On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 09:14:44 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/11/15 8:42 AM, Tim wrote:
On Saturday, July 11, 2015 at 4:49:02 AM UTC-7, Justan Olphat wrote:
On 7/11/2015 7:35 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:

At least President Bill "dated" outside his immediate family.

We're talking Hillery and Chelsea here. Can you blame him?


--

Respectfully submitted by Justan

Laugh of the day from Krause

"I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here.
I've been "born again" as a nice guy."

LOL!


No doubt FlaJim prefers dumb women.

Like Hillary and Chelsea? Geeez, Krause.
--

Guns don't cause problems.
Gun owner behavior causes problems.

On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 09:16:17 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/11/15 8:59 AM, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 07:35:05 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/11/15 1:18 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 18:27:44 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 7/10/15 3:00 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 11:26:28 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 7/10/15 11:04 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 07:22:37 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

...delicious...


Racist Donald Trump Jumps Out To Wide Lead As Republican 2016 Frontrunner

16% is not really a lead, it just says 16% agree with him. Some of
them are undoubtedly democrats, probably loyal union members who hate
Mexicans too.

He is as electable as Bernie Sanders and I am sure Sanders is getting
much higher numbers



Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle. You're good at it. The fact remains that in the
poll in question, Trump the Racist is leading, which makes sense,
considering the sort of trash that comprises the GOP base these days.

Bernie Sanders is not a pig. Trump is a pig.


Trump is a well known pig, with plenty of TVQ
When you put as many names in a poll as they have now, name
recognition may mean as much as any position they take and you have to
admit, Trump has plenty of that.
I bet Caitlin Jenner would beat Martin O'Malley in a poll right now
among democrats.


Certainly name recognition is a factor, but there are a number of GOPers
seeking the nomination who have that, and several have been after the
nomination for some time. I think Trump really, truly appeals to a large
percentage of the Republican base who are racists, hater of ethnic
minorities, and admirers of loudmouth politicians who appeal to their
basest instincts. And of course, Trump is really rich, and that also
appeals to Republicans.

I wish Trump well in his quest. I hope he is the GOP nominee...he stands
for the party's worst beliefs and instincts.

I think you are underestimating the number of democrats who respond to
that anti-immigration message


Which has nothing to do with my point that Trump stands for the worst in
beliefs. If he is the nominee, and I agree that is a long shot, he will
lose. And, of course, he can't control his mouth. A few years ago, he
"jokingly" said the following:


NEW YORK — Donald Trump joked that he would date his 24-year-old
daughter, Ivanka — if he weren’t her father.

Trump and Ivanka, a vice president of real estate development at the
Trump Organization, appeared Monday on ABC’s “The View” to promote her
five-episode stint as a boardroom adviser on “The Apprentice.”

When asked how he would react if Ivanka, a former teen model, posed for
Playboy, Trump replied, “It would be really disappointing — not really —
but it would depend on what’s inside the magazine.”

He added: “I don’t think Ivanka would do that, although she does have a
very nice figure. I’ve said if Ivanka weren’t my daughter, perhaps I’d
be dating her.”

- - -

At least President Bill "dated" outside his immediate family.

Did Trump 'date' his daughter, or is this simply more liberal horse**** throwing?

Not that you would ever do such a thing, Krause.



No, Johnny the Racist, I wouldn't date a blood relative *or* Donald Trump.

Nor did Trump.
--

Guns don't cause problems.
Gun owner behavior causes problems.

On 7/11/2015 7:27 AM, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 01:32:37 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 18:41:15 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


Disclaimer: In no way is the following comment an endorsement or
statement of support for Donald Trump. That said:

What did he say that is "racist" in nature? He erroneously claimed that
the Mexican government exports criminals, rapists and drug dealers to
the USA. He didn't say anything derogatory about Mexicans in general.

He's wrong of course, but I don't see he statement as "racist".
He's against illegals, but so is the majority of the US population.



Harry thinks everyone is a racist.
It is just short hand for "I disagree with them".
I totally disagree with the assertion but I think Trump is just trying
to appeal to the hard hat gang and that crosses racial lines.
I think the anti-immigrant demographic is the "working class" who feel
their job may be in danger.
The ironic thing is, down here, the Latinos are actually doing jobs
Americans will not do. When it is 95 in the shade, you need someone
who is used to working in the heat. Those northern white boys are not
going to be able to deal with it.
A guy who was raised in central Mexico never knew anything else.

The Mexicans I've hired and seen working seem to have a tremendous work ethic. I've
no problem with legal Mexican immigrants. Just their legality shows they're willing
to put forth a lot of effort to get something accomplished.

The illegals? Well, they've already broken the law once.

The liberals would much rather leave the distinction out of their comments. Trump
referred to *illegals*, but the liberal media continues to apply his comments to
*all* Mexicans. This whole episode is showing how the liberal media can inflame a
situation as it desires.



I agree with you. The dishonesty is just written off as being "politics".

On 7/11/15 12:22 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 7/11/2015 7:27 AM, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 01:32:37 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 18:41:15 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


Disclaimer: In no way is the following comment an endorsement or
statement of support for Donald Trump. That said:

What did he say that is "racist" in nature? He erroneously claimed
that
the Mexican government exports criminals, rapists and drug dealers to
the USA. He didn't say anything derogatory about Mexicans in general.

He's wrong of course, but I don't see he statement as "racist".
He's against illegals, but so is the majority of the US population.



Harry thinks everyone is a racist.
It is just short hand for "I disagree with them".
I totally disagree with the assertion but I think Trump is just trying
to appeal to the hard hat gang and that crosses racial lines.
I think the anti-immigrant demographic is the "working class" who feel
their job may be in danger.
The ironic thing is, down here, the Latinos are actually doing jobs
Americans will not do. When it is 95 in the shade, you need someone
who is used to working in the heat. Those northern white boys are not
going to be able to deal with it.
A guy who was raised in central Mexico never knew anything else.

The Mexicans I've hired and seen working seem to have a tremendous
work ethic. I've
no problem with legal Mexican immigrants. Just their legality shows
they're willing
to put forth a lot of effort to get something accomplished.

The illegals? Well, they've already broken the law once.

The liberals would much rather leave the distinction out of their
comments. Trump
referred to *illegals*, but the liberal media continues to apply his
comments to
*all* Mexicans. This whole episode is showing how the liberal media
can inflame a
situation as it desires.



I agree with you. The dishonesty is just written off as being "politics".





You guys think that Trump is only referring to illegals? Get up to speed
on GOP "coding."

On 7/11/2015 12:24 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/11/15 12:22 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 7/11/2015 7:27 AM, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 01:32:37 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 18:41:15 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


Disclaimer: In no way is the following comment an endorsement or
statement of support for Donald Trump. That said:

What did he say that is "racist" in nature? He erroneously claimed
that
the Mexican government exports criminals, rapists and drug dealers to
the USA. He didn't say anything derogatory about Mexicans in general.

He's wrong of course, but I don't see he statement as "racist".
He's against illegals, but so is the majority of the US population.



Harry thinks everyone is a racist.
It is just short hand for "I disagree with them".
I totally disagree with the assertion but I think Trump is just trying
to appeal to the hard hat gang and that crosses racial lines.
I think the anti-immigrant demographic is the "working class" who feel
their job may be in danger.
The ironic thing is, down here, the Latinos are actually doing jobs
Americans will not do. When it is 95 in the shade, you need someone
who is used to working in the heat. Those northern white boys are not
going to be able to deal with it.
A guy who was raised in central Mexico never knew anything else.

The Mexicans I've hired and seen working seem to have a tremendous
work ethic. I've
no problem with legal Mexican immigrants. Just their legality shows
they're willing
to put forth a lot of effort to get something accomplished.

The illegals? Well, they've already broken the law once.

The liberals would much rather leave the distinction out of their
comments. Trump
referred to *illegals*, but the liberal media continues to apply his
comments to
*all* Mexicans. This whole episode is showing how the liberal media
can inflame a
situation as it desires.



I agree with you. The dishonesty is just written off as being
"politics".






You guys think that Trump is only referring to illegals? Get up to speed
on GOP "coding."


Is there an official decoder that you use approved and sanctioned by the
DNC?

Words matter, as you like to remind everyone. They are especially
important in politics because they are usually recorded and available
for public playback at any time. It's what croaked Romney.

On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 12:24:25 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/11/15 12:22 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 7/11/2015 7:27 AM, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 01:32:37 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 18:41:15 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


Disclaimer: In no way is the following comment an endorsement or
statement of support for Donald Trump. That said:

What did he say that is "racist" in nature? He erroneously claimed
that
the Mexican government exports criminals, rapists and drug dealers to
the USA. He didn't say anything derogatory about Mexicans in general.

He's wrong of course, but I don't see he statement as "racist".
He's against illegals, but so is the majority of the US population.



Harry thinks everyone is a racist.
It is just short hand for "I disagree with them".
I totally disagree with the assertion but I think Trump is just trying
to appeal to the hard hat gang and that crosses racial lines.
I think the anti-immigrant demographic is the "working class" who feel
their job may be in danger.
The ironic thing is, down here, the Latinos are actually doing jobs
Americans will not do. When it is 95 in the shade, you need someone
who is used to working in the heat. Those northern white boys are not
going to be able to deal with it.
A guy who was raised in central Mexico never knew anything else.

The Mexicans I've hired and seen working seem to have a tremendous
work ethic. I've
no problem with legal Mexican immigrants. Just their legality shows
they're willing
to put forth a lot of effort to get something accomplished.

The illegals? Well, they've already broken the law once.

The liberals would much rather leave the distinction out of their
comments. Trump
referred to *illegals*, but the liberal media continues to apply his
comments to
*all* Mexicans. This whole episode is showing how the liberal media
can inflame a
situation as it desires.



I agree with you. The dishonesty is just written off as being "politics".





You guys think that Trump is only referring to illegals? Get up to speed
on GOP "coding."

Trump used the term 'illegal immigrants'. Is that some special coding? Perhaps it
means, 'Harry Krause is full of ****'?
--

Guns don't cause problems.
Gun owner behavior causes problems.

On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 12:41:30 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 12:24:25 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 7/11/15 12:22 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 7/11/2015 7:27 AM, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 01:32:37 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 18:41:15 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


Disclaimer: In no way is the following comment an endorsement or
statement of support for Donald Trump. That said:

What did he say that is "racist" in nature? He erroneously claimed
that
the Mexican government exports criminals, rapists and drug dealers to
the USA. He didn't say anything derogatory about Mexicans in general.

He's wrong of course, but I don't see he statement as "racist".
He's against illegals, but so is the majority of the US population.



Harry thinks everyone is a racist.
It is just short hand for "I disagree with them".
I totally disagree with the assertion but I think Trump is just trying
to appeal to the hard hat gang and that crosses racial lines.
I think the anti-immigrant demographic is the "working class" who feel
their job may be in danger.
The ironic thing is, down here, the Latinos are actually doing jobs
Americans will not do. When it is 95 in the shade, you need someone
who is used to working in the heat. Those northern white boys are not
going to be able to deal with it.
A guy who was raised in central Mexico never knew anything else.

The Mexicans I've hired and seen working seem to have a tremendous
work ethic. I've
no problem with legal Mexican immigrants. Just their legality shows
they're willing
to put forth a lot of effort to get something accomplished.

The illegals? Well, they've already broken the law once.

The liberals would much rather leave the distinction out of their
comments. Trump
referred to *illegals*, but the liberal media continues to apply his
comments to
*all* Mexicans. This whole episode is showing how the liberal media
can inflame a
situation as it desires.



I agree with you. The dishonesty is just written off as being "politics".





You guys think that Trump is only referring to illegals? Get up to speed
on GOP "coding."

I am sure Trump loves the cheap labor he gets from "legals".
I bet the housekeeping and kitchen staff at any of his hotels is
80-90% Latino.
I have no doubt that he demands I-9s, whether they are valid or not.
That is simply a good business decision.

He has admitted repeatedly that there are many Mexicans in his employee. He's also
not denied there may be an illegal or two hiding in the group.
--

Guns don't cause problems.
Gun owner behavior causes problems.

On 7/11/15 12:33 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 7/11/2015 12:24 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/11/15 12:22 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 7/11/2015 7:27 AM, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 01:32:37 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 18:41:15 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


Disclaimer: In no way is the following comment an endorsement or
statement of support for Donald Trump. That said:

What did he say that is "racist" in nature? He erroneously claimed
that
the Mexican government exports criminals, rapists and drug dealers to
the USA. He didn't say anything derogatory about Mexicans in
general.

He's wrong of course, but I don't see he statement as "racist".
He's against illegals, but so is the majority of the US population.



Harry thinks everyone is a racist.
It is just short hand for "I disagree with them".
I totally disagree with the assertion but I think Trump is just trying
to appeal to the hard hat gang and that crosses racial lines.
I think the anti-immigrant demographic is the "working class" who feel
their job may be in danger.
The ironic thing is, down here, the Latinos are actually doing jobs
Americans will not do. When it is 95 in the shade, you need someone
who is used to working in the heat. Those northern white boys are not
going to be able to deal with it.
A guy who was raised in central Mexico never knew anything else.

The Mexicans I've hired and seen working seem to have a tremendous
work ethic. I've
no problem with legal Mexican immigrants. Just their legality shows
they're willing
to put forth a lot of effort to get something accomplished.

The illegals? Well, they've already broken the law once.

The liberals would much rather leave the distinction out of their
comments. Trump
referred to *illegals*, but the liberal media continues to apply his
comments to
*all* Mexicans. This whole episode is showing how the liberal media
can inflame a
situation as it desires.



I agree with you. The dishonesty is just written off as being
"politics".






You guys think that Trump is only referring to illegals? Get up to speed
on GOP "coding."


Is there an official decoder that you use approved and sanctioned by the
DNC?

Words matter, as you like to remind everyone. They are especially
important in politics because they are usually recorded and available
for public playback at any time. It's what croaked Romney.





There are lists of words Republican candidates use that have racial,
ethnic, and gender connotations well-known to the GOP "base" voter but
which sound innocuous enough. Sometimes they are called "dog whistle"
words or phrases. Examples: "Where's the original birth certificate?"
"Death panels" "Urban"

On Saturday, July 11, 2015 at 10:33:23 AM UTC-7, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/11/15 12:33 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 7/11/2015 12:24 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/11/15 12:22 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 7/11/2015 7:27 AM, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 01:32:37 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 18:41:15 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


Disclaimer: In no way is the following comment an endorsement or
statement of support for Donald Trump. That said:

What did he say that is "racist" in nature? He erroneously claimed
that
the Mexican government exports criminals, rapists and drug dealers to
the USA. He didn't say anything derogatory about Mexicans in
general.

He's wrong of course, but I don't see he statement as "racist".
He's against illegals, but so is the majority of the US population..



Harry thinks everyone is a racist.
It is just short hand for "I disagree with them".
I totally disagree with the assertion but I think Trump is just trying
to appeal to the hard hat gang and that crosses racial lines.
I think the anti-immigrant demographic is the "working class" who feel
their job may be in danger.
The ironic thing is, down here, the Latinos are actually doing jobs
Americans will not do. When it is 95 in the shade, you need someone
who is used to working in the heat. Those northern white boys are not
going to be able to deal with it.
A guy who was raised in central Mexico never knew anything else.

The Mexicans I've hired and seen working seem to have a tremendous
work ethic. I've
no problem with legal Mexican immigrants. Just their legality shows
they're willing
to put forth a lot of effort to get something accomplished.

The illegals? Well, they've already broken the law once.

The liberals would much rather leave the distinction out of their
comments. Trump
referred to *illegals*, but the liberal media continues to apply his
comments to
*all* Mexicans. This whole episode is showing how the liberal media
can inflame a
situation as it desires.



I agree with you. The dishonesty is just written off as being
"politics".






You guys think that Trump is only referring to illegals? Get up to speed
on GOP "coding."


Is there an official decoder that you use approved and sanctioned by the
DNC?

Words matter, as you like to remind everyone. They are especially
important in politics because they are usually recorded and available
for public playback at any time. It's what croaked Romney.





There are lists of words Republican candidates use that have racial,
ethnic, and gender connotations well-known to the GOP "base" voter but
which sound innocuous enough. Sometimes they are called "dog whistle"
words or phrases. Examples: "Where's the original birth certificate?"
"Death panels" "Urban"

Ad what does your statement have to do with Trump? You're shifting off topic, Harry. That statement of yours *looks* like a 'save face' comment.

On 7/11/15 2:17 PM, Tim wrote:
On Saturday, July 11, 2015 at 10:33:23 AM UTC-7, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/11/15 12:33 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 7/11/2015 12:24 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/11/15 12:22 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 7/11/2015 7:27 AM, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 01:32:37 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 18:41:15 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


Disclaimer: In no way is the following comment an endorsement or
statement of support for Donald Trump. That said:

What did he say that is "racist" in nature? He erroneously claimed
that
the Mexican government exports criminals, rapists and drug dealers to
the USA. He didn't say anything derogatory about Mexicans in
general.

He's wrong of course, but I don't see he statement as "racist".
He's against illegals, but so is the majority of the US population.



Harry thinks everyone is a racist.
It is just short hand for "I disagree with them".
I totally disagree with the assertion but I think Trump is just trying
to appeal to the hard hat gang and that crosses racial lines.
I think the anti-immigrant demographic is the "working class" who feel
their job may be in danger.
The ironic thing is, down here, the Latinos are actually doing jobs
Americans will not do. When it is 95 in the shade, you need someone
who is used to working in the heat. Those northern white boys are not
going to be able to deal with it.
A guy who was raised in central Mexico never knew anything else.

The Mexicans I've hired and seen working seem to have a tremendous
work ethic. I've
no problem with legal Mexican immigrants. Just their legality shows
they're willing
to put forth a lot of effort to get something accomplished.

The illegals? Well, they've already broken the law once.

The liberals would much rather leave the distinction out of their
comments. Trump
referred to *illegals*, but the liberal media continues to apply his
comments to
*all* Mexicans. This whole episode is showing how the liberal media
can inflame a
situation as it desires.



I agree with you. The dishonesty is just written off as being
"politics".






You guys think that Trump is only referring to illegals? Get up to speed
on GOP "coding."


Is there an official decoder that you use approved and sanctioned by the
DNC?

Words matter, as you like to remind everyone. They are especially
important in politics because they are usually recorded and available
for public playback at any time. It's what croaked Romney.





There are lists of words Republican candidates use that have racial,
ethnic, and gender connotations well-known to the GOP "base" voter but
which sound innocuous enough. Sometimes they are called "dog whistle"
words or phrases. Examples: "Where's the original birth certificate?"
"Death panels" "Urban"

Ad what does your statement have to do with Trump? You're shifting off topic, Harry. That statement of yours *looks* like a 'save face' comment.



It warms my heart to see Trump get so much support here from the usual
right-wing suspects.

Trump, by the way, is a big fan of his fellow bigots, Tony Perkins and
Ralph Reed:

In 2011 Trump declared, "I recently spoke to Ralph Reed and Tony Perkins
and I was really impressed, they have great reputations and I have been
hearing about them for years." He added that they were "smart people."

http://tinyurl.com/psd4ugd