several
million muslims is not totally off the wall tho. They have far worse
islamic terrorism problems than we do and it is right on their
borders, not across an ocean.
I doubt it would actually accomplish much tho.

That is because they have pretty much banned Islam in China.

http://tinyurl.com/patk2fk

Smart moves.
--


Good grief...you righties really truly have your heads up your asses
when it comes to knowledge of the world and the way it is. If there is
an antidote for Fox News and crazy rightwingedness, you ought to take it
three times a day.

The PRC has *not* banned Islam. There are millions of Muslims in China,
there are Muslim schools, festivals, cultural activities, architectural,
ways to practice Muslim dietary laws.

The site RGrew176 cited is a right-wing, bat**** crazy christian site
run by a convert.

Wow, apparently you didn't bother to read the article.

Harry admires the Chinese style commitment to the free exercise of
religion.
Essentially the policy is "It is OK as long as nobody ever sees it or
hears about it".
If it ever inconveniences the government in any way it is stamped out.

Personally I don't care either way. This is China and the chinese have
the right to run their country as they wish. It is really none of our
business as long as they don't bother us with it. We certainly do not
want them telling us how our government should work.
I am not even that upset that they are building islands in the South
China Sea.
These are largely uninhabited spits of volcanic rock that everyone
claimed but nobody actually wanted to do anything with. We should be
able to negotiate some kind of settlement here without shooting
anyone.

They're just thugs...
 

On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 10:20:47 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote:

China even banned Ramadan fasting at one time in
predominately Muslim regions.

How do you do that?
Force feed people?

They're just thugs...
 

On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 12:38:42 PM UTC-6, wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 12:28:29 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 09:33:26 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 11/15/15 8:27 AM, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 07:54:04 +0000, RGrew176
wrote:


;1048830 Wrote:
On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 12:16:40 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:
-
At this point I think WW III is inevitable. Just a matter of time.
Russia and maybe even China may end up being allies.-

I am not sure China really cares about this because they don't seem to
have a muslim problem. They have sense enough not to have "made in
China" bomb fragments in the rubble.
The idea that we would partner up with the russians to kill several
million muslims is not totally off the wall tho. They have far worse
islamic terrorism problems than we do and it is right on their
borders, not across an ocean.
I doubt it would actually accomplish much tho.

That is because they have pretty much banned Islam in China.

http://tinyurl.com/patk2fk

Smart moves.
--


Good grief...you righties really truly have your heads up your asses
when it comes to knowledge of the world and the way it is. If there is
an antidote for Fox News and crazy rightwingedness, you ought to take it
three times a day.

The PRC has *not* banned Islam. There are millions of Muslims in China,
there are Muslim schools, festivals, cultural activities, architectural,
ways to practice Muslim dietary laws.

The site RGrew176 cited is a right-wing, bat**** crazy christian site
run by a convert.

Wow, apparently you didn't bother to read the article.

Harry admires the Chinese style commitment to the free exercise of
religion.
Essentially the policy is "It is OK as long as nobody ever sees it or
hears about it".
If it ever inconveniences the government in any way it is stamped out.

Personally I don't care either way. This is China and the chinese have
the right to run their country as they wish. It is really none of our
business as long as they don't bother us with it. We certainly do not
want them telling us how our government should work.
I am not even that upset that they are building islands in the South
China Sea.
These are largely uninhabited spits of volcanic rock that everyone
claimed but nobody actually wanted to do anything with. We should be
able to negotiate some kind of settlement here without shooting
anyone.

That's nice.

Can or will you dispute the article? Honestly, I don't think you can, but it was interesting reading your knee-jerk reaction to it.

They're just thugs...
 

On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 12:23:48 PM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/15/15 1:14 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 12:11:08 PM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/15/15 12:48 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 8:33:30 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/15/15 8:27 AM, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 07:54:04 +0000, RGrew176
wrote:


;1048830 Wrote:
On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 12:16:40 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:
-
At this point I think WW III is inevitable. Just a matter of time..
Russia and maybe even China may end up being allies.-

I am not sure China really cares about this because they don't seem to
have a muslim problem. They have sense enough not to have "made in
China" bomb fragments in the rubble.
The idea that we would partner up with the russians to kill several
million muslims is not totally off the wall tho. They have far worse
islamic terrorism problems than we do and it is right on their
borders, not across an ocean.
I doubt it would actually accomplish much tho.

That is because they have pretty much banned Islam in China.

http://tinyurl.com/patk2fk

Smart moves.
--


Good grief...you righties really truly have your heads up your asses
when it comes to knowledge of the world and the way it is. If there is
an antidote for Fox News and crazy rightwingedness, you ought to take it
three times a day.

The PRC has *not* banned Islam. There are millions of Muslims in China,
there are Muslim schools, festivals, cultural activities, architectural,
ways to practice Muslim dietary laws.

The site RGrew176 cited is a right-wing, bat**** crazy christian site
run by a convert.

Say what you want but can, or will you prove it wrong?


Prove what? That the guy whose site it is is a convert to some sort of
christianity and has no particular "cred" on islam in China?

content Harry, content. can or will you disprove the article?


There are all sorts of non-religious sites that describe the status of
islam in china.

As for prove or disproves, here's one for you:

Prove the fellow you believe is your savior is the son of god.

And naturally, in your abstract way of "answering" questions. "What does that have to do wtth the article or it's author?

They're just thugs...
 

On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 1:29:25 PM UTC-6, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 12:38:42 PM UTC-6, wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 12:28:29 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 09:33:26 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 11/15/15 8:27 AM, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 07:54:04 +0000, RGrew176
wrote:


;1048830 Wrote:
On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 12:16:40 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:
-
At this point I think WW III is inevitable. Just a matter of time..
Russia and maybe even China may end up being allies.-

I am not sure China really cares about this because they don't seem to
have a muslim problem. They have sense enough not to have "made in
China" bomb fragments in the rubble.
The idea that we would partner up with the russians to kill several
million muslims is not totally off the wall tho. They have far worse
islamic terrorism problems than we do and it is right on their
borders, not across an ocean.
I doubt it would actually accomplish much tho.

That is because they have pretty much banned Islam in China.

http://tinyurl.com/patk2fk

Smart moves.
--


Good grief...you righties really truly have your heads up your asses
when it comes to knowledge of the world and the way it is. If there is
an antidote for Fox News and crazy rightwingedness, you ought to take it
three times a day.

The PRC has *not* banned Islam. There are millions of Muslims in China,
there are Muslim schools, festivals, cultural activities, architectural,
ways to practice Muslim dietary laws.

The site RGrew176 cited is a right-wing, bat**** crazy christian site
run by a convert.

Wow, apparently you didn't bother to read the article.

Harry admires the Chinese style commitment to the free exercise of
religion.
Essentially the policy is "It is OK as long as nobody ever sees it or
hears about it".
If it ever inconveniences the government in any way it is stamped out.

Personally I don't care either way. This is China and the chinese have
the right to run their country as they wish. It is really none of our
business as long as they don't bother us with it. We certainly do not
want them telling us how our government should work.
I am not even that upset that they are building islands in the South
China Sea.
These are largely uninhabited spits of volcanic rock that everyone
claimed but nobody actually wanted to do anything with. We should be
able to negotiate some kind of settlement here without shooting
anyone.

That's nice.

Can or will you dispute the article? Honestly, I don't think you can, but it was interesting reading your knee-jerk reaction to it.

Greg I must have hit the wrong response arrow. That was intended for Harold..

They're just thugs...
 

wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 10:20:47 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote:

China even banned Ramadan fasting at one time in
predominately Muslim regions.

How do you do that?
Force feed people?


Probably as effectively as us trying to bring democracy to Iraq,
Afghanistan, Syria, etc.

They're just thugs...
 

On 11/15/15 2:35 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 12:23:48 PM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/15/15 1:14 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 12:11:08 PM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/15/15 12:48 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 8:33:30 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/15/15 8:27 AM, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 07:54:04 +0000, RGrew176
wrote:


;1048830 Wrote:
On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 12:16:40 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:
-
At this point I think WW III is inevitable. Just a matter of time.
Russia and maybe even China may end up being allies.-

I am not sure China really cares about this because they don't seem to
have a muslim problem. They have sense enough not to have "made in
China" bomb fragments in the rubble.
The idea that we would partner up with the russians to kill several
million muslims is not totally off the wall tho. They have far worse
islamic terrorism problems than we do and it is right on their
borders, not across an ocean.
I doubt it would actually accomplish much tho.

That is because they have pretty much banned Islam in China.

http://tinyurl.com/patk2fk

Smart moves.
--


Good grief...you righties really truly have your heads up your asses
when it comes to knowledge of the world and the way it is. If there is
an antidote for Fox News and crazy rightwingedness, you ought to take it
three times a day.

The PRC has *not* banned Islam. There are millions of Muslims in China,
there are Muslim schools, festivals, cultural activities, architectural,
ways to practice Muslim dietary laws.

The site RGrew176 cited is a right-wing, bat**** crazy christian site
run by a convert.

Say what you want but can, or will you prove it wrong?


Prove what? That the guy whose site it is is a convert to some sort of
christianity and has no particular "cred" on islam in China?

content Harry, content. can or will you disprove the article?


There are all sorts of non-religious sites that describe the status of
islam in china.

As for prove or disproves, here's one for you:

Prove the fellow you believe is your savior is the son of god.

And naturally, in your abstract way of "answering" questions. "What does that have to do wtth the article or it's author?


It displays the level of your logical reasoning processes. You are
willing to believe a negative screed about Muslims in China when there
are many legitimate sites that state the opposite of what your religious
convert claimed. And, you are also willing to believe in the existence
of a "creator" and the alleged son of that creator without a shred of
tangible evidence proving either.

Hey, believe whatever you like on your religion, but obviously your
beliefs on at least parts of the real world have been shaped by Fox
News, spurious sites like the one you cited, and their ilk.

They're just thugs...
 

On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 2:07:58 PM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/15/15 2:35 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 12:23:48 PM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/15/15 1:14 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 12:11:08 PM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/15/15 12:48 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 8:33:30 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/15/15 8:27 AM, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 07:54:04 +0000, RGrew176
wrote:


;1048830 Wrote:
On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 12:16:40 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:
-
At this point I think WW III is inevitable. Just a matter of time.
Russia and maybe even China may end up being allies.-

I am not sure China really cares about this because they don't seem to
have a muslim problem. They have sense enough not to have "made in
China" bomb fragments in the rubble.
The idea that we would partner up with the russians to kill several
million muslims is not totally off the wall tho. They have far worse
islamic terrorism problems than we do and it is right on their
borders, not across an ocean.
I doubt it would actually accomplish much tho.

That is because they have pretty much banned Islam in China.

http://tinyurl.com/patk2fk

Smart moves.
--


Good grief...you righties really truly have your heads up your asses
when it comes to knowledge of the world and the way it is. If there is
an antidote for Fox News and crazy rightwingedness, you ought to take it
three times a day.

The PRC has *not* banned Islam. There are millions of Muslims in China,
there are Muslim schools, festivals, cultural activities, architectural,
ways to practice Muslim dietary laws.

The site RGrew176 cited is a right-wing, bat**** crazy christian site
run by a convert.

Say what you want but can, or will you prove it wrong?


Prove what? That the guy whose site it is is a convert to some sort of
christianity and has no particular "cred" on islam in China?

content Harry, content. can or will you disprove the article?


There are all sorts of non-religious sites that describe the status of
islam in china.

As for prove or disproves, here's one for you:

Prove the fellow you believe is your savior is the son of god.

And naturally, in your abstract way of "answering" questions. "What does that have to do wtth the article or it's author?


It displays the level of your logical reasoning processes. You are
willing to believe a negative screed about Muslims in China when there
are many legitimate sites that state the opposite of what your religious
convert claimed.


What "legitimate sites you talking about?

And, you are also willing to believe in the existence
of a "creator" and the alleged son of that creator without a shred of
tangible evidence proving either.

ZZZZzzz

Hey, believe whatever you like on your religion, but obviously your
beliefs on at least parts of the real world have been shaped by Fox
News, spurious sites like the one you cited, and their ilk.

How perceptive of you Harry. I've had my religious beliefs before Fox News was ever thought of.

They're just thugs...
 

On 11/15/15 3:42 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 2:07:58 PM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/15/15 2:35 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 12:23:48 PM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/15/15 1:14 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 12:11:08 PM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/15/15 12:48 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 8:33:30 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/15/15 8:27 AM, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 07:54:04 +0000, RGrew176
wrote:


;1048830 Wrote:
On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 12:16:40 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:
-
At this point I think WW III is inevitable. Just a matter of time.
Russia and maybe even China may end up being allies.-

I am not sure China really cares about this because they don't seem to
have a muslim problem. They have sense enough not to have "made in
China" bomb fragments in the rubble.
The idea that we would partner up with the russians to kill several
million muslims is not totally off the wall tho. They have far worse
islamic terrorism problems than we do and it is right on their
borders, not across an ocean.
I doubt it would actually accomplish much tho.

That is because they have pretty much banned Islam in China.

http://tinyurl.com/patk2fk

Smart moves.
--


Good grief...you righties really truly have your heads up your asses
when it comes to knowledge of the world and the way it is. If there is
an antidote for Fox News and crazy rightwingedness, you ought to take it
three times a day.

The PRC has *not* banned Islam. There are millions of Muslims in China,
there are Muslim schools, festivals, cultural activities, architectural,
ways to practice Muslim dietary laws.

The site RGrew176 cited is a right-wing, bat**** crazy christian site
run by a convert.

Say what you want but can, or will you prove it wrong?


Prove what? That the guy whose site it is is a convert to some sort of
christianity and has no particular "cred" on islam in China?

content Harry, content. can or will you disprove the article?


There are all sorts of non-religious sites that describe the status of
islam in china.

As for prove or disproves, here's one for you:

Prove the fellow you believe is your savior is the son of god.

And naturally, in your abstract way of "answering" questions. "What does that have to do wtth the article or it's author?


It displays the level of your logical reasoning processes. You are
willing to believe a negative screed about Muslims in China when there
are many legitimate sites that state the opposite of what your religious
convert claimed.


What "legitimate sites you talking about?

And, you are also willing to believe in the existence
of a "creator" and the alleged son of that creator without a shred of
tangible evidence proving either.

ZZZZzzz

Hey, believe whatever you like on your religion, but obviously your
beliefs on at least parts of the real world have been shaped by Fox
News, spurious sites like the one you cited, and their ilk.

How perceptive of you Harry. I've had my religious beliefs before Fox News was ever thought of.



I was commenting on your non-religious beliefs.

They're just thugs...
 

On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 11:29:22 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 12:38:42 PM UTC-6, wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 12:28:29 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 09:33:26 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 11/15/15 8:27 AM, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 07:54:04 +0000, RGrew176
wrote:


;1048830 Wrote:
On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 12:16:40 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:
-
At this point I think WW III is inevitable. Just a matter of time.
Russia and maybe even China may end up being allies.-

I am not sure China really cares about this because they don't seem to
have a muslim problem. They have sense enough not to have "made in
China" bomb fragments in the rubble.
The idea that we would partner up with the russians to kill several
million muslims is not totally off the wall tho. They have far worse
islamic terrorism problems than we do and it is right on their
borders, not across an ocean.
I doubt it would actually accomplish much tho.

That is because they have pretty much banned Islam in China.

http://tinyurl.com/patk2fk

Smart moves.
--


Good grief...you righties really truly have your heads up your asses
when it comes to knowledge of the world and the way it is. If there is
an antidote for Fox News and crazy rightwingedness, you ought to take it
three times a day.

The PRC has *not* banned Islam. There are millions of Muslims in China,
there are Muslim schools, festivals, cultural activities, architectural,
ways to practice Muslim dietary laws.

The site RGrew176 cited is a right-wing, bat**** crazy christian site
run by a convert.

Wow, apparently you didn't bother to read the article.

Harry admires the Chinese style commitment to the free exercise of
religion.
Essentially the policy is "It is OK as long as nobody ever sees it or
hears about it".
If it ever inconveniences the government in any way it is stamped out.

Personally I don't care either way. This is China and the chinese have
the right to run their country as they wish. It is really none of our
business as long as they don't bother us with it. We certainly do not
want them telling us how our government should work.
I am not even that upset that they are building islands in the South
China Sea.
These are largely uninhabited spits of volcanic rock that everyone
claimed but nobody actually wanted to do anything with. We should be
able to negotiate some kind of settlement here without shooting
anyone.

That's nice.

Can or will you dispute the article? Honestly, I don't think you can, but it was interesting reading your knee-jerk reaction to it.

I don't think it was a knee jerk at all. I believe most people
understand the chinese tolerate religion as long as it doesn't
threaten their idea of the general order or challenge the central
government.

They're just thugs...
 

On 11/15/2015 7:20 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 11:29:22 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 12:38:42 PM UTC-6, wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 12:28:29 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 09:33:26 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 11/15/15 8:27 AM, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 07:54:04 +0000, RGrew176
wrote:


;1048830 Wrote:
On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 12:16:40 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:
-
At this point I think WW III is inevitable. Just a matter of time.
Russia and maybe even China may end up being allies.-

I am not sure China really cares about this because they don't seem to
have a muslim problem. They have sense enough not to have "made in
China" bomb fragments in the rubble.
The idea that we would partner up with the russians to kill several
million muslims is not totally off the wall tho. They have far worse
islamic terrorism problems than we do and it is right on their
borders, not across an ocean.
I doubt it would actually accomplish much tho.

That is because they have pretty much banned Islam in China.

http://tinyurl.com/patk2fk

Smart moves.
--


Good grief...you righties really truly have your heads up your asses
when it comes to knowledge of the world and the way it is. If there is
an antidote for Fox News and crazy rightwingedness, you ought to take it
three times a day.

The PRC has *not* banned Islam. There are millions of Muslims in China,
there are Muslim schools, festivals, cultural activities, architectural,
ways to practice Muslim dietary laws.

The site RGrew176 cited is a right-wing, bat**** crazy christian site
run by a convert.

Wow, apparently you didn't bother to read the article.

Harry admires the Chinese style commitment to the free exercise of
religion.
Essentially the policy is "It is OK as long as nobody ever sees it or
hears about it".
If it ever inconveniences the government in any way it is stamped out.

Personally I don't care either way. This is China and the chinese have
the right to run their country as they wish. It is really none of our
business as long as they don't bother us with it. We certainly do not
want them telling us how our government should work.
I am not even that upset that they are building islands in the South
China Sea.
These are largely uninhabited spits of volcanic rock that everyone
claimed but nobody actually wanted to do anything with. We should be
able to negotiate some kind of settlement here without shooting
anyone.

That's nice.

Can or will you dispute the article? Honestly, I don't think you can, but it was interesting reading your knee-jerk reaction to it.

I don't think it was a knee jerk at all. I believe most people
understand the chinese tolerate religion as long as it doesn't
threaten their idea of the general order or challenge the central
government.


Pretty much how it's supposed to work here.

They're just thugs...
 

On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 19:26:27 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

I don't think it was a knee jerk at all. I believe most people
understand the chinese tolerate religion as long as it doesn't
threaten their idea of the general order or challenge the central
government.


Pretty much how it's supposed to work here.


I tend to agree with Harry that we may have tipped the other way too
far. When Democrats have to go to prayer breakfasts to get elected, we
may be letting the church run our life a tad too much and they have
destroyed the GOP.
On the other hand the Harry's of the world are pressing too hard not
to ever see any sign of the religions too.

When there is enough politically correct pressure that Starbucks can't
put a santa clause on a coffee cup, we have lost our way

I don't think that Aljazeera could be considered to be a right wing news source.

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2015/0...070016245.html

And CNN is certainly NOT a right wing news source.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/13/world/...ina-burqa-ban/

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

They're just thugs...
 

On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 6:20:43 PM UTC-6, wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 11:29:22 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 12:38:42 PM UTC-6, wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 12:28:29 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 09:33:26 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 11/15/15 8:27 AM, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 07:54:04 +0000, RGrew176
wrote:


;1048830 Wrote:
On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 12:16:40 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:
-
At this point I think WW III is inevitable. Just a matter of time.
Russia and maybe even China may end up being allies.-

I am not sure China really cares about this because they don't seem to
have a muslim problem. They have sense enough not to have "made in
China" bomb fragments in the rubble.
The idea that we would partner up with the russians to kill several
million muslims is not totally off the wall tho. They have far worse
islamic terrorism problems than we do and it is right on their
borders, not across an ocean.
I doubt it would actually accomplish much tho.

That is because they have pretty much banned Islam in China.

http://tinyurl.com/patk2fk

Smart moves.
--


Good grief...you righties really truly have your heads up your asses
when it comes to knowledge of the world and the way it is. If there is
an antidote for Fox News and crazy rightwingedness, you ought to take it
three times a day.

The PRC has *not* banned Islam. There are millions of Muslims in China,
there are Muslim schools, festivals, cultural activities, architectural,
ways to practice Muslim dietary laws.

The site RGrew176 cited is a right-wing, bat**** crazy christian site
run by a convert.

Wow, apparently you didn't bother to read the article.

Harry admires the Chinese style commitment to the free exercise of
religion.
Essentially the policy is "It is OK as long as nobody ever sees it or
hears about it".
If it ever inconveniences the government in any way it is stamped out.

Personally I don't care either way. This is China and the chinese have
the right to run their country as they wish. It is really none of our
business as long as they don't bother us with it. We certainly do not
want them telling us how our government should work.
I am not even that upset that they are building islands in the South
China Sea.
These are largely uninhabited spits of volcanic rock that everyone
claimed but nobody actually wanted to do anything with. We should be
able to negotiate some kind of settlement here without shooting
anyone.

That's nice.

Can or will you dispute the article? Honestly, I don't think you can, but it was interesting reading your knee-jerk reaction to it.

I don't think it was a knee jerk at all. I believe most people
understand the chinese tolerate religion as long as it doesn't
threaten their idea of the general order or challenge the central
government.

Greg, I meant that comment for Harry. I hit the wrog comment to respond to by accident

They're just thugs...
 

On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 12:49:03 AM UTC-6, RGrew176 wrote:
I don't think that Aljazeera could be considered to be a right wing news
source.

http://tinyurl.com/p7yjadj

And CNN is certainly NOT a right wing news source.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/13/world/...ina-burqa-ban/

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




--
RGrew176

Nor the Huffington post...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/0...n_5551063.html

They're just thugs...
 

Tim wrote:
On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 12:49:03 AM UTC-6, RGrew176 wrote:
I don't think that Aljazeera could be considered to be a right wing news
source.

http://tinyurl.com/p7yjadj

And CNN is certainly NOT a right wing news source.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/13/world/...ina-burqa-ban/

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




--
RGrew176

Nor the Huffington post...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/0...n_5551063.html


Get back to us when you find a legit article that states the PRC has banned
the Muslim religion.

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

They're just thugs...
 

On 11/15/15 8:31 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 19:26:27 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

I don't think it was a knee jerk at all. I believe most people
understand the chinese tolerate religion as long as it doesn't
threaten their idea of the general order or challenge the central
government.


Pretty much how it's supposed to work here.


I tend to agree with Harry that we may have tipped the other way too
far. When Democrats have to go to prayer breakfasts to get elected, we
may be letting the church run our life a tad too much and they have
destroyed the GOP.
On the other hand the Harry's of the world are pressing too hard not
to ever see any sign of the religions too.

When there is enough politically correct pressure that Starbucks can't
put a santa clause on a coffee cup, we have lost our way


I have no objections to reasonable religious practices "practiced" in
churches, homes, religious schools, et cetera, or even the occasional
"let us pray" nonsense that creeps into the non-church environment. My
objection to religion is when its proponents push it into the public
sector, when it attempts to pass laws that restrict those who believe
differently, when it insinuates itself into public schools, et cetera.

They're just thugs...
 

On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 5:11:28 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 12:49:03 AM UTC-6, RGrew176 wrote:
I don't think that Aljazeera could be considered to be a right wing news
source.

http://tinyurl.com/p7yjadj

And CNN is certainly NOT a right wing news source.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/13/world/...ina-burqa-ban/

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




--
RGrew176

Nor the Huffington post...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/0...n_5551063.html


Get back to us when you find a legit article that states the PRC has banned
the Muslim religion.

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

Get back to us when you can disprove the article RGrew posted

They're just thugs...
 

On 11/15/15 1:38 PM, wrote:

Harry admires the Chinese style commitment to the free exercise of
religion.


Nonsense.

They're just thugs...
 

On 11/16/15 6:25 AM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 5:11:28 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 12:49:03 AM UTC-6, RGrew176 wrote:
I don't think that Aljazeera could be considered to be a right wing news
source.

http://tinyurl.com/p7yjadj

And CNN is certainly NOT a right wing news source.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/13/world/...ina-burqa-ban/

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




--
RGrew176

Nor the Huffington post...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/0...n_5551063.html


Get back to us when you find a legit article that states the PRC has banned
the Muslim religion.

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

Get back to us when you can disprove the article RGrew posted


Are you channeling Herring now? Oh, and it wasn't a news article...it
was a screed from a "convert" to Christianity. Remember reading about
the good old days, when Christianity forced non-believers to convert or
die?

They're just thugs...
 

On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 06:28:05 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 11/16/15 6:25 AM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 5:11:28 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 12:49:03 AM UTC-6, RGrew176 wrote:
I don't think that Aljazeera could be considered to be a right wing news
source.

http://tinyurl.com/p7yjadj

And CNN is certainly NOT a right wing news source.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/13/world/...ina-burqa-ban/

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




--
RGrew176

Nor the Huffington post...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/0...n_5551063.html


Get back to us when you find a legit article that states the PRC has banned
the Muslim religion.

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

Get back to us when you can disprove the article RGrew posted


Are you channeling Herring now? Oh, and it wasn't a news article...it
was a screed from a "convert" to Christianity. Remember reading about
the good old days, when Christianity forced non-believers to convert or
die?

The articles are saying the same thing, duh!

Tim surely doesn't need me for anything. He put you right in the corner where you
belong.

What a f'ing joke, Krause. Tell us some more lies about your exploits. Those are fun.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

They're just thugs...
 

On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 06:24:25 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 11/15/15 8:31 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 19:26:27 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

I don't think it was a knee jerk at all. I believe most people
understand the chinese tolerate religion as long as it doesn't
threaten their idea of the general order or challenge the central
government.


Pretty much how it's supposed to work here.


I tend to agree with Harry that we may have tipped the other way too
far. When Democrats have to go to prayer breakfasts to get elected, we
may be letting the church run our life a tad too much and they have
destroyed the GOP.
On the other hand the Harry's of the world are pressing too hard not
to ever see any sign of the religions too.

When there is enough politically correct pressure that Starbucks can't
put a santa clause on a coffee cup, we have lost our way


I have no objections to reasonable religious practices "practiced" in
churches, homes, religious schools, et cetera, or even the occasional
"let us pray" nonsense that creeps into the non-church environment. My
objection to religion is when its proponents push it into the public
sector, when it attempts to pass laws that restrict those who believe
differently, when it insinuates itself into public schools, et cetera.

Unless it's Islam, correct? Then the pushing, beheading, raping, killing, and other
public 'practices' are OK, eh Krause?
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

They're just thugs...
 

On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 5:28:08 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/16/15 6:25 AM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 5:11:28 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 12:49:03 AM UTC-6, RGrew176 wrote:
I don't think that Aljazeera could be considered to be a right wing news
source.

http://tinyurl.com/p7yjadj

And CNN is certainly NOT a right wing news source.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/13/world/...ina-burqa-ban/

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




--
RGrew176

Nor the Huffington post...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/0..._5551063..html


Get back to us when you find a legit article that states the PRC has banned
the Muslim religion.

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

Get back to us when you can disprove the article RGrew posted


Are you channeling Herring now?

No

Oh, and it wasn't a news article...it
was a screed from a "convert" to Christianity. Remember reading about
the good old days, when Christianity forced non-believers to convert or
die?

No

They're just thugs...
 

On 11/16/15 7:02 AM, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 06:24:25 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 11/15/15 8:31 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 19:26:27 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

I don't think it was a knee jerk at all. I believe most people
understand the chinese tolerate religion as long as it doesn't
threaten their idea of the general order or challenge the central
government.


Pretty much how it's supposed to work here.


I tend to agree with Harry that we may have tipped the other way too
far. When Democrats have to go to prayer breakfasts to get elected, we
may be letting the church run our life a tad too much and they have
destroyed the GOP.
On the other hand the Harry's of the world are pressing too hard not
to ever see any sign of the religions too.

When there is enough politically correct pressure that Starbucks can't
put a santa clause on a coffee cup, we have lost our way


I have no objections to reasonable religious practices "practiced" in
churches, homes, religious schools, et cetera, or even the occasional
"let us pray" nonsense that creeps into the non-church environment. My
objection to religion is when its proponents push it into the public
sector, when it attempts to pass laws that restrict those who believe
differently, when it insinuates itself into public schools, et cetera.

Unless it's Islam, correct? Then the pushing, beheading, raping, killing, and other
public 'practices' are OK, eh Krause?
--


Those would be the practices the Muslims learned from Christians, right,
Johnnycakes? Because, as we all know, Christians engaged in these
practices before there was a Muslim religion and after the Muslim
religion came about. You know the old Christian battle cry, right? The
one that goes "Convert or die"?

My primary concern about the evils of religious-osity is how it is
practiced in *this* country. In this country, it is mostly Christian
extremists who push their superstitious and ignorant beliefs onto the
public outside of churches, homes, religious schools, et cetera.

They're just thugs...
 

On 11/16/15 7:45 AM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 5:28:08 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/16/15 6:25 AM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 5:11:28 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 12:49:03 AM UTC-6, RGrew176 wrote:
I don't think that Aljazeera could be considered to be a right wing news
source.

http://tinyurl.com/p7yjadj

And CNN is certainly NOT a right wing news source.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/13/world/...ina-burqa-ban/

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




--
RGrew176

Nor the Huffington post...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/0...n_5551063.html


Get back to us when you find a legit article that states the PRC has banned
the Muslim religion.

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

Get back to us when you can disprove the article RGrew posted


Are you channeling Herring now?

No

Oh, and it wasn't a news article...it
was a screed from a "convert" to Christianity. Remember reading about
the good old days, when Christianity forced non-believers to convert or
die?

No


Oh, so you are ignorant of those "Christian practices," too. Well, there
are plenty of examples.

They're just thugs...
 

On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 07:48:08 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 11/16/15 7:02 AM, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 06:24:25 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 11/15/15 8:31 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 19:26:27 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

I don't think it was a knee jerk at all. I believe most people
understand the chinese tolerate religion as long as it doesn't
threaten their idea of the general order or challenge the central
government.


Pretty much how it's supposed to work here.


I tend to agree with Harry that we may have tipped the other way too
far. When Democrats have to go to prayer breakfasts to get elected, we
may be letting the church run our life a tad too much and they have
destroyed the GOP.
On the other hand the Harry's of the world are pressing too hard not
to ever see any sign of the religions too.

When there is enough politically correct pressure that Starbucks can't
put a santa clause on a coffee cup, we have lost our way


I have no objections to reasonable religious practices "practiced" in
churches, homes, religious schools, et cetera, or even the occasional
"let us pray" nonsense that creeps into the non-church environment. My
objection to religion is when its proponents push it into the public
sector, when it attempts to pass laws that restrict those who believe
differently, when it insinuates itself into public schools, et cetera.

Unless it's Islam, correct? Then the pushing, beheading, raping, killing, and other
public 'practices' are OK, eh Krause?
--


Those would be the practices the Muslims learned from Christians, right,
Johnnycakes? Because, as we all know, Christians engaged in these
practices before there was a Muslim religion and after the Muslim
religion came about. You know the old Christian battle cry, right? The
one that goes "Convert or die"?


So the killing, raping, beheading, etc. being practiced by Muslims now is OK, because
centuries ago Christians were doing it.

That's Krause logic, eh? WADumFoch!

My primary concern about the evils of religious-osity is how it is
practiced in *this* country. In this country, it is mostly Christian
extremists who push their superstitious and ignorant beliefs onto the
public outside of churches, homes, religious schools, et cetera.


But it's OK for Muslims to push their belief in public, eh? You're a joke, Krause!
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

They're just thugs...
 

On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 07:50:38 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 11/16/15 7:45 AM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 5:28:08 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/16/15 6:25 AM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 5:11:28 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 12:49:03 AM UTC-6, RGrew176 wrote:
I don't think that Aljazeera could be considered to be a right wing news
source.

http://tinyurl.com/p7yjadj

And CNN is certainly NOT a right wing news source.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/13/world/...ina-burqa-ban/

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




--
RGrew176

Nor the Huffington post...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/0...n_5551063.html


Get back to us when you find a legit article that states the PRC has banned
the Muslim religion.

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

Get back to us when you can disprove the article RGrew posted


Are you channeling Herring now?

No

Oh, and it wasn't a news article...it
was a screed from a "convert" to Christianity. Remember reading about
the good old days, when Christianity forced non-believers to convert or
die?

No


Oh, so you are ignorant of those "Christian practices," too. Well, there
are plenty of examples.

So thousand-year-old Christian atrocities justify today's Muslim atrocities? You're a
joke, Krause.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

They're just thugs...
 

Oh, so you are ignorant of those "Christian practices," too. Well, there
are plenty of examples.
.........

Do I remember?

Harry I wasn't born then...

They're just thugs...
 

On 11/16/2015 6:24 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
when it insinuates itself into public schools, et cetera.


Are you sure you are a writer, Krause?

I wonder why Donnie doesn't jump in to help you out? You sure could use
some assistance with your writing.

They're just thugs...
 

On 11/16/2015 6:25 AM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 5:11:28 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 12:49:03 AM UTC-6, RGrew176 wrote:
I don't think that Aljazeera could be considered to be a right wing news
source.

http://tinyurl.com/p7yjadj

And CNN is certainly NOT a right wing news source.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/13/world/...ina-burqa-ban/

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




--
RGrew176

Nor the Huffington post...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/0...n_5551063.html


Get back to us when you find a legit article that states the PRC has banned
the Muslim religion.

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

Get back to us when you can disprove the article RGrew posted


The only things he could prove are that he neglects to pay his taxes and
other financial obligations. Those are a matter of public record. He
can't even prove that he's married to the lovely Ms Grear, or that he
has any financial interest in her home. Harry is a leech, liar, and
layabout. Why do you bother to engage him?

They're just thugs...
 

On 11/16/2015 7:50 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/16/15 7:45 AM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 5:28:08 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/16/15 6:25 AM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 5:11:28 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 12:49:03 AM UTC-6, RGrew176 wrote:
I don't think that Aljazeera could be considered to be a right
wing news
source.

http://tinyurl.com/p7yjadj

And CNN is certainly NOT a right wing news source.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/13/world/...ina-burqa-ban/

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




--
RGrew176

Nor the Huffington post...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/0...n_5551063.html



Get back to us when you find a legit article that states the PRC
has banned
the Muslim religion.

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

Get back to us when you can disprove the article RGrew posted


Are you channeling Herring now?

No

Oh, and it wasn't a news article...it
was a screed from a "convert" to Christianity. Remember reading about
the good old days, when Christianity forced non-believers to convert or
die?

No


Oh, so you are ignorant of those "Christian practices," too. Well, there
are plenty of examples.

I looked all through the archives of the Christian Science Monitor and
couldn't find any references to your plenty of made up examples. ;-)
Perhaps you could cite some legitimate and substantiated examples.

They're just thugs...
 

On 11/16/2015 8:01 AM, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 07:48:08 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 11/16/15 7:02 AM, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 06:24:25 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 11/15/15 8:31 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 19:26:27 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

I don't think it was a knee jerk at all. I believe most people
understand the chinese tolerate religion as long as it doesn't
threaten their idea of the general order or challenge the central
government.


Pretty much how it's supposed to work here.


I tend to agree with Harry that we may have tipped the other way too
far. When Democrats have to go to prayer breakfasts to get elected, we
may be letting the church run our life a tad too much and they have
destroyed the GOP.
On the other hand the Harry's of the world are pressing too hard not
to ever see any sign of the religions too.

When there is enough politically correct pressure that Starbucks can't
put a santa clause on a coffee cup, we have lost our way


I have no objections to reasonable religious practices "practiced" in
churches, homes, religious schools, et cetera, or even the occasional
"let us pray" nonsense that creeps into the non-church environment. My
objection to religion is when its proponents push it into the public
sector, when it attempts to pass laws that restrict those who believe
differently, when it insinuates itself into public schools, et cetera.

Unless it's Islam, correct? Then the pushing, beheading, raping, killing, and other
public 'practices' are OK, eh Krause?
--


Those would be the practices the Muslims learned from Christians, right,
Johnnycakes? Because, as we all know, Christians engaged in these
practices before there was a Muslim religion and after the Muslim
religion came about. You know the old Christian battle cry, right? The
one that goes "Convert or die"?


So the killing, raping, beheading, etc. being practiced by Muslims now is OK, because
centuries ago Christians were doing it.

That's Krause logic, eh? WADumFoch!

My primary concern about the evils of religious-osity is how it is
practiced in *this* country. In this country, it is mostly Christian
extremists who push their superstitious and ignorant beliefs onto the
public outside of churches, homes, religious schools, et cetera.


But it's OK for Muslims to push their belief in public, eh? You're a joke, Krause!
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


Harry thinks if he keeps his head buried in the sand, with regard to
world affairs, he won't get it lopped off by crazy muslim with a sword.

They're just thugs...
 

On 11/16/2015 7:48 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/16/15 7:02 AM, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 06:24:25 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 11/15/15 8:31 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 19:26:27 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

I don't think it was a knee jerk at all. I believe most people
understand the chinese tolerate religion as long as it doesn't
threaten their idea of the general order or challenge the central
government.


Pretty much how it's supposed to work here.


I tend to agree with Harry that we may have tipped the other way too
far. When Democrats have to go to prayer breakfasts to get elected, we
may be letting the church run our life a tad too much and they have
destroyed the GOP.
On the other hand the Harry's of the world are pressing too hard not
to ever see any sign of the religions too.

When there is enough politically correct pressure that Starbucks can't
put a santa clause on a coffee cup, we have lost our way


I have no objections to reasonable religious practices "practiced" in
churches, homes, religious schools, et cetera, or even the occasional
"let us pray" nonsense that creeps into the non-church environment. My
objection to religion is when its proponents push it into the public
sector, when it attempts to pass laws that restrict those who believe
differently, when it insinuates itself into public schools, et cetera.

Unless it's Islam, correct? Then the pushing, beheading, raping,
killing, and other
public 'practices' are OK, eh Krause?
--


Those would be the practices the Muslims learned from Christians, right,
Johnnycakes? Because, as we all know, Christians engaged in these
practices before there was a Muslim religion and after the Muslim
religion came about. You know the old Christian battle cry, right? The
one that goes "Convert or die"?

My primary concern about the evils of religious-osity is how it is
practiced in *this* country. In this country, it is mostly Christian
extremists who push their superstitious and ignorant beliefs onto the
public outside of churches, homes, religious schools, et cetera.




Whew. For a minute there I thought you were going to blame it on GWB.