On 12/2/2014 2:37 PM, Poco Loco wrote:

On Tue, 02 Dec 2014 14:28:55 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Tue, 02 Dec 2014 10:59:47 -0800, jps wrote:

The cop was a complete dick. The kid lost his cool, the cop ****ed up
the altercation in a big way. Didn't call for backup, jumped out of
his car and began shooting even though Brown was fleeing.

===

More nonsense. Brown was not shot in the back, not even once.

Why let truth get in the way of a good agenda?


I remember serving as a juror in a homicide trial years ago. The
evidence presented by the prosecution during the trial was very
convincing and the defense was weak, to be sure.

When we were finally charged by the judge and retired for deliberations
I remember the jury foreman stating right away that the guy's guilt was
obvious and beyond question and he didn't see any need for prolonged
discussion. He wanted to vote right away, return a guilty verdict and
go home. He asked if everyone agreed. The majority of us didn't agree
and told him that we owed the defendant some discussion of the evidence
before returning a verdict. He was ****ed but had no choice but to
cooperate.

In the end the defendent was found guilty but at least he had a fair trial.