On 2/7/15 5:00 PM, KC wrote:
On 2/7/2015 3:40 PM, Abit Loco wrote:
On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 15:03:02 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 2/7/15 2:31 PM, Abit Loco wrote:
On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 14:18:53 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 2/7/15 12:08 PM, Tim wrote:
I don't think Harry would like the place. It's owned by a family
of gun totin' Christians! Lol!

http://www.shootersgrillofrifle.com/laurens-prayers-2/



I do think the combo of guns and jesus is absurd humor, but it
wouldn't
keep me from patronizing the joint if the food were any good.

More absurd than swords, lighter fluid and Mohammed?



I'll be the first to admit I know little about the teachings of
Mohammed,

You're right.

I don't know this for a fact, but my guess is that over the centuries
since the founding of Christianity and Islam, more people have been
slaughtered by Christians in the name of Christianity than by Muslims in
the name of Islam.

Bad guess. Better go back and see what prompted the Crusades.

[Note: some snippage of Krause's post.]


The crusades were a response to years of attacks... anybody with a hs
education should know that...

I'm embarrassed that you also went to public schools in Connecticut, but
apparently not very good ones, eh? No CE history courses?

Arab Muslims took Jerusalem in 638 CE. The First Crusade was launched
400+ years later, in 1095 CE.

Do you want to talk about the unjust nature of the seizure of California
from Mexico less than 200 years ago? Or the seizure of lands in this
country from the Native Americans?

The crusades were nothing more than acts of Christian aggression to
retake territory that was perceived in the 11th century to be
Christianity's patrimony.

That sort of perception doesn't make it anything more than a perception.



--
Proud to be a Liberal.

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/7/15 5:00 PM, KC wrote:
On 2/7/2015 3:40 PM, Abit Loco wrote:
On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 15:03:02 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 2/7/15 2:31 PM, Abit Loco wrote:
On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 14:18:53 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 2/7/15 12:08 PM, Tim wrote:
I don't think Harry would like the place. It's owned by a family
of gun totin' Christians! Lol!

http://www.shootersgrillofrifle.com/laurens-prayers-2/



I do think the combo of guns and jesus is absurd humor, but it
wouldn't
keep me from patronizing the joint if the food were any good.

More absurd than swords, lighter fluid and Mohammed?



I'll be the first to admit I know little about the teachings of
Mohammed,

You're right.

I don't know this for a fact, but my guess is that over the centuries
since the founding of Christianity and Islam, more people have been
slaughtered by Christians in the name of Christianity than by Muslims in
the name of Islam.

Bad guess. Better go back and see what prompted the Crusades.

[Note: some snippage of Krause's post.]


The crusades were a response to years of attacks... anybody with a hs
education should know that...

I'm embarrassed that you also went to public schools in Connecticut, but
apparently not very good ones, eh? No CE history courses?

Arab Muslims took Jerusalem in 638 CE. The First Crusade was launched
400+ years later, in 1095 CE.

Do you want to talk about the unjust nature of the seizure of California
from Mexico less than 200 years ago? Or the seizure of lands in this
country from the Native Americans?

The crusades were nothing more than acts of Christian aggression to
retake territory that was perceived in the 11th century to be Christianity's patrimony.

That sort of perception doesn't make it anything more than a perception.




What was unjust about taking California from Mexico? We also had Russian
Enclaves here, and Mexico only "owed" California for 30 years. The Spanish
only had the southern half of the state, and they stole it from the
natives.

On 2/8/15 12:45 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/7/15 5:00 PM, KC wrote:
On 2/7/2015 3:40 PM, Abit Loco wrote:
On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 15:03:02 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 2/7/15 2:31 PM, Abit Loco wrote:
On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 14:18:53 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 2/7/15 12:08 PM, Tim wrote:
I don't think Harry would like the place. It's owned by a family
of gun totin' Christians! Lol!

http://www.shootersgrillofrifle.com/laurens-prayers-2/



I do think the combo of guns and jesus is absurd humor, but it
wouldn't
keep me from patronizing the joint if the food were any good.

More absurd than swords, lighter fluid and Mohammed?



I'll be the first to admit I know little about the teachings of
Mohammed,

You're right.

I don't know this for a fact, but my guess is that over the centuries
since the founding of Christianity and Islam, more people have been
slaughtered by Christians in the name of Christianity than by Muslims in
the name of Islam.

Bad guess. Better go back and see what prompted the Crusades.

[Note: some snippage of Krause's post.]


The crusades were a response to years of attacks... anybody with a hs
education should know that...

I'm embarrassed that you also went to public schools in Connecticut, but
apparently not very good ones, eh? No CE history courses?

Arab Muslims took Jerusalem in 638 CE. The First Crusade was launched
400+ years later, in 1095 CE.

Do you want to talk about the unjust nature of the seizure of California
from Mexico less than 200 years ago? Or the seizure of lands in this
country from the Native Americans?

The crusades were nothing more than acts of Christian aggression to
retake territory that was perceived in the 11th century to be Christianity's patrimony.

That sort of perception doesn't make it anything more than a perception.




What was unjust about taking California from Mexico? We also had Russian
Enclaves here, and Mexico only "owed" California for 30 years. The Spanish
only had the southern half of the state, and they stole it from the
natives.



Following your logic, what was "just" about the Christians mounting
crusades to take back the "holy land" 400+ years after the Muslims took it?

--
Proud to be a Liberal.

On Sun, 08 Feb 2015 12:52:18 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 2/8/15 12:45 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/7/15 5:00 PM, KC wrote:
On 2/7/2015 3:40 PM, Abit Loco wrote:
On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 15:03:02 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 2/7/15 2:31 PM, Abit Loco wrote:
On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 14:18:53 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 2/7/15 12:08 PM, Tim wrote:
I don't think Harry would like the place. It's owned by a family
of gun totin' Christians! Lol!

http://www.shootersgrillofrifle.com/laurens-prayers-2/



I do think the combo of guns and jesus is absurd humor, but it
wouldn't
keep me from patronizing the joint if the food were any good.

More absurd than swords, lighter fluid and Mohammed?



I'll be the first to admit I know little about the teachings of
Mohammed,

You're right.

I don't know this for a fact, but my guess is that over the centuries
since the founding of Christianity and Islam, more people have been
slaughtered by Christians in the name of Christianity than by Muslims in
the name of Islam.

Bad guess. Better go back and see what prompted the Crusades.

[Note: some snippage of Krause's post.]


The crusades were a response to years of attacks... anybody with a hs
education should know that...

I'm embarrassed that you also went to public schools in Connecticut, but
apparently not very good ones, eh? No CE history courses?

Arab Muslims took Jerusalem in 638 CE. The First Crusade was launched
400+ years later, in 1095 CE.

Do you want to talk about the unjust nature of the seizure of California
from Mexico less than 200 years ago? Or the seizure of lands in this
country from the Native Americans?

The crusades were nothing more than acts of Christian aggression to
retake territory that was perceived in the 11th century to be Christianity's patrimony.

That sort of perception doesn't make it anything more than a perception.




What was unjust about taking California from Mexico? We also had Russian
Enclaves here, and Mexico only "owed" California for 30 years. The Spanish
only had the southern half of the state, and they stole it from the
natives.



Following your logic, what was "just" about the Christians mounting
crusades to take back the "holy land" 400+ years after the Muslims took it?

What was just about the Muslims taking it in the first place? At least you're getting
to the reason Christians were so 'barbaric' to the Muslims.
--

Guns don't cause problems. The behavior
of certain gun owners causes problems.

On 2/8/15 1:08 PM, Abit Loco wrote:
On Sun, 08 Feb 2015 12:52:18 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 2/8/15 12:45 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/7/15 5:00 PM, KC wrote:
On 2/7/2015 3:40 PM, Abit Loco wrote:
On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 15:03:02 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 2/7/15 2:31 PM, Abit Loco wrote:
On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 14:18:53 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 2/7/15 12:08 PM, Tim wrote:
I don't think Harry would like the place. It's owned by a family
of gun totin' Christians! Lol!

http://www.shootersgrillofrifle.com/laurens-prayers-2/



I do think the combo of guns and jesus is absurd humor, but it
wouldn't
keep me from patronizing the joint if the food were any good.

More absurd than swords, lighter fluid and Mohammed?



I'll be the first to admit I know little about the teachings of
Mohammed,

You're right.

I don't know this for a fact, but my guess is that over the centuries
since the founding of Christianity and Islam, more people have been
slaughtered by Christians in the name of Christianity than by Muslims in
the name of Islam.

Bad guess. Better go back and see what prompted the Crusades.

[Note: some snippage of Krause's post.]


The crusades were a response to years of attacks... anybody with a hs
education should know that...

I'm embarrassed that you also went to public schools in Connecticut, but
apparently not very good ones, eh? No CE history courses?

Arab Muslims took Jerusalem in 638 CE. The First Crusade was launched
400+ years later, in 1095 CE.

Do you want to talk about the unjust nature of the seizure of California
from Mexico less than 200 years ago? Or the seizure of lands in this
country from the Native Americans?

The crusades were nothing more than acts of Christian aggression to
retake territory that was perceived in the 11th century to be Christianity's patrimony.

That sort of perception doesn't make it anything more than a perception.




What was unjust about taking California from Mexico? We also had Russian
Enclaves here, and Mexico only "owed" California for 30 years. The Spanish
only had the southern half of the state, and they stole it from the
natives.



Following your logic, what was "just" about the Christians mounting
crusades to take back the "holy land" 400+ years after the Muslims took it?

What was just about the Muslims taking it in the first place? At least you're getting
to the reason Christians were so 'barbaric' to the Muslims.



Kinda sketchy on early Middle Ages history, John?

--
Proud to be a Liberal.

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/8/15 12:45 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/7/15 5:00 PM, KC wrote:
On 2/7/2015 3:40 PM, Abit Loco wrote:
On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 15:03:02 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 2/7/15 2:31 PM, Abit Loco wrote:
On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 14:18:53 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 2/7/15 12:08 PM, Tim wrote:
I don't think Harry would like the place. It's owned by a family
of gun totin' Christians! Lol!

http://www.shootersgrillofrifle.com/laurens-prayers-2/



I do think the combo of guns and jesus is absurd humor, but it
wouldn't
keep me from patronizing the joint if the food were any good.

More absurd than swords, lighter fluid and Mohammed?



I'll be the first to admit I know little about the teachings of
Mohammed,

You're right.

I don't know this for a fact, but my guess is that over the centuries
since the founding of Christianity and Islam, more people have been
slaughtered by Christians in the name of Christianity than by Muslims in
the name of Islam.

Bad guess. Better go back and see what prompted the Crusades.

[Note: some snippage of Krause's post.]


The crusades were a response to years of attacks... anybody with a hs
education should know that...

I'm embarrassed that you also went to public schools in Connecticut, but
apparently not very good ones, eh? No CE history courses?

Arab Muslims took Jerusalem in 638 CE. The First Crusade was launched
400+ years later, in 1095 CE.

Do you want to talk about the unjust nature of the seizure of California
from Mexico less than 200 years ago? Or the seizure of lands in this
country from the Native Americans?

The crusades were nothing more than acts of Christian aggression to
retake territory that was perceived in the 11th century to be Christianity's patrimony.

That sort of perception doesn't make it anything more than a perception.




What was unjust about taking California from Mexico? We also had Russian
Enclaves here, and Mexico only "owed" California for 30 years. The Spanish
only had the southern half of the state, and they stole it from the
natives.



Following your logic, what was "just" about the Christians mounting
crusades to take back the "holy land" 400+ years after the Muslims took it?


By then was a shopping trip. Most of the crusades were taking back Europe.