![]() |
ABC report
On 14 Aug 2015 13:44:25 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:
"Mr. Luddite" wrote: I was just reading this as reported by ABC news 2 days ago: ------------------ "The last batch of Hillary Clinton emails released by the State Department included one from Clinton asking to borrow a book called “Send: Why People Email So Badly and How to Do It Better,” by David Shipley and Will Schwalbe. Clinton has not said why she requested the book, but it includes some advice that is particularly interesting in light of the controversy over her unconventional email arrangement at the State Department and her decision to delete tens of thousands of emails she deemed to be purely personal. The copy that ABC downloaded for $9.99 had some interesting revelations. Take, for example, Chapter Six: “The Email That Can Land You In Jail.” The chapter includes a section entitled “How to Delete Something So It Stays Deleted.” “Some people are hoarders, some are checkers,” the authors write. “The main thing to consider is that once you do decide to delete, it’s like taking the garbage from your kitchen and putting it in your hallway. It’s still there.” The chapter advised that to truly delete emails may require a special rewriting program “to make sure that it’s not just elsewhere on the drive but has in fact been written over sixteen or twenty times and rendered undefinable.” But Shipley and Schwalbe warn that deleting emails could lead to future legal troubles. On page 215, the authors list “Stupid (and Real) Email Phrases That Wound Up in Court.” Number one on the list? “DELETE THIS EMAIL!’ Later, on page 226, the writers warn, “If you’re issued a subpoena, your deletion binge will only make you look guilty.” ---------------------- The ABC article also include an image of the email reply to Hillary from Cheryl Mills (State staff member) This is the content: ----------------- From: Mills, Cheryl D Sent: Tuesday, December 1, 2009 8:25 PM To: H Subject: May I borrow Will bring tomorrow --- Original Message --- From: H Sent: Tue Dec 01 19:17:57 2009 Subject: May I borrow SEND by David Shipley? ------------------ and thus, the coverup began. Too bad you had no interest in the 22 million emails Dubya dumped. Or the emails your hero Jeb dumped. Hey if it stops the Bush candidacy, it is OK with me. I don't care if I ever hear Bush, Clinton or even Kennedy again. We kicked out the British to get rid of royal families. |
ABC report
On 8/14/2015 12:57 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article IJCdncIiL49BiFPInZ2dnUU7- , says... Just because classified information becomes known to the media and made public doesn't change the laws and requirements to protect such information from becoming public. *That* is the issue, not what you think you heard on TV that may have been "secret". It's just another red herring. There's been many. Look, if HRC has done something criminal, she'll be charged. That's how it works. I've been waiting 20 ****ing years. The part of "Morning Joe" that I caught this morning was when both Mika and Scarborough were hammering Eugene Robinson, the liberal (and respected) columnist for the Washington Post. He's a regular on the program and is usually precise and well reasoned in his arguments. Not today though. It was the first time I have seen him tongue-tied trying to come up with ways to defend Clinton against Mika and Scarborough's accusations. Lol. Funny how we see things differently. How is Gene going to argue with the 2 hosts who have already made up their minds. He has a pretty constant gig on that show. What I saw was him looking at them and thinking, "Well, these people are crazy. It doesn't matter what I say. I'll hold my tongue and keep my gig." Jesus, they won't stop harping on the same thing, over and over and over again. Pretty much like you're doing. How do you tell people they are crazy? Luddite..Luddite? I don't think I am crazy ... at least not yet. If I am, what difference does it make? My purpose in harping about Hillary is two fold: 1. I got tired of a certain person here constantly posting to the newsgroup with his anti-everything and everyone except Hillary (who he seems to think is the second coming). Over the past couple of years he has lost any sense of reasonable discussion or debate and labels anyone who doesn't see things his way as being crazies, republi-trash or whatever other derogatory comment he can dream up. He is not rational in discussion anymore. That combined with unsolicited posts about religious nut cases that don't reflect most people's beliefs, his negative accusations about people's military service ... recently adding "murderous" to one of them (which may border on slander or libel) and his constant and repetitious anti-American comments got to be a waste of time reading everyday. So, he's keeping company with slammer, the only other person in my Bozo Bin. Combined, those make up reason number one. (BTW, I also realize it's a game for him. I just got tired of reading all his crap). 2. I think Hillary Clinton is a deceitful, lying and unqualified person to be the Chief Executive of this country. If I can convince just one person to not vote for her, the effort would be worthwhile. If you notice I don't call her supporters (including Harry) "loonies", "trash" or other derogatory names. I try to make a case for my arguments and opinions. Your mileage may vary of course. It's your right. |
ABC report
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 11:00:50 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: 22 million, that's million, emails dumped at the behest of Dubya and his puppetmaster. 22 million. Seen any? How about the ones that said if they fudged the intel on Iraq, they could start their shooting war. Maybe I missed it Scooter but is GW in the race too? |
ABC report
|
ABC report
In article 9MqdnfwcXbSztVPInZ2dnUU7-b-
, says... 2. I think Hillary Clinton is a deceitful, lying and unqualified person to be the Chief Executive of this country. If I can convince just one person to not vote for her, the effort would be worthwhile. If you notice I don't call her supporters (including Harry) "loonies", "trash" or other derogatory names. I try to make a case for my arguments and opinions. Your mileage may vary of course. It's your right. You won't convince anybody. Maybe kids. Everybody else has heard that same bull**** for 20 years. They are immune. Sorry. It always gets down to proposed policies. The GOP has shot their feet off. HRC is a woman. Most likely that's the the end of the story. |
ABC report
On 8/14/15 1:40 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 8/14/2015 12:57 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article IJCdncIiL49BiFPInZ2dnUU7- , says... Just because classified information becomes known to the media and made public doesn't change the laws and requirements to protect such information from becoming public. *That* is the issue, not what you think you heard on TV that may have been "secret". It's just another red herring. There's been many. Look, if HRC has done something criminal, she'll be charged. That's how it works. I've been waiting 20 ****ing years. The part of "Morning Joe" that I caught this morning was when both Mika and Scarborough were hammering Eugene Robinson, the liberal (and respected) columnist for the Washington Post. He's a regular on the program and is usually precise and well reasoned in his arguments. Not today though. It was the first time I have seen him tongue-tied trying to come up with ways to defend Clinton against Mika and Scarborough's accusations. Lol. Funny how we see things differently. How is Gene going to argue with the 2 hosts who have already made up their minds. He has a pretty constant gig on that show. What I saw was him looking at them and thinking, "Well, these people are crazy. It doesn't matter what I say. I'll hold my tongue and keep my gig." Jesus, they won't stop harping on the same thing, over and over and over again. Pretty much like you're doing. How do you tell people they are crazy? Luddite..Luddite? I don't think I am crazy ... at least not yet. If I am, what difference does it make? My purpose in harping about Hillary is two fold: 1. I got tired of a certain person here constantly posting to the newsgroup with his anti-everything and everyone except Hillary (who he seems to think is the second coming). Over the past couple of years he has lost any sense of reasonable discussion or debate and labels anyone who doesn't see things his way as being crazies, republi-trash or whatever other derogatory comment he can dream up. He is not rational in discussion anymore. That combined with unsolicited posts about religious nut cases that don't reflect most people's beliefs, his negative accusations about people's military service ... recently adding "murderous" to one of them (which may border on slander or libel) and his constant and repetitious anti-American comments got to be a waste of time reading everyday. So, he's keeping company with slammer, the only other person in my Bozo Bin. Combined, those make up reason number one. (BTW, I also realize it's a game for him. I just got tired of reading all his crap). 2. I think Hillary Clinton is a deceitful, lying and unqualified person to be the Chief Executive of this country. If I can convince just one person to not vote for her, the effort would be worthwhile. If you notice I don't call her supporters (including Harry) "loonies", "trash" or other derogatory names. I try to make a case for my arguments and opinions. Your mileage may vary of course. It's your right. Awwww. And you want those you convince to vote for Dumb Jebbie... |
ABC report
On 8/14/15 2:06 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article 9MqdnfwcXbSztVPInZ2dnUU7-b- , says... 2. I think Hillary Clinton is a deceitful, lying and unqualified person to be the Chief Executive of this country. If I can convince just one person to not vote for her, the effort would be worthwhile. If you notice I don't call her supporters (including Harry) "loonies", "trash" or other derogatory names. I try to make a case for my arguments and opinions. Your mileage may vary of course. It's your right. You won't convince anybody. Maybe kids. Everybody else has heard that same bull**** for 20 years. They are immune. Sorry. It always gets down to proposed policies. The GOP has shot their feet off. HRC is a woman. Most likely that's the the end of the story. What, you don't think GOP plans to make it tougher to get abortions, and the attacks on womens' health care, immigrants, voting rights, the affordable care act, social security, environmental protections, jobsite protections, and its fondness for war is going to product a Republican presidential victory in 2016? :) |
ABC report
|
ABC report
On 8/14/2015 8:44 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
"Mr. Luddite" wrote: I was just reading this as reported by ABC news 2 days ago: ------------------ "The last batch of Hillary Clinton emails released by the State Department included one from Clinton asking to borrow a book called “Send: Why People Email So Badly and How to Do It Better,” by David Shipley and Will Schwalbe. Clinton has not said why she requested the book, but it includes some advice that is particularly interesting in light of the controversy over her unconventional email arrangement at the State Department and her decision to delete tens of thousands of emails she deemed to be purely personal. The copy that ABC downloaded for $9.99 had some interesting revelations. Take, for example, Chapter Six: “The Email That Can Land You In Jail.” The chapter includes a section entitled “How to Delete Something So It Stays Deleted.” “Some people are hoarders, some are checkers,” the authors write. “The main thing to consider is that once you do decide to delete, it’s like taking the garbage from your kitchen and putting it in your hallway. It’s still there.” The chapter advised that to truly delete emails may require a special rewriting program “to make sure that it’s not just elsewhere on the drive but has in fact been written over sixteen or twenty times and rendered undefinable.” But Shipley and Schwalbe warn that deleting emails could lead to future legal troubles. On page 215, the authors list “Stupid (and Real) Email Phrases That Wound Up in Court.” Number one on the list? “DELETE THIS EMAIL!’ Later, on page 226, the writers warn, “If you’re issued a subpoena, your deletion binge will only make you look guilty.” ---------------------- The ABC article also include an image of the email reply to Hillary from Cheryl Mills (State staff member) This is the content: ----------------- From: Mills, Cheryl D Sent: Tuesday, December 1, 2009 8:25 PM To: H Subject: May I borrow Will bring tomorrow --- Original Message --- From: H Sent: Tue Dec 01 19:17:57 2009 Subject: May I borrow SEND by David Shipley? ------------------ and thus, the coverup began. Too bad you had no interest in the 22 million emails Dubya dumped. Did he really read 7,534 emails everyday he was in office? Or the emails your hero Jeb dumped. What were they being investigated for when they did that? Oh, nothing? Kinda different to delete something the governments wants, because the think you committed a crime. Mikek --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:44 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com