On 10/30/2015 9:06 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/30/15 6:11 PM, Califbill wrote:
True North wrote:
John H.

One must wonder: With whom our troops will fight ISIS? If they join the
anti-Assad forces, they're susceptible to bombing by Putin. If they join
Assad's forces...surely not. Is the dumb **** we have for a president
using our tiny force as a 'tripwire'? "


That seems highly disrespectful of your Commander and Chief considering
you belly right up near the front of the line for benefits from Uncle Sam.


Someone who has actually been in war, may be more of a pacifist than you or
a Community Organizer.


Who do you have in mind as "someone who has actually been in war," Bilious?



You can not be that stupid!


Why not?

He served. Those benefits were earned.

On 10/30/15 9:06 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/30/15 6:11 PM, Califbill wrote:
True North wrote:
John H.

One must wonder: With whom our troops will fight ISIS? If they join the
anti-Assad forces, they're susceptible to bombing by Putin. If they join
Assad's forces...surely not. Is the dumb **** we have for a president
using our tiny force as a 'tripwire'? "


That seems highly disrespectful of your Commander and Chief considering
you belly right up near the front of the line for benefits from Uncle Sam.


Someone who has actually been in war, may be more of a pacifist than you or
a Community Organizer.


Who do you have in mind as "someone who has actually been in war," Bilious?



You can not be that stupid!


Well, Bilious, the only candidate I know of for sure who was in the
military was Lindsay Graham, and he is a field-grade asshole. Who do you
have in mind?

Justan Olphart wrote:
On 10/30/2015 9:06 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/30/15 6:11 PM, Califbill wrote:
True North wrote:
John H.

One must wonder: With whom our troops will fight ISIS? If they join the
anti-Assad forces, they're susceptible to bombing by Putin. If they join
Assad's forces...surely not. Is the dumb **** we have for a president
using our tiny force as a 'tripwire'? "


That seems highly disrespectful of your Commander and Chief considering
you belly right up near the front of the line for benefits from Uncle Sam.


Someone who has actually been in war, may be more of a pacifist than you or
a Community Organizer.


Who do you have in mind as "someone who has actually been in war," Bilious?



You can not be that stupid!


Why not?


Because he claims to have multiple degrees.

On 10/31/2015 12:12 PM, Califbill wrote:
Justan Olphart wrote:
On 10/30/2015 9:06 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/30/15 6:11 PM, Califbill wrote:
True North wrote:
John H.

One must wonder: With whom our troops will fight ISIS? If they join the
anti-Assad forces, they're susceptible to bombing by Putin. If they join
Assad's forces...surely not. Is the dumb **** we have for a president
using our tiny force as a 'tripwire'? "


That seems highly disrespectful of your Commander and Chief considering
you belly right up near the front of the line for benefits from Uncle Sam.


Someone who has actually been in war, may be more of a pacifist than you or
a Community Organizer.


Who do you have in mind as "someone who has actually been in war," Bilious?



You can not be that stupid!


Why not?


Because he claims to have multiple degrees.

There's no law that prevents folks with a bunch of alphabet stuff after
their names, to be stupid.

On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 13:08:21 -0400, Justan Olphart
wrote:

On 10/31/2015 12:12 PM, Califbill wrote:
Justan Olphart wrote:
On 10/30/2015 9:06 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/30/15 6:11 PM, Califbill wrote:
True North wrote:
John H.

One must wonder: With whom our troops will fight ISIS? If they join the
anti-Assad forces, they're susceptible to bombing by Putin. If they join
Assad's forces...surely not. Is the dumb **** we have for a president
using our tiny force as a 'tripwire'? "


That seems highly disrespectful of your Commander and Chief considering
you belly right up near the front of the line for benefits from Uncle Sam.


Someone who has actually been in war, may be more of a pacifist than you or
a Community Organizer.


Who do you have in mind as "someone who has actually been in war," Bilious?



You can not be that stupid!


Why not?


Because he claims to have multiple degrees.

There's no law that prevents folks with a bunch of alphabet stuff after
their names, to be stupid.

===

True, there's no shortage of educated fools and YKW may be the leader
of the pack.

On 10/30/15 9:06 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/30/15 6:11 PM, Califbill wrote:
True North wrote:
John H.

One must wonder: With whom our troops will fight ISIS? If they join the
anti-Assad forces, they're susceptible to bombing by Putin. If they join
Assad's forces...surely not. Is the dumb **** we have for a president
using our tiny force as a 'tripwire'? "


That seems highly disrespectful of your Commander and Chief considering
you belly right up near the front of the line for benefits from Uncle Sam.


Someone who has actually been in war, may be more of a pacifist than you or
a Community Organizer.


Who do you have in mind as "someone who has actually been in war," Bilious?



You can not be that stupid!


Just wondering which candidate has "actually been in war" who you would
prefer, not that being in a war has relevancy for being POTUS. And, of
course, why you would want a war veteran. John McCain had "actually been
in war," and he chose a complete nitwit as his VEEP running mate.

I have a feeling Ben Carson is your current candidate of choice...that's
Ben Carson, the national spokesperson for Ambien.

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/30/15 9:06 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/30/15 6:11 PM, Califbill wrote:
True North wrote:
John H.

One must wonder: With whom our troops will fight ISIS? If they join the
anti-Assad forces, they're susceptible to bombing by Putin. If they join
Assad's forces...surely not. Is the dumb **** we have for a president
using our tiny force as a 'tripwire'? "


That seems highly disrespectful of your Commander and Chief considering
you belly right up near the front of the line for benefits from Uncle Sam.


Someone who has actually been in war, may be more of a pacifist than you or
a Community Organizer.


Who do you have in mind as "someone who has actually been in war," Bilious?



You can not be that stupid!


Just wondering which candidate has "actually been in war" who you would
prefer, not that being in a war has relevancy for being POTUS. And, of
course, why you would want a war veteran. John McCain had "actually been
in war," and he chose a complete nitwit as his VEEP running mate.

I have a feeling Ben Carson is your current candidate of choice...that's
Ben Carson, the national spokesperson for Ambien.


I think that those who have been in a shooting war are mush less likely to
get us in unnecessary wars. What is our reason for being in Syria? Did
they attack us?

On 10/31/15 2:08 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/30/15 9:06 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/30/15 6:11 PM, Califbill wrote:
True North wrote:
John H.

One must wonder: With whom our troops will fight ISIS? If they join the
anti-Assad forces, they're susceptible to bombing by Putin. If they join
Assad's forces...surely not. Is the dumb **** we have for a president
using our tiny force as a 'tripwire'? "


That seems highly disrespectful of your Commander and Chief considering
you belly right up near the front of the line for benefits from Uncle Sam.


Someone who has actually been in war, may be more of a pacifist than you or
a Community Organizer.


Who do you have in mind as "someone who has actually been in war," Bilious?



You can not be that stupid!


Just wondering which candidate has "actually been in war" who you would
prefer, not that being in a war has relevancy for being POTUS. And, of
course, why you would want a war veteran. John McCain had "actually been
in war," and he chose a complete nitwit as his VEEP running mate.

I have a feeling Ben Carson is your current candidate of choice...that's
Ben Carson, the national spokesperson for Ambien.


I think that those who have been in a shooting war are mush less likely to
get us in unnecessary wars. What is our reason for being in Syria? Did
they attack us?


So, which of the 2016 candidates with a serious chance of winning the
nomination or the election served in a shooting war?

The toughest candidate without question is Hillary Clinton. I can't wait
to see her devour Little Boy Marco in the debates.

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/31/15 2:08 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/30/15 9:06 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/30/15 6:11 PM, Califbill wrote:
True North wrote:
John H.

One must wonder: With whom our troops will fight ISIS? If they join the
anti-Assad forces, they're susceptible to bombing by Putin. If they join
Assad's forces...surely not. Is the dumb **** we have for a president
using our tiny force as a 'tripwire'? "


That seems highly disrespectful of your Commander and Chief considering
you belly right up near the front of the line for benefits from Uncle Sam.


Someone who has actually been in war, may be more of a pacifist than you or
a Community Organizer.


Who do you have in mind as "someone who has actually been in war," Bilious?



You can not be that stupid!


Just wondering which candidate has "actually been in war" who you would
prefer, not that being in a war has relevancy for being POTUS. And, of
course, why you would want a war veteran. John McCain had "actually been
in war," and he chose a complete nitwit as his VEEP running mate.

I have a feeling Ben Carson is your current candidate of choice...that's
Ben Carson, the national spokesperson for Ambien.


I think that those who have been in a shooting war are mush less likely to
get us in unnecessary wars. What is our reason for being in Syria? Did
they attack us?


So, which of the 2016 candidates with a serious chance of winning the
nomination or the election served in a shooting war?

The toughest candidate without question is Hillary Clinton. I can't wait
to see her devour Little Boy Marco in the debates.


Hillary. Yup been shot at as SOS. Oh, another fabrication. Tough? Truth
challenged, incompetent! Should be a better description.