On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:09:02 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 15:41:35 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

Not by the normal definition of subsistence hunting.

BTW I noticed that you ducked the question about taking invasive
exotics.

If he agreed with it, he'd have to agree to shooting mute swans.
They're raising hell with the Chesapeake.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n..._muteswan.html

Perhaps a few relocated pythons could help with our problem? I hear
they're getting more and more used to cold weather.

On 11/18/2014 5:21 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:09:02 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 15:41:35 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

Not by the normal definition of subsistence hunting.

BTW I noticed that you ducked the question about taking invasive
exotics.

If he agreed with it, he'd have to agree to shooting mute swans.
They're raising hell with the Chesapeake.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n..._muteswan.html

Perhaps a few relocated pythons could help with our problem? I hear
they're getting more and more used to cold weather.


cough**** CANADA GEESEcough Just sayin'...

On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:29:22 -0500, KC wrote:

On 11/18/2014 5:21 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:09:02 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 15:41:35 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

Not by the normal definition of subsistence hunting.

BTW I noticed that you ducked the question about taking invasive
exotics.

If he agreed with it, he'd have to agree to shooting mute swans.
They're raising hell with the Chesapeake.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n..._muteswan.html

Perhaps a few relocated pythons could help with our problem? I hear
they're getting more and more used to cold weather.


cough**** CANADA GEESEcough Just sayin'...

....yeah, those too.

On 11/18/14 5:29 PM, KC wrote:
On 11/18/2014 5:21 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:09:02 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 15:41:35 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

Not by the normal definition of subsistence hunting.

BTW I noticed that you ducked the question about taking invasive
exotics.

If he agreed with it, he'd have to agree to shooting mute swans.
They're raising hell with the Chesapeake.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n..._muteswan.html

Perhaps a few relocated pythons could help with our problem? I hear
they're getting more and more used to cold weather.


cough**** CANADA GEESEcough Just sayin'...

You probably have.

--
Just because you are opposed to abortion doesn’t make you pro-life. Your
morality is deeply lacking if all you want is a child born but not a
child fed, not a child educated, not a child housed, not a child
clothed, not a child able to see the doctor. That’s not pro-life…that’s
pro-birth.