On 7/23/15 3:33 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 15:17:26 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 7/23/15 3:13 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 12:12:45 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 7/23/15 12:09 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 11:46:55 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:



As to blaming the bankers for the tanking, try being a bit honest. It won't hurt.

http://www.businessweek.com/the_thre...ons_drive.html

There, that clears that up.



Oh, snerk.

Now you are snerking Mike Bloomberg? He is to the left of you.


Oh, Mikey is writing under a nom de plume now, eh?

The last time I looked "Bloomberg Business" was one of Mikey's rags.



And you think Bloomberg looks at every article every day planned for his
site before it appears, eh?

I think that if you are not writing the type of article Mike likes,
you won't be working there long.

Do you have the same opinion of Fox and Murdoch?


I doubt Murdoch watches a lot of Fox News. He's not, after all, the sort
of idiot the network attracts to its "news" programming.

Back in the day when I worked for a big circulation daily newspaper, the
stuff on the editorial pages -opinions and op ed pieces and features-
ran the gamut. There was no effort made to kiss the ass of either the
editorial page editors or the managing editors or the publisher. My
guess is that Bloomberg himself pays little attention to the content of
his publication(s).

Now, my hometown paper, the New Haven Register, was "responsible
Republican" in those days, and it rarely endorsed other than Republican
candidates for political office, but it had little difficulty getting
behind editorials that were "progressive" in nature. Of course, back in
those days, Republicans were *responsible* and not the sort of insane
trash that party puts forth for national office these days.