Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #23   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2014
Posts: 5,832
Default Yet another reason to never...

On 2/28/15 8:02 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 17:06:33 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/28/15 4:47 PM,
wrote:
On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 13:23:18 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/28/15 12:44 PM,
wrote:

Maryland is infringing on my 2nd Amendment rights? How?

Limiting what you can buy and the hoops you have to jump through to
buy what you can.

How is some legislator in Idaho making a symbolic gesture that
reflects the beliefs of his residents, "congress" making a law?

I look at things like this to be about as significant as making the
bald eagle the american bird. They don't make you buy one and keep it
as a pet.



Maryland's firearm regulations have never limited what firearms *I*
wanted to buy.

That is just you and I bet your wife calls that rationalization. AKA
sour grapes. You managed to fine the one AR platform that slipped
through a loophole in the law and then rationalized that it was what
you wanted all the time. Will you turn it in when someone points out
the error and they close that loophole?
BTW I stumbled into federal legislation that tries to do that the
other day when I was researching the DHS funding vote.


Actually, I asked around and was advised that an HBAR AR would do the
trick and there were side bennies to the HBAR, including greater
accuracy than the pencil or grenade launcher AR barrels. I think the
sour grapes are on your end. But what's it to you...you haven't bought a
firearm in this century.


I haven't felt the need. I have all the guns I want. I have a far more
wide ranging selection than you since I don't have to sell one to
afford a new one.
BTW I didn't say I didn't buy any recently, just not a new one.


I don't have to sell one to buy a new one, either. I have no need for
two .357 MAG pistols, and I wanted to play with a S&W for a while, so I
sold the Ruger for a little less than I paid for it.

--
Proud to be a Liberal.
  #25   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2015
Posts: 824
Default Yet another reason to never...

On 2/28/2015 9:00 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/28/15 8:02 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 17:06:33 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/28/15 4:47 PM,
wrote:
On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 13:23:18 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/28/15 12:44 PM,
wrote:

Maryland is infringing on my 2nd Amendment rights? How?

Limiting what you can buy and the hoops you have to jump through to
buy what you can.

How is some legislator in Idaho making a symbolic gesture that
reflects the beliefs of his residents, "congress" making a law?

I look at things like this to be about as significant as making the
bald eagle the american bird. They don't make you buy one and
keep it
as a pet.



Maryland's firearm regulations have never limited what firearms *I*
wanted to buy.

That is just you and I bet your wife calls that rationalization. AKA
sour grapes. You managed to fine the one AR platform that slipped
through a loophole in the law and then rationalized that it was what
you wanted all the time. Will you turn it in when someone points out
the error and they close that loophole?
BTW I stumbled into federal legislation that tries to do that the
other day when I was researching the DHS funding vote.


Actually, I asked around and was advised that an HBAR AR would do the
trick and there were side bennies to the HBAR, including greater
accuracy than the pencil or grenade launcher AR barrels. I think the
sour grapes are on your end. But what's it to you...you haven't bought a
firearm in this century.


I haven't felt the need. I have all the guns I want. I have a far more
wide ranging selection than you since I don't have to sell one to
afford a new one.
BTW I didn't say I didn't buy any recently, just not a new one.


I don't have to sell one to buy a new one, either. I have no need for
two .357 MAG pistols, and I wanted to play with a S&W for a while, so I
sold the Ruger for a little less than I paid for it.

What's your "need" for one 357 mag pistol?

--

Respectfully submitted by Justan

Laugh of the day from Krause

"I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here.
I've been "born again" as a nice guy."




  #26   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 10,492
Default Yet another reason to never...

On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 22:39:10 -0500, Justan Olphart
wrote:

I don't have to sell one to buy a new one, either. I have no need for
two .357 MAG pistols, and I wanted to play with a S&W for a while, so I
sold the Ruger for a little less than I paid for it.

What's your "need" for one 357 mag pistol?


===

His enemies list is longer than Richard Nixon's. :-)

I honestly believe that Harry is in a state of physical and mental
decline.
  #27   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2014
Posts: 5,832
Default Yet another reason to never...

On 2/28/15 11:26 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 21:00:24 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/28/15 8:02 PM,
wrote:
On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 17:06:33 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/28/15 4:47 PM,
wrote:
On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 13:23:18 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/28/15 12:44 PM,
wrote:

Maryland is infringing on my 2nd Amendment rights? How?

Limiting what you can buy and the hoops you have to jump through to
buy what you can.

How is some legislator in Idaho making a symbolic gesture that
reflects the beliefs of his residents, "congress" making a law?

I look at things like this to be about as significant as making the
bald eagle the american bird. They don't make you buy one and keep it
as a pet.



Maryland's firearm regulations have never limited what firearms *I*
wanted to buy.

That is just you and I bet your wife calls that rationalization. AKA
sour grapes. You managed to fine the one AR platform that slipped
through a loophole in the law and then rationalized that it was what
you wanted all the time. Will you turn it in when someone points out
the error and they close that loophole?
BTW I stumbled into federal legislation that tries to do that the
other day when I was researching the DHS funding vote.


Actually, I asked around and was advised that an HBAR AR would do the
trick and there were side bennies to the HBAR, including greater
accuracy than the pencil or grenade launcher AR barrels. I think the
sour grapes are on your end. But what's it to you...you haven't bought a
firearm in this century.

I haven't felt the need. I have all the guns I want. I have a far more
wide ranging selection than you since I don't have to sell one to
afford a new one.
BTW I didn't say I didn't buy any recently, just not a new one.


I don't have to sell one to buy a new one, either. I have no need for
two .357 MAG pistols, and I wanted to play with a S&W for a while, so I
sold the Ruger for a little less than I paid for it.


I have two .38s and a 357. So what? Granted one of the .38s is a true
antique that I don't shoot.



So far, I haven't noticed any qualitative differences between the Ruger
GP 100 and the S&W 686. They're both nicely finished, smoothly operating
revolvers. I haven't shot the Smith yet, but I have dry fired it a few
times. The D/A trigger pull seems heavier than on the Ruger.

--
Proud to be a Liberal.
  #29   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,663
Default Yet another reason to never...

On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 22:51:13 -0500, Wayne.B wrote:

On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 22:39:10 -0500, Justan Olphart
wrote:

I don't have to sell one to buy a new one, either. I have no need for
two .357 MAG pistols, and I wanted to play with a S&W for a while, so I
sold the Ruger for a little less than I paid for it.

What's your "need" for one 357 mag pistol?


===

His enemies list is longer than Richard Nixon's. :-)

I honestly believe that Harry is in a state of physical and mental
decline.


He's just looking for attention. My mother-in-law, for a while before she died at age
88, needed the same thing.
--

Guns don't cause problems. The behavior
of certain gun owners causes problems.
  #30   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2015
Posts: 824
Default Yet another reason to never...

On 2/28/2015 10:51 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 22:39:10 -0500, Justan Olphart
wrote:

I don't have to sell one to buy a new one, either. I have no need for
two .357 MAG pistols, and I wanted to play with a S&W for a while, so I
sold the Ruger for a little less than I paid for it.

What's your "need" for one 357 mag pistol?


===

His enemies list is longer than Richard Nixon's. :-)

I honestly believe that Harry is in a state of physical and mental
decline.

It doesn't take a brain surgeon to see that. ;-)

--

Respectfully submitted by Justan

Laugh of the day from Krause

"I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here.
I've been "born again" as a nice guy."


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Yet another reason to NOT... F.O.A.D. General 14 July 2nd 13 03:44 AM
Yet another reason... F.O.A.D. General 0 March 30th 13 02:45 PM
Yet Another Reason... hk General 1 April 22nd 10 03:02 PM
Another reason Bart ASA 0 October 4th 06 01:45 AM
Another reason Martin Baxter ASA 2 October 3rd 06 07:08 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017