The leading...
 

....GOP candidate...

"Donald Trump says that if he had been president in 2001, his
immigration policies would have kept terrorists from attacking the World
Trade Center on September 11.

"I am extremely, extremely tough on illegal immigration. I'm extremely
tough on people coming into this country," Trump said on Fox News
Sunday. "I believe that if I were running things, I doubt those families
would have -- I doubt that those people would have been in the country."

- - -

Donald Trump, the *perfect* asshole candidate for the party of assholes.
Really. And just behind Trump, another asshole candidate, Ben Carson.
Crikey.

The leading...
 

Keyser Söze wrote:
...GOP candidate...

"Donald Trump says that if he had been president in 2001, his
immigration policies would have kept terrorists from attacking the World
Trade Center on September 11.

"I am extremely, extremely tough on illegal immigration. I'm extremely
tough on people coming into this country," Trump said on Fox News
Sunday. "I believe that if I were running things, I doubt those families
would have -- I doubt that those people would have been in the country."

- - -

Donald Trump, the *perfect* asshole candidate for the party of assholes.
Really. And just behind Trump, another asshole candidate, Ben Carson.
Crikey.


Would be nice to know what Hillary knew and did. Lots,of complaints about
Bush on 9/11. Lots of death at Benghazi!

The leading...
 

On 10/18/2015 5:01 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...GOP candidate...

"Donald Trump says that if he had been president in 2001, his
immigration policies would have kept terrorists from attacking the World
Trade Center on September 11.

"I am extremely, extremely tough on illegal immigration. I'm extremely
tough on people coming into this country," Trump said on Fox News
Sunday. "I believe that if I were running things, I doubt those families
would have -- I doubt that those people would have been in the country."

- - -

Donald Trump, the *perfect* asshole candidate for the party of assholes.
Really. And just behind Trump, another asshole candidate, Ben Carson.
Crikey.


You (nor I) have no way of knowing if Trump's position on illegal
immigration would have prevented al-Qaeda from sending terrorists to
the USA to attend flight schools in preparation for the 9/11 attacks had
he been POTUS at the time. Warnings of "something is up" were
raised back when Clinton was still in office for cripes sake and he
didn't do anything about it either.

That said, you crack me up (again). In the past you have placed
responsibility for 9/11 squarely on GWB because it happened on his
watch. Trump basically just said the same thing but now he's a "perfect
asshole" according to you.

The leading...
 

On 10/18/15 7:44 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/18/2015 5:01 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...GOP candidate...

"Donald Trump says that if he had been president in 2001, his
immigration policies would have kept terrorists from attacking the World
Trade Center on September 11.

"I am extremely, extremely tough on illegal immigration. I'm extremely
tough on people coming into this country," Trump said on Fox News
Sunday. "I believe that if I were running things, I doubt those families
would have -- I doubt that those people would have been in the country."

- - -

Donald Trump, the *perfect* asshole candidate for the party of assholes.
Really. And just behind Trump, another asshole candidate, Ben Carson.
Crikey.


You (nor I) have no way of knowing if Trump's position on illegal
immigration would have prevented al-Qaeda from sending terrorists to
the USA to attend flight schools in preparation for the 9/11 attacks had
he been POTUS at the time. Warnings of "something is up" were
raised back when Clinton was still in office for cripes sake and he
didn't do anything about it either.

That said, you crack me up (again). In the past you have placed
responsibility for 9/11 squarely on GWB because it happened on his
watch. Trump basically just said the same thing but now he's a "perfect
asshole" according to you.



I don't recall Trump's policies on immigration in 2001. Do you? And he
wasn't "running things" back then and it isn't likely he'll be "running
things" beyond his businesses in the future.

I doubt if Trump knew what Bush did or did not do in the lead up to
2001. His knowledge of such things seems non-existent.

The leading...
 

On 10/18/15 7:11 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
...GOP candidate...

"Donald Trump says that if he had been president in 2001, his
immigration policies would have kept terrorists from attacking the World
Trade Center on September 11.

"I am extremely, extremely tough on illegal immigration. I'm extremely
tough on people coming into this country," Trump said on Fox News
Sunday. "I believe that if I were running things, I doubt those families
would have -- I doubt that those people would have been in the country."

- - -

Donald Trump, the *perfect* asshole candidate for the party of assholes.
Really. And just behind Trump, another asshole candidate, Ben Carson.
Crikey.


Would be nice to know what Hillary knew and did. Lots,of complaints about
Bush on 9/11. Lots of death at Benghazi!


Four Americans, sad, but fewer than are killed in the average school
shooting these days, or so it seems.

The leading...
 

On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 19:44:11 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 10/18/2015 5:01 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...GOP candidate...

"Donald Trump says that if he had been president in 2001, his
immigration policies would have kept terrorists from attacking the World
Trade Center on September 11.

"I am extremely, extremely tough on illegal immigration. I'm extremely
tough on people coming into this country," Trump said on Fox News
Sunday. "I believe that if I were running things, I doubt those families
would have -- I doubt that those people would have been in the country."

- - -

Donald Trump, the *perfect* asshole candidate for the party of assholes.
Really. And just behind Trump, another asshole candidate, Ben Carson.
Crikey.


You (nor I) have no way of knowing if Trump's position on illegal
immigration would have prevented al-Qaeda from sending terrorists to
the USA to attend flight schools in preparation for the 9/11 attacks had
he been POTUS at the time. Warnings of "something is up" were
raised back when Clinton was still in office for cripes sake and he
didn't do anything about it either.

That said, you crack me up (again). In the past you have placed
responsibility for 9/11 squarely on GWB because it happened on his
watch. Trump basically just said the same thing but now he's a "perfect
asshole" according to you.


I blame just about everything that has happened to us in the middle
east and Afghanistan on GHWB

If he had just followed his own advice, declared victory after Kuwait
and brought the troops home, particularly from Saudi Arabia, OBL loses
his biggest recruiting tool and the reason he claimed for 911.
Without 911, there is no Afghanistan war and without the decade long
bombing campaign in Iraq, there is no Iraq war.

The people we were "saving" from Saddam, are the ones we are fighting
in Syria now and they are using our weapons.

The leading...
 

- show quoted text -
Four Americans, sad, but fewer than are killed in the average school
shooting these days, or so it seems.

......
And whose watch are these under?

The leading...
 

On 10/18/2015 8:04 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/18/15 7:44 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/18/2015 5:01 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...GOP candidate...

"Donald Trump says that if he had been president in 2001, his
immigration policies would have kept terrorists from attacking the World
Trade Center on September 11.

"I am extremely, extremely tough on illegal immigration. I'm extremely
tough on people coming into this country," Trump said on Fox News
Sunday. "I believe that if I were running things, I doubt those families
would have -- I doubt that those people would have been in the country."

- - -

Donald Trump, the *perfect* asshole candidate for the party of assholes.
Really. And just behind Trump, another asshole candidate, Ben Carson.
Crikey.


You (nor I) have no way of knowing if Trump's position on illegal
immigration would have prevented al-Qaeda from sending terrorists to
the USA to attend flight schools in preparation for the 9/11 attacks had
he been POTUS at the time. Warnings of "something is up" were
raised back when Clinton was still in office for cripes sake and he
didn't do anything about it either.

That said, you crack me up (again). In the past you have placed
responsibility for 9/11 squarely on GWB because it happened on his
watch. Trump basically just said the same thing but now he's a "perfect
asshole" according to you.



I don't recall Trump's policies on immigration in 2001. Do you? And he
wasn't "running things" back then and it isn't likely he'll be "running
things" beyond his businesses in the future.

I doubt if Trump knew what Bush did or did not do in the lead up to
2001. His knowledge of such things seems non-existent.



Not what Trump said. He said "if" he had been POTUS at the time with
the illegal immigration position that he has described *now*, the
terrorists may not have been able to get into the USA.

The leading...
 

On 10/19/15 1:57 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/18/2015 8:04 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/18/15 7:44 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/18/2015 5:01 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...GOP candidate...

"Donald Trump says that if he had been president in 2001, his
immigration policies would have kept terrorists from attacking the
World
Trade Center on September 11.

"I am extremely, extremely tough on illegal immigration. I'm extremely
tough on people coming into this country," Trump said on Fox News
Sunday. "I believe that if I were running things, I doubt those
families
would have -- I doubt that those people would have been in the
country."

- - -

Donald Trump, the *perfect* asshole candidate for the party of
assholes.
Really. And just behind Trump, another asshole candidate, Ben Carson.
Crikey.


You (nor I) have no way of knowing if Trump's position on illegal
immigration would have prevented al-Qaeda from sending terrorists to
the USA to attend flight schools in preparation for the 9/11 attacks had
he been POTUS at the time. Warnings of "something is up" were
raised back when Clinton was still in office for cripes sake and he
didn't do anything about it either.

That said, you crack me up (again). In the past you have placed
responsibility for 9/11 squarely on GWB because it happened on his
watch. Trump basically just said the same thing but now he's a "perfect
asshole" according to you.



I don't recall Trump's policies on immigration in 2001. Do you? And he
wasn't "running things" back then and it isn't likely he'll be "running
things" beyond his businesses in the future.

I doubt if Trump knew what Bush did or did not do in the lead up to
2001. His knowledge of such things seems non-existent.



Not what Trump said. He said "if" he had been POTUS at the time with
the illegal immigration position that he has described *now*, the
terrorists may not have been able to get into the USA.


And you believe that, right? Hey, Trump, Carson, and the rest of the GOP
wannabe bozos are exactly what the Republicans deserve in
2016...politically naive, ignorant, hate-filled, science-denying idiots
who appeal to the "base" of the party. The only difficult part is to
figure out on a given day which one is the worst.

"If" Trump had been president in 2001, we'd be trying to recover from
global thermonuclear war...

The leading...
 

On Monday, October 19, 2015 at 5:30:43 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/19/15 1:57 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/18/2015 8:04 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/18/15 7:44 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/18/2015 5:01 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...GOP candidate...

"Donald Trump says that if he had been president in 2001, his
immigration policies would have kept terrorists from attacking the
World
Trade Center on September 11.

"I am extremely, extremely tough on illegal immigration. I'm extremely
tough on people coming into this country," Trump said on Fox News
Sunday. "I believe that if I were running things, I doubt those
families
would have -- I doubt that those people would have been in the
country."

- - -

Donald Trump, the *perfect* asshole candidate for the party of
assholes.
Really. And just behind Trump, another asshole candidate, Ben Carson..
Crikey.


You (nor I) have no way of knowing if Trump's position on illegal
immigration would have prevented al-Qaeda from sending terrorists to
the USA to attend flight schools in preparation for the 9/11 attacks had
he been POTUS at the time. Warnings of "something is up" were
raised back when Clinton was still in office for cripes sake and he
didn't do anything about it either.

That said, you crack me up (again). In the past you have placed
responsibility for 9/11 squarely on GWB because it happened on his
watch. Trump basically just said the same thing but now he's a "perfect
asshole" according to you.



I don't recall Trump's policies on immigration in 2001. Do you? And he
wasn't "running things" back then and it isn't likely he'll be "running
things" beyond his businesses in the future.

I doubt if Trump knew what Bush did or did not do in the lead up to
2001. His knowledge of such things seems non-existent.



Not what Trump said. He said "if" he had been POTUS at the time with
the illegal immigration position that he has described *now*, the
terrorists may not have been able to get into the USA.


And you believe that, right? Hey, Trump, Carson, and the rest of the GOP
wannabe bozos are exactly what the Republicans deserve in
2016...politically naive, ignorant, hate-filled, science-denying idiots
who appeal to the "base" of the party. The only difficult part is to
figure out on a given day which one is the worst.

"If" Trump had been president in 2001, we'd be trying to recover from
global thermonuclear war...

Harry are you scared of Trump? you must be because you blast him every chance you can.

The leading...
 

On 10/19/2015 8:15 AM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, October 19, 2015 at 5:30:43 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/19/15 1:57 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/18/2015 8:04 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/18/15 7:44 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/18/2015 5:01 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...GOP candidate...

"Donald Trump says that if he had been president in 2001, his
immigration policies would have kept terrorists from attacking the
World
Trade Center on September 11.

"I am extremely, extremely tough on illegal immigration. I'm extremely
tough on people coming into this country," Trump said on Fox News
Sunday. "I believe that if I were running things, I doubt those
families
would have -- I doubt that those people would have been in the
country."

- - -

Donald Trump, the *perfect* asshole candidate for the party of
assholes.
Really. And just behind Trump, another asshole candidate, Ben Carson..
Crikey.


You (nor I) have no way of knowing if Trump's position on illegal
immigration would have prevented al-Qaeda from sending terrorists to
the USA to attend flight schools in preparation for the 9/11 attacks had
he been POTUS at the time. Warnings of "something is up" were
raised back when Clinton was still in office for cripes sake and he
didn't do anything about it either.

That said, you crack me up (again). In the past you have placed
responsibility for 9/11 squarely on GWB because it happened on his
watch. Trump basically just said the same thing but now he's a "perfect
asshole" according to you.



I don't recall Trump's policies on immigration in 2001. Do you? And he
wasn't "running things" back then and it isn't likely he'll be "running
things" beyond his businesses in the future.

I doubt if Trump knew what Bush did or did not do in the lead up to
2001. His knowledge of such things seems non-existent.



Not what Trump said. He said "if" he had been POTUS at the time with
the illegal immigration position that he has described *now*, the
terrorists may not have been able to get into the USA.


And you believe that, right? Hey, Trump, Carson, and the rest of the GOP
wannabe bozos are exactly what the Republicans deserve in
2016...politically naive, ignorant, hate-filled, science-denying idiots
who appeal to the "base" of the party. The only difficult part is to
figure out on a given day which one is the worst.

"If" Trump had been president in 2001, we'd be trying to recover from
global thermonuclear war...

Harry are you scared of Trump? you must be because you blast him every chance you can.

Harry is a dilusional fool. He believes and parrots whatever the smarmy
democratic leadership is pimping. Hopefully, the American voters have
smartened up since the last two election cycles.

The leading...
 

On 10/19/15 8:15 AM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, October 19, 2015 at 5:30:43 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/19/15 1:57 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/18/2015 8:04 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/18/15 7:44 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/18/2015 5:01 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...GOP candidate...

"Donald Trump says that if he had been president in 2001, his
immigration policies would have kept terrorists from attacking the
World
Trade Center on September 11.

"I am extremely, extremely tough on illegal immigration. I'm extremely
tough on people coming into this country," Trump said on Fox News
Sunday. "I believe that if I were running things, I doubt those
families
would have -- I doubt that those people would have been in the
country."

- - -

Donald Trump, the *perfect* asshole candidate for the party of
assholes.
Really. And just behind Trump, another asshole candidate, Ben Carson.
Crikey.


You (nor I) have no way of knowing if Trump's position on illegal
immigration would have prevented al-Qaeda from sending terrorists to
the USA to attend flight schools in preparation for the 9/11 attacks had
he been POTUS at the time. Warnings of "something is up" were
raised back when Clinton was still in office for cripes sake and he
didn't do anything about it either.

That said, you crack me up (again). In the past you have placed
responsibility for 9/11 squarely on GWB because it happened on his
watch. Trump basically just said the same thing but now he's a "perfect
asshole" according to you.



I don't recall Trump's policies on immigration in 2001. Do you? And he
wasn't "running things" back then and it isn't likely he'll be "running
things" beyond his businesses in the future.

I doubt if Trump knew what Bush did or did not do in the lead up to
2001. His knowledge of such things seems non-existent.



Not what Trump said. He said "if" he had been POTUS at the time with
the illegal immigration position that he has described *now*, the
terrorists may not have been able to get into the USA.


And you believe that, right? Hey, Trump, Carson, and the rest of the GOP
wannabe bozos are exactly what the Republicans deserve in
2016...politically naive, ignorant, hate-filled, science-denying idiots
who appeal to the "base" of the party. The only difficult part is to
figure out on a given day which one is the worst.

"If" Trump had been president in 2001, we'd be trying to recover from
global thermonuclear war...

Harry are you scared of Trump? you must be because you blast him every chance you can.



Why would I be scared of Trump, Tim? I just am enjoying the fact that
your party seems intent on nominating one of several unsuitable flaming
asses for POTUS. Trump, Carson, Cruz, Rubio, Fiorina, Bush, et
cetera...crikey, what a crowd you boys have.

The leading...
 

On 10/19/2015 10:06 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/19/15 8:15 AM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, October 19, 2015 at 5:30:43 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/19/15 1:57 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/18/2015 8:04 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/18/15 7:44 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/18/2015 5:01 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...GOP candidate...

"Donald Trump says that if he had been president in 2001, his
immigration policies would have kept terrorists from attacking the
World
Trade Center on September 11.

"I am extremely, extremely tough on illegal immigration. I'm
extremely
tough on people coming into this country," Trump said on Fox News
Sunday. "I believe that if I were running things, I doubt those
families
would have -- I doubt that those people would have been in the
country."

- - -

Donald Trump, the *perfect* asshole candidate for the party of
assholes.
Really. And just behind Trump, another asshole candidate, Ben
Carson.
Crikey.


You (nor I) have no way of knowing if Trump's position on illegal
immigration would have prevented al-Qaeda from sending terrorists to
the USA to attend flight schools in preparation for the 9/11
attacks had
he been POTUS at the time. Warnings of "something is up" were
raised back when Clinton was still in office for cripes sake and he
didn't do anything about it either.

That said, you crack me up (again). In the past you have placed
responsibility for 9/11 squarely on GWB because it happened on his
watch. Trump basically just said the same thing but now he's a
"perfect
asshole" according to you.



I don't recall Trump's policies on immigration in 2001. Do you? And he
wasn't "running things" back then and it isn't likely he'll be
"running
things" beyond his businesses in the future.

I doubt if Trump knew what Bush did or did not do in the lead up to
2001. His knowledge of such things seems non-existent.



Not what Trump said. He said "if" he had been POTUS at the time with
the illegal immigration position that he has described *now*, the
terrorists may not have been able to get into the USA.


And you believe that, right? Hey, Trump, Carson, and the rest of the GOP
wannabe bozos are exactly what the Republicans deserve in
2016...politically naive, ignorant, hate-filled, science-denying idiots
who appeal to the "base" of the party. The only difficult part is to
figure out on a given day which one is the worst.

"If" Trump had been president in 2001, we'd be trying to recover from
global thermonuclear war...

Harry are you scared of Trump? you must be because you blast him
every chance you can.



Why would I be scared of Trump, Tim? I just am enjoying the fact that
your party seems intent on nominating one of several unsuitable flaming
asses for POTUS. Trump, Carson, Cruz, Rubio, Fiorina, Bush, et
cetera...crikey, what a crowd you boys have.


On the other hand, we have a choice of Hillary the Hun who could fool a
polygraph machine or Bernie the Socialist who wants to re-write the
Constitution. Think I'll just sit this one out.

The leading...
 

- show quoted text -
Why would I be scared of Trump, Tim? I just am enjoying the fact that
your party...
...........
"My party?" Why do you say that Harry? Because I'm critical of the D. Candidates? I've never endorsed Trump.

If that's the way you want to look at it, I suppose Gus Hall was the candidate of *your* party.

The leading...
 

On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:30:53 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:

On 10/19/2015 10:06 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/19/15 8:15 AM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, October 19, 2015 at 5:30:43 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/19/15 1:57 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/18/2015 8:04 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/18/15 7:44 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/18/2015 5:01 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...GOP candidate...

"Donald Trump says that if he had been president in 2001, his
immigration policies would have kept terrorists from attacking the
World
Trade Center on September 11.

"I am extremely, extremely tough on illegal immigration. I'm
extremely
tough on people coming into this country," Trump said on Fox News
Sunday. "I believe that if I were running things, I doubt those
families
would have -- I doubt that those people would have been in the
country."

- - -

Donald Trump, the *perfect* asshole candidate for the party of
assholes.
Really. And just behind Trump, another asshole candidate, Ben
Carson.
Crikey.


You (nor I) have no way of knowing if Trump's position on illegal
immigration would have prevented al-Qaeda from sending terrorists to
the USA to attend flight schools in preparation for the 9/11
attacks had
he been POTUS at the time. Warnings of "something is up" were
raised back when Clinton was still in office for cripes sake and he
didn't do anything about it either.

That said, you crack me up (again). In the past you have placed
responsibility for 9/11 squarely on GWB because it happened on his
watch. Trump basically just said the same thing but now he's a
"perfect
asshole" according to you.



I don't recall Trump's policies on immigration in 2001. Do you? And he
wasn't "running things" back then and it isn't likely he'll be
"running
things" beyond his businesses in the future.

I doubt if Trump knew what Bush did or did not do in the lead up to
2001. His knowledge of such things seems non-existent.



Not what Trump said. He said "if" he had been POTUS at the time with
the illegal immigration position that he has described *now*, the
terrorists may not have been able to get into the USA.


And you believe that, right? Hey, Trump, Carson, and the rest of the GOP
wannabe bozos are exactly what the Republicans deserve in
2016...politically naive, ignorant, hate-filled, science-denying idiots
who appeal to the "base" of the party. The only difficult part is to
figure out on a given day which one is the worst.

"If" Trump had been president in 2001, we'd be trying to recover from
global thermonuclear war...

Harry are you scared of Trump? you must be because you blast him
every chance you can.



Why would I be scared of Trump, Tim? I just am enjoying the fact that
your party seems intent on nominating one of several unsuitable flaming
asses for POTUS. Trump, Carson, Cruz, Rubio, Fiorina, Bush, et
cetera...crikey, what a crowd you boys have.


On the other hand, we have a choice of Hillary the Hun who could fool a
polygraph machine or Bernie the Socialist who wants to re-write the
Constitution. Think I'll just sit this one out.


I'd much rather try to choose the lesser of two evils come election day.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

The leading...
 

On 10/19/15 10:30 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/19/2015 10:06 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/19/15 8:15 AM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, October 19, 2015 at 5:30:43 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/19/15 1:57 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/18/2015 8:04 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/18/15 7:44 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/18/2015 5:01 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...GOP candidate...

"Donald Trump says that if he had been president in 2001, his
immigration policies would have kept terrorists from attacking the
World
Trade Center on September 11.

"I am extremely, extremely tough on illegal immigration. I'm
extremely
tough on people coming into this country," Trump said on Fox News
Sunday. "I believe that if I were running things, I doubt those
families
would have -- I doubt that those people would have been in the
country."

- - -

Donald Trump, the *perfect* asshole candidate for the party of
assholes.
Really. And just behind Trump, another asshole candidate, Ben
Carson.
Crikey.


You (nor I) have no way of knowing if Trump's position on illegal
immigration would have prevented al-Qaeda from sending
terrorists to
the USA to attend flight schools in preparation for the 9/11
attacks had
he been POTUS at the time. Warnings of "something is up" were
raised back when Clinton was still in office for cripes sake and he
didn't do anything about it either.

That said, you crack me up (again). In the past you have placed
responsibility for 9/11 squarely on GWB because it happened on his
watch. Trump basically just said the same thing but now he's a
"perfect
asshole" according to you.



I don't recall Trump's policies on immigration in 2001. Do you?
And he
wasn't "running things" back then and it isn't likely he'll be
"running
things" beyond his businesses in the future.

I doubt if Trump knew what Bush did or did not do in the lead up to
2001. His knowledge of such things seems non-existent.



Not what Trump said. He said "if" he had been POTUS at the time with
the illegal immigration position that he has described *now*, the
terrorists may not have been able to get into the USA.


And you believe that, right? Hey, Trump, Carson, and the rest of the
GOP
wannabe bozos are exactly what the Republicans deserve in
2016...politically naive, ignorant, hate-filled, science-denying idiots
who appeal to the "base" of the party. The only difficult part is to
figure out on a given day which one is the worst.

"If" Trump had been president in 2001, we'd be trying to recover from
global thermonuclear war...

Harry are you scared of Trump? you must be because you blast him
every chance you can.



Why would I be scared of Trump, Tim? I just am enjoying the fact that
your party seems intent on nominating one of several unsuitable flaming
asses for POTUS. Trump, Carson, Cruz, Rubio, Fiorina, Bush, et
cetera...crikey, what a crowd you boys have.


On the other hand, we have a choice of Hillary the Hun who could fool a
polygraph machine or Bernie the Socialist who wants to re-write the
Constitution. Think I'll just sit this one out.



Good. That'll be one less vote for the Republicans... Perhaps you can
convince your buddies in "red" states to do the same. :)

The leading...
 

On 10/19/2015 10:38 AM, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:30:53 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:

On 10/19/2015 10:06 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/19/15 8:15 AM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, October 19, 2015 at 5:30:43 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/19/15 1:57 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/18/2015 8:04 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/18/15 7:44 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/18/2015 5:01 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...GOP candidate...

"Donald Trump says that if he had been president in 2001, his
immigration policies would have kept terrorists from attacking the
World
Trade Center on September 11.

"I am extremely, extremely tough on illegal immigration. I'm
extremely
tough on people coming into this country," Trump said on Fox News
Sunday. "I believe that if I were running things, I doubt those
families
would have -- I doubt that those people would have been in the
country."

- - -

Donald Trump, the *perfect* asshole candidate for the party of
assholes.
Really. And just behind Trump, another asshole candidate, Ben
Carson.
Crikey.


You (nor I) have no way of knowing if Trump's position on illegal
immigration would have prevented al-Qaeda from sending terrorists to
the USA to attend flight schools in preparation for the 9/11
attacks had
he been POTUS at the time. Warnings of "something is up" were
raised back when Clinton was still in office for cripes sake and he
didn't do anything about it either.

That said, you crack me up (again). In the past you have placed
responsibility for 9/11 squarely on GWB because it happened on his
watch. Trump basically just said the same thing but now he's a
"perfect
asshole" according to you.



I don't recall Trump's policies on immigration in 2001. Do you? And he
wasn't "running things" back then and it isn't likely he'll be
"running
things" beyond his businesses in the future.

I doubt if Trump knew what Bush did or did not do in the lead up to
2001. His knowledge of such things seems non-existent.



Not what Trump said. He said "if" he had been POTUS at the time with
the illegal immigration position that he has described *now*, the
terrorists may not have been able to get into the USA.


And you believe that, right? Hey, Trump, Carson, and the rest of the GOP
wannabe bozos are exactly what the Republicans deserve in
2016...politically naive, ignorant, hate-filled, science-denying idiots
who appeal to the "base" of the party. The only difficult part is to
figure out on a given day which one is the worst.

"If" Trump had been president in 2001, we'd be trying to recover from
global thermonuclear war...

Harry are you scared of Trump? you must be because you blast him
every chance you can.



Why would I be scared of Trump, Tim? I just am enjoying the fact that
your party seems intent on nominating one of several unsuitable flaming
asses for POTUS. Trump, Carson, Cruz, Rubio, Fiorina, Bush, et
cetera...crikey, what a crowd you boys have.


On the other hand, we have a choice of Hillary the Hun who could fool a
polygraph machine or Bernie the Socialist who wants to re-write the
Constitution. Think I'll just sit this one out.


I'd much rather try to choose the lesser of two evils come election day.


You've forgotten where I live. Unless you vote for a Democrat to add to
the overwhelming tally, voting for president is just an exercise.

Massachusetts has gone Republican only 4 times since 1928, twice for
Eisenhower and twice for Reagan. Even George McGovern won the state's
electoral votes in 1974 ... the only state to do so.

The leading...
 

On 10/19/15 10:38 AM, Tim wrote:
- show quoted text -
Why would I be scared of Trump, Tim? I just am enjoying the fact that
your party...
..........
"My party?" Why do you say that Harry? Because I'm critical of the D. Candidates? I've never endorsed Trump.

If that's the way you want to look at it, I suppose Gus Hall was the candidate of *your* party.


It doesn't matter if you've endorsed Trump or any of the other
Republicans...when you vote, if you vote, I'm pretty sure you'll vote
for the *R* candidate no matter who it is. You've got a hell of a choice
there, eh?

Poor Gus Hall. No, Tim, Hall was never a candidate of "my" party. Where
do you source this nonsense? Even the Russian Commies didn't have much
use for Hall.

The leading...
 

On 10/19/2015 10:38 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/19/15 10:30 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/19/2015 10:06 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/19/15 8:15 AM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, October 19, 2015 at 5:30:43 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/19/15 1:57 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/18/2015 8:04 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/18/15 7:44 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/18/2015 5:01 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...GOP candidate...

"Donald Trump says that if he had been president in 2001, his
immigration policies would have kept terrorists from attacking the
World
Trade Center on September 11.

"I am extremely, extremely tough on illegal immigration. I'm
extremely
tough on people coming into this country," Trump said on Fox News
Sunday. "I believe that if I were running things, I doubt those
families
would have -- I doubt that those people would have been in the
country."

- - -

Donald Trump, the *perfect* asshole candidate for the party of
assholes.
Really. And just behind Trump, another asshole candidate, Ben
Carson.
Crikey.


You (nor I) have no way of knowing if Trump's position on illegal
immigration would have prevented al-Qaeda from sending
terrorists to
the USA to attend flight schools in preparation for the 9/11
attacks had
he been POTUS at the time. Warnings of "something is up" were
raised back when Clinton was still in office for cripes sake and he
didn't do anything about it either.

That said, you crack me up (again). In the past you have placed
responsibility for 9/11 squarely on GWB because it happened on his
watch. Trump basically just said the same thing but now he's a
"perfect
asshole" according to you.



I don't recall Trump's policies on immigration in 2001. Do you?
And he
wasn't "running things" back then and it isn't likely he'll be
"running
things" beyond his businesses in the future.

I doubt if Trump knew what Bush did or did not do in the lead up to
2001. His knowledge of such things seems non-existent.



Not what Trump said. He said "if" he had been POTUS at the time
with
the illegal immigration position that he has described *now*, the
terrorists may not have been able to get into the USA.


And you believe that, right? Hey, Trump, Carson, and the rest of the
GOP
wannabe bozos are exactly what the Republicans deserve in
2016...politically naive, ignorant, hate-filled, science-denying
idiots
who appeal to the "base" of the party. The only difficult part is to
figure out on a given day which one is the worst.

"If" Trump had been president in 2001, we'd be trying to recover from
global thermonuclear war...

Harry are you scared of Trump? you must be because you blast him
every chance you can.



Why would I be scared of Trump, Tim? I just am enjoying the fact that
your party seems intent on nominating one of several unsuitable flaming
asses for POTUS. Trump, Carson, Cruz, Rubio, Fiorina, Bush, et
cetera...crikey, what a crowd you boys have.


On the other hand, we have a choice of Hillary the Hun who could fool a
polygraph machine or Bernie the Socialist who wants to re-write the
Constitution. Think I'll just sit this one out.



Good. That'll be one less vote for the Republicans... Perhaps you can
convince your buddies in "red" states to do the same. :)



Voting for anyone other than a Democrat (for President) is a waste of
time here.

The leading...
 

On 10/19/15 10:53 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/19/2015 10:38 AM, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:30:53 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 10/19/2015 10:06 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/19/15 8:15 AM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, October 19, 2015 at 5:30:43 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/19/15 1:57 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/18/2015 8:04 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/18/15 7:44 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/18/2015 5:01 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...GOP candidate...

"Donald Trump says that if he had been president in 2001, his
immigration policies would have kept terrorists from attacking
the
World
Trade Center on September 11.

"I am extremely, extremely tough on illegal immigration. I'm
extremely
tough on people coming into this country," Trump said on Fox News
Sunday. "I believe that if I were running things, I doubt those
families
would have -- I doubt that those people would have been in the
country."

- - -

Donald Trump, the *perfect* asshole candidate for the party of
assholes.
Really. And just behind Trump, another asshole candidate, Ben
Carson.
Crikey.


You (nor I) have no way of knowing if Trump's position on illegal
immigration would have prevented al-Qaeda from sending
terrorists to
the USA to attend flight schools in preparation for the 9/11
attacks had
he been POTUS at the time. Warnings of "something is up" were
raised back when Clinton was still in office for cripes sake
and he
didn't do anything about it either.

That said, you crack me up (again). In the past you have placed
responsibility for 9/11 squarely on GWB because it happened on his
watch. Trump basically just said the same thing but now he's a
"perfect
asshole" according to you.



I don't recall Trump's policies on immigration in 2001. Do you?
And he
wasn't "running things" back then and it isn't likely he'll be
"running
things" beyond his businesses in the future.

I doubt if Trump knew what Bush did or did not do in the lead up to
2001. His knowledge of such things seems non-existent.



Not what Trump said. He said "if" he had been POTUS at the time
with
the illegal immigration position that he has described *now*, the
terrorists may not have been able to get into the USA.


And you believe that, right? Hey, Trump, Carson, and the rest of
the GOP
wannabe bozos are exactly what the Republicans deserve in
2016...politically naive, ignorant, hate-filled, science-denying
idiots
who appeal to the "base" of the party. The only difficult part is to
figure out on a given day which one is the worst.

"If" Trump had been president in 2001, we'd be trying to recover from
global thermonuclear war...

Harry are you scared of Trump? you must be because you blast him
every chance you can.



Why would I be scared of Trump, Tim? I just am enjoying the fact that
your party seems intent on nominating one of several unsuitable flaming
asses for POTUS. Trump, Carson, Cruz, Rubio, Fiorina, Bush, et
cetera...crikey, what a crowd you boys have.


On the other hand, we have a choice of Hillary the Hun who could fool a
polygraph machine or Bernie the Socialist who wants to re-write the
Constitution. Think I'll just sit this one out.


I'd much rather try to choose the lesser of two evils come election day.


You've forgotten where I live. Unless you vote for a Democrat to add to
the overwhelming tally, voting for president is just an exercise.

Massachusetts has gone Republican only 4 times since 1928, twice for
Eisenhower and twice for Reagan. Even George McGovern won the state's
electoral votes in 1974 ... the only state to do so.





You mean 1984, of course...and he was the lesser of two evils that year,
considering his opponent was Reagan.

The leading...
 

On 10/19/2015 11:00 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/19/15 10:53 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/19/2015 10:38 AM, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:30:53 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 10/19/2015 10:06 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/19/15 8:15 AM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, October 19, 2015 at 5:30:43 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/19/15 1:57 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/18/2015 8:04 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/18/15 7:44 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/18/2015 5:01 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...GOP candidate...

"Donald Trump says that if he had been president in 2001, his
immigration policies would have kept terrorists from attacking
the
World
Trade Center on September 11.

"I am extremely, extremely tough on illegal immigration. I'm
extremely
tough on people coming into this country," Trump said on Fox
News
Sunday. "I believe that if I were running things, I doubt those
families
would have -- I doubt that those people would have been in the
country."

- - -

Donald Trump, the *perfect* asshole candidate for the party of
assholes.
Really. And just behind Trump, another asshole candidate, Ben
Carson.
Crikey.


You (nor I) have no way of knowing if Trump's position on illegal
immigration would have prevented al-Qaeda from sending
terrorists to
the USA to attend flight schools in preparation for the 9/11
attacks had
he been POTUS at the time. Warnings of "something is up" were
raised back when Clinton was still in office for cripes sake
and he
didn't do anything about it either.

That said, you crack me up (again). In the past you have placed
responsibility for 9/11 squarely on GWB because it happened on
his
watch. Trump basically just said the same thing but now he's a
"perfect
asshole" according to you.



I don't recall Trump's policies on immigration in 2001. Do you?
And he
wasn't "running things" back then and it isn't likely he'll be
"running
things" beyond his businesses in the future.

I doubt if Trump knew what Bush did or did not do in the lead
up to
2001. His knowledge of such things seems non-existent.



Not what Trump said. He said "if" he had been POTUS at the time
with
the illegal immigration position that he has described *now*, the
terrorists may not have been able to get into the USA.


And you believe that, right? Hey, Trump, Carson, and the rest of
the GOP
wannabe bozos are exactly what the Republicans deserve in
2016...politically naive, ignorant, hate-filled, science-denying
idiots
who appeal to the "base" of the party. The only difficult part is to
figure out on a given day which one is the worst.

"If" Trump had been president in 2001, we'd be trying to recover
from
global thermonuclear war...

Harry are you scared of Trump? you must be because you blast him
every chance you can.



Why would I be scared of Trump, Tim? I just am enjoying the fact that
your party seems intent on nominating one of several unsuitable
flaming
asses for POTUS. Trump, Carson, Cruz, Rubio, Fiorina, Bush, et
cetera...crikey, what a crowd you boys have.


On the other hand, we have a choice of Hillary the Hun who could fool a
polygraph machine or Bernie the Socialist who wants to re-write the
Constitution. Think I'll just sit this one out.


I'd much rather try to choose the lesser of two evils come election day.


You've forgotten where I live. Unless you vote for a Democrat to add to
the overwhelming tally, voting for president is just an exercise.

Massachusetts has gone Republican only 4 times since 1928, twice for
Eisenhower and twice for Reagan. Even George McGovern won the state's
electoral votes in 1974 ... the only state to do so.





You mean 1984, of course...and he was the lesser of two evils that year,
considering his opponent was Reagan.


Actually, I meant 1972 ... McGovern vs Nixon.. Massachusetts was the
only state that went for McGovern.

The leading...
 

On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 11:00:48 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Massachusetts has gone Republican only 4 times since 1928, twice for
Eisenhower and twice for Reagan. Even George McGovern won the state's
electoral votes in 1974 ... the only state to do so.





You mean 1984, of course...and he was the lesser of two evils that year,
considering his opponent was Reagan.

84 was Mondale but it is a distinction without a difference.

The leading...
 

wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 11:00:48 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Massachusetts has gone Republican only 4 times since 1928, twice for
Eisenhower and twice for Reagan. Even George McGovern won the state's
electoral votes in 1974 ... the only state to do so.





You mean 1984, of course...and he was the lesser of two evils that year,
considering his opponent was Reagan.

84 was Mondale but it is a distinction without a difference.


Right.

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

The leading...
 

On 10/19/15 10:30 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/19/2015 10:06 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/19/15 8:15 AM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, October 19, 2015 at 5:30:43 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/19/15 1:57 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/18/2015 8:04 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/18/15 7:44 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/18/2015 5:01 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...GOP candidate...

"Donald Trump says that if he had been president in 2001, his
immigration policies would have kept terrorists from attacking the
World
Trade Center on September 11.

"I am extremely, extremely tough on illegal immigration. I'm
extremely
tough on people coming into this country," Trump said on Fox News
Sunday. "I believe that if I were running things, I doubt those
families
would have -- I doubt that those people would have been in the
country."

- - -

Donald Trump, the *perfect* asshole candidate for the party of
assholes.
Really. And just behind Trump, another asshole candidate, Ben
Carson.
Crikey.


You (nor I) have no way of knowing if Trump's position on illegal
immigration would have prevented al-Qaeda from sending
terrorists to
the USA to attend flight schools in preparation for the 9/11
attacks had
he been POTUS at the time. Warnings of "something is up" were
raised back when Clinton was still in office for cripes sake and he
didn't do anything about it either.

That said, you crack me up (again). In the past you have placed
responsibility for 9/11 squarely on GWB because it happened on his
watch. Trump basically just said the same thing but now he's a
"perfect
asshole" according to you.



I don't recall Trump's policies on immigration in 2001. Do you?
And he
wasn't "running things" back then and it isn't likely he'll be
"running
things" beyond his businesses in the future.

I doubt if Trump knew what Bush did or did not do in the lead up to
2001. His knowledge of such things seems non-existent.



Not what Trump said. He said "if" he had been POTUS at the time with
the illegal immigration position that he has described *now*, the
terrorists may not have been able to get into the USA.


And you believe that, right? Hey, Trump, Carson, and the rest of the
GOP
wannabe bozos are exactly what the Republicans deserve in
2016...politically naive, ignorant, hate-filled, science-denying idiots
who appeal to the "base" of the party. The only difficult part is to
figure out on a given day which one is the worst.

"If" Trump had been president in 2001, we'd be trying to recover from
global thermonuclear war...

Harry are you scared of Trump? you must be because you blast him
every chance you can.



Why would I be scared of Trump, Tim? I just am enjoying the fact that
your party seems intent on nominating one of several unsuitable flaming
asses for POTUS. Trump, Carson, Cruz, Rubio, Fiorina, Bush, et
cetera...crikey, what a crowd you boys have.


On the other hand, we have a choice of Hillary the Hun who could fool a
polygraph machine or Bernie the Socialist who wants to re-write the
Constitution. Think I'll just sit this one out.



Well, if you are looking for a total lack of credibility, there's always
Trey Gowdy and his fellow GOP bull****ters on the Benghazi Committee.

The leading...
 

On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 12:15:10 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 10/19/15 10:30 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/19/2015 10:06 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/19/15 8:15 AM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, October 19, 2015 at 5:30:43 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/19/15 1:57 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/18/2015 8:04 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/18/15 7:44 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/18/2015 5:01 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...GOP candidate...

"Donald Trump says that if he had been president in 2001, his
immigration policies would have kept terrorists from attacking the
World
Trade Center on September 11.

"I am extremely, extremely tough on illegal immigration. I'm
extremely
tough on people coming into this country," Trump said on Fox News
Sunday. "I believe that if I were running things, I doubt those
families
would have -- I doubt that those people would have been in the
country."

- - -

Donald Trump, the *perfect* asshole candidate for the party of
assholes.
Really. And just behind Trump, another asshole candidate, Ben
Carson.
Crikey.


You (nor I) have no way of knowing if Trump's position on illegal
immigration would have prevented al-Qaeda from sending
terrorists to
the USA to attend flight schools in preparation for the 9/11
attacks had
he been POTUS at the time. Warnings of "something is up" were
raised back when Clinton was still in office for cripes sake and he
didn't do anything about it either.

That said, you crack me up (again). In the past you have placed
responsibility for 9/11 squarely on GWB because it happened on his
watch. Trump basically just said the same thing but now he's a
"perfect
asshole" according to you.



I don't recall Trump's policies on immigration in 2001. Do you?
And he
wasn't "running things" back then and it isn't likely he'll be
"running
things" beyond his businesses in the future.

I doubt if Trump knew what Bush did or did not do in the lead up to
2001. His knowledge of such things seems non-existent.



Not what Trump said. He said "if" he had been POTUS at the time with
the illegal immigration position that he has described *now*, the
terrorists may not have been able to get into the USA.


And you believe that, right? Hey, Trump, Carson, and the rest of the
GOP
wannabe bozos are exactly what the Republicans deserve in
2016...politically naive, ignorant, hate-filled, science-denying idiots
who appeal to the "base" of the party. The only difficult part is to
figure out on a given day which one is the worst.

"If" Trump had been president in 2001, we'd be trying to recover from
global thermonuclear war...

Harry are you scared of Trump? you must be because you blast him
every chance you can.



Why would I be scared of Trump, Tim? I just am enjoying the fact that
your party seems intent on nominating one of several unsuitable flaming
asses for POTUS. Trump, Carson, Cruz, Rubio, Fiorina, Bush, et
cetera...crikey, what a crowd you boys have.


On the other hand, we have a choice of Hillary the Hun who could fool a
polygraph machine or Bernie the Socialist who wants to re-write the
Constitution. Think I'll just sit this one out.



Well, if you are looking for a total lack of credibility, there's always
Trey Gowdy and his fellow GOP bull****ters on the Benghazi Committee.

Or just look at the author of your post, eh?

Which unit were you with in Vietnam? How're those owls doing, eh? Your red barn been
repainted yet?
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

The leading...
 

On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 12:15:10 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:



Well, if you are looking for a total lack of credibility, there's always
Trey Gowdy and his fellow GOP bull****ters on the Benghazi Committee.

One thing seems to be true. The Clintons are so good at covering their
tracks that the only thing they might ever be convicted of is perjury
and obstruction of justice. Hillary worked on the Watergate committee
and she knows that without the tapes, Nixon would have retired as a
respected former president who survived an onslaught from the vast
left wing conspiracy. You can bet your ass there are no "Clinton
tapes" or anything else that might come back to haunt them.
I am always amazed at the people who do not understand the difference
between having your own mail server and having a personal account
with Gmail, Hotmail or a web host. (like everyone else mentioned who
had "private" email accounts)
If you delete an Email on your own server, you virtually smell the
smoke of it burning. Not so on any of the other services. Hillary knew
that and I assume any sensitive communications were burned right after
reading.
I still think they should follow the money if they really want to find
the dirt. Was there any quid pro quo on the massive contributions
state actors made to the CGI? There is certainly the potential of a
conflict of interest there. It doesn't take much of a minor policy
shift at State to put a lot of extra cash in the pocket of a foreign
government official.

The leading...
 

- show quoted text -
It doesn't matter if you've endorsed Trump or any of the other
Republicans...when you vote, if you vote, I'm pretty sure you'll vote
for the *R* candidate no matter who it is. You've got a hell of a choice
there, eh?

Poor Gus Hall. No, Tim, Hall was never a candidate of "my" party. Where
do you source this nonsense? Even the Russian Commies didn't have much
use for Hall.
.........

Using your "reasoning " I'll vot for Trump because he's of "my" party. Again if that's the case I'll use your "reasoning " and say you'd vote for Hall because he's a nominee of "your" party.

Harry you shouldn't knee jerk to premature conclusions and label others like that.

The leading...
 

On 10/19/15 1:11 PM, Tim wrote:
- show quoted text -
It doesn't matter if you've endorsed Trump or any of the other
Republicans...when you vote, if you vote, I'm pretty sure you'll vote
for the *R* candidate no matter who it is. You've got a hell of a choice
there, eh?

Poor Gus Hall. No, Tim, Hall was never a candidate of "my" party. Where
do you source this nonsense? Even the Russian Commies didn't have much
use for Hall.
........

Using your "reasoning " I'll vot for Trump because he's of "my" party. Again if that's the case I'll use your "reasoning " and say you'd vote for Hall because he's a nominee of "your" party.

Harry you shouldn't knee jerk to premature conclusions and label others like that.


Gus Hall is dead, Tim. But if Trump is the nominee, I'm certain you'll
vote for him.

The leading...
 

On 10/19/15 12:49 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 12:15:10 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:



Well, if you are looking for a total lack of credibility, there's always
Trey Gowdy and his fellow GOP bull****ters on the Benghazi Committee.

One thing seems to be true. The Clintons are so good at covering their
tracks that the only thing they might ever be convicted of is perjury
and obstruction of justice. Hillary worked on the Watergate committee
and she knows that without the tapes, Nixon would have retired as a
respected former president who survived an onslaught from the vast
left wing conspiracy. You can bet your ass there are no "Clinton
tapes" or anything else that might come back to haunt them.
I am always amazed at the people who do not understand the difference
between having your own mail server and having a personal account
with Gmail, Hotmail or a web host. (like everyone else mentioned who
had "private" email accounts)
If you delete an Email on your own server, you virtually smell the
smoke of it burning. Not so on any of the other services. Hillary knew
that and I assume any sensitive communications were burned right after
reading.
I still think they should follow the money if they really want to find
the dirt. Was there any quid pro quo on the massive contributions
state actors made to the CGI? There is certainly the potential of a
conflict of interest there. It doesn't take much of a minor policy
shift at State to put a lot of extra cash in the pocket of a foreign
government official.


Perhaps Trey will call you as a witness next week.

The leading...
 

- show quoted text -
Gus Hall is dead, Tim. But if Trump is the nominee, I'm certain you'll
vote for him.

..........

I know, and Trump wasn't president nor a nominee in 2001. But if Hall was alive you'd probably vote for him. (Using your logic, of course!)

The leading...
 

On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 14:39:32 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 10/19/15 12:49 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 12:15:10 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:



Well, if you are looking for a total lack of credibility, there's always
Trey Gowdy and his fellow GOP bull****ters on the Benghazi Committee.

One thing seems to be true. The Clintons are so good at covering their
tracks that the only thing they might ever be convicted of is perjury
and obstruction of justice. Hillary worked on the Watergate committee
and she knows that without the tapes, Nixon would have retired as a
respected former president who survived an onslaught from the vast
left wing conspiracy. You can bet your ass there are no "Clinton
tapes" or anything else that might come back to haunt them.
I am always amazed at the people who do not understand the difference
between having your own mail server and having a personal account
with Gmail, Hotmail or a web host. (like everyone else mentioned who
had "private" email accounts)
If you delete an Email on your own server, you virtually smell the
smoke of it burning. Not so on any of the other services. Hillary knew
that and I assume any sensitive communications were burned right after
reading.
I still think they should follow the money if they really want to find
the dirt. Was there any quid pro quo on the massive contributions
state actors made to the CGI? There is certainly the potential of a
conflict of interest there. It doesn't take much of a minor policy
shift at State to put a lot of extra cash in the pocket of a foreign
government official.


Perhaps Trey will call you as a witness next week.

They are still looking for their "Butterfield". Before he showed up,
Nixon was looking like he would get off the hook.
I just believe that the Clintons are better at covering up. When they
write their books, facts are not so important to them that they need
first source records that may be incriminating.
The idea that there was any residual data on that server after all
these years only pointed out how little people know about computers.

The leading...
 

On 10/19/15 3:06 PM, Tim wrote:
- show quoted text -
Gus Hall is dead, Tim. But if Trump is the nominee, I'm certain you'll
vote for him.

.........

I know, and Trump wasn't president nor a nominee in 2001. But if Hall was alive you'd probably vote for him. (Using your logic, of course!)


Sorry, Tim, but I'm not a fan of the Communist Party, nor do I vote for
non-mainstream political party candidates. I do feel confident, though,
that if Trump is the GOP nominee, you will vote for him.

The leading...
 

On 10/19/15 3:27 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 14:39:32 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 10/19/15 12:49 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 12:15:10 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:



Well, if you are looking for a total lack of credibility, there's always
Trey Gowdy and his fellow GOP bull****ters on the Benghazi Committee.

One thing seems to be true. The Clintons are so good at covering their
tracks that the only thing they might ever be convicted of is perjury
and obstruction of justice. Hillary worked on the Watergate committee
and she knows that without the tapes, Nixon would have retired as a
respected former president who survived an onslaught from the vast
left wing conspiracy. You can bet your ass there are no "Clinton
tapes" or anything else that might come back to haunt them.
I am always amazed at the people who do not understand the difference
between having your own mail server and having a personal account
with Gmail, Hotmail or a web host. (like everyone else mentioned who
had "private" email accounts)
If you delete an Email on your own server, you virtually smell the
smoke of it burning. Not so on any of the other services. Hillary knew
that and I assume any sensitive communications were burned right after
reading.
I still think they should follow the money if they really want to find
the dirt. Was there any quid pro quo on the massive contributions
state actors made to the CGI? There is certainly the potential of a
conflict of interest there. It doesn't take much of a minor policy
shift at State to put a lot of extra cash in the pocket of a foreign
government official.


Perhaps Trey will call you as a witness next week.

They are still looking for their "Butterfield". Before he showed up,
Nixon was looking like he would get off the hook.
I just believe that the Clintons are better at covering up. When they
write their books, facts are not so important to them that they need
first source records that may be incriminating.
The idea that there was any residual data on that server after all
these years only pointed out how little people know about computers.

Well, you can speculate all you like, but what is true is that Trey
Gowdy altered documents he received from the CIA in an attempt to frame
Hillary Clinton.

The leading...
 

On 10/19/2015 3:06 PM, Tim wrote:
- show quoted text -
Gus Hall is dead, Tim. But if Trump is the nominee, I'm certain you'll
vote for him.

.........

I know, and Trump wasn't president nor a nominee in 2001. But if Hall was alive you'd probably vote for him. (Using your logic, of course!)



Hall's successors end up endorsing the Democrat party candidate claiming
the Democrat party is closer to the Communist Party USA ideological
principles compared to the GOP.

The leading...
 

On 10/19/15 4:41 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/19/2015 3:06 PM, Tim wrote:
- show quoted text -
Gus Hall is dead, Tim. But if Trump is the nominee, I'm certain you'll
vote for him.

.........

I know, and Trump wasn't president nor a nominee in 2001. But if Hall
was alive you'd probably vote for him. (Using your logic, of course!)



Hall's successors end up endorsing the Democrat party candidate claiming
the Democrat party is closer to the Communist Party USA ideological
principles compared to the GOP.


As far as I can tell from today's leading GOP candidates, the Republican
Party has no principles whatsoever.

The leading...
 

On 10/19/2015 4:52 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/19/15 4:41 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/19/2015 3:06 PM, Tim wrote:
- show quoted text -
Gus Hall is dead, Tim. But if Trump is the nominee, I'm certain you'll
vote for him.

.........

I know, and Trump wasn't president nor a nominee in 2001. But if Hall
was alive you'd probably vote for him. (Using your logic, of course!)



Hall's successors end up endorsing the Democrat party candidate claiming
the Democrat party is closer to the Communist Party USA ideological
principles compared to the GOP.


As far as I can tell from today's leading GOP candidates, the Republican
Party has no principles whatsoever.


They have principles but few that I can comfortably subscribe to.
Trump has some fundamental beliefs outside of the Tea Party's take over
and influence but it's hard to imagine him as POTUS. He expresses some
of the popular frustrations but doesn't have any realistic fixes.

I suppose I *could* make life simple and just pick a party and be happy
to vote for it's nominee, regardless of who he or she is. Like you do.

The leading...
 

Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/19/2015 4:52 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/19/15 4:41 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/19/2015 3:06 PM, Tim wrote:
- show quoted text -
Gus Hall is dead, Tim. But if Trump is the nominee, I'm certain you'll
vote for him.

.........

I know, and Trump wasn't president nor a nominee in 2001. But if Hall
was alive you'd probably vote for him. (Using your logic, of course!)



Hall's successors end up endorsing the Democrat party candidate claiming
the Democrat party is closer to the Communist Party USA ideological
principles compared to the GOP.


As far as I can tell from today's leading GOP candidates, the Republican
Party has no principles whatsoever.


They have principles but few that I can comfortably subscribe to.
Trump has some fundamental beliefs outside of the Tea Party's take over
and influence but it's hard to imagine him as POTUS. He expresses some
of the popular frustrations but doesn't have any realistic fixes.

I suppose I *could* make life simple and just pick a party and be happy
to vote for it's nominee, regardless of who he or she is. Like you do.




Wow. No,I don't do that. I pick candidates whose positions on issues that
concern me align reasonably well with my positions. These days, that rarely
is a Republican and almost always is a Democrat. I don't waste votes on
third party candidates.

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

The leading...
 

On 10/19/2015 5:30 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/19/2015 4:52 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/19/15 4:41 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/19/2015 3:06 PM, Tim wrote:
- show quoted text -
Gus Hall is dead, Tim. But if Trump is the nominee, I'm certain you'll
vote for him.

.........

I know, and Trump wasn't president nor a nominee in 2001. But if Hall
was alive you'd probably vote for him. (Using your logic, of course!)



Hall's successors end up endorsing the Democrat party candidate claiming
the Democrat party is closer to the Communist Party USA ideological
principles compared to the GOP.


As far as I can tell from today's leading GOP candidates, the Republican
Party has no principles whatsoever.


They have principles but few that I can comfortably subscribe to.
Trump has some fundamental beliefs outside of the Tea Party's take over
and influence but it's hard to imagine him as POTUS. He expresses some
of the popular frustrations but doesn't have any realistic fixes.

I suppose I *could* make life simple and just pick a party and be happy
to vote for it's nominee, regardless of who he or she is. Like you do.




Wow. No,I don't do that. I pick candidates whose positions on issues that
concern me align reasonably well with my positions. These days, that rarely
is a Republican and almost always is a Democrat. I don't waste votes on
third party candidates.


That's at odds with statements you've made in the past.
You have stated several times that you would support and vote
for the Democrat nominee period. You are a party guy.

The leading...
 

On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 17:30:06 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/19/2015 4:52 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/19/15 4:41 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/19/2015 3:06 PM, Tim wrote:
- show quoted text -
Gus Hall is dead, Tim. But if Trump is the nominee, I'm certain you'll
vote for him.

.........

I know, and Trump wasn't president nor a nominee in 2001. But if Hall
was alive you'd probably vote for him. (Using your logic, of course!)



Hall's successors end up endorsing the Democrat party candidate claiming
the Democrat party is closer to the Communist Party USA ideological
principles compared to the GOP.


As far as I can tell from today's leading GOP candidates, the Republican
Party has no principles whatsoever.


They have principles but few that I can comfortably subscribe to.
Trump has some fundamental beliefs outside of the Tea Party's take over
and influence but it's hard to imagine him as POTUS. He expresses some
of the popular frustrations but doesn't have any realistic fixes.

I suppose I *could* make life simple and just pick a party and be happy
to vote for it's nominee, regardless of who he or she is. Like you do.




Wow. No,I don't do that. I pick candidates whose positions on issues that
concern me align reasonably well with my positions. These days, that rarely
is a Republican and almost always is a Democrat. I don't waste votes on
third party candidates.

There is no bigger waste of your vote than to fail to vote for the
candidate you agree with the most.
It is that thinking that assures you will never change the status quo.

For the last 25 years, we have just got the big business candidate, no
matter which party won. Hillary will be the 5th Bush administration.

The leading...
 

- show quoted text -
Sorry, Tim, but I'm not a fan of the Communist Party, nor do I vote for
non-mainstream political party candidates. I do feel confident, though,
that if Trump is the GOP nominee, you will vote for him.
..........

Harry Potter f you really want to be fair then. If you want to label Richard, Greg and me as "righties" then it's only fair to label you as a "commie"

I think that's agreeable, "eh?"