| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
|
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
Wow...you can tell that just from fox news coverage?
The US justice dept should hire you...you could save them millions in court costs. |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
On 9/25/2014 12:20 PM, True North wrote:
Wow...you can tell that just from fox news coverage? The US justice dept should hire you...you could save them millions in court costs. Just testing to see which turd would float first. You da winnah. |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
On Thursday, September 25, 2014 1:49:16 PM UTC-4, Harrold wrote:
On 9/25/2014 12:20 PM, True North wrote: Wow...you can tell that just from fox news coverage? The US justice dept should hire you...you could save them millions in court costs. Just testing to see which turd would float first. You da winnah. And they are so quick to blame the white guy, innocent or not! I'm surprised Jesse and Al haven't jumped in screaming 'racism' 'cause they posted a picture of an individual not yet found guilty. |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
On Thursday, September 25, 2014 1:49:16 PM UTC-4, Harrold wrote:
On 9/25/2014 12:20 PM, True North wrote: Wow...you can tell that just from fox news coverage? The US justice dept should hire you...you could save them millions in court costs. Just testing to see which turd would float first. You da winnah. And harry even wrote his reply....cant you tell? |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
On 9/25/14 9:57 PM, KC wrote:
On 9/25/2014 7:45 PM, BAR wrote: In article , says... Wow...you can tell that just from fox news coverage? The US justice dept should hire you...you could save them millions in court costs. Guy shows up at the police station asking for a lawyer. The guy gets the name and leaves. The police chase him and call off the chase when the speeds get too high. The guy is acting funny in Galveston, TX, 1000 miles away from Charlottesville, VA. Local citizen calls up police and the show up and figure out the guy is who Virginia is looking for. The guy is not contesting extradition to Virginia from Texas. The only question left is do they still fry people in Virginia? Saw a prosecutor interviewed today and he said it might not be a bad thing if he fights extradition, since they have not built a whole case yet or found the girl, it would give them more time to make their case before his constitutionally guaranteed "speedy trial"... D'oh. A "speedy trial" doesn't mean it has to be held the next week or the next month or even three months from now, moron. Oh, and the prosecution makes its case *during* the trial, if there is a trial. It doesn't take much of a case to get a grand jury to indict a suspect. You obviously did not understand what was being said in that interview. No surprise. |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
On 9/26/14 10:46 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 06:45:02 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: On 9/25/14 9:57 PM, KC wrote: On 9/25/2014 7:45 PM, BAR wrote: In article , says... Wow...you can tell that just from fox news coverage? The US justice dept should hire you...you could save them millions in court costs. Guy shows up at the police station asking for a lawyer. The guy gets the name and leaves. The police chase him and call off the chase when the speeds get too high. The guy is acting funny in Galveston, TX, 1000 miles away from Charlottesville, VA. Local citizen calls up police and the show up and figure out the guy is who Virginia is looking for. The guy is not contesting extradition to Virginia from Texas. The only question left is do they still fry people in Virginia? Saw a prosecutor interviewed today and he said it might not be a bad thing if he fights extradition, since they have not built a whole case yet or found the girl, it would give them more time to make their case before his constitutionally guaranteed "speedy trial"... D'oh. A "speedy trial" doesn't mean it has to be held the next week or the next month or even three months from now, moron. Oh, and the prosecution makes its case *during* the trial, if there is a trial. It doesn't take much of a case to get a grand jury to indict a suspect. You obviously did not understand what was being said in that interview. No surprise. Unless they have more than reported it might be hard to get past habeas corpus. They literally don't have a body, nor can they even prove something happened to the girl. Indeed, but those issues have nothing to do with the "right to a speedy trial." |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
F*O*A*D wrote:
On 9/26/14 10:46 AM, wrote: On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 06:45:02 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: On 9/25/14 9:57 PM, KC wrote: On 9/25/2014 7:45 PM, BAR wrote: In article , says... Wow...you can tell that just from fox news coverage? The US justice dept should hire you...you could save them millions in court costs. Guy shows up at the police station asking for a lawyer. The guy gets the name and leaves. The police chase him and call off the chase when the speeds get too high. The guy is acting funny in Galveston, TX, 1000 miles away from Charlottesville, VA. Local citizen calls up police and the show up and figure out the guy is who Virginia is looking for. The guy is not contesting extradition to Virginia from Texas. The only question left is do they still fry people in Virginia? Saw a prosecutor interviewed today and he said it might not be a bad thing if he fights extradition, since they have not built a whole case yet or found the girl, it would give them more time to make their case before his constitutionally guaranteed "speedy trial"... D'oh. A "speedy trial" doesn't mean it has to be held the next week or the next month or even three months from now, moron. Oh, and the prosecution makes its case *during* the trial, if there is a trial. It doesn't take much of a case to get a grand jury to indict a suspect. You obviously did not understand what was being said in that interview. No surprise. Unless they have more than reported it might be hard to get past habeas corpus. They literally don't have a body, nor can they even prove something happened to the girl. Indeed, but those issues have nothing to do with the "right to a speedy trial." A speedy trial is required and it is not a great amount of time after indictment. I think 90 days, unless waived. Our neighbor was murdered by her new husband. Back about 1980. They screwed up the paper work and scheduled the trial 3 days late. He walked! And he was definitely guilty of the murder. |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
On Friday, September 26, 2014 7:58:50 AM UTC-7, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 9/26/14 10:46 AM, wrote: On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 06:45:02 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: On 9/25/14 9:57 PM, KC wrote: On 9/25/2014 7:45 PM, BAR wrote: In article , says... Wow...you can tell that just from fox news coverage? The US justice dept should hire you...you could save them millions in court costs. Guy shows up at the police station asking for a lawyer. The guy gets the name and leaves. The police chase him and call off the chase when the speeds get too high. The guy is acting funny in Galveston, TX, 1000 miles away from Charlottesville, VA. Local citizen calls up police and the show up and figure out the guy is who Virginia is looking for. The guy is not contesting extradition to Virginia from Texas. The only question left is do they still fry people in Virginia? Saw a prosecutor interviewed today and he said it might not be a bad thing if he fights extradition, since they have not built a whole case yet or found the girl, it would give them more time to make their case before his constitutionally guaranteed "speedy trial"... D'oh. A "speedy trial" doesn't mean it has to be held the next week or the next month or even three months from now, moron. Oh, and the prosecution makes its case *during* the trial, if there is a trial. It doesn't take much of a case to get a grand jury to indict a suspect. You obviously did not understand what was being said in that interview. No surprise. Unless they have more than reported it might be hard to get past habeas corpus. They literally don't have a body, nor can they even prove something happened to the girl. Indeed, but those issues have nothing to do with the "right to a speedy trial." Your idea of a speedy trial is to see how fast the lawyers can finalize your your bankruptcies. |
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| for all those who doubt America | General | |||
| Conyers guilty... | General | |||
| River of Doubt | General | |||
| No Doubt..... | ASA | |||
| S.S in the Bahamas, I doubt it! | ASA | |||
Hybrid Mode
