On Friday, September 26, 2014 7:58:50 AM UTC-7, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 9/26/14 10:46 AM, wrote:

On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 06:45:02 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:



On 9/25/14 9:57 PM, KC wrote:

On 9/25/2014 7:45 PM, BAR wrote:

In article ,

says...



Wow...you can tell that just from fox news coverage?

The US justice dept should hire you...you could save them millions in

court costs.



Guy shows up at the police station asking for a lawyer.



The guy gets the name and leaves.



The police chase him and call off the chase when the speeds get too

high.



The guy is acting funny in Galveston, TX, 1000 miles away from

Charlottesville, VA.



Local citizen calls up police and the show up and figure out the guy is

who Virginia is looking for.



The guy is not contesting extradition to Virginia from Texas.



The only question left is do they still fry people in Virginia?





Saw a prosecutor interviewed today and he said it might not be a bad

thing if he fights extradition, since they have not built a whole case

yet or found the girl, it would give them more time to make their case

before his constitutionally guaranteed "speedy trial"...





D'oh. A "speedy trial" doesn't mean it has to be held the next week or

the next month or even three months from now, moron. Oh, and the

prosecution makes its case *during* the trial, if there is a trial. It

doesn't take much of a case to get a grand jury to indict a suspect. You

obviously did not understand what was being said in that interview. No

surprise.



Unless they have more than reported it might be hard to get past

habeas corpus. They literally don't have a body, nor can they even

prove something happened to the girl.





Indeed, but those issues have nothing to do with the "right to a speedy

trial."

Your idea of a speedy trial is to see how fast the lawyers can finalize your your bankruptcies.