On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 15:19:54 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


One solution to our horrific prisons is to moderate the SuperMax
facilities

The super max was started because regular maximum se4curity prisons
were not effectively controlling some prisoners.


to get the private sector out of the prison-for-profit
business altogether. If and when "society" wants to put people away,
it's representatives ought to be *directly* responsible for the outcomes
and conditions, and they ought not to be able to hide behind
"corporations uber alles."

That is another issue and as far as I know all of the federal super
max prisons are run by the FBOP.
Do you know one that isn't?

On 8/11/15 5:33 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 15:19:54 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


One solution to our horrific prisons is to moderate the SuperMax
facilities

The super max was started because regular maximum se4curity prisons
were not effectively controlling some prisoners.


to get the private sector out of the prison-for-profit
business altogether. If and when "society" wants to put people away,
it's representatives ought to be *directly* responsible for the outcomes
and conditions, and they ought not to be able to hide behind
"corporations uber alles."

That is another issue and as far as I know all of the federal super
max prisons are run by the FBOP.
Do you know one that isn't?



My comment was to moderate the SuperMax prisons and to get the private
sector out of the prison business. You obviously are not reading
carefully before you post.

On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 17:41:16 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 8/11/15 5:33 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 15:19:54 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


One solution to our horrific prisons is to moderate the SuperMax
facilities

The super max was started because regular maximum se4curity prisons
were not effectively controlling some prisoners.


to get the private sector out of the prison-for-profit
business altogether. If and when "society" wants to put people away,
it's representatives ought to be *directly* responsible for the outcomes
and conditions, and they ought not to be able to hide behind
"corporations uber alles."

That is another issue and as far as I know all of the federal super
max prisons are run by the FBOP.
Do you know one that isn't?



My comment was to moderate the SuperMax prisons and to get the private
sector out of the prison business. You obviously are not reading
carefully before you post.

Go read your sentence, dim bulb:

One solution to our horrific prisons is to moderate the SuperMax
facilities to get the private sector out of the prison-for-profit
business altogether.

Just what does the phrase, '...to get the private sector...altogether.' modify if not
'to moderate the SuperMax facilities...".

And you consider yourself a 'writer'. There was no 'and' in the sentence.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 18:58:00 -0400, John H.
wrote:

On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 17:41:16 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 8/11/15 5:33 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 15:19:54 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


One solution to our horrific prisons is to moderate the SuperMax
facilities

The super max was started because regular maximum se4curity prisons
were not effectively controlling some prisoners.


to get the private sector out of the prison-for-profit
business altogether. If and when "society" wants to put people away,
it's representatives ought to be *directly* responsible for the outcomes
and conditions, and they ought not to be able to hide behind
"corporations uber alles."

That is another issue and as far as I know all of the federal super
max prisons are run by the FBOP.
Do you know one that isn't?



My comment was to moderate the SuperMax prisons and to get the private
sector out of the prison business. You obviously are not reading
carefully before you post.

Go read your sentence, dim bulb:

One solution to our horrific prisons is to moderate the SuperMax
facilities to get the private sector out of the prison-for-profit
business altogether.

Just what does the phrase, '...to get the private sector...altogether.' modify if not
'to moderate the SuperMax facilities...".

And you consider yourself a 'writer'. There was no 'and' in the sentence.

Harry just posts his opinions about unrelated things and then
complains when we say he is changing the subject.

On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 17:41:16 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 8/11/15 5:33 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 15:19:54 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


One solution to our horrific prisons is to moderate the SuperMax
facilities

The super max was started because regular maximum se4curity prisons
were not effectively controlling some prisoners.


to get the private sector out of the prison-for-profit
business altogether. If and when "society" wants to put people away,
it's representatives ought to be *directly* responsible for the outcomes
and conditions, and they ought not to be able to hide behind
"corporations uber alles."

That is another issue and as far as I know all of the federal super
max prisons are run by the FBOP.
Do you know one that isn't?



My comment was to moderate the SuperMax prisons and to get the private
sector out of the prison business. You obviously are not reading
carefully before you post.

Either you are changing the subject again (federal super max prisons
are not privately managed) or you are not reading.

You also never explained how you would "moderate" these prisons and
still control the worst of the worst either.