Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 20:10:36 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 8/11/15 8:08 PM, wrote: Saving animal habitat TAKES money but I suppose a socialist like you would just print it or borrow it. Unfortunately the countries where these animals live naturally, tend to be too poor to take care of them and the people would rather poach them for that dirty money you talk about than watch their families starve. Letting a few rich hunters come in generates the revenue to save the majority of the animals while sacrificing a few old sick ones and provides some incentive for the people there not to poach. BTW your article is not about regulated hunters, it is about poachers who were not taking selected animals. Oh, right. It would have been A-OK if they were dentists from the USA who paid for the privilege, right? I already said I think trophy hunting is silly and they would be better off doing their hunting with a tranquilize dart gun, helping the vets take care of the animals but the fact remains, the only way these countries can get the money to run these conservation programs is to allow some limited hunting. (generally targeting old animals that will be dying soon anyway) If you people bitching about this would get off your wallets and send them $50,000- $60,000 each like the dentist, you could save some animals but it is easier to just bitch about it. The same is true here. If PETA put as much money into habitat restoration as Ducks Unlimited, they would have standing when they bitch about duck hunting. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Great News! | General | |||
What great news!! | General | |||
Great Dog News! | General | |||
Some great news! | General | |||
OT--Great news for Iraq...terrible news for Iran | General |