Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
 

http://news.msn.com/crime-justice/su...ocid=ansnews11

Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
 

Wow...you can tell that just from fox news coverage?
The US justice dept should hire you...you could save them millions in court costs.

Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
 

On 9/25/2014 12:20 PM, True North wrote:
Wow...you can tell that just from fox news coverage?
The US justice dept should hire you...you could save them millions in court costs.


Just testing to see which turd would float first. You da winnah.

Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
 

On Thursday, September 25, 2014 1:49:16 PM UTC-4, Harrold wrote:
On 9/25/2014 12:20 PM, True North wrote:

Wow...you can tell that just from fox news coverage?

The US justice dept should hire you...you could save them millions in court costs.





Just testing to see which turd would float first. You da winnah.

And they are so quick to blame the white guy, innocent or not! I'm surprised Jesse and Al haven't jumped in screaming 'racism' 'cause they posted a picture of an individual not yet found guilty.

Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
 

On 9/25/2014 7:45 PM, BAR wrote:
In article ,
says...

Wow...you can tell that just from fox news coverage?
The US justice dept should hire you...you could save them millions in court costs.

Guy shows up at the police station asking for a lawyer.

The guy gets the name and leaves.

The police chase him and call off the chase when the speeds get too
high.

The guy is acting funny in Galveston, TX, 1000 miles away from
Charlottesville, VA.

Local citizen calls up police and the show up and figure out the guy is
who Virginia is looking for.

The guy is not contesting extradition to Virginia from Texas.

The only question left is do they still fry people in Virginia?


Saw a prosecutor interviewed today and he said it might not be a bad
thing if he fights extradition, since they have not built a whole case
yet or found the girl, it would give them more time to make their case
before his constitutionally guaranteed "speedy trial"...

Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
 

On Thursday, September 25, 2014 1:49:16 PM UTC-4, Harrold wrote:
On 9/25/2014 12:20 PM, True North wrote:

Wow...you can tell that just from fox news coverage?

The US justice dept should hire you...you could save them millions in court costs.





Just testing to see which turd would float first. You da winnah.

And harry even wrote his reply....cant you tell?

Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
 

On 9/25/14 9:57 PM, KC wrote:
On 9/25/2014 7:45 PM, BAR wrote:
In article ,
says...

Wow...you can tell that just from fox news coverage?
The US justice dept should hire you...you could save them millions in
court costs.

Guy shows up at the police station asking for a lawyer.

The guy gets the name and leaves.

The police chase him and call off the chase when the speeds get too
high.

The guy is acting funny in Galveston, TX, 1000 miles away from
Charlottesville, VA.

Local citizen calls up police and the show up and figure out the guy is
who Virginia is looking for.

The guy is not contesting extradition to Virginia from Texas.

The only question left is do they still fry people in Virginia?


Saw a prosecutor interviewed today and he said it might not be a bad
thing if he fights extradition, since they have not built a whole case
yet or found the girl, it would give them more time to make their case
before his constitutionally guaranteed "speedy trial"...


D'oh. A "speedy trial" doesn't mean it has to be held the next week or
the next month or even three months from now, moron. Oh, and the
prosecution makes its case *during* the trial, if there is a trial. It
doesn't take much of a case to get a grand jury to indict a suspect. You
obviously did not understand what was being said in that interview. No
surprise.

Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
 

On 9/26/14 10:46 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 06:45:02 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 9/25/14 9:57 PM, KC wrote:
On 9/25/2014 7:45 PM, BAR wrote:
In article ,
says...

Wow...you can tell that just from fox news coverage?
The US justice dept should hire you...you could save them millions in
court costs.

Guy shows up at the police station asking for a lawyer.

The guy gets the name and leaves.

The police chase him and call off the chase when the speeds get too
high.

The guy is acting funny in Galveston, TX, 1000 miles away from
Charlottesville, VA.

Local citizen calls up police and the show up and figure out the guy is
who Virginia is looking for.

The guy is not contesting extradition to Virginia from Texas.

The only question left is do they still fry people in Virginia?


Saw a prosecutor interviewed today and he said it might not be a bad
thing if he fights extradition, since they have not built a whole case
yet or found the girl, it would give them more time to make their case
before his constitutionally guaranteed "speedy trial"...


D'oh. A "speedy trial" doesn't mean it has to be held the next week or
the next month or even three months from now, moron. Oh, and the
prosecution makes its case *during* the trial, if there is a trial. It
doesn't take much of a case to get a grand jury to indict a suspect. You
obviously did not understand what was being said in that interview. No
surprise.

Unless they have more than reported it might be hard to get past
habeas corpus. They literally don't have a body, nor can they even
prove something happened to the girl.


Indeed, but those issues have nothing to do with the "right to a speedy
trial."

Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
 

F*O*A*D wrote:
On 9/26/14 10:46 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 06:45:02 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 9/25/14 9:57 PM, KC wrote:
On 9/25/2014 7:45 PM, BAR wrote:
In article ,
says...

Wow...you can tell that just from fox news coverage?
The US justice dept should hire you...you could save them millions in
court costs.

Guy shows up at the police station asking for a lawyer.

The guy gets the name and leaves.

The police chase him and call off the chase when the speeds get too
high.

The guy is acting funny in Galveston, TX, 1000 miles away from
Charlottesville, VA.

Local citizen calls up police and the show up and figure out the guy is
who Virginia is looking for.

The guy is not contesting extradition to Virginia from Texas.

The only question left is do they still fry people in Virginia?


Saw a prosecutor interviewed today and he said it might not be a bad
thing if he fights extradition, since they have not built a whole case
yet or found the girl, it would give them more time to make their case
before his constitutionally guaranteed "speedy trial"...


D'oh. A "speedy trial" doesn't mean it has to be held the next week or
the next month or even three months from now, moron. Oh, and the
prosecution makes its case *during* the trial, if there is a trial. It
doesn't take much of a case to get a grand jury to indict a suspect. You
obviously did not understand what was being said in that interview. No
surprise.

Unless they have more than reported it might be hard to get past
habeas corpus. They literally don't have a body, nor can they even
prove something happened to the girl.


Indeed, but those issues have nothing to do with the "right to a speedy trial."

A speedy trial is required and it is not a great amount of time after
indictment. I think 90 days, unless waived. Our neighbor was murdered by
her new husband. Back about 1980. They screwed up the paper work and
scheduled the trial 3 days late. He walked! And he was definitely guilty
of the murder.

Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
 

On 9/26/14 11:49 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 10:58:50 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 9/26/14 10:46 AM, wrote:

Unless they have more than reported it might be hard to get past
habeas corpus. They literally don't have a body, nor can they even
prove something happened to the girl.


Indeed, but those issues have nothing to do with the "right to a speedy
trial."

It certainly does if the prosecution is not ready to go to trial.
Fortunately for them, lawyers get paid by the hour so, even if they
were ready, the defense will drag this out.
There is no such thing as speedy justice.



I'm sorry...has the guy been indicted? No? Then the clock isn't running.
And once it starts running, doesn't the prosecution have six months or
so to get to trial? While the standards for obtaining an indictment are
pretty low, prosecutors usually try a bit harder for a murder true bill.
Unless you are in the south and the defendant is black...then, there are
no standards, apparently, and, if you are in Texas, in trial it doesn't
even matter if your defense attorney is awake or sober.