John H.

One must wonder: With whom our troops will fight ISIS? If they join the anti-Assad forces, they're susceptible to bombing by Putin. If they join Assad's forces...surely not. Is the dumb **** we have for a president using our tiny force as a 'tripwire'? "


That seems highly disrespectful of your Commander and Chief considering you belly right up near the front of the line for benefits from Uncle Sam.

True North wrote:
John H.

One must wonder: With whom our troops will fight ISIS? If they join the
anti-Assad forces, they're susceptible to bombing by Putin. If they join
Assad's forces...surely not. Is the dumb **** we have for a president
using our tiny force as a 'tripwire'? "


That seems highly disrespectful of your Commander and Chief considering
you belly right up near the front of the line for benefits from Uncle Sam.


Someone who has actually been in war, may be more of a pacifist than you or
a Community Organizer.

On 10/30/15 6:11 PM, Califbill wrote:
True North wrote:
John H.

One must wonder: With whom our troops will fight ISIS? If they join the
anti-Assad forces, they're susceptible to bombing by Putin. If they join
Assad's forces...surely not. Is the dumb **** we have for a president
using our tiny force as a 'tripwire'? "


That seems highly disrespectful of your Commander and Chief considering
you belly right up near the front of the line for benefits from Uncle Sam.


Someone who has actually been in war, may be more of a pacifist than you or
a Community Organizer.


Who do you have in mind as "someone who has actually been in war," Bilious?

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/30/15 6:11 PM, Califbill wrote:
True North wrote:
John H.

One must wonder: With whom our troops will fight ISIS? If they join the
anti-Assad forces, they're susceptible to bombing by Putin. If they join
Assad's forces...surely not. Is the dumb **** we have for a president
using our tiny force as a 'tripwire'? "


That seems highly disrespectful of your Commander and Chief considering
you belly right up near the front of the line for benefits from Uncle Sam.


Someone who has actually been in war, may be more of a pacifist than you or
a Community Organizer.


Who do you have in mind as "someone who has actually been in war," Bilious?



You can not be that stupid!

On 10/30/2015 9:06 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/30/15 6:11 PM, Califbill wrote:
True North wrote:
John H.

One must wonder: With whom our troops will fight ISIS? If they join the
anti-Assad forces, they're susceptible to bombing by Putin. If they join
Assad's forces...surely not. Is the dumb **** we have for a president
using our tiny force as a 'tripwire'? "


That seems highly disrespectful of your Commander and Chief considering
you belly right up near the front of the line for benefits from Uncle Sam.


Someone who has actually been in war, may be more of a pacifist than you or
a Community Organizer.


Who do you have in mind as "someone who has actually been in war," Bilious?



You can not be that stupid!


Why not?

Justan Olphart wrote:
On 10/30/2015 9:06 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/30/15 6:11 PM, Califbill wrote:
True North wrote:
John H.

One must wonder: With whom our troops will fight ISIS? If they join the
anti-Assad forces, they're susceptible to bombing by Putin. If they join
Assad's forces...surely not. Is the dumb **** we have for a president
using our tiny force as a 'tripwire'? "


That seems highly disrespectful of your Commander and Chief considering
you belly right up near the front of the line for benefits from Uncle Sam.


Someone who has actually been in war, may be more of a pacifist than you or
a Community Organizer.


Who do you have in mind as "someone who has actually been in war," Bilious?



You can not be that stupid!


Why not?


Because he claims to have multiple degrees.

On 10/31/2015 12:12 PM, Califbill wrote:
Justan Olphart wrote:
On 10/30/2015 9:06 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/30/15 6:11 PM, Califbill wrote:
True North wrote:
John H.

One must wonder: With whom our troops will fight ISIS? If they join the
anti-Assad forces, they're susceptible to bombing by Putin. If they join
Assad's forces...surely not. Is the dumb **** we have for a president
using our tiny force as a 'tripwire'? "


That seems highly disrespectful of your Commander and Chief considering
you belly right up near the front of the line for benefits from Uncle Sam.


Someone who has actually been in war, may be more of a pacifist than you or
a Community Organizer.


Who do you have in mind as "someone who has actually been in war," Bilious?



You can not be that stupid!


Why not?


Because he claims to have multiple degrees.

There's no law that prevents folks with a bunch of alphabet stuff after
their names, to be stupid.

On 10/30/15 9:06 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/30/15 6:11 PM, Califbill wrote:
True North wrote:
John H.

One must wonder: With whom our troops will fight ISIS? If they join the
anti-Assad forces, they're susceptible to bombing by Putin. If they join
Assad's forces...surely not. Is the dumb **** we have for a president
using our tiny force as a 'tripwire'? "


That seems highly disrespectful of your Commander and Chief considering
you belly right up near the front of the line for benefits from Uncle Sam.


Someone who has actually been in war, may be more of a pacifist than you or
a Community Organizer.


Who do you have in mind as "someone who has actually been in war," Bilious?



You can not be that stupid!


Well, Bilious, the only candidate I know of for sure who was in the
military was Lindsay Graham, and he is a field-grade asshole. Who do you
have in mind?

On 10/30/15 9:06 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/30/15 6:11 PM, Califbill wrote:
True North wrote:
John H.

One must wonder: With whom our troops will fight ISIS? If they join the
anti-Assad forces, they're susceptible to bombing by Putin. If they join
Assad's forces...surely not. Is the dumb **** we have for a president
using our tiny force as a 'tripwire'? "


That seems highly disrespectful of your Commander and Chief considering
you belly right up near the front of the line for benefits from Uncle Sam.


Someone who has actually been in war, may be more of a pacifist than you or
a Community Organizer.


Who do you have in mind as "someone who has actually been in war," Bilious?



You can not be that stupid!


Just wondering which candidate has "actually been in war" who you would
prefer, not that being in a war has relevancy for being POTUS. And, of
course, why you would want a war veteran. John McCain had "actually been
in war," and he chose a complete nitwit as his VEEP running mate.

I have a feeling Ben Carson is your current candidate of choice...that's
Ben Carson, the national spokesperson for Ambien.

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/30/15 9:06 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/30/15 6:11 PM, Califbill wrote:
True North wrote:
John H.

One must wonder: With whom our troops will fight ISIS? If they join the
anti-Assad forces, they're susceptible to bombing by Putin. If they join
Assad's forces...surely not. Is the dumb **** we have for a president
using our tiny force as a 'tripwire'? "


That seems highly disrespectful of your Commander and Chief considering
you belly right up near the front of the line for benefits from Uncle Sam.


Someone who has actually been in war, may be more of a pacifist than you or
a Community Organizer.


Who do you have in mind as "someone who has actually been in war," Bilious?



You can not be that stupid!


Just wondering which candidate has "actually been in war" who you would
prefer, not that being in a war has relevancy for being POTUS. And, of
course, why you would want a war veteran. John McCain had "actually been
in war," and he chose a complete nitwit as his VEEP running mate.

I have a feeling Ben Carson is your current candidate of choice...that's
Ben Carson, the national spokesperson for Ambien.


I think that those who have been in a shooting war are mush less likely to
get us in unnecessary wars. What is our reason for being in Syria? Did
they attack us?