On 12/27/14 10:01 AM, Let it snowe wrote:
On 12/27/2014 7:06 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/26/14 9:42 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/26/2014 8:57 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 26 Dec 2014 20:46:56 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 12/26/14 8:14 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 26 Dec 2014 19:33:27 -0500, Poquito Loco
wrote:

The greatest miracle of all time, without any close seconds, is the
universe.

===

Of that there can be no doubt regardless of your religious beliefs
(or
not).



A miracle implies the intervention of a deity. There's no proof of
that.

===

I disagree. To me a miracle is something that defies all odds whether
there are religious implications or not. Under that definition the
universe is definitely a miracle, i.e., something miraculous.


e.g. the fact that you two are discussing a subject in a respectful,
civil manner is indeed a miracle! :=)



Sadly, Wayne has "reverted" back to snarky in several other threads.

So you have decided that "monkey see monkey do" is the way to go. That
was one hellofa experiment while it lasted. Thanks for the brief
reprieve from the same ol same ol.


I haven't decided any such thing. I simply pointed out that Wayne
"reverted" back to snarky. I haven't. Will you?

On 12/27/2014 10:05 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/27/14 10:01 AM, Let it snowe wrote:
On 12/27/2014 7:06 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/26/14 9:42 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/26/2014 8:57 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 26 Dec 2014 20:46:56 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 12/26/14 8:14 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 26 Dec 2014 19:33:27 -0500, Poquito Loco
wrote:

The greatest miracle of all time, without any close seconds, is the
universe.

===

Of that there can be no doubt regardless of your religious beliefs
(or
not).



A miracle implies the intervention of a deity. There's no proof of
that.

===

I disagree. To me a miracle is something that defies all odds whether
there are religious implications or not. Under that definition the
universe is definitely a miracle, i.e., something miraculous.


e.g. the fact that you two are discussing a subject in a respectful,
civil manner is indeed a miracle! :=)



Sadly, Wayne has "reverted" back to snarky in several other threads.

So you have decided that "monkey see monkey do" is the way to go. That
was one hellofa experiment while it lasted. Thanks for the brief
reprieve from the same ol same ol.


I haven't decided any such thing. I simply pointed out that Wayne
"reverted" back to snarky. I haven't. Will you?

Are you saying that Wayne directed a snarky remark toward you,
unprovoked? That seems highly unlikely to me.

--
Patriotic Americans dump on O'Bama.

On Sat, 27 Dec 2014 11:05:02 -0500, Let it snowe
wrote:

Are you saying that Wayne directed a snarky remark toward you,
unprovoked? That seems highly unlikely to me.

===

Harry, who is perhaps the all time snark master in this group, now
sees snarky under every rock and behind every tree, even in the
cellar.

It's his destiny.

What goes around, comes around.

On 12/27/14 2:55 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 27 Dec 2014 11:05:02 -0500, Let it snowe
wrote:

Are you saying that Wayne directed a snarky remark toward you,
unprovoked? That seems highly unlikely to me.

===

Harry, who is perhaps the all time snark master in this group, now
sees snarky under every rock and behind every tree, even in the
cellar.

It's his destiny.

What goes around, comes around.


The reality is that how this group moves forward is up to those who
behave decently in here and those who don't.

On Sat, 27 Dec 2014 17:07:19 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 12/27/14 2:55 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 27 Dec 2014 11:05:02 -0500, Let it snowe
wrote:

Are you saying that Wayne directed a snarky remark toward you,
unprovoked? That seems highly unlikely to me.

===

Harry, who is perhaps the all time snark master in this group, now
sees snarky under every rock and behind every tree, even in the
cellar.

It's his destiny.

What goes around, comes around.


The reality is that how this group moves forward is up to those who
behave decently in here and those who don't.

===

And I suppose you think that you're qualified to be the arbiter of
said behavior?

On 12/27/2014 5:07 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/27/14 2:55 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 27 Dec 2014 11:05:02 -0500, Let it snowe
wrote:

Are you saying that Wayne directed a snarky remark toward you,
unprovoked? That seems highly unlikely to me.

===

Harry, who is perhaps the all time snark master in this group, now
sees snarky under every rock and behind every tree, even in the
cellar.

It's his destiny.

What goes around, comes around.


The reality is that how this group moves forward is up to those who
behave decently in here and those who don't.

You are absolutely correct.

--
Patriotic Americans dump on O'Bama.

On 12/27/14 5:25 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 27 Dec 2014 17:07:19 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 12/27/14 2:55 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 27 Dec 2014 11:05:02 -0500, Let it snowe
wrote:

Are you saying that Wayne directed a snarky remark toward you,
unprovoked? That seems highly unlikely to me.

===

Harry, who is perhaps the all time snark master in this group, now
sees snarky under every rock and behind every tree, even in the
cellar.

It's his destiny.

What goes around, comes around.


The reality is that how this group moves forward is up to those who
behave decently in here and those who don't.

===

And I suppose you think that you're qualified to be the arbiter of
said behavior?



No, I do not. Those who want this group to be a pleasant place will
behave pleasantly. Those who want this group to be snarky will behave
snarky.