On 2/7/15 5:00 PM, KC wrote:
On 2/7/2015 3:40 PM, Abit Loco wrote:
On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 15:03:02 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 2/7/15 2:31 PM, Abit Loco wrote:
On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 14:18:53 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 2/7/15 12:08 PM, Tim wrote:
I don't think Harry would like the place. It's owned by a family
of gun totin' Christians! Lol!

http://www.shootersgrillofrifle.com/laurens-prayers-2/



I do think the combo of guns and jesus is absurd humor, but it
wouldn't
keep me from patronizing the joint if the food were any good.

More absurd than swords, lighter fluid and Mohammed?



I'll be the first to admit I know little about the teachings of
Mohammed,

You're right.

I don't know this for a fact, but my guess is that over the centuries
since the founding of Christianity and Islam, more people have been
slaughtered by Christians in the name of Christianity than by Muslims in
the name of Islam.

Bad guess. Better go back and see what prompted the Crusades.

[Note: some snippage of Krause's post.]


The crusades were a response to years of attacks... anybody with a hs
education should know that...

I'm embarrassed that you also went to public schools in Connecticut, but
apparently not very good ones, eh? No CE history courses?

Arab Muslims took Jerusalem in 638 CE. The First Crusade was launched
400+ years later, in 1095 CE.

Do you want to talk about the unjust nature of the seizure of California
from Mexico less than 200 years ago? Or the seizure of lands in this
country from the Native Americans?

The crusades were nothing more than acts of Christian aggression to
retake territory that was perceived in the 11th century to be
Christianity's patrimony.

That sort of perception doesn't make it anything more than a perception.



--
Proud to be a Liberal.