![]() |
Flood waters coming...
On 14 Jun 2015 19:00:59 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:
By the time the oil from that exploded rig finished leaking into the Gulf, it will be so dispersed you'll never even notice it. By the time the oil that leaks from that new midwest pipeline finishes seeping into the aquifer there, making the water undrinkable, you'll never notice it. Repeal the EPA. Why is everything you write an off topic brain fart Perfectly on target if you can think abstractly. === People on LSD think abstractly also. No one is collecting their work and neither is anyone likely to collect yours. |
Flood waters coming...
On 6/14/2015 3:17 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On 14 Jun 2015 19:00:59 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote: By the time the oil from that exploded rig finished leaking into the Gulf, it will be so dispersed you'll never even notice it. By the time the oil that leaks from that new midwest pipeline finishes seeping into the aquifer there, making the water undrinkable, you'll never notice it. Repeal the EPA. Why is everything you write an off topic brain fart Perfectly on target if you can think abstractly. === People on LSD think abstractly also. No one is collecting their work and neither is anyone likely to collect yours. Borrowed from some bonehead's definition of abstract thinking "6. When compared to concrete thinking, abstract thinking is about understanding the multiple meanings. 7. While abstract thinking is based on ideas, concrete thinking is based on what the person sees as well as the facts." An abstract thinker might be able to come up with multiple meanings, but hasn't a clue as to which is applicable. An abstract thinker has no use for facts. I hope this helps you to understand why Harry won't stay on topic. -- Respectfully submitted by Justan Laugh of the day from Krause "I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here. I've been "born again" as a nice guy." |
Flood waters coming...
On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 16:05:24 -0400, Justan Olphart
wrote: On 6/14/2015 3:17 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On 14 Jun 2015 19:00:59 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote: By the time the oil from that exploded rig finished leaking into the Gulf, it will be so dispersed you'll never even notice it. By the time the oil that leaks from that new midwest pipeline finishes seeping into the aquifer there, making the water undrinkable, you'll never notice it. Repeal the EPA. Why is everything you write an off topic brain fart Perfectly on target if you can think abstractly. === People on LSD think abstractly also. No one is collecting their work and neither is anyone likely to collect yours. Borrowed from some bonehead's definition of abstract thinking "6. When compared to concrete thinking, abstract thinking is about understanding the multiple meanings. 7. While abstract thinking is based on ideas, concrete thinking is based on what the person sees as well as the facts." An abstract thinker might be able to come up with multiple meanings, but hasn't a clue as to which is applicable. An abstract thinker has no use for facts. I hope this helps you to understand why Harry won't stay on topic. === Interesting observation. I always believed it was because he thought like a woman. |
Flood waters coming...
On 6/14/2015 4:44 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 16:05:24 -0400, Justan Olphart wrote: On 6/14/2015 3:17 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On 14 Jun 2015 19:00:59 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote: By the time the oil from that exploded rig finished leaking into the Gulf, it will be so dispersed you'll never even notice it. By the time the oil that leaks from that new midwest pipeline finishes seeping into the aquifer there, making the water undrinkable, you'll never notice it. Repeal the EPA. Why is everything you write an off topic brain fart Perfectly on target if you can think abstractly. === People on LSD think abstractly also. No one is collecting their work and neither is anyone likely to collect yours. Borrowed from some bonehead's definition of abstract thinking "6. When compared to concrete thinking, abstract thinking is about understanding the multiple meanings. 7. While abstract thinking is based on ideas, concrete thinking is based on what the person sees as well as the facts." An abstract thinker might be able to come up with multiple meanings, but hasn't a clue as to which is applicable. An abstract thinker has no use for facts. I hope this helps you to understand why Harry won't stay on topic. === Interesting observation. I always believed it was because he thought like a woman. Not like any woman I'd want to know. -- Respectfully submitted by Justan Laugh of the day from Krause "I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here. I've been "born again" as a nice guy." |
Flood waters coming...
On Sunday, June 14, 2015 at 4:44:53 PM UTC-4, Wayne. B wrote:
On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 16:05:24 -0400, Justan Olphart wrote: On 6/14/2015 3:17 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On 14 Jun 2015 19:00:59 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote: By the time the oil from that exploded rig finished leaking into the Gulf, it will be so dispersed you'll never even notice it. By the time the oil that leaks from that new midwest pipeline finishes seeping into the aquifer there, making the water undrinkable, you'll never notice it. Repeal the EPA. Why is everything you write an off topic brain fart Perfectly on target if you can think abstractly. === People on LSD think abstractly also. No one is collecting their work and neither is anyone likely to collect yours. Borrowed from some bonehead's definition of abstract thinking "6. When compared to concrete thinking, abstract thinking is about understanding the multiple meanings. 7. While abstract thinking is based on ideas, concrete thinking is based on what the person sees as well as the facts." An abstract thinker might be able to come up with multiple meanings, but hasn't a clue as to which is applicable. An abstract thinker has no use for facts. I hope this helps you to understand why Harry won't stay on topic. === Interesting observation. I always believed it was because he thought like a woman. Now you owe me a new keyboard. Seriously. |
Flood waters coming...
On 6/14/15 2:24 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 10:56:17 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/14/15 10:40 AM, wrote: On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 08:08:48 -0400, Justan Olphart wrote: On 6/13/2015 8:52 PM, wrote: On Sat, 13 Jun 2015 17:24:46 -0400, Justan Olphart wrote: http://stopnestlewaters.org/tag/florida I would be upset about half a million gallons of water if I didn't have 50,000 "neighbors" putting an inch of water a day on their lawn. No water restrictions in your neighborhood? Maybe that's why you don't care about your gov't awarding licenses to suck our aquifers dry, for profit. What a deal. The water we use finds it's way back to the aquifer, enriched by chemicals laid down by farmers, golf course owners, and lawn worshipers. The water restrictions are toothless. I have no problem with charging water companies for the water they sell but I am not going to let that "anti bottled water" hysteria over inflate their impact on the aquifer. The people who drink that water would be drinking something. By the time your average tap water drinker lets the water run until it is cold and then washes the glass, they use about 10 times as much water as actually gets in their mouth. By the time the oil from that exploded rig finished leaking into the Gulf, it will be so dispersed you'll never even notice it. By the time the oil that leaks from that new midwest pipeline finishes seeping into the aquifer there, making the water undrinkable, you'll never notice it. Repeal the EPA. Why is everything you write an off topic brain fart Let's try this again. We, all of us, corporations, municipalities, golf courses, individuals, are destroying the environment. We're misusing a commodity - potable water - that is in short supply in many places in the world. We're creating other environmental disasters, such as fracking and the disputed oil pipeline, that will further negatively impact the supplies of potable water. It's all connected, in the end. You know, one of those "abstractions." |
Flood waters coming...
Well, instead of getting the boat out the day got really wet. I figured launch time would be about 2-2:30 but the weather forecast for Carlyle I'll. showed heave rains and 30 mile wind gusts which if the wind holds long itakes that shallow lake pretty angry. Sure enough, about 2:30 the storms hit.
If we'd gone we'd probably be stuck out in the middle scrambling for shore, or we would have made a 60 mile one way trip wasted. So..., Eh, another time. |
Flood waters coming...
On 6/15/2015 6:45 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/14/15 2:24 PM, wrote: On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 10:56:17 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/14/15 10:40 AM, wrote: On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 08:08:48 -0400, Justan Olphart wrote: On 6/13/2015 8:52 PM, wrote: On Sat, 13 Jun 2015 17:24:46 -0400, Justan Olphart wrote: http://stopnestlewaters.org/tag/florida I would be upset about half a million gallons of water if I didn't have 50,000 "neighbors" putting an inch of water a day on their lawn. No water restrictions in your neighborhood? Maybe that's why you don't care about your gov't awarding licenses to suck our aquifers dry, for profit. What a deal. The water we use finds it's way back to the aquifer, enriched by chemicals laid down by farmers, golf course owners, and lawn worshipers. The water restrictions are toothless. I have no problem with charging water companies for the water they sell but I am not going to let that "anti bottled water" hysteria over inflate their impact on the aquifer. The people who drink that water would be drinking something. By the time your average tap water drinker lets the water run until it is cold and then washes the glass, they use about 10 times as much water as actually gets in their mouth. By the time the oil from that exploded rig finished leaking into the Gulf, it will be so dispersed you'll never even notice it. By the time the oil that leaks from that new midwest pipeline finishes seeping into the aquifer there, making the water undrinkable, you'll never notice it. Repeal the EPA. Why is everything you write an off topic brain fart Let's try this again. We, all of us, corporations, municipalities, golf courses, individuals, are destroying the environment. We're misusing a commodity - potable water - that is in short supply in many places in the world. We're creating other environmental disasters, such as fracking and the disputed oil pipeline, that will further negatively impact the supplies of potable water. It's all connected, in the end. You know, one of those "abstractions." Where.s the gubmint when you need it. Too busy micromanaging our lives to see the forest through the trees. Perhaps in 2016 gubmint will transition into something that will serve all the people and not just certain minority groups. I hope that was abstract enough for you and not too too factual and concrete. -- Respectfully submitted by Justan Laugh of the day from Krause "I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here. I've been "born again" as a nice guy." |
Flood waters coming...
On 6/15/15 6:45 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/14/15 2:24 PM, wrote: On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 10:56:17 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/14/15 10:40 AM, wrote: On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 08:08:48 -0400, Justan Olphart wrote: On 6/13/2015 8:52 PM, wrote: On Sat, 13 Jun 2015 17:24:46 -0400, Justan Olphart wrote: http://stopnestlewaters.org/tag/florida I would be upset about half a million gallons of water if I didn't have 50,000 "neighbors" putting an inch of water a day on their lawn. No water restrictions in your neighborhood? Maybe that's why you don't care about your gov't awarding licenses to suck our aquifers dry, for profit. What a deal. The water we use finds it's way back to the aquifer, enriched by chemicals laid down by farmers, golf course owners, and lawn worshipers. The water restrictions are toothless. I have no problem with charging water companies for the water they sell but I am not going to let that "anti bottled water" hysteria over inflate their impact on the aquifer. The people who drink that water would be drinking something. By the time your average tap water drinker lets the water run until it is cold and then washes the glass, they use about 10 times as much water as actually gets in their mouth. By the time the oil from that exploded rig finished leaking into the Gulf, it will be so dispersed you'll never even notice it. By the time the oil that leaks from that new midwest pipeline finishes seeping into the aquifer there, making the water undrinkable, you'll never notice it. Repeal the EPA. Why is everything you write an off topic brain fart Let's try this again. We, all of us, corporations, municipalities, golf courses, individuals, are destroying the environment. We're misusing a commodity - potable water - that is in short supply in many places in the world. We're creating other environmental disasters, such as fracking and the disputed oil pipeline, that will further negatively impact the supplies of potable water. It's all connected, in the end. You know, one of those "abstractions." Oh, and how much is Florida governor Rick Scott being paid each year to ignore Georgia-Pacific's illegal daily dumping of toxic waste into Florida's St. Johns River? As luck would have it, Georgia-Pacific is owned by the Koch brothers. What a surprise! |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:23 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com