Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
....not to vote for Republicans:
Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee indicated Thursday that if elected, he wouldn’t rule out employing federal troops or the Federal Bureau of Investigation to stop abortion from taking place in the United States. Though the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against bans on abortion, Huckabee said past presidents have defied Supreme Court rulings. http://tinyurl.com/qhe233w - - - Most of the mooks who want the GOP 2016 presidential nomination believe in the same sort of anti-abortion bull**** as Hucksterbee, but probably won't say what he said...publicly. Fundamentalist christianity and the GOP...a match made in hell. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/31/2015 4:07 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...not to vote for Republicans: Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee indicated Thursday that if elected, he wouldn’t rule out employing federal troops or the Federal Bureau of Investigation to stop abortion from taking place in the United States. Though the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against bans on abortion, Huckabee said past presidents have defied Supreme Court rulings. http://tinyurl.com/qhe233w - - - Most of the mooks who want the GOP 2016 presidential nomination believe in the same sort of anti-abortion bull**** as Hucksterbee, but probably won't say what he said...publicly. Fundamentalist christianity and the GOP...a match made in hell. There you go again. Big broad brush. I'd say it's a reason not to support or vote for Huckabee but what makes you think *all* Republicans would agree with him? In fact, you said "most" with regard to being anti-abortion which means not all. Sometimes I think it would be easier to be a card carrying liberal Democrat like you. No thinking required ... just support the standard DNC party line. Doesn't really matter who gets the nomination. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/31/15 6:21 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 7/31/2015 4:07 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: ...not to vote for Republicans: Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee indicated Thursday that if elected, he wouldn’t rule out employing federal troops or the Federal Bureau of Investigation to stop abortion from taking place in the United States. Though the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against bans on abortion, Huckabee said past presidents have defied Supreme Court rulings. http://tinyurl.com/qhe233w - - - Most of the mooks who want the GOP 2016 presidential nomination believe in the same sort of anti-abortion bull**** as Hucksterbee, but probably won't say what he said...publicly. Fundamentalist christianity and the GOP...a match made in hell. There you go again. Big broad brush. I'd say it's a reason not to support or vote for Huckabee but what makes you think *all* Republicans would agree with him? In fact, you said "most" with regard to being anti-abortion which means not all. Sometimes I think it would be easier to be a card carrying liberal Democrat like you. No thinking required ... just support the standard DNC party line. Doesn't really matter who gets the nomination. As far as I can determine, *every single one* of the GOP 2016 POTUS wannabes is anti-abortion and if elected would do everything within his power to further restrict abortion rights. That includes Trump, who used to be "pro-choice," but flip-flopped when he decided to make a run for the nomination. Whether *all* Republicans are anti-choice is not relevant...what is relevant is that all the 2016 POTUS wannabes are, and so are virtually all the GOP members of Congress. Therefore, I could not vote for any of the GOP 2016 POTUS wannabes. I have additional reasons, but that one is sufficient. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Yet another reason to NOT... | General | |||
Yet another reason... | General | |||
Yet another reason... | General | |||
Yet another reason to never... | General | |||
Another reason | ASA |