Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#23
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#24
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, August 30, 2014 7:37:29 AM UTC-4, F*O*A*D wrote:
Yeah, well, I'm not your "cop buddy" shooting, so I judge a firearm's accuracy on its innate accuracy and my ability to shoot it accurately. I'm not a fan of full auto fire. Waste of ammo. Just like you're a waste of skin, pusbag. |
#25
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, August 30, 2014 9:49:45 AM UTC-4, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 8/30/14 7:36 AM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 8/30/14 12:04 AM, wrote: On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 15:27:26 -0400, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 13:31:51 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: ... .22LR rifle, PSA has a pretty good sale on these this weekend: http://tinyurl.com/opnxuaq The $299 price is $50 to $100 less than these usually sell for. Terrific rifle, very accurate right out of the box, looks and size just like my standard AR 15 other than the slightly smaller in diameter barrel. Much more accurate than the more common Ruger .22LR rifles. Here's a snap of mags from each of the rifles, a 10-round PMAG for my .223 Rem AR 15, and the 25-round S&W mag for the .22LR http://tinyurl.com/otkdvot === I don't see anything about optics. Does it have a Weaver rail that will acept a standard scope mount? Can the trigger be customized? It does say "quad rail" so I assume they mean the forward hand guard is a quad picatinny rail. The good news it takes anything "Weaver" but it won't take a regular .22 "tip off" scope unless you put longer screws on it. I still do not see the allure of this kind of gun unless you are channeling some Vietnam war fantasy. The M&P 15-22 will accept a lot of AR "accessories" without modification to either. I have a scope I use on mine with an "AR type" mount. The front and rear sights that come standard with the rifle are the removable AR sights that slide right on or off the rail. An AR aftermarket trigger will drop in, as will an AR stock and an AR handgrip. I changed the handgrip on mine to a Hogue model I like better. I also installed an ambi safety. I still have the stock trigger, which seems ok to me. The "allure" to me was the rifle's light weight, ergonomics, accuracy out of the box. It's easy for me to shoot it accurately off-hand. You'd have to spend a lot of money on a Ruger 10/22 to get it to shoot as accurately off-hand as the M&P 15-22. There are a ka-zillion different firearms out there. Obviously, allure is in the mind of the beholder. Here's a photo of mine: http://tinyurl.com/m68gjgj Shows scope, scope mount, Hogue grip, empty 25-round mag (with arrow for my non-shooting friends..(as in, this part points towards the muzzle when you load up ![]() to rear of trigger). Flash suppressor on barrel muzzle will be removed when my sound suppressor paperwork comes back (takes two to three months, I am told). Sometimes I fasten a red dot to the rails. Where'd you steal that picture, asswipe? LMAO. |
#26
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
F*O*A*D wrote:
On 8/29/14 9:27 PM, Roger wrote: F*O*A*D wrote: ... .22LR rifle, PSA has a pretty good sale on these this weekend: http://tinyurl.com/opnxuaq The $299 price is $50 to $100 less than these usually sell for. Terrific rifle, very accurate right out of the box, looks and size just like my standard AR 15 other than the slightly smaller in diameter barrel. Much more accurate than the more common Ruger .22LR rifles. Here's a snap of mags from each of the rifles, a 10-round PMAG for my .223 Rem AR 15, and the 25-round S&W mag for the .22LR http://tinyurl.com/otkdvot But it LOOKS like an ASSAULT rifle!! How do you know it's more accurate than a 10/22? Personal experience and the reports of literally hundreds of shooters, including many who compete regularly. The Ruger 10/22's need all sorts of add-on part$ to shoot accurately. The day after I got mine, I was "killing" one liter empty soft drink plastic bottles at 25 to 35 yards with iron sights and no modifications. I own three 10/22's. The oldest is maybe 20 years old or better. I've shot 4" diameter smiley faces in pumpkins from 100 feet with a cheap scope. They are very accurate. |
#27
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
F*O*A*D wrote:
On 8/30/14 12:04 AM, wrote: On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 15:27:26 -0400, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 13:31:51 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: ... .22LR rifle, PSA has a pretty good sale on these this weekend: http://tinyurl.com/opnxuaq The $299 price is $50 to $100 less than these usually sell for. Terrific rifle, very accurate right out of the box, looks and size just like my standard AR 15 other than the slightly smaller in diameter barrel. Much more accurate than the more common Ruger .22LR rifles. Here's a snap of mags from each of the rifles, a 10-round PMAG for my .223 Rem AR 15, and the 25-round S&W mag for the .22LR http://tinyurl.com/otkdvot === I don't see anything about optics. Does it have a Weaver rail that will acept a standard scope mount? Can the trigger be customized? It does say "quad rail" so I assume they mean the forward hand guard is a quad picatinny rail. The good news it takes anything "Weaver" but it won't take a regular .22 "tip off" scope unless you put longer screws on it. I still do not see the allure of this kind of gun unless you are channeling some Vietnam war fantasy. The M&P 15-22 will accept a lot of AR "accessories" without modification to either. I have a scope I use on mine with an "AR type" mount. The front and rear sights that come standard with the rifle are the removable AR sights that slide right on or off the rail. An AR aftermarket trigger will drop in, as will an AR stock and an AR handgrip. I changed the handgrip on mine to a Hogue model I like better. I also installed an ambi safety. I still have the stock trigger, which seems ok to me. The "allure" to me was the rifle's light weight, ergonomics, accuracy out of the box. It's easy for me to shoot it accurately off-hand. You'd have to spend a lot of money on a Ruger 10/22 to get it to shoot as accurately off-hand as the M&P 15-22. There are a ka-zillion different firearms out there. Obviously, allure is in the mind of the beholder. It certainly is. |
#28
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
F*O*A*D wrote:
On 8/30/14 7:36 AM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 8/30/14 12:04 AM, wrote: On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 15:27:26 -0400, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 13:31:51 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: ... .22LR rifle, PSA has a pretty good sale on these this weekend: http://tinyurl.com/opnxuaq The $299 price is $50 to $100 less than these usually sell for. Terrific rifle, very accurate right out of the box, looks and size just like my standard AR 15 other than the slightly smaller in diameter barrel. Much more accurate than the more common Ruger .22LR rifles. Here's a snap of mags from each of the rifles, a 10-round PMAG for my .223 Rem AR 15, and the 25-round S&W mag for the .22LR http://tinyurl.com/otkdvot === I don't see anything about optics. Does it have a Weaver rail that will acept a standard scope mount? Can the trigger be customized? It does say "quad rail" so I assume they mean the forward hand guard is a quad picatinny rail. The good news it takes anything "Weaver" but it won't take a regular .22 "tip off" scope unless you put longer screws on it. I still do not see the allure of this kind of gun unless you are channeling some Vietnam war fantasy. The M&P 15-22 will accept a lot of AR "accessories" without modification to either. I have a scope I use on mine with an "AR type" mount. The front and rear sights that come standard with the rifle are the removable AR sights that slide right on or off the rail. An AR aftermarket trigger will drop in, as will an AR stock and an AR handgrip. I changed the handgrip on mine to a Hogue model I like better. I also installed an ambi safety. I still have the stock trigger, which seems ok to me. The "allure" to me was the rifle's light weight, ergonomics, accuracy out of the box. It's easy for me to shoot it accurately off-hand. You'd have to spend a lot of money on a Ruger 10/22 to get it to shoot as accurately off-hand as the M&P 15-22. There are a ka-zillion different firearms out there. Obviously, allure is in the mind of the beholder. Here's a photo of mine: http://tinyurl.com/m68gjgj Shows scope, scope mount, Hogue grip, empty 25-round mag (with arrow for my non-shooting friends..(as in, this part points towards the muzzle when you load up ![]() above and to rear of trigger). Flash suppressor on barrel muzzle will be removed when my sound suppressor paperwork comes back (takes two to three months, I am told). Sometimes I fasten a red dot to the rails. The arrows are for your non-shooting friends? Do you lend out your firearms? Why do you want a suppressor for a .22LR? |
#29
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
On Sat, 30 Aug 2014 21:42:08 -0400, BAR wrote: I guess I just never had the "black gun" thing. I like wood and full power 30 cal if I am buying a center fire rifle. I understand the attraction for the military but I am not packing 600 rounds into a fire fight, nor is my intent to inflict grievous wounds There is always the AR-15's Daddy, the AR-10. That is just taking an inferior idea and expanding to a Russian slightly better idea. Look at the sturmgewehr, where this reduced power round came from. Buy an M1A and get on with your life ... out to 1000 yards. The original AR was a 308. That is what the AR-10 is. Is nice with every thing in line with the shoulder to reduce climb between shots. |
#30
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
On Sat, 30 Aug 2014 13:16:49 -0500, Harrold wrote: On 8/30/2014 12:14 PM, wrote: On Sat, 30 Aug 2014 12:00:44 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: Another of our weird regs concerns AR-15s. If you buy one fully assembled, it has to be one of only a couple of HBAR models. You can, however, buy a fully assembled lower. I guess I just never had the "black gun" thing. I like wood and full power 30 cal if I am buying a center fire rifle. I understand the attraction for the military but I am not packing 600 rounds into a fire fight, nor is my intent to inflict grievous wounds I wonder what Harry's need for or attraction to military weaponry is? Back in the sixties when Uncle Sam would have appreciated him picking up a gun and serving his country, Harry preferred to seek a scholars deferment to attend a third rate school for girls in, of all places, Kansas. My point exactly. He could have stepped up and they would have given him a M16-A1 and let him shoot gooks with it. Now he lives that life vicariously shooting Evian bottles. He would have been one of two things in the service. Clerk, or paper pusher or cannon fodder. That liberal arts degree would not get a skilled position. Why I got to fix radar on airplanes instead of jungle fighting. Had skills that counted. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
It's terrific! | General | |||
This is going to be a terrific... | General | |||
Thom's terrific! | ASA | |||
A terrific site | General | |||
OT--Terrific employment news again | General |