On 8/26/15 12:20 PM, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 12:02:53 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 8/26/15 11:50 AM, amdx wrote:
On 8/26/2015 9:34 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/26/15 10:25 AM, amdx wrote:
On 8/25/2015 8:40 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/25/15 9:08 PM, amdx wrote:

Wal-Mart.
They lose $3 Billion a year to theft. (Walmart)

Mikek




---

Gosh, no wonder the economy of Communist China is collapsing...it's
because of theft losses at its biggest 'Merican customer!

That would help the China economy. That shows your great understanding
of economics!
Are you endorsing the idea of not prosecuting shoplifters?

Mikek



Whoooooooosh...the sound irony makes as it whizzes between your ears.

As usual, you won't commit to an answer.
You'll note I wasn't the only one commenting on your lack of economic
logic.
Mikek


My post was intended as humorous irony. Apparently you and at least one
other poster took it seriously. It's not my job to help you attain your
goal as newsgroup dimwit, because that would be unfair to Ingerfool,
Herring the Racist, and Bilious.

Oh, China's economy...two of the reasons for its problems...massive
overcapacity and slowing demand within the country and worldwide for
what it is producing.

I'm not really concerned about Walmart's problems operating its sleazy
stores. Perhaps if they hired better and smarter people, paid them more,
and had more of them on duty, they could get their "shrinkage" under
control. I do of course care when decent businesses have such problems,
and think shoplifters ought to be prosecuted.



Better and smarter? And you call me racist?

What a hypocrite, Krause.
--


Oh, did I point out a particular race, or is it your implication that
Walmart only hires people of a particular race? That seems unlikely.