http://nypost.com/2014/11/28/the-beg...-nancy-pelosi/

I contend that Madame Pelosi is the only one who isn't tired of her ****.

On 11/29/2014 1:27 AM, Tom Nofinger wrote:
http://nypost.com/2014/11/28/the-beg...-nancy-pelosi/

I contend that Madame Pelosi is the only one who isn't tired of her ****.

May she RIP, soon.

I don't wish her harm but I think the validity of her political career is over rated. IMO she should retire...

Yeah. I don't really know why she was voted to that position anyhow. Scapegoat maybe?

I wish her well but there are others more qualified for the position. I'm not a fan (I don't hate the guy) of Dick Durbin but I think he'd be aore reasonable choice for the position.

The only reason I mentioned Durbin Is because I'm not familiar with other leading dems and usually don't follow the political arena.

Your right about Durbin. I just showed how much I know. Lol!

On 11/29/2014 10:04 AM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 11/29/14 10:00 AM, Tim wrote:
I don't wish her harm but I think the validity of her political career
is over rated. IMO she should retire...


I think she should step down as leader. The party needs someone a lot
tougher in that job.

Tough is OK. Obstructionist is not. She needs to become as irrelevant as
you.

On 11/29/2014 10:17 AM, Tim wrote:
Yeah. I don't really know why she was voted to that position anyhow. Scapegoat maybe?

I wish her well but there are others more qualified for the position. I'm not a fan (I don't hate the guy) of Dick Durbin but I think he'd be aore reasonable choice for the position.

The only reason I mentioned Durbin Is because I'm not familiar with other leading dems and usually don't follow the political arena.


The DNC and in particular the present admin. is like the mafia... the
dirtier the deeds, the more reward/promotion you get in the party...

On 11/29/2014 11:28 AM, Toasty The Snowless Man wrote:
On 11/29/2014 10:04 AM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 11/29/14 10:00 AM, Tim wrote:
I don't wish her harm but I think the validity of her political career
is over rated. IMO she should retire...


I think she should step down as leader. The party needs someone a lot
tougher in that job.

Tough is OK. Obstructionist is not. She needs to become as irrelevant as
you.

If by tough he means dishonest and insane.. I am not sure you could find
anybody "tougher"...

On 11/29/2014 12:10 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 07:17:32 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

Yeah. I don't really know why she was voted to that position anyhow. Scapegoat maybe?

I wish her well but there are others more qualified for the position. I'm not a fan (I don't hate the guy) of Dick Durbin but I think he'd be aore reasonable choice for the position.

The only reason I mentioned Durbin Is because I'm not familiar with other leading dems and usually don't follow the political arena.

Pelosi has just been there a really long time and she knows a lot of
people. That is one of the flaws in not having term limits. The
crustiest old farts are in charge and new ideas don't stand a chance.



I surely agree with you.

F*O*A*D wrote:
On 11/29/14 10:00 AM, Tim wrote:
I don't wish her harm but I think the validity of her political
career is over rated. IMO she should retire...


I think she should step down as leader. The party needs someone a lot
tougher in that job.


She already got knocked down from her leadership. She's delusional and
should retire completely.