On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 19:52:27 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 11/28/14 7:45 PM, KC wrote:
On 11/28/2014 7:38 PM, wrote:
On Friday, November 28, 2014 7:25:26 PM UTC-5, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 11/28/14 7:18 PM, Califbill wrote:
"Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 11/28/2014 3:48 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 11/27/14 10:37 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/27/2014 10:15 PM, KC wrote:
On 11/27/2014 10:08 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 20:28:37 -0500, KC
wrote:


I think the first batch of wounds were actually pretty
superficial. I
would like to say Wilson was trying not to have to kill the punk
but I
fear it was just bad shooting. Some shots were never
recovered and
didn't hit Brown at all.


I think like half... at the same time I do math and I can not
see any
way looking at a 6 foot 6 inch 300 pounder running at me, I would
try to
do anything but kill on every shot... no wounding. As to that,
I have
had a lot of cop friends and iirc, it's pretty much illegal to
"fire a
warning shot, or wound to slow down". Pull the trigger, it's
lethal
force, period...

That is what they tell us in the CCW classes and they are usually
police instructors doing it.

The problem with most of these things is the cop forgets rule #1
"Aim".
They spray and pray when one well placed shot would end it.


Yeah, like I said I think I had heard that before. My dads rule was
"never touch another mans gun unless you intend to fire it, and
never
fire it if you don't want to kill something"...

Back to this wound thing.. or even follow thing the pundits and
racists
are saying... Again, this was a 300 pound 6'6 man closing from
less than
35 feet away. Ask any quarterback if you have time to wound or slow
down. And anybody at all who thinks after fighting with the cop,
being
shot, and turning around and attacking the shooter that kid
woudln't
have killed the cop if he closed in, is lying, or retarded...
period...
mostly just lying...


Nobody is "lying" or "retarded" Scott. All that is being
discussed here
is speculative ideas on what may have actually happened. No one
here
was there to see it, including you. The multiple witnesses who were
there and saw it have many conflicting stories and recollections.








Nancy Grace is no slouch and she usually sides on the side of
cops...not
this time:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a-JuoQ4CQaI



Nancy Grace gives me the creeps so I rarely watch or listen to her.

People are posting an adult "rap" sheet on Brown, yet the Ferguson
police
department said he didn't have any kind of adult record. Others are
claiming a juvenile record that tied Brown to a 2nd degree murder but
nothing of the sort has been officially released.

The only think I know for sure is that Brown was a punk. I know that
because I saw him rob the store for the cigars, shove the proprietor
around and intimidate him, as recorded by the store's video camera
system.

Did that or the events that followed justify killing him? I don't
know.
I wasn't there and the reports by witnesses are full of
contradictions.

The manner in which the county prosecutor handled the case via the
Grand
Jury is, according to most of the legal beagles who have commented, is
not completely unheard of but *is* very unusual.

Right on.


It seems obvious the prosecutor did not want an indictment and that's
the way the grand jury was led...

Why spend the taxpayer's money on a losing case? Unless he wanted to
placate the bed-wetting libs, like yourself.


If anything they way overboard to make sure the right outcome was found.
People tend to be more honest in closed doors, when they are not
grandstanding for the court spectators or in this case what surely would
have been cameras.



You don't understand the purpose of a grand jury or what a prosecutor is
supposed to do when presenting. It isn't to indict, necessarily, but in
this case, the prosecutor seemingly did not want an indictment.

"Why spend the taxpayer's money on a losing case? Unless he wanted to
placate the bed-wetting libs, like yourself." (42580435)