ABC report
 

On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 13:06:21 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

You won't convince anybody. Maybe kids. Everybody
else has heard that same bull**** for 20 years.
They are immune. Sorry.

It took 22 years to get Nixon and in the end, it was not what he may
or may not have done, it was trying to cover it up.
Hillary is smarter tho. She knows that if Nixon had burned those
tapes, he would have left office in 1977, probably seen as a
persecuted hero. There will be no equivalent to "Hillary tapes".

We keep talking like Hillary was just your average computer user. She
could make a phone call and get the best software any ambassador might
be running in a foreign consulate. I don't know why anyone thought
there would be anything on that server.

ABC report
 

On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 14:30:55 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 8/14/15 1:42 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 11:00:50 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

22 million, that's million, emails dumped at the behest of Dubya and his
puppetmaster. 22 million. Seen any? How about the ones that said if they
fudged the intel on Iraq, they could start their shooting war.

Maybe I missed it Scooter but is GW in the race too?


He certainly is...the next POTUS will have to continue to clean up the
messes he left.

What does that have to do with this election? Do you think you can
vote GW out?
If Iraq really determines who you want to vote for, it shouldn't be
Hillary.

ABC report
 

On 8/15/2015 1:11 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 13:06:21 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

You won't convince anybody. Maybe kids. Everybody
else has heard that same bull**** for 20 years.
They are immune. Sorry.

It took 22 years to get Nixon and in the end, it was not what he may
or may not have done, it was trying to cover it up.
Hillary is smarter tho. She knows that if Nixon had burned those
tapes, he would have left office in 1977, probably seen as a
persecuted hero. There will be no equivalent to "Hillary tapes".

We keep talking like Hillary was just your average computer user. She
could make a phone call and get the best software any ambassador might
be running in a foreign consulate. I don't know why anyone thought
there would be anything on that server.


If you or I were suspected of having government classified information
on our computers there would be no "requests" made. The FBI would
show up unannounced with a court order and just take it.

ABC report
 

On 8/15/15 1:30 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 14:30:55 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 8/14/15 1:42 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 11:00:50 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

22 million, that's million, emails dumped at the behest of Dubya and his
puppetmaster. 22 million. Seen any? How about the ones that said if they
fudged the intel on Iraq, they could start their shooting war.

Maybe I missed it Scooter but is GW in the race too?


He certainly is...the next POTUS will have to continue to clean up the
messes he left.

What does that have to do with this election? Do you think you can
vote GW out?
If Iraq really determines who you want to vote for, it shouldn't be
Hillary.


I don't believe Mrs. Clinton will fall for the sort of false intel the
Bush admin put out earlier this century, nor do I believe she will
engage in another absurd land war. And even a flawed Mrs. Clinton (and
all pols are flawed) is head and shoulders above any of the jerks in the
GOP nomination clown car in terms of integrity, ability, and experience,
and she's not anti woman, anti minority, anti gay, anti student, anti
poor, anti middle class. There will be many issues in the upcoming
presidential election, and the GOPers are on the wrong side of all the
serious ones. Further, as I have previously stated, I don't throw my
vote away on third party candidates.

I hope that is clear enough for you that you don't feel the need to
advice me on who should or shouldn't get my vote.

ABC report
 

On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 07:49:52 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 8/15/15 1:30 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 14:30:55 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 8/14/15 1:42 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 11:00:50 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

22 million, that's million, emails dumped at the behest of Dubya and his
puppetmaster. 22 million. Seen any? How about the ones that said if they
fudged the intel on Iraq, they could start their shooting war.

Maybe I missed it Scooter but is GW in the race too?


He certainly is...the next POTUS will have to continue to clean up the
messes he left.

What does that have to do with this election? Do you think you can
vote GW out?
If Iraq really determines who you want to vote for, it shouldn't be
Hillary.


I don't believe Mrs. Clinton will fall for the sort of false intel the
Bush admin put out earlier this century, nor do I believe she will
engage in another absurd land war.

Not AGAIN huh?
BTW it was her hubby's absurd air war that prompted 9-11.
The muslims were demonstrating that we could be killed from the air
too.


And even a flawed Mrs. Clinton (and
all pols are flawed) is head and shoulders above any of the jerks in the
GOP nomination clown car in terms of integrity, ability, and experience,
and she's not anti woman, anti minority, anti gay, anti student, anti
poor, anti middle class. There will be many issues in the upcoming
presidential election, and the GOPers are on the wrong side of all the
serious ones. Further, as I have previously stated, I don't throw my
vote away on third party candidates.


Lincoln was a 3d party candidate and he won with less than 40% of the
vote.
BTW do you know the last 3d party candidate who actually won states?
(not just accidental or protest EC votes)
Silly **** happens. That is why you should be worried about silly
people like Trump.

ABC report
 

wrote:
On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 07:49:52 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 8/15/15 1:30 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 14:30:55 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 8/14/15 1:42 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 11:00:50 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

22 million, that's million, emails dumped at the behest of Dubya and his
puppetmaster. 22 million. Seen any? How about the ones that said if they
fudged the intel on Iraq, they could start their shooting war.

Maybe I missed it Scooter but is GW in the race too?


He certainly is...the next POTUS will have to continue to clean up the
messes he left.

What does that have to do with this election? Do you think you can
vote GW out?
If Iraq really determines who you want to vote for, it shouldn't be
Hillary.


I don't believe Mrs. Clinton will fall for the sort of false intel the
Bush admin put out earlier this century, nor do I believe she will
engage in another absurd land war.

Not AGAIN huh?
BTW it was her hubby's absurd air war that prompted 9-11.
The muslims were demonstrating that we could be killed from the air
too.


And even a flawed Mrs. Clinton (and
all pols are flawed) is head and shoulders above any of the jerks in the
GOP nomination clown car in terms of integrity, ability, and experience,
and she's not anti woman, anti minority, anti gay, anti student, anti
poor, anti middle class. There will be many issues in the upcoming
presidential election, and the GOPers are on the wrong side of all the
serious ones. Further, as I have previously stated, I don't throw my
vote away on third party candidates.


Lincoln was a 3d party candidate and he won with less than 40% of the
vote.
BTW do you know the last 3d party candidate who actually won states?
(not just accidental or protest EC votes)
Silly **** happens. That is why you should be worried about silly
people like Trump.

I'll let you and the rest of the GOPers worry about Trump.
--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

ABC report
 

On 15 Aug 2015 17:16:43 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

wrote:

Lincoln was a 3d party candidate and he won with less than 40% of the
vote.
BTW do you know the last 3d party candidate who actually won states?
(not just accidental or protest EC votes)
Silly **** happens. That is why you should be worried about silly
people like Trump.

I'll let you and the rest of the GOPers worry about Trump.

I worry about how many democrats might vote for him
Someone with a vote in the low 40s might win or worse, toss it back to
the house.

ABC report
 

On 8/15/15 3:52 PM, wrote:
On 15 Aug 2015 17:16:43 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

wrote:

Lincoln was a 3d party candidate and he won with less than 40% of the
vote.
BTW do you know the last 3d party candidate who actually won states?
(not just accidental or protest EC votes)
Silly **** happens. That is why you should be worried about silly
people like Trump.

I'll let you and the rest of the GOPers worry about Trump.

I worry about how many democrats might vote for him
Someone with a vote in the low 40s might win or worse, toss it back to
the house.


As I posted...you and the rest of the GOPers can worry about that.

ABC report