Very Refreshing
 

On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 16:49:29 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/31/15 4:41 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 16:20:12 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/31/15 3:51 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 14:04:57 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/31/15 11:47 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 06:59:05 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/30/15 11:32 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 14:55:59 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/30/15 2:32 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 13:10:06 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/30/15 12:52 PM, wrote:

Bloomberg isn't spending his money to promote voter suppression,
backwards, overly religious candidates, and regressive legislation as
the Kochs are.

No, he wants to take your assault rifles away from you.

I support most of Bloomberg's
efforts to tighten up firearms laws on illegal possession,

One of them is eliminating civilian ownership of guns like your ARs.


So? If it came to pass, I'd do what was required. I'm a gun hobbyist,
not a crazed NRA gun nutsie.

So you would just turn it in and take the $50 the government said was
just compensation?


I'm certainly *not* going to try to hold off federal or local law
enforcement agents...I'll leave that to Wayne, who said here he would in
order to retain possession of his firearms.

I'd rather give them up and then go to the beach. Firearms are a hobby
for me.

I forgot, you are a democrat. If the government wants to take your
stuff, you are more than happy to just give it to them. If our
forefathers were like you, you would still be curtseying to the queen.


Well, I'm not dumb enough to think I can stand off armed federal law
enforcement officers. This isn't the 18th Century and the troops aren't
on a supply or reinforcement chain 3000 miles long. I'll let your
survivors and those of Wayne let me know what happened. Has to do with
me not being an idiot, not with me being a Democrat.

===

Have you ever heard the saying "Live Free or Die"?

This country ws not founded by a bunch of pansy assed eastern
liberals.


I'll be delighted for you to take on federal authorities with your Mosin
Nagent you apparently can't shoot straight and your Ruger Mark III with
the dimpled barrel. Please let us know when you are going to do this, so
we are sure to tape it on the TV news.

Oh...the 18th Century founding fathers? They were eastern and pretty
radical and liberal. The *conservative* response would have been to
remain under the thumb of the Crown.

===

Funny stuff Harry. It's a lot more likely that the Feds will be
coming after you than after me. And although the founding fathers of
this great country may have been radical for their time, they were
not afraid of standing up to authority when oppressed.



1. Yup, funny.
2. Not likely.
3. Three of the times I "stood up to authority" to help the oppressed
resulted in me getting shot at, once while reporting on and
participating in a black voter registration drive in the 1960s in the
deep south, once while working for land reform in Central America, and
once while helping organize oil rig supply ship crews.

How many times have you been shot at while standing up to authority to
help the oppressed?

Yeah, I thought so.

===

I was shot at while in the service of my country but as a draft dodger
you wouldn't understand that.

Very Refreshing
 

On Saturday, January 31, 2015 at 1:49:32 PM UTC-8, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/31/15 4:41 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 16:20:12 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/31/15 3:51 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 14:04:57 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/31/15 11:47 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 06:59:05 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/30/15 11:32 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 14:55:59 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/30/15 2:32 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 13:10:06 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/30/15 12:52 PM, wrote:

Bloomberg isn't spending his money to promote voter suppression,
backwards, overly religious candidates, and regressive legislation as
the Kochs are.

No, he wants to take your assault rifles away from you.

I support most of Bloomberg's
efforts to tighten up firearms laws on illegal possession,

One of them is eliminating civilian ownership of guns like your ARs.


So? If it came to pass, I'd do what was required. I'm a gun hobbyist,
not a crazed NRA gun nutsie.

So you would just turn it in and take the $50 the government said was
just compensation?


I'm certainly *not* going to try to hold off federal or local law
enforcement agents...I'll leave that to Wayne, who said here he would in
order to retain possession of his firearms.

I'd rather give them up and then go to the beach. Firearms are a hobby
for me.

I forgot, you are a democrat. If the government wants to take your
stuff, you are more than happy to just give it to them. If our
forefathers were like you, you would still be curtseying to the queen.


Well, I'm not dumb enough to think I can stand off armed federal law
enforcement officers. This isn't the 18th Century and the troops aren't
on a supply or reinforcement chain 3000 miles long. I'll let your
survivors and those of Wayne let me know what happened. Has to do with
me not being an idiot, not with me being a Democrat.

===

Have you ever heard the saying "Live Free or Die"?

This country ws not founded by a bunch of pansy assed eastern
liberals.


I'll be delighted for you to take on federal authorities with your Mosin
Nagent you apparently can't shoot straight and your Ruger Mark III with
the dimpled barrel. Please let us know when you are going to do this, so
we are sure to tape it on the TV news.

Oh...the 18th Century founding fathers? They were eastern and pretty
radical and liberal. The *conservative* response would have been to
remain under the thumb of the Crown.

===

Funny stuff Harry. It's a lot more likely that the Feds will be
coming after you than after me. And although the founding fathers of
this great country may have been radical for their time, they were
not afraid of standing up to authority when oppressed.



1. Yup, funny.
2. Not likely.
3. Three of the times I "stood up to authority" to help the oppressed
resulted in me getting shot at, once while reporting on and
participating in a black voter registration drive in the 1960s in the
deep south, once while working for land reform in Central America, and
once while helping organize oil rig supply ship crews.

How many times have you been shot at while standing up to authority to
help the oppressed?

Yeah, I thought so.





--
Proud to be a Liberal.

"Many will call me an adventurer - and that I am, only one of a different sort: one of those who risks his skin to prove his platitudes." [Che Guevara]

Very Refreshing
 

On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 16:49:29 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 1/31/15 4:41 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 16:20:12 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/31/15 3:51 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 14:04:57 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/31/15 11:47 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 06:59:05 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/30/15 11:32 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 14:55:59 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/30/15 2:32 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 13:10:06 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/30/15 12:52 PM, wrote:

Bloomberg isn't spending his money to promote voter suppression,
backwards, overly religious candidates, and regressive legislation as
the Kochs are.

No, he wants to take your assault rifles away from you.

I support most of Bloomberg's
efforts to tighten up firearms laws on illegal possession,

One of them is eliminating civilian ownership of guns like your ARs.


So? If it came to pass, I'd do what was required. I'm a gun hobbyist,
not a crazed NRA gun nutsie.

So you would just turn it in and take the $50 the government said was
just compensation?


I'm certainly *not* going to try to hold off federal or local law
enforcement agents...I'll leave that to Wayne, who said here he would in
order to retain possession of his firearms.

I'd rather give them up and then go to the beach. Firearms are a hobby
for me.

I forgot, you are a democrat. If the government wants to take your
stuff, you are more than happy to just give it to them. If our
forefathers were like you, you would still be curtseying to the queen.


Well, I'm not dumb enough to think I can stand off armed federal law
enforcement officers. This isn't the 18th Century and the troops aren't
on a supply or reinforcement chain 3000 miles long. I'll let your
survivors and those of Wayne let me know what happened. Has to do with
me not being an idiot, not with me being a Democrat.

===

Have you ever heard the saying "Live Free or Die"?

This country ws not founded by a bunch of pansy assed eastern
liberals.


I'll be delighted for you to take on federal authorities with your Mosin
Nagent you apparently can't shoot straight and your Ruger Mark III with
the dimpled barrel. Please let us know when you are going to do this, so
we are sure to tape it on the TV news.

Oh...the 18th Century founding fathers? They were eastern and pretty
radical and liberal. The *conservative* response would have been to
remain under the thumb of the Crown.

===

Funny stuff Harry. It's a lot more likely that the Feds will be
coming after you than after me. And although the founding fathers of
this great country may have been radical for their time, they were
not afraid of standing up to authority when oppressed.



1. Yup, funny.
2. Not likely.
3. Three of the times I "stood up to authority" to help the oppressed
resulted in me getting shot at, once while reporting on and
participating in a black voter registration drive in the 1960s in the
deep south, once while working for land reform in Central America, and
once while helping organize oil rig supply ship crews.

How many times have you been shot at while standing up to authority to
help the oppressed?

Yeah, I thought so.

Harry, tooting your own horn is unmannerly.

Were the owls overlooking those events?
--

Guns don't cause problems. The behavior
of certain gun owners causes problems.

Very Refreshing
 

On 1/31/2015 5:13 PM, Mucho Loco wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 16:49:29 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 1/31/15 4:41 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 16:20:12 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/31/15 3:51 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 14:04:57 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/31/15 11:47 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 06:59:05 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/30/15 11:32 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 14:55:59 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/30/15 2:32 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 13:10:06 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/30/15 12:52 PM, wrote:

Bloomberg isn't spending his money to promote voter suppression,
backwards, overly religious candidates, and regressive legislation as
the Kochs are.

No, he wants to take your assault rifles away from you.

I support most of Bloomberg's
efforts to tighten up firearms laws on illegal possession,

One of them is eliminating civilian ownership of guns like your ARs.


So? If it came to pass, I'd do what was required. I'm a gun hobbyist,
not a crazed NRA gun nutsie.

So you would just turn it in and take the $50 the government said was
just compensation?


I'm certainly *not* going to try to hold off federal or local law
enforcement agents...I'll leave that to Wayne, who said here he would in
order to retain possession of his firearms.

I'd rather give them up and then go to the beach. Firearms are a hobby
for me.

I forgot, you are a democrat. If the government wants to take your
stuff, you are more than happy to just give it to them. If our
forefathers were like you, you would still be curtseying to the queen.


Well, I'm not dumb enough to think I can stand off armed federal law
enforcement officers. This isn't the 18th Century and the troops aren't
on a supply or reinforcement chain 3000 miles long. I'll let your
survivors and those of Wayne let me know what happened. Has to do with
me not being an idiot, not with me being a Democrat.

===

Have you ever heard the saying "Live Free or Die"?

This country ws not founded by a bunch of pansy assed eastern
liberals.


I'll be delighted for you to take on federal authorities with your Mosin
Nagent you apparently can't shoot straight and your Ruger Mark III with
the dimpled barrel. Please let us know when you are going to do this, so
we are sure to tape it on the TV news.

Oh...the 18th Century founding fathers? They were eastern and pretty
radical and liberal. The *conservative* response would have been to
remain under the thumb of the Crown.

===

Funny stuff Harry. It's a lot more likely that the Feds will be
coming after you than after me. And although the founding fathers of
this great country may have been radical for their time, they were
not afraid of standing up to authority when oppressed.



1. Yup, funny.
2. Not likely.
3. Three of the times I "stood up to authority" to help the oppressed
resulted in me getting shot at, once while reporting on and
participating in a black voter registration drive in the 1960s in the
deep south, once while working for land reform in Central America, and
once while helping organize oil rig supply ship crews.

How many times have you been shot at while standing up to authority to
help the oppressed?

Yeah, I thought so.

Harry, tooting your own horn is unmannerly.

Were the owls overlooking those events?


He wouldn't get shot at so often if he didn't hang out with thieves,
thugs, union bosses, and other low life.


--

Respectfully submitted by Justan

Laugh of the day from Krause

"I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here.
I've been "born again" as a nice guy."

Very Refreshing
 

Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 16:49:29 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/31/15 4:41 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 16:20:12 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/31/15 3:51 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 14:04:57 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/31/15 11:47 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 06:59:05 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/30/15 11:32 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 14:55:59 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/30/15 2:32 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 13:10:06 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/30/15 12:52 PM, wrote:

Bloomberg isn't spending his money to promote voter suppression,
backwards, overly religious candidates, and regressive legislation as
the Kochs are.

No, he wants to take your assault rifles away from you.

I support most of Bloomberg's
efforts to tighten up firearms laws on illegal possession,

One of them is eliminating civilian ownership of guns like your ARs.


So? If it came to pass, I'd do what was required. I'm a gun hobbyist,
not a crazed NRA gun nutsie.

So you would just turn it in and take the $50 the government said was
just compensation?


I'm certainly *not* going to try to hold off federal or local law
enforcement agents...I'll leave that to Wayne, who said here he would in
order to retain possession of his firearms.

I'd rather give them up and then go to the beach. Firearms are a hobby
for me.

I forgot, you are a democrat. If the government wants to take your
stuff, you are more than happy to just give it to them. If our
forefathers were like you, you would still be curtseying to the queen.


Well, I'm not dumb enough to think I can stand off armed federal law
enforcement officers. This isn't the 18th Century and the troops aren't
on a supply or reinforcement chain 3000 miles long. I'll let your
survivors and those of Wayne let me know what happened. Has to do with
me not being an idiot, not with me being a Democrat.

===

Have you ever heard the saying "Live Free or Die"?

This country ws not founded by a bunch of pansy assed eastern
liberals.


I'll be delighted for you to take on federal authorities with your Mosin
Nagent you apparently can't shoot straight and your Ruger Mark III with
the dimpled barrel. Please let us know when you are going to do this, so
we are sure to tape it on the TV news.

Oh...the 18th Century founding fathers? They were eastern and pretty
radical and liberal. The *conservative* response would have been to
remain under the thumb of the Crown.

===

Funny stuff Harry. It's a lot more likely that the Feds will be
coming after you than after me. And although the founding fathers of
this great country may have been radical for their time, they were
not afraid of standing up to authority when oppressed.



1. Yup, funny.
2. Not likely.
3. Three of the times I "stood up to authority" to help the oppressed
resulted in me getting shot at, once while reporting on and
participating in a black voter registration drive in the 1960s in the
deep south, once while working for land reform in Central America, and
once while helping organize oil rig supply ship crews.

How many times have you been shot at while standing up to authority to
help the oppressed?

Yeah, I thought so.

===

I was shot at while in the service of my country but as a draft dodger
you wouldn't understand that.

Sorry, but I am not a neocon republican like Cheney so I never dodged the
draft.
--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

Very Refreshing
 

On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 16:59:18 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 1/31/2015 4:41 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 16:20:12 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/31/15 3:51 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 14:04:57 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/31/15 11:47 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 06:59:05 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/30/15 11:32 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 14:55:59 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/30/15 2:32 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 13:10:06 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/30/15 12:52 PM, wrote:

Bloomberg isn't spending his money to promote voter suppression,
backwards, overly religious candidates, and regressive legislation as
the Kochs are.

No, he wants to take your assault rifles away from you.

I support most of Bloomberg's
efforts to tighten up firearms laws on illegal possession,

One of them is eliminating civilian ownership of guns like your ARs.


So? If it came to pass, I'd do what was required. I'm a gun hobbyist,
not a crazed NRA gun nutsie.

So you would just turn it in and take the $50 the government said was
just compensation?


I'm certainly *not* going to try to hold off federal or local law
enforcement agents...I'll leave that to Wayne, who said here he would in
order to retain possession of his firearms.

I'd rather give them up and then go to the beach. Firearms are a hobby
for me.

I forgot, you are a democrat. If the government wants to take your
stuff, you are more than happy to just give it to them. If our
forefathers were like you, you would still be curtseying to the queen.


Well, I'm not dumb enough to think I can stand off armed federal law
enforcement officers. This isn't the 18th Century and the troops aren't
on a supply or reinforcement chain 3000 miles long. I'll let your
survivors and those of Wayne let me know what happened. Has to do with
me not being an idiot, not with me being a Democrat.

===

Have you ever heard the saying "Live Free or Die"?

This country ws not founded by a bunch of pansy assed eastern
liberals.


I'll be delighted for you to take on federal authorities with your Mosin
Nagent you apparently can't shoot straight and your Ruger Mark III with
the dimpled barrel. Please let us know when you are going to do this, so
we are sure to tape it on the TV news.

Oh...the 18th Century founding fathers? They were eastern and pretty
radical and liberal. The *conservative* response would have been to
remain under the thumb of the Crown.

===

Funny stuff Harry. It's a lot more likely that the Feds will be
coming after you than after me. And although the founding fathers of
this great country may have been radical for their time, they were
not afraid of standing up to authority when oppressed.



Are you thinking of declaring independence sometime soon Wayne? :-)

===

I thought we were all independent as of 1776 or so. :-)

Very Refreshing
 

On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 17:21:24 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote:

On 1/31/2015 5:13 PM, Mucho Loco wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 16:49:29 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 1/31/15 4:41 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 16:20:12 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/31/15 3:51 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 14:04:57 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/31/15 11:47 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 06:59:05 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/30/15 11:32 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 14:55:59 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/30/15 2:32 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 13:10:06 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/30/15 12:52 PM, wrote:

Bloomberg isn't spending his money to promote voter suppression,
backwards, overly religious candidates, and regressive legislation as
the Kochs are.

No, he wants to take your assault rifles away from you.

I support most of Bloomberg's
efforts to tighten up firearms laws on illegal possession,

One of them is eliminating civilian ownership of guns like your ARs.


So? If it came to pass, I'd do what was required. I'm a gun hobbyist,
not a crazed NRA gun nutsie.

So you would just turn it in and take the $50 the government said was
just compensation?


I'm certainly *not* going to try to hold off federal or local law
enforcement agents...I'll leave that to Wayne, who said here he would in
order to retain possession of his firearms.

I'd rather give them up and then go to the beach. Firearms are a hobby
for me.

I forgot, you are a democrat. If the government wants to take your
stuff, you are more than happy to just give it to them. If our
forefathers were like you, you would still be curtseying to the queen.


Well, I'm not dumb enough to think I can stand off armed federal law
enforcement officers. This isn't the 18th Century and the troops aren't
on a supply or reinforcement chain 3000 miles long. I'll let your
survivors and those of Wayne let me know what happened. Has to do with
me not being an idiot, not with me being a Democrat.

===

Have you ever heard the saying "Live Free or Die"?

This country ws not founded by a bunch of pansy assed eastern
liberals.


I'll be delighted for you to take on federal authorities with your Mosin
Nagent you apparently can't shoot straight and your Ruger Mark III with
the dimpled barrel. Please let us know when you are going to do this, so
we are sure to tape it on the TV news.

Oh...the 18th Century founding fathers? They were eastern and pretty
radical and liberal. The *conservative* response would have been to
remain under the thumb of the Crown.

===

Funny stuff Harry. It's a lot more likely that the Feds will be
coming after you than after me. And although the founding fathers of
this great country may have been radical for their time, they were
not afraid of standing up to authority when oppressed.



1. Yup, funny.
2. Not likely.
3. Three of the times I "stood up to authority" to help the oppressed
resulted in me getting shot at, once while reporting on and
participating in a black voter registration drive in the 1960s in the
deep south, once while working for land reform in Central America, and
once while helping organize oil rig supply ship crews.

How many times have you been shot at while standing up to authority to
help the oppressed?

Yeah, I thought so.

Harry, tooting your own horn is unmannerly.

Were the owls overlooking those events?


He wouldn't get shot at so often if he didn't hang out with thieves,
thugs, union bosses, and other low life.

I've never heard anyone, even my two cop brothers and fellow soldiers, talk about
'the times they've been shot at'.

Now we're up to three times.
--

Guns don't cause problems. The behavior
of certain gun owners causes problems.

Very Refreshing
 

On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 16:49:29 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

3. Three of the times I "stood up to authority" to help the oppressed
resulted in me getting shot at, once while reporting on and
participating in a black voter registration drive in the 1960s in the
deep south, once while working for land reform in Central America, and
once while helping organize oil rig supply ship crews.

===

Tell us more about this "land reform" in Central America. Does that
mean that you were trying to take land away from whom it legally
belonged and give it to someone else? That sounds like some kind of
Robin Hood adventure to me although it's hard to imagine your fat ass
in green tights and carrying a bow and arrow. Sounds like you were
ahead of your time and should have waited for Hugo Chavez in
Venezuela. His little adventure in socialism and seizing the assets
of others isn't turning out very well though.

Very Refreshing
 

On 1/31/15 6:02 PM, Mucho Loco wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 17:21:24 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote:

On 1/31/2015 5:13 PM, Mucho Loco wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 16:49:29 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 1/31/15 4:41 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 16:20:12 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/31/15 3:51 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 14:04:57 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/31/15 11:47 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 06:59:05 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/30/15 11:32 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 14:55:59 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/30/15 2:32 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 13:10:06 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/30/15 12:52 PM, wrote:

Bloomberg isn't spending his money to promote voter suppression,
backwards, overly religious candidates, and regressive legislation as
the Kochs are.

No, he wants to take your assault rifles away from you.

I support most of Bloomberg's
efforts to tighten up firearms laws on illegal possession,

One of them is eliminating civilian ownership of guns like your ARs.


So? If it came to pass, I'd do what was required. I'm a gun hobbyist,
not a crazed NRA gun nutsie.

So you would just turn it in and take the $50 the government said was
just compensation?


I'm certainly *not* going to try to hold off federal or local law
enforcement agents...I'll leave that to Wayne, who said here he would in
order to retain possession of his firearms.

I'd rather give them up and then go to the beach. Firearms are a hobby
for me.

I forgot, you are a democrat. If the government wants to take your
stuff, you are more than happy to just give it to them. If our
forefathers were like you, you would still be curtseying to the queen.


Well, I'm not dumb enough to think I can stand off armed federal law
enforcement officers. This isn't the 18th Century and the troops aren't
on a supply or reinforcement chain 3000 miles long. I'll let your
survivors and those of Wayne let me know what happened. Has to do with
me not being an idiot, not with me being a Democrat.

===

Have you ever heard the saying "Live Free or Die"?

This country ws not founded by a bunch of pansy assed eastern
liberals.


I'll be delighted for you to take on federal authorities with your Mosin
Nagent you apparently can't shoot straight and your Ruger Mark III with
the dimpled barrel. Please let us know when you are going to do this, so
we are sure to tape it on the TV news.

Oh...the 18th Century founding fathers? They were eastern and pretty
radical and liberal. The *conservative* response would have been to
remain under the thumb of the Crown.

===

Funny stuff Harry. It's a lot more likely that the Feds will be
coming after you than after me. And although the founding fathers of
this great country may have been radical for their time, they were
not afraid of standing up to authority when oppressed.



1. Yup, funny.
2. Not likely.
3. Three of the times I "stood up to authority" to help the oppressed
resulted in me getting shot at, once while reporting on and
participating in a black voter registration drive in the 1960s in the
deep south, once while working for land reform in Central America, and
once while helping organize oil rig supply ship crews.

How many times have you been shot at while standing up to authority to
help the oppressed?

Yeah, I thought so.

Harry, tooting your own horn is unmannerly.

Were the owls overlooking those events?


He wouldn't get shot at so often if he didn't hang out with thieves,
thugs, union bosses, and other low life.

I've never heard anyone, even my two cop brothers and fellow soldiers, talk about
'the times they've been shot at'.

Now we're up to three times.


It's been three times since the last time, which was in 2003.

--
Proud to be a Liberal.

Very Refreshing
 

On 1/31/15 6:03 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 16:49:29 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

3. Three of the times I "stood up to authority" to help the oppressed
resulted in me getting shot at, once while reporting on and
participating in a black voter registration drive in the 1960s in the
deep south, once while working for land reform in Central America, and
once while helping organize oil rig supply ship crews.

===

Tell us more about this "land reform" in Central America. Does that
mean that you were trying to take land away from whom it legally
belonged and give it to someone else? That sounds like some kind of
Robin Hood adventure to me although it's hard to imagine your fat ass
in green tights and carrying a bow and arrow. Sounds like you were
ahead of your time and should have waited for Hugo Chavez in
Venezuela. His little adventure in socialism and seizing the assets
of others isn't turning out very well though.


Legally belonged? That's funny. In much of Central America, land was
stolen from the indigent people by the oligarchy, aided by the military
and sometimes aided by the good old USA, not unlike it was done in this
country, eh?

--
Proud to be a Liberal.