On Wed, 4 Nov 2015 15:21:04 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 11/4/15 2:45 PM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 17:01:24 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

...eagle takes down annoying drone:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hr-xBtVU4lg

Hope this happens everywhere...



No you don't, dumb****. What happened to the eagle (if that's what it was). Those
propellers will easily take off a finger, let alone cut up an eagle, or hawk or any
other bird, very badly. You'll note the drone is still transmitting, which means the
owner can easily retrieve and repair it.

No one knows what happened to the bird. I hope it made it.

And I hope you learned something.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!



Johnnycakes, I really don't give a **** about you and your boytoy
hobbies. I hope the eagle made it, too, and I hope eagles learn to
recognize those damned drones for the intrusive pieces of **** they are.

Then don't 'hope this happens everywhere', you friggin' fool.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

Just saw a news items about drones. There is some kind of exhibition in town with 40 exhibitors and 200 delegates.
If a person was interested in one of the toys it might be worth the price of admission.

On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 15:56:06 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 14:45:37 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 17:01:24 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

...eagle takes down annoying drone:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hr-xBtVU4lg

Hope this happens everywhere...



No you don't, dumb****. What happened to the eagle (if that's what it was). Those
propellers will easily take off a finger, let alone cut up an eagle, or hawk or any
other bird, very badly. You'll note the drone is still transmitting, which means the
owner can easily retrieve and repair it.

No one knows what happened to the bird. I hope it made it.

And I hope you learned something.

Myth busters tested drones. All but the biggest were pretty much
harmless. Some of the big commercial ones with carbon fiber blades can
leave a mark ;-)

I've seen the damage a plastic airplane propeller going at a much slower rpm can do
to a leather covered ottoman corner. Ate right through it to the stuffing. My wife
was very unhappy. I'm thinking your 'myth busters' test is bull****. Although small
and plastic, those props are going several thousand rpm, and they're very sharp.

Here's a view of some of the damage caused with the airplane/drone that caused the
problem, in some cases. It's in French, but you get the idea. Imagine if those cuts
were in an eagle's neck? Or a foot joint?

http://chrismeme11.over-blog.com/article-36258812.html
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 18:18:20 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 15:56:06 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 14:45:37 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 17:01:24 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

...eagle takes down annoying drone:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hr-xBtVU4lg

Hope this happens everywhere...



No you don't, dumb****. What happened to the eagle (if that's what it was). Those
propellers will easily take off a finger, let alone cut up an eagle, or hawk or any
other bird, very badly. You'll note the drone is still transmitting, which means the
owner can easily retrieve and repair it.

No one knows what happened to the bird. I hope it made it.

And I hope you learned something.

Myth busters tested drones. All but the biggest were pretty much
harmless. Some of the big commercial ones with carbon fiber blades can
leave a mark ;-)

I've seen the damage a plastic airplane propeller going at a much slower rpm can do
to a leather covered ottoman corner. Ate right through it to the stuffing. My wife
was very unhappy. I'm thinking your 'myth busters' test is bull****. Although small
and plastic, those props are going several thousand rpm, and they're very sharp.

Here's a view of some of the damage caused with the airplane/drone that caused the
problem, in some cases. It's in French, but you get the idea. Imagine if those cuts
were in an eagle's neck? Or a foot joint?

http://chrismeme11.over-blog.com/article-36258812.html

Dunno. They were using a few different small hobby drones hitting a
ballistic gel dummy and watching it on a high speed camera.

This really comes down to this being a very light propeller driven by
a pretty weak motor. You can't compare that to the old 2 stroke model
airplanes.

On 11/5/2015 1:30 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 18:18:20 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 15:56:06 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 14:45:37 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 17:01:24 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

...eagle takes down annoying drone:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hr-xBtVU4lg

Hope this happens everywhere...



No you don't, dumb****. What happened to the eagle (if that's what it was). Those
propellers will easily take off a finger, let alone cut up an eagle, or hawk or any
other bird, very badly. You'll note the drone is still transmitting, which means the
owner can easily retrieve and repair it.

No one knows what happened to the bird. I hope it made it.

And I hope you learned something.

Myth busters tested drones. All but the biggest were pretty much
harmless. Some of the big commercial ones with carbon fiber blades can
leave a mark ;-)

I've seen the damage a plastic airplane propeller going at a much slower rpm can do
to a leather covered ottoman corner. Ate right through it to the stuffing. My wife
was very unhappy. I'm thinking your 'myth busters' test is bull****. Although small
and plastic, those props are going several thousand rpm, and they're very sharp.

Here's a view of some of the damage caused with the airplane/drone that caused the
problem, in some cases. It's in French, but you get the idea. Imagine if those cuts
were in an eagle's neck? Or a foot joint?

http://chrismeme11.over-blog.com/article-36258812.html

Dunno. They were using a few different small hobby drones hitting a
ballistic gel dummy and watching it on a high speed camera.

This really comes down to this being a very light propeller driven by
a pretty weak motor. You can't compare that to the old 2 stroke model
airplanes.



Based on what I've read (and heard), the lithium/ion batteries used in
these hobbyist quads are more dangerous than the spinning propellers.

On Thu, 5 Nov 2015 03:08:05 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 11/5/2015 1:30 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 18:18:20 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 15:56:06 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 14:45:37 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 17:01:24 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

...eagle takes down annoying drone:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hr-xBtVU4lg

Hope this happens everywhere...



No you don't, dumb****. What happened to the eagle (if that's what it was). Those
propellers will easily take off a finger, let alone cut up an eagle, or hawk or any
other bird, very badly. You'll note the drone is still transmitting, which means the
owner can easily retrieve and repair it.

No one knows what happened to the bird. I hope it made it.

And I hope you learned something.

Myth busters tested drones. All but the biggest were pretty much
harmless. Some of the big commercial ones with carbon fiber blades can
leave a mark ;-)

I've seen the damage a plastic airplane propeller going at a much slower rpm can do
to a leather covered ottoman corner. Ate right through it to the stuffing. My wife
was very unhappy. I'm thinking your 'myth busters' test is bull****. Although small
and plastic, those props are going several thousand rpm, and they're very sharp.

Here's a view of some of the damage caused with the airplane/drone that caused the
problem, in some cases. It's in French, but you get the idea. Imagine if those cuts
were in an eagle's neck? Or a foot joint?

http://chrismeme11.over-blog.com/article-36258812.html

Dunno. They were using a few different small hobby drones hitting a
ballistic gel dummy and watching it on a high speed camera.

This really comes down to this being a very light propeller driven by
a pretty weak motor. You can't compare that to the old 2 stroke model
airplanes.



Based on what I've read (and heard), the lithium/ion batteries used in
these hobbyist quads are more dangerous than the spinning propellers.

I imagine it is just a matter of time until these things outgrow the
batteries and they put a fuel cell or an IC engine in them to increase
range. Then you will have some serious danger.

On 11/5/2015 11:06 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 5 Nov 2015 03:08:05 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 11/5/2015 1:30 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 18:18:20 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 15:56:06 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 14:45:37 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 17:01:24 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

...eagle takes down annoying drone:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hr-xBtVU4lg

Hope this happens everywhere...



No you don't, dumb****. What happened to the eagle (if that's what it was). Those
propellers will easily take off a finger, let alone cut up an eagle, or hawk or any
other bird, very badly. You'll note the drone is still transmitting, which means the
owner can easily retrieve and repair it.

No one knows what happened to the bird. I hope it made it.

And I hope you learned something.

Myth busters tested drones. All but the biggest were pretty much
harmless. Some of the big commercial ones with carbon fiber blades can
leave a mark ;-)

I've seen the damage a plastic airplane propeller going at a much slower rpm can do
to a leather covered ottoman corner. Ate right through it to the stuffing. My wife
was very unhappy. I'm thinking your 'myth busters' test is bull****. Although small
and plastic, those props are going several thousand rpm, and they're very sharp.

Here's a view of some of the damage caused with the airplane/drone that caused the
problem, in some cases. It's in French, but you get the idea. Imagine if those cuts
were in an eagle's neck? Or a foot joint?

http://chrismeme11.over-blog.com/article-36258812.html

Dunno. They were using a few different small hobby drones hitting a
ballistic gel dummy and watching it on a high speed camera.

This really comes down to this being a very light propeller driven by
a pretty weak motor. You can't compare that to the old 2 stroke model
airplanes.



Based on what I've read (and heard), the lithium/ion batteries used in
these hobbyist quads are more dangerous than the spinning propellers.

I imagine it is just a matter of time until these things outgrow the
batteries and they put a fuel cell or an IC engine in them to increase
range. Then you will have some serious danger.



I've seen pictures of a lithium/ion battery in a carrying case that
"let go" during a recharge. Caught fire and damn near burned up the
owner's SUV that it was in.

On 11/5/15 11:06 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 5 Nov 2015 03:08:05 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 11/5/2015 1:30 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 18:18:20 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 15:56:06 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 14:45:37 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 17:01:24 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

...eagle takes down annoying drone:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hr-xBtVU4lg

Hope this happens everywhere...



No you don't, dumb****. What happened to the eagle (if that's what it was). Those
propellers will easily take off a finger, let alone cut up an eagle, or hawk or any
other bird, very badly. You'll note the drone is still transmitting, which means the
owner can easily retrieve and repair it.

No one knows what happened to the bird. I hope it made it.

And I hope you learned something.

Myth busters tested drones. All but the biggest were pretty much
harmless. Some of the big commercial ones with carbon fiber blades can
leave a mark ;-)

I've seen the damage a plastic airplane propeller going at a much slower rpm can do
to a leather covered ottoman corner. Ate right through it to the stuffing. My wife
was very unhappy. I'm thinking your 'myth busters' test is bull****. Although small
and plastic, those props are going several thousand rpm, and they're very sharp.

Here's a view of some of the damage caused with the airplane/drone that caused the
problem, in some cases. It's in French, but you get the idea. Imagine if those cuts
were in an eagle's neck? Or a foot joint?

http://chrismeme11.over-blog.com/article-36258812.html

Dunno. They were using a few different small hobby drones hitting a
ballistic gel dummy and watching it on a high speed camera.

This really comes down to this being a very light propeller driven by
a pretty weak motor. You can't compare that to the old 2 stroke model
airplanes.



Based on what I've read (and heard), the lithium/ion batteries used in
these hobbyist quads are more dangerous than the spinning propellers.

I imagine it is just a matter of time until these things outgrow the
batteries and they put a fuel cell or an IC engine in them to increase
range. Then you will have some serious danger.



More Darwin awards...can hardly wait.

On Thu, 5 Nov 2015 11:43:23 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

I imagine it is just a matter of time until these things outgrow the
batteries and they put a fuel cell or an IC engine in them to increase
range. Then you will have some serious danger.



More Darwin awards...can hardly wait.

Since these will be operated by companies like Aamzon, perhaps over
your house, I am not sure what you mean.

On Wed, 4 Nov 2015 15:07:17 -0800 (PST), True North wrote:

Just saw a news items about drones. There is some kind of exhibition in town with 40 exhibitors and 200 delegates.
If a person was interested in one of the toys it might be worth the price of admission.

Flying RC airplanes is, IMHO, fun. I've flown the multirotors, but don't get a kick
out of it. Except for small ones for the grandkids, I'd not be interested in buying
one. And, I've found that flying a helicopter and then flying an airplane pose a
problem. 'Up' for a helicopter is 'down' for an airplane using the transmitter
controls. That can get interesting.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!