Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2014
Posts: 3,524
Default Remember Benghazi?

You know, that non-scandal the GOPers investigated, investigated, and
investigated, and our own little PsychoScotty pushed...

Well, the GOP now admits, in writing, there was nothing of a serious
nature to be found there. Nothing.

The House Select Intelligence Committee—controlled by Republicans—has
been investigating the Benghazi attacks in minute detail for two years.
Today, with the midterm elections safely past, they issued their
findings. Their exoneration of the White House was sweeping and nearly
absolute.

The Committee first concludes that the CIA ensured sufficient
security for CIA facilities in Benghazi....Appropriate U.S. personnel
made reasonable tactical decisions that night, and the Committee found
no evidence that there was either a stand down order or a denial of
available air support....

Second, the Committee finds that there was no intelligence failure
prior to the attacks. In the months prior, the IC provided intelligence
about previous attacks and the increased threat environment in Benghazi,
but the IC did not have specific, tactical warning of the September 11
attacks.

Third, the Committee finds that a mixed group of individuals,
including those affiliated with Al Qa'ida, participated in the attacks....

Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early
intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public
narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully
accurate....There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial
assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption
television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days
after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke)....

Fifth, the Committee finds that the process used to generate the
talking points HPSCI asked for—and which were used for Ambassador Rice's
public appearances—was flawed....

Finally, the Committee found no evidence that any officer was
intimidated, wrongly forced to sign a nondisclosure agreement or
otherwise kept from speaking to Congress, or polygraphed because of
their presence in Benghazi. The Committee also found no evidence that
the CIA conducted unauthorized activities in Benghazi and no evidence
that the IC shipped arms to Syria.

--
One failed attempt at a shoe bomb and we all have to take our shoes off
at the airport…

Thirty one school shootings since Columbine and counting and *no change*
in gun regulations.
  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2013
Posts: 3,344
Default Remember Benghazi?

On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 09:27:20 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

You know, that non-scandal the GOPers investigated, investigated, and
investigated, and our own little PsychoScotty pushed...

Well, the GOP now admits, in writing, there was nothing of a serious
nature to be found there. Nothing.

Good. They investigated and cleared those being investigated. That's
the way the system is supposed to work, Toad.

The Grand Jury in Ferguson will soon provide its findings. That's the
way the system is supposed to work. Zimmerman was found not guilty.
That's the way the system works.

Why does that **** you off, Toad?
  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
KC KC is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,563
Default Remember Benghazi?

On 11/22/2014 10:08 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 09:27:20 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

You know, that non-scandal the GOPers investigated, investigated, and
investigated, and our own little PsychoScotty pushed...

Well, the GOP now admits, in writing, there was nothing of a serious
nature to be found there. Nothing.

Good. They investigated and cleared those being investigated. That's
the way the system is supposed to work, Toad.

The Grand Jury in Ferguson will soon provide its findings. That's the
way the system is supposed to work. Zimmerman was found not guilty.
That's the way the system works.

Why does that **** you off, Toad?



Well, I guess after years of stonewalling and still missing thousands of
papers, non-appearances by the key players we can assume I guess that
either they just gave up or they just decided the weapons sales was not
something they wanted to write about for nat security reasons... So move
on...
  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
KC KC is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,563
Default Remember Benghazi?

On 11/22/2014 10:29 AM, KC wrote:
On 11/22/2014 10:08 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 09:27:20 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

You know, that non-scandal the GOPers investigated, investigated, and
investigated, and our own little PsychoScotty pushed...

Well, the GOP now admits, in writing, there was nothing of a serious
nature to be found there. Nothing.

Good. They investigated and cleared those being investigated. That's
the way the system is supposed to work, Toad.

The Grand Jury in Ferguson will soon provide its findings. That's the
way the system is supposed to work. Zimmerman was found not guilty.
That's the way the system works.

Why does that **** you off, Toad?



Well, I guess after years of stonewalling and still missing thousands of
papers, non-appearances by the key players we can assume I guess that
either they just gave up or they just decided the weapons sales was not
something they wanted to write about for nat security reasons... So move
on...


Trust me, if it was a repub pres the facts would come streaming out,
even if it was against the best interest of the nation. We saw "leaks"
put Bush into some pretty hairy situations where he couldn't really come
out and defend himself because of nat sec... like "weapons of mass
distruction"....
  #5   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2014
Posts: 3,524
Default Remember Benghazi?

On 11/22/14 10:08 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 09:27:20 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

You know, that non-scandal the GOPers investigated, investigated, and
investigated, and our own little PsychoScotty pushed...

Well, the GOP now admits, in writing, there was nothing of a serious
nature to be found there. Nothing.

Good. They investigated and cleared those being investigated. That's
the way the system is supposed to work, Toad.

The Grand Jury in Ferguson will soon provide its findings. That's the
way the system is supposed to work. Zimmerman was found not guilty.
That's the way the system works.

Why does that **** you off, Toad?



I have virtually no confidence in the American legal system as it
pertains to and treats minorities. Zimmerman was and is a thug.

As for the RepubliThug investigations of Benghazi, they had nothing to
with anything *but* politics.



--
One failed attempt at a shoe bomb and we all have to take our shoes off
at the airport…

Thirty one school shootings since Columbine and counting and *no change*
in gun regulations.


  #6   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2014
Posts: 580
Default Remember Benghazi?

On 11/22/2014 12:17 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 11/22/14 10:08 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 09:27:20 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

You know, that non-scandal the GOPers investigated, investigated, and
investigated, and our own little PsychoScotty pushed...

Well, the GOP now admits, in writing, there was nothing of a serious
nature to be found there. Nothing.

Good. They investigated and cleared those being investigated. That's
the way the system is supposed to work, Toad.

The Grand Jury in Ferguson will soon provide its findings. That's the
way the system is supposed to work. Zimmerman was found not guilty.
That's the way the system works.

Why does that **** you off, Toad?



I have virtually no confidence in the American legal system as it
pertains to and treats minorities. Zimmerman was and is a thug.

As for the RepubliThug investigations of Benghazi, they had nothing to
with anything *but* politics.




Zimmerman performed a service and that's the thanks you give him?
  #7   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2012
Posts: 610
Default Remember Benghazi?

On Saturday, November 22, 2014 9:17:14 AM UTC-8, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 11/22/14 10:08 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 09:27:20 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

You know, that non-scandal the GOPers investigated, investigated, and
investigated, and our own little PsychoScotty pushed...

Well, the GOP now admits, in writing, there was nothing of a serious
nature to be found there. Nothing.

Good. They investigated and cleared those being investigated. That's
the way the system is supposed to work, Toad.

The Grand Jury in Ferguson will soon provide its findings. That's the
way the system is supposed to work. Zimmerman was found not guilty.
That's the way the system works.

Why does that **** you off, Toad?



I have virtually no confidence in the American legal system as it
pertains to and treats minorities. Zimmerman was and is a thug.



OJ was a minority thug as well. He walked. Cochran was a minority racist who pulled the race card. He won.

Think of a better line Krause.
  #8   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2013
Posts: 6,972
Default Remember Benghazi?

On 11/22/2014 9:27 AM, F*O*A*D wrote:
You know, that non-scandal the GOPers investigated, investigated, and
investigated, and our own little PsychoScotty pushed...

Well, the GOP now admits, in writing, there was nothing of a serious
nature to be found there. Nothing.

The House Select Intelligence Committee—controlled by Republicans—has
been investigating the Benghazi attacks in minute detail for two years.
Today, with the midterm elections safely past, they issued their
findings. Their exoneration of the White House was sweeping and nearly
absolute.

The Committee first concludes that the CIA ensured sufficient
security for CIA facilities in Benghazi....Appropriate U.S. personnel
made reasonable tactical decisions that night, and the Committee found
no evidence that there was either a stand down order or a denial of
available air support....

Second, the Committee finds that there was no intelligence failure
prior to the attacks. In the months prior, the IC provided intelligence
about previous attacks and the increased threat environment in Benghazi,
but the IC did not have specific, tactical warning of the September 11
attacks.

Third, the Committee finds that a mixed group of individuals,
including those affiliated with Al Qa'ida, participated in the attacks....

Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early
intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public
narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully
accurate....There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial
assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption
television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days
after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke)....

Fifth, the Committee finds that the process used to generate the
talking points HPSCI asked for—and which were used for Ambassador Rice's
public appearances—was flawed....

Finally, the Committee found no evidence that any officer was
intimidated, wrongly forced to sign a nondisclosure agreement or
otherwise kept from speaking to Congress, or polygraphed because of
their presence in Benghazi. The Committee also found no evidence that
the CIA conducted unauthorized activities in Benghazi and no evidence
that the IC shipped arms to Syria.



I read that yesterday. Another thing that caught my attention is that
the specific report you are citing is the seventh of eight
"investigations" conducted regarding the Benghazi affair.

This report, by the House Committee, is consistent with the six
previous investigations. One more investigation is being conducted
apparently.


  #9   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2014
Posts: 3,524
Default Remember Benghazi?

"Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 11/22/2014 9:27 AM, F*O*A*D wrote:
You know, that non-scandal the GOPers investigated, investigated, and
investigated, and our own little PsychoScotty pushed...

Well, the GOP now admits, in writing, there was nothing of a serious
nature to be found there. Nothing.

The House Select Intelligence Committee—controlled by Republicans—has
been investigating the Benghazi attacks in minute detail for two years.
Today, with the midterm elections safely past, they issued their
findings. Their exoneration of the White House was sweeping and nearly
absolute.

The Committee first concludes that the CIA ensured sufficient
security for CIA facilities in Benghazi....Appropriate U.S. personnel
made reasonable tactical decisions that night, and the Committee found
no evidence that there was either a stand down order or a denial of
available air support....

Second, the Committee finds that there was no intelligence failure
prior to the attacks. In the months prior, the IC provided intelligence
about previous attacks and the increased threat environment in Benghazi,
but the IC did not have specific, tactical warning of the September 11
attacks.

Third, the Committee finds that a mixed group of individuals,
including those affiliated with Al Qa'ida, participated in the attacks....

Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early
intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public
narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully
accurate....There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial
assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption
television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days
after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke)....

Fifth, the Committee finds that the process used to generate the
talking points HPSCI asked for—and which were used for Ambassador Rice's
public appearances—was flawed....

Finally, the Committee found no evidence that any officer was
intimidated, wrongly forced to sign a nondisclosure agreement or
otherwise kept from speaking to Congress, or polygraphed because of
their presence in Benghazi. The Committee also found no evidence that
the CIA conducted unauthorized activities in Benghazi and no evidence
that the IC shipped arms to Syria.



I read that yesterday. Another thing that caught my attention is that
the specific report you are citing is the seventh of eight
"investigations" conducted regarding the Benghazi affair.

This report, by the House Committee, is consistent with the six previous
investigations. One more investigation is being conducted apparently.


The GOPers were only interested in drumming up scandals.

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+
  #10   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2013
Posts: 6,972
Default Remember Benghazi?

On 11/23/2014 2:17 PM, BAR wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 11/22/2014 9:27 AM, F*O*A*D wrote:
You know, that non-scandal the GOPers investigated, investigated, and
investigated, and our own little PsychoScotty pushed...

Well, the GOP now admits, in writing, there was nothing of a serious
nature to be found there. Nothing.

The House Select Intelligence Committee?controlled by Republicans?has
been investigating the Benghazi attacks in minute detail for two years.
Today, with the midterm elections safely past, they issued their
findings. Their exoneration of the White House was sweeping and nearly
absolute.

The Committee first concludes that the CIA ensured sufficient
security for CIA facilities in Benghazi....Appropriate U.S. personnel
made reasonable tactical decisions that night, and the Committee found
no evidence that there was either a stand down order or a denial of
available air support....

Second, the Committee finds that there was no intelligence failure
prior to the attacks. In the months prior, the IC provided intelligence
about previous attacks and the increased threat environment in Benghazi,
but the IC did not have specific, tactical warning of the September 11
attacks.

Third, the Committee finds that a mixed group of individuals,
including those affiliated with Al Qa'ida, participated in the attacks....

Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early
intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public
narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully
accurate....There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial
assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption
television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days
after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke)....

Fifth, the Committee finds that the process used to generate the
talking points HPSCI asked for?and which were used for Ambassador Rice's
public appearances?was flawed....

Finally, the Committee found no evidence that any officer was
intimidated, wrongly forced to sign a nondisclosure agreement or
otherwise kept from speaking to Congress, or polygraphed because of
their presence in Benghazi. The Committee also found no evidence that
the CIA conducted unauthorized activities in Benghazi and no evidence
that the IC shipped arms to Syria.



I read that yesterday. Another thing that caught my attention is that
the specific report you are citing is the seventh of eight
"investigations" conducted regarding the Benghazi affair.

This report, by the House Committee, is consistent with the six
previous investigations. One more investigation is being conducted
apparently.



We, the US, were invovled in "gun running" in Libya.


Do you know that to be a fact? The CIA denies it but said they "can't
comment on other agencies".

So if the CIA doesn't know for sure, where did you get your intel?

Or is your position that the CIA is just lying?








Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Betrayal in Benghazi Poquito Loco General 28 May 24th 14 04:23 PM
I remember when... F.O.A.D. General 1 August 22nd 13 07:15 PM
Remember this? F.O.A.D. General 30 June 14th 13 02:26 PM
John can't remember houses, Cindy can't remember sisters. Tim General 6 August 23rd 08 12:06 PM
Guys, remember spontoon boy. Remember Burnt Njall. Oci-One Kanubi General 11 April 1st 07 01:15 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017