On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 12:14:50 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:

In article ,
says...

That's the problem with people like BOA. He selectively ignores some
things if it doesn't serve his argument.


The trouble with "people like Luddite" is they can't help dragging
partisan politics into a subject titled "Torturing SOB's."

Luddite made it a political ploy? What horse**** are you full of. I'm
thinking Clydesdale.


There is plenty of debate going on about the release of this report and
it's not limited to the right-leaning media outlets. Even MSNBC has
raised some questions regarding the motivations of Feinstien and her
committee. The committee never bothered interviewing any of the people
who were actually involved in the interrogation program as research for
the report. It started as a conclusion which then had to be justified
with selectively chosen accusations and facts. You are correct. Many
of the same people were chastising the CIA for not doing enough shortly
after 9/11.

Finger pointing and evading responsibility. That's all.

You just evade the point of my post, which is that U.S. Government
engaged in widespread torture.

....according to Diane.

Maybe you don't believe it happened. Or maybe you think it's okay.
But you want to get into political ****-slinging.

You don't want to sling any more of the political **** you've been
slinging?

I don't. Sorry about that.
You can argue politics with Scotty. Go right ahead.

Tell us about ISIS.
--

"The modern definition of 'ingrained racist' is someone who's winning an argument
with a couple liberals."

(Thanks, Luddite!)