Well ....
 

On 11/20/14 12:33 PM, True North wrote:
Wayne. B
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 07:35:16 -0500, Poco Loco
wrote:

Surely Wayne, or anyone else here, could outshoot your ass any day of
the week, Toad.

===

"Would that require a weapon of ass destruction?"


Weren't you just admonishing me for making uncalled for comments?


My guess is that Wayne and ****head Johnny think their tongues are
weapons of ass destruction.

--
Just because you are opposed to abortion doesn’t make you pro-life. Your
morality is deeply lacking if all you want is a child born but not a
child fed, not a child educated, not a child housed, not a child
clothed, not a child able to see the doctor. That’s not pro-life…that’s
pro-birth.

Well ....
 

Greg she was definitely lucky. Those things can as you know be vicious.

A 12ga. slug would do the job unless it's charging at you. Then 2-0 steel buckshot would probably be a better choice. At least that's my thought.

Well ....
 

On 11/20/2014 12:33 PM, True North wrote:
Wayne. B
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 07:35:16 -0500, Poco Loco
wrote:

Surely Wayne, or anyone else here, could outshoot your ass any day of
the week, Toad.

===

"Would that require a weapon of ass destruction?"


Weren't you just admonishing me for making uncalled for comments?

I think he did. So stop already

Well ....
 

On 11/20/2014 1:16 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 11/20/14 12:33 PM, True North wrote:
Wayne. B
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 07:35:16 -0500, Poco Loco
wrote:

Surely Wayne, or anyone else here, could outshoot your ass any day of
the week, Toad.

===

"Would that require a weapon of ass destruction?"


Weren't you just admonishing me for making uncalled for comments?


My guess is that Wayne and ****head Johnny think their tongues are
weapons of ass destruction.

You're s weird one.

Well ....
 

On 11/20/14 12:59 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 06:37:57 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 11/20/14 1:24 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 20:51:41 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 14:27:17 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 07:47:57 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

Greg changed the subject to the hunting of invasive species. I'm not
playing that game with him in this discussion.

It is still hunting. Hog hunting may be the most popular hunting we
have here, right behind alligators.

===

What's the gun of choice for hog hunting?

You need something that hits pretty hard but a slug in a shotgun is
the easy choice. They also like 308/30 08 class 30 cals.
There are guys who go with .44mag revolvers but they better be good.
I imagine my .,44 carbine would work but I still like the slug idea,

It depends on whether you have dogs and whether you have backup I
suppose.
Folks used to say Auggie Doggie looked like a "hog dog". Being from
Arcadia, it was certainly a possibility. He certainly wasn't afraid of
much

75# bull dog mix.
http://gfretwell.com/ftp/Auggie%20on%20watch2.jpg



Surely Wayne, who describes himself as a terrific shot, could drop a hog
with that pellet rifle he keeps advocating from, say, five yards away.
At the very least, it would be entertaining for observers and the hog.

I am not sure I would want to be there with a .223 either.
That is a heluva round if you want to inflict grievous wounds on a 100
pound 3d world teenagers but when a 400 pound hog with 5" tusks is
charging you, knockdown power is king.

That may be a bit overstated tho. My wife ran one off in the scrub by
yelling at him and hitting him in the nose with her (thrown) Nextel
brick. Everyone agreed she was lucky. The rangers carry shotguns with
slugs.


Oh, I wouldn't want your wife on the losing end of a fight with a wild
hog. Wayne, though... what the hell.

--
Just because you are opposed to abortion doesn’t make you pro-life. Your
morality is deeply lacking if all you want is a child born but not a
child fed, not a child educated, not a child housed, not a child
clothed, not a child able to see the doctor. That’s not pro-life…that’s
pro-birth.

Well ....
 

On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 09:33:27 -0800 (PST), True North
wrote:

Wayne. B
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 07:35:16 -0500, Poco Loco
wrote:

Surely Wayne, or anyone else here, could outshoot your ass any day of
the week, Toad.

===

"Would that require a weapon of ass destruction? "


Weren't you just admonishing me for making uncalled for comments?

===

There's an important difference Don. There was no personal invective
in my comment as opposed to yours. I would concede that I've directed
a bit of invective at Harry but that's just tit for tat and all true
as far as I know.

Well ....
 

On 11/20/14 2:10 PM, Wayne.B wrote:

"Would that require a weapon of ass destruction?"




===

There's an important difference Don. There was no personal invective
in my comment as opposed to yours. I would concede that I've directed
a bit of invective at Harry but that's just tit for tat and all true
as far as I know.



Tit for tat:

So, Wayne, how far do you stick your tongue up someone's ass in order
to destroy it, and have you had a lot of experience doing that?

--
Just because you are opposed to abortion doesn’t make you pro-life. Your
morality is deeply lacking if all you want is a child born but not a
child fed, not a child educated, not a child housed, not a child
clothed, not a child able to see the doctor. That’s not pro-life…that’s
pro-birth.

Well ....
 

On 11/20/2014 3:51 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 11/20/14 2:10 PM, Wayne.B wrote:

"Would that require a weapon of ass destruction?"




===

There's an important difference Don. There was no personal invective
in my comment as opposed to yours. I would concede that I've directed
a bit of invective at Harry but that's just tit for tat and all true
as far as I know.



Tit for tat:

So, Wayne, how far do you stick your tongue up someone's ass in order
to destroy it, and have you had a lot of experience doing that?



Why the slammer impersonations lately?

Well ....
 

Wayne. B
- show quoted text -
===

"There's an important difference Don. *There was no personal invective
in my comment as opposed to yours. *I would concede that I've directed
a bit of invective at Harry but that's just tit for tat and all true
as far as I know. "


Bingo!

You vs Harry
Me vs FlaJim
From my point of view...similar, except my jab about the possibly of his being afraid of the dark is almost
laughably mild.

Well ....
 

On 11/20/14 3:54 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/20/2014 3:51 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 11/20/14 2:10 PM, Wayne.B wrote:

"Would that require a weapon of ass destruction?"




===

There's an important difference Don. There was no personal invective
in my comment as opposed to yours. I would concede that I've directed
a bit of invective at Harry but that's just tit for tat and all true
as far as I know.



Tit for tat:

So, Wayne, how far do you stick your tongue up someone's ass in order
to destroy it, and have you had a lot of experience doing that?



Why the slammer impersonations lately?

I'm just channeling your buddy Wayne, whose snarky comments about me you
find humorous. I don't see slammer's comments...does he comment about
Wayne, too?

--
Just because you are opposed to abortion doesn’t make you pro-life. Your
morality is deeply lacking if all you want is a child born but not a
child fed, not a child educated, not a child housed, not a child
clothed, not a child able to see the doctor. That’s not pro-life…that’s
pro-birth.