|
Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
|
Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
Wow...you can tell that just from fox news coverage?
The US justice dept should hire you...you could save them millions in court costs. |
Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
On 9/25/2014 12:20 PM, True North wrote:
Wow...you can tell that just from fox news coverage? The US justice dept should hire you...you could save them millions in court costs. Just testing to see which turd would float first. You da winnah. |
Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
On Thursday, September 25, 2014 1:49:16 PM UTC-4, Harrold wrote:
On 9/25/2014 12:20 PM, True North wrote: Wow...you can tell that just from fox news coverage? The US justice dept should hire you...you could save them millions in court costs. Just testing to see which turd would float first. You da winnah. And they are so quick to blame the white guy, innocent or not! I'm surprised Jesse and Al haven't jumped in screaming 'racism' 'cause they posted a picture of an individual not yet found guilty. |
Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
On 9/25/2014 7:45 PM, BAR wrote:
In article , says... Wow...you can tell that just from fox news coverage? The US justice dept should hire you...you could save them millions in court costs. Guy shows up at the police station asking for a lawyer. The guy gets the name and leaves. The police chase him and call off the chase when the speeds get too high. The guy is acting funny in Galveston, TX, 1000 miles away from Charlottesville, VA. Local citizen calls up police and the show up and figure out the guy is who Virginia is looking for. The guy is not contesting extradition to Virginia from Texas. The only question left is do they still fry people in Virginia? Saw a prosecutor interviewed today and he said it might not be a bad thing if he fights extradition, since they have not built a whole case yet or found the girl, it would give them more time to make their case before his constitutionally guaranteed "speedy trial"... |
Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
On Thursday, September 25, 2014 1:49:16 PM UTC-4, Harrold wrote:
On 9/25/2014 12:20 PM, True North wrote: Wow...you can tell that just from fox news coverage? The US justice dept should hire you...you could save them millions in court costs. Just testing to see which turd would float first. You da winnah. And harry even wrote his reply....cant you tell? |
Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
On 9/25/14 9:57 PM, KC wrote:
On 9/25/2014 7:45 PM, BAR wrote: In article , says... Wow...you can tell that just from fox news coverage? The US justice dept should hire you...you could save them millions in court costs. Guy shows up at the police station asking for a lawyer. The guy gets the name and leaves. The police chase him and call off the chase when the speeds get too high. The guy is acting funny in Galveston, TX, 1000 miles away from Charlottesville, VA. Local citizen calls up police and the show up and figure out the guy is who Virginia is looking for. The guy is not contesting extradition to Virginia from Texas. The only question left is do they still fry people in Virginia? Saw a prosecutor interviewed today and he said it might not be a bad thing if he fights extradition, since they have not built a whole case yet or found the girl, it would give them more time to make their case before his constitutionally guaranteed "speedy trial"... D'oh. A "speedy trial" doesn't mean it has to be held the next week or the next month or even three months from now, moron. Oh, and the prosecution makes its case *during* the trial, if there is a trial. It doesn't take much of a case to get a grand jury to indict a suspect. You obviously did not understand what was being said in that interview. No surprise. |
Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
F*O*A*D wrote:
On 9/26/14 10:46 AM, wrote: On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 06:45:02 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: On 9/25/14 9:57 PM, KC wrote: On 9/25/2014 7:45 PM, BAR wrote: In article , says... Wow...you can tell that just from fox news coverage? The US justice dept should hire you...you could save them millions in court costs. Guy shows up at the police station asking for a lawyer. The guy gets the name and leaves. The police chase him and call off the chase when the speeds get too high. The guy is acting funny in Galveston, TX, 1000 miles away from Charlottesville, VA. Local citizen calls up police and the show up and figure out the guy is who Virginia is looking for. The guy is not contesting extradition to Virginia from Texas. The only question left is do they still fry people in Virginia? Saw a prosecutor interviewed today and he said it might not be a bad thing if he fights extradition, since they have not built a whole case yet or found the girl, it would give them more time to make their case before his constitutionally guaranteed "speedy trial"... D'oh. A "speedy trial" doesn't mean it has to be held the next week or the next month or even three months from now, moron. Oh, and the prosecution makes its case *during* the trial, if there is a trial. It doesn't take much of a case to get a grand jury to indict a suspect. You obviously did not understand what was being said in that interview. No surprise. Unless they have more than reported it might be hard to get past habeas corpus. They literally don't have a body, nor can they even prove something happened to the girl. Indeed, but those issues have nothing to do with the "right to a speedy trial." A speedy trial is required and it is not a great amount of time after indictment. I think 90 days, unless waived. Our neighbor was murdered by her new husband. Back about 1980. They screwed up the paper work and scheduled the trial 3 days late. He walked! And he was definitely guilty of the murder. |
Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
On 9/26/14 11:49 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 10:58:50 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: On 9/26/14 10:46 AM, wrote: Unless they have more than reported it might be hard to get past habeas corpus. They literally don't have a body, nor can they even prove something happened to the girl. Indeed, but those issues have nothing to do with the "right to a speedy trial." It certainly does if the prosecution is not ready to go to trial. Fortunately for them, lawyers get paid by the hour so, even if they were ready, the defense will drag this out. There is no such thing as speedy justice. I'm sorry...has the guy been indicted? No? Then the clock isn't running. And once it starts running, doesn't the prosecution have six months or so to get to trial? While the standards for obtaining an indictment are pretty low, prosecutors usually try a bit harder for a murder true bill. Unless you are in the south and the defendant is black...then, there are no standards, apparently, and, if you are in Texas, in trial it doesn't even matter if your defense attorney is awake or sober. |
Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
On 9/26/2014 10:46 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 06:45:02 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: On 9/25/14 9:57 PM, KC wrote: On 9/25/2014 7:45 PM, BAR wrote: In article , says... Wow...you can tell that just from fox news coverage? The US justice dept should hire you...you could save them millions in court costs. Guy shows up at the police station asking for a lawyer. The guy gets the name and leaves. The police chase him and call off the chase when the speeds get too high. The guy is acting funny in Galveston, TX, 1000 miles away from Charlottesville, VA. Local citizen calls up police and the show up and figure out the guy is who Virginia is looking for. The guy is not contesting extradition to Virginia from Texas. The only question left is do they still fry people in Virginia? Saw a prosecutor interviewed today and he said it might not be a bad thing if he fights extradition, since they have not built a whole case yet or found the girl, it would give them more time to make their case before his constitutionally guaranteed "speedy trial"... D'oh. A "speedy trial" doesn't mean it has to be held the next week or the next month or even three months from now, moron. Oh, and the prosecution makes its case *during* the trial, if there is a trial. It doesn't take much of a case to get a grand jury to indict a suspect. You obviously did not understand what was being said in that interview. No surprise. Unless they have more than reported it might be hard to get past habeas corpus. They literally don't have a body, nor can they even prove something happened to the girl. Harry is too busy dragging his knuckles to see beyond his will to insult... and krausebag, I know what a speedy trial means. If you took the time to read, or had a bit better of an education you might have picked up the fact that I was only relaying an opinion I heard... moron... |
Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
|
Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
|
Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
On 9/26/14 3:45 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 12:22:19 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: On 9/26/14 12:17 PM, wrote: At least you proved black people are more likely to commit crimes, Oh, really? Another example of your imagination taking over your perception? No it is simple logic,. You implied that it was only in the south that blacks were not getting fair trials so I just gave you the statistics for your state where the trials were fair. I neither said nor implied it only happened in the south. |
Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
On 9/26/14 3:47 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 12:29:35 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: On 9/26/14 12:17 PM, wrote: And once it starts running, doesn't the prosecution have six months or so to get to trial? While the standards for obtaining an indictment are pretty low, prosecutors usually try a bit harder for a murder true bill. 18 U.S. Code § 3161 says 70 days The Supreme Court hasn't really ruled on this, and there is no shortage of cases in which the defendant did not seek a delay and the trial did not start for months or even years after "70 days." Must be another one of those laws Holder is not enforcing. ;-) BTW can you cite one of those trials or did you just pull that out of your ass? Sure. And so can you. Easy to google. |
Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
On Friday, September 26, 2014 7:58:50 AM UTC-7, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 9/26/14 10:46 AM, wrote: On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 06:45:02 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: On 9/25/14 9:57 PM, KC wrote: On 9/25/2014 7:45 PM, BAR wrote: In article , says... Wow...you can tell that just from fox news coverage? The US justice dept should hire you...you could save them millions in court costs. Guy shows up at the police station asking for a lawyer. The guy gets the name and leaves. The police chase him and call off the chase when the speeds get too high. The guy is acting funny in Galveston, TX, 1000 miles away from Charlottesville, VA. Local citizen calls up police and the show up and figure out the guy is who Virginia is looking for. The guy is not contesting extradition to Virginia from Texas. The only question left is do they still fry people in Virginia? Saw a prosecutor interviewed today and he said it might not be a bad thing if he fights extradition, since they have not built a whole case yet or found the girl, it would give them more time to make their case before his constitutionally guaranteed "speedy trial"... D'oh. A "speedy trial" doesn't mean it has to be held the next week or the next month or even three months from now, moron. Oh, and the prosecution makes its case *during* the trial, if there is a trial. It doesn't take much of a case to get a grand jury to indict a suspect. You obviously did not understand what was being said in that interview. No surprise. Unless they have more than reported it might be hard to get past habeas corpus. They literally don't have a body, nor can they even prove something happened to the girl. Indeed, but those issues have nothing to do with the "right to a speedy trial." Your idea of a speedy trial is to see how fast the lawyers can finalize your your bankruptcies. |
Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 12:17:42 -0400, wrote:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 11:59:52 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: On 9/26/14 11:49 AM, wrote: On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 10:58:50 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: On 9/26/14 10:46 AM, wrote: Unless they have more than reported it might be hard to get past habeas corpus. They literally don't have a body, nor can they even prove something happened to the girl. Indeed, but those issues have nothing to do with the "right to a speedy trial." It certainly does if the prosecution is not ready to go to trial. Fortunately for them, lawyers get paid by the hour so, even if they were ready, the defense will drag this out. There is no such thing as speedy justice. I'm sorry...has the guy been indicted? No? Then the clock isn't running. It certainly is. He needs to be charged or released. And once it starts running, doesn't the prosecution have six months or so to get to trial? While the standards for obtaining an indictment are pretty low, prosecutors usually try a bit harder for a murder true bill. 18 U.S. Code § 3161 says 70 days The defense usually delays the trial unless they know for sure that the prosecution doesn't have a case. Unless you are in the south and the defendant is black...then, there are no standards, apparently, and, if you are in Texas, in trial it doesn't even matter if your defense attorney is awake or sober. There was never problem in the north? I guess that means all of the black people in the Maryland prison system were guilty and they never rushed to judgement. At least you proved black people are more likely to commit crimes, just by looking at the DoC statistics. 28% of the Maryland population makes up 76% of the prison population. The Virginia Felony Trial You have the right to a speedy trial in Virginia. If you have been accused of committing a felony and you are incarcerated, you will have a trial within five months of your arrest. If you are not in custody, your trial will take place within nine months. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:25 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com