On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 10:06:55 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 1/17/15 9:31 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 08:59:28 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 1/17/15 8:46 AM, Tim wrote:
On Saturday, January 17, 2015 at 5:11:58 AM UTC-8, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/16/15 9:18 PM, True North wrote:
On Friday, 16 January 2015 20:04:45 UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote:
Poquito Loco wrote:
What a movie. Go see it.

Why?
--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

It fulfills Johnny's fantasies to a T.
Shootin'and killin' with a powerful weapon from a safe distance.


The subject of the story was a very adept serial killer.

--
Proud to be a Liberal.

No really, Harry. You ought to go see it. You could probably get some tips on setting that scope you have on that AR of yours. That way you could do some really long distance target practice.


The "hero" of that movie fits the definition of serial killer.

From where comes your definition of 'serial killer'? A serial killer is defined as one who has
murdered three or more people in a short time. (Wikipedia) I assume *your* definition includes as
'serial killers' those who've killed three or more enemy in a short amount of time. That would
include a tremendous number of Soldiers, Sailors, Marines, and Airmen. Yet you claim you don't
denigrate the military - only certain individuals.

There may be one or two here who believe that ****, but I'm certainly not one of them.

It's nice to see you 'taking an interest' in the military, but you should really get your head out
of your ass.



"... do you just wake up with a mouth full of dog **** to spew?"

Oh, who posted that? Why, you did.

I notice you dodged the question.

"From where comes your definition of 'serial killer'?"

Did you think my question for Don was not warranted? I'm sure you've probably put him in Bozo's Bin,
but you should be able to see his posts second or third hand.
--

Guns don't cause problems. The behavior
of certain gun owners causes problems.