About Us

Poco Loco

On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 15:51:25 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 13:18:01 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 11/18/2014 1:12 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 06:50:08 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 11/18/14 12:51 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 22:22:10 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

If you mean the palins, they are not subsistence hunters. I have no idea
who the "motor city mad man" is. I have no objection to, for example,
tribesmen who hunt because it is the only way they can feed themselves
and their families. You really should stop coming to conclusions based
upon your wild-assed guesses.

So someone who just hunts to supplement their income is evil?
Do you feel the same about gardening?

Personally I do not see much difference between shooting a deer and
paying Giant food to kill a steer, butcher and wrap it for me.
Both are going to be a dead mammal that we cook and eat.

*My* point was that there is no morality in non-subsistence hunting. If
a family with very little money can put food on the table or have
something to sell or trade by hunting, then *that* is subsistence hunting.

You don't seem to understand the point.

Maybe I do.

If the hunter is eating the game, it is subsistence hunting. If he is
just collecting trophies I agree with you.

The other side of this is controlling invasive species. I assume you
are OK with shooting wild hogs and pythons. You certainly should be if
protecting native species and habitat are important to you.

Does that mean we should be shooting illegal immigrants?

(just a joke, relax)

If we did that, who would do all of the hard work?

We would starve, nothing would be built and the grass would be over
the house.

And the Democrats would lose lots of votes!

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Menu

About Us