Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 10/16/14, 9:09 PM, wrote: On 16 Oct 2014 18:02:43 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote: True North wrote: Johnny spess... "Now Don will be re-reading the article over and over trying to see if Cathy Fears belonged to the 15 year-old. " Naw, I quickly marked it off as due to your diminished faculties and moved on. My condolences to Mrs Herring. She keeps suggesting new hobbies to get her creepy husband out of the house and out of her sight. This month, model airplanes. Next month, Ebola safety suit tester. You really have a hard time criticizing any one's hobby when yours is tiptoeing around an assault weapons ban that you profess to support by doing modifications to a rifle they intended to outlaw. The only reason you seem to have for it is to spray the Shanandoah valley with spent 5.56 rounds and broken bits of plastic. If that is all you want to do you need one of these. http://cdn.pyramydair.com/images/Dai...3925601938.jpg What assault weapons ban am I tiptoeing around, pray tell? I don't own any "assault weapons." I do have a few semi-auto rifles. None of the firearms I own are banned in my state. I have three ranges I can shoot my rifles at, all within about 20-30 miles or so of here, and one of them is an indoor range. None of the rifles I have are modified in any way that would make them illegal. Adding an ambi safety, a red dot sight, or modifying a gas block does not make the rifles fire automatically. According to the government assault rifles only have to look nasty. Nothing about select fire. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/16/14 11:20 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/16/14, 9:09 PM, wrote: On 16 Oct 2014 18:02:43 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote: True North wrote: Johnny spess... "Now Don will be re-reading the article over and over trying to see if Cathy Fears belonged to the 15 year-old. " Naw, I quickly marked it off as due to your diminished faculties and moved on. My condolences to Mrs Herring. She keeps suggesting new hobbies to get her creepy husband out of the house and out of her sight. This month, model airplanes. Next month, Ebola safety suit tester. You really have a hard time criticizing any one's hobby when yours is tiptoeing around an assault weapons ban that you profess to support by doing modifications to a rifle they intended to outlaw. The only reason you seem to have for it is to spray the Shanandoah valley with spent 5.56 rounds and broken bits of plastic. If that is all you want to do you need one of these. http://cdn.pyramydair.com/images/Dai...3925601938.jpg What assault weapons ban am I tiptoeing around, pray tell? I don't own any "assault weapons." I do have a few semi-auto rifles. None of the firearms I own are banned in my state. I have three ranges I can shoot my rifles at, all within about 20-30 miles or so of here, and one of them is an indoor range. None of the rifles I have are modified in any way that would make them illegal. Adding an ambi safety, a red dot sight, or modifying a gas block does not make the rifles fire automatically. According to the government assault rifles only have to look nasty. Nothing about select fire. Didn't you recently buy a S&W variant of an AR-15? -- The new GOP credo: Hate the people who are being oppressed, love the people who are doing the oppressing. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
F*O*A*D wrote:
On 10/16/14 11:20 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 10/16/14, 9:09 PM, wrote: On 16 Oct 2014 18:02:43 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote: True North wrote: Johnny spess... "Now Don will be re-reading the article over and over trying to see if Cathy Fears belonged to the 15 year-old. " Naw, I quickly marked it off as due to your diminished faculties and moved on. My condolences to Mrs Herring. She keeps suggesting new hobbies to get her creepy husband out of the house and out of her sight. This month, model airplanes. Next month, Ebola safety suit tester. You really have a hard time criticizing any one's hobby when yours is tiptoeing around an assault weapons ban that you profess to support by doing modifications to a rifle they intended to outlaw. The only reason you seem to have for it is to spray the Shanandoah valley with spent 5.56 rounds and broken bits of plastic. If that is all you want to do you need one of these. http://cdn.pyramydair.com/images/Dai...3925601938.jpg What assault weapons ban am I tiptoeing around, pray tell? I don't own any "assault weapons." I do have a few semi-auto rifles. None of the firearms I own are banned in my state. I have three ranges I can shoot my rifles at, all within about 20-30 miles or so of here, and one of them is an indoor range. None of the rifles I have are modified in any way that would make them illegal. Adding an ambi safety, a red dot sight, or modifying a gas block does not make the rifles fire automatically. According to the government assault rifles only have to look nasty. Nothing about select fire. Didn't you recently buy a S&W variant of an AR-15? Yup. And it gets around the "assault rifle" ban by having a bullet button, and flash suppressor is welded on. Lots of others, including the original AR's are banned. On looks. You can own a pre ban AR if you both owned it before the ban and registered the gun. Very much anti 2nd admendment. Hell my Remington 7400 30.06 is more deadly than the AR's .223. Except my 7400 was known as the Jamomatic. Is all on looks, perception. Like the no hunting Mountain Lions in this state. They are not endangered, they are a danger, and have about wiped out the endangered desert Big Horn Sheep. Is perception of. a cuddly cat. Snerk. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 07:44:14 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:
Anyone, even you, if you lived here, could buy an AR-15 lower in Maryland through an FFL and finish it off into a rifle with a 16" HBAR and have yourself a new AR-15. The .308 battle rifles, by the way, aren't on the forbidden list, and neither are the .300 Blackouts. === ..308 on an AR-15 frame is not an enjoyable gun to shoot. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/17/14 9:50 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 07:44:14 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: Anyone, even you, if you lived here, could buy an AR-15 lower in Maryland through an FFL and finish it off into a rifle with a 16" HBAR and have yourself a new AR-15. The .308 battle rifles, by the way, aren't on the forbidden list, and neither are the .300 Blackouts. === .308 on an AR-15 frame is not an enjoyable gun to shoot. ..300 blackout is better than ok on an AR-15 frame. Bullet is close to a a .308, pretty much identical to a 7.62 Sov, but not as big a powder charge. I've never shot a .308 rifle, AR-15 style or otherwise. -- The new GOP credo: Hate the people who are being oppressed, love the people who are doing the oppressing. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 10:14:33 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:
I've never shot a .308 rifle, AR-15 style or otherwise. === Very accurate but a nasty recoil, especially on a light weight rifle. |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
F*O*A*D wrote:
On 10/17/14 9:50 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 07:44:14 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: Anyone, even you, if you lived here, could buy an AR-15 lower in Maryland through an FFL and finish it off into a rifle with a 16" HBAR and have yourself a new AR-15. The .308 battle rifles, by the way, aren't on the forbidden list, and neither are the .300 Blackouts. === .308 on an AR-15 frame is not an enjoyable gun to shoot. .300 blackout is better than ok on an AR-15 frame. Bullet is close to a a .308, pretty much identical to a 7.62 Sov, but not as big a powder charge. I've never shot a .308 rifle, AR-15 style or otherwise. Bad choice of rounds. If similar to 308, would be a heck of a lot cheaper to shoot. Or a 7.62 Russian. Lots cheaper to buy a military round than a wildcat.. |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/17/14 2:52 PM, Califbill wrote:
F*O*A*D wrote: On 10/17/14 9:50 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 07:44:14 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: Anyone, even you, if you lived here, could buy an AR-15 lower in Maryland through an FFL and finish it off into a rifle with a 16" HBAR and have yourself a new AR-15. The .308 battle rifles, by the way, aren't on the forbidden list, and neither are the .300 Blackouts. === .308 on an AR-15 frame is not an enjoyable gun to shoot. .300 blackout is better than ok on an AR-15 frame. Bullet is close to a a .308, pretty much identical to a 7.62 Sov, but not as big a powder charge. I've never shot a .308 rifle, AR-15 style or otherwise. Bad choice of rounds. If similar to 308, would be a heck of a lot cheaper to shoot. Or a 7.62 Russian. Lots cheaper to buy a military round than a wildcat.. ..300 aac blackout is a wildcat no longer. Just got an email alert for .300 blackout rounds for about .32 each...price is dropping rapidly. I don't like or use Russian ammo. -- The new GOP credo: Hate the people who are being oppressed, love the people who are doing the oppressing. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
YOU'RE FULL OF SMART-ASS TALK WHEN IN THE COMPANY OF OTHERS.....BUTALONE.....WILL YOUR MOUTH RING SO SMART????? I DONT THINK SO. | General | |||
OT "Smart Cars" not so smart | General | |||
Smart Yoga: - Learn Yoga in a smart way | General | |||
Smart Yoga: - Learn Yoga in a smart way | General | |||
Getting smart | General |