Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2015
Posts: 920
Default Trump Seals His Fate

Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/2/2015 5:57 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 17:29:27 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

I am not ignoring your comments about the lack of penalties for illegal
weapons possession. I am suggesting that we try to prevent it in the
first place. The concept of the license requirement to buy ammo is to
get around the NRA supported 2nd Amendment "right" claims.


===

If you made it difficult or expensive to purchase ammo, there would
immediately be a large number of "make your own ammo" kits on the
market. It's not difficult as evidenced by the large number of
serious target shooters that are already reloading their own. You
keep proposing solutions that penalize legitimate gun owners and
target shooters. Why not think of ways to go after the root causes?
We all know what they are. It just takes some political backbone to
enforce the laws we already have. New York City made some major
progress by enforcing strict "stop and frisk" policies for suspicious
persons. You can guess how that ended up even though it was
successful.



I don't understand why so many people feel that the requirement of a
license/permit is "penalizing" anyone. Maybe I am going by my own
experience here in Massachusetts. In order to legally own a firearm
a MA resident must have one of several types of gun permits with a
Class "A" concealed carry permit being the most sought after. Others
are for handguns for home defense only, and long gun permit
(rifle/shotgun) only. There's even a permit available to legally carry
mace.

The reason for this is that there are some pretty severe penalties,
including jail time, for the possession of a firearm *without* the
required permit. Of course, the permit issuance process includes
a criminal background check.

The issued permit must be shown to the cashier when purchasing ammo.

None of this is a big deal nor is it difficult or expensive.


Because it does not do anything about the root cause.

  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2013
Posts: 6,972
Default Trump Seals His Fate

On 10/2/2015 7:02 PM, Califbill wrote:
Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/2/2015 5:57 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 17:29:27 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

I am not ignoring your comments about the lack of penalties for illegal
weapons possession. I am suggesting that we try to prevent it in the
first place. The concept of the license requirement to buy ammo is to
get around the NRA supported 2nd Amendment "right" claims.

===

If you made it difficult or expensive to purchase ammo, there would
immediately be a large number of "make your own ammo" kits on the
market. It's not difficult as evidenced by the large number of
serious target shooters that are already reloading their own. You
keep proposing solutions that penalize legitimate gun owners and
target shooters. Why not think of ways to go after the root causes?
We all know what they are. It just takes some political backbone to
enforce the laws we already have. New York City made some major
progress by enforcing strict "stop and frisk" policies for suspicious
persons. You can guess how that ended up even though it was
successful.



I don't understand why so many people feel that the requirement of a
license/permit is "penalizing" anyone. Maybe I am going by my own
experience here in Massachusetts. In order to legally own a firearm
a MA resident must have one of several types of gun permits with a
Class "A" concealed carry permit being the most sought after. Others
are for handguns for home defense only, and long gun permit
(rifle/shotgun) only. There's even a permit available to legally carry
mace.

The reason for this is that there are some pretty severe penalties,
including jail time, for the possession of a firearm *without* the
required permit. Of course, the permit issuance process includes
a criminal background check.

The issued permit must be shown to the cashier when purchasing ammo.

None of this is a big deal nor is it difficult or expensive.


Because it does not do anything about the root cause.



Ok. So we may as well adopt BOA's and Jeb Bush's philosophy about
mass shootings of innocent people (including little kids).

"**** happens".

Right?
  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,663
Default Trump Seals His Fate

On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 19:17:52 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:

On 10/2/2015 7:02 PM, Califbill wrote:
Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/2/2015 5:57 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 17:29:27 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

I am not ignoring your comments about the lack of penalties for illegal
weapons possession. I am suggesting that we try to prevent it in the
first place. The concept of the license requirement to buy ammo is to
get around the NRA supported 2nd Amendment "right" claims.

===

If you made it difficult or expensive to purchase ammo, there would
immediately be a large number of "make your own ammo" kits on the
market. It's not difficult as evidenced by the large number of
serious target shooters that are already reloading their own. You
keep proposing solutions that penalize legitimate gun owners and
target shooters. Why not think of ways to go after the root causes?
We all know what they are. It just takes some political backbone to
enforce the laws we already have. New York City made some major
progress by enforcing strict "stop and frisk" policies for suspicious
persons. You can guess how that ended up even though it was
successful.



I don't understand why so many people feel that the requirement of a
license/permit is "penalizing" anyone. Maybe I am going by my own
experience here in Massachusetts. In order to legally own a firearm
a MA resident must have one of several types of gun permits with a
Class "A" concealed carry permit being the most sought after. Others
are for handguns for home defense only, and long gun permit
(rifle/shotgun) only. There's even a permit available to legally carry
mace.

The reason for this is that there are some pretty severe penalties,
including jail time, for the possession of a firearm *without* the
required permit. Of course, the permit issuance process includes
a criminal background check.

The issued permit must be shown to the cashier when purchasing ammo.

None of this is a big deal nor is it difficult or expensive.


Because it does not do anything about the root cause.



Ok. So we may as well adopt BOA's and Jeb Bush's philosophy about
mass shootings of innocent people (including little kids).

"**** happens".

Right?


No, not right. Go after the root cause of the great majority of the shootings. If
you're for infringing on rights, let cops pat down suspected gun carriers, especially
in high crime areas.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Thank you Mr. Trump ... Mr. Luddite General 29 August 22nd 15 04:56 PM
Not so tough now that fate has dealt you a bad deal, Huh Loogy... *e#c General 2 January 13th 11 12:21 AM
Florida Boat Trash? Cut the mustards fate? Joe ASA 9 December 11th 06 11:00 PM
Account of pair's fate at sea chills courtroom [email protected] General 74 November 21st 06 02:55 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017