On 8/5/2014 11:01 AM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 8/5/14 11:30 AM, amdx wrote:
http://www.wnd.com/2014/08/is-thinking-now-obsolete/

Mikek

Oh, great, another ignorant asshole referencing "world nutcase daily."

Name calling rather than being able to refute the argument.

Mikek

On 8/5/14 5:39 PM, amdx wrote:
On 8/5/2014 11:01 AM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 8/5/14 11:30 AM, amdx wrote:
http://www.wnd.com/2014/08/is-thinking-now-obsolete/

Mikek

Oh, great, another ignorant asshole referencing "world nutcase daily."

Name calling rather than being able to refute the argument.

Mikek




World NutCase Daily is a birther, teabagger, conspiracy drenched site
for mindless right-wingers, a site with even less credibility than Fox
News, hard as that is to imagine. If you read and believe that site, it
is no wonder you are so ****ed in the head.

On 8/5/14 8:03 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 05 Aug 2014 17:48:31 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 8/5/14 5:39 PM, amdx wrote:
On 8/5/2014 11:01 AM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 8/5/14 11:30 AM, amdx wrote:
http://www.wnd.com/2014/08/is-thinking-now-obsolete/

Mikek

Oh, great, another ignorant asshole referencing "world nutcase daily."

Name calling rather than being able to refute the argument.

Mikek




World NutCase Daily is a birther, teabagger, conspiracy drenched site
for mindless right-wingers, a site with even less credibility than Fox
News, hard as that is to imagine. If you read and believe that site, it
is no wonder you are so ****ed in the head.

The ironic thing is the article advances the same basic opinion you
gave us in the other thread about Israel ... along with Scottie.

You see what strange bedfellows this issue makes?

You are a neocon now. Is that a Cheney sticker on your bumper?



Nonsense.

On 8/5/14 11:48 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 05 Aug 2014 20:10:56 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

World NutCase Daily is a birther, teabagger, conspiracy drenched site
for mindless right-wingers, a site with even less credibility than Fox
News, hard as that is to imagine. If you read and believe that site, it
is no wonder you are so ****ed in the head.

The ironic thing is the article advances the same basic opinion you
gave us in the other thread about Israel ... along with Scottie.

You see what strange bedfellows this issue makes?

You are a neocon now. Is that a Cheney sticker on your bumper?



Nonsense.

You are demonstrating the first step of your grief about being a
neocon.
(the Kübler-Ross model)
Denial.

I admit anger is a constant state with you and you seem depressed most
of the time. Your acceptance of Hillary put you firmly in the neocon
column. You are just missing "bargaining" but that may be the bargain
with the devil you made to join the gang.



You're hysterical. You support the destruction of Israel, so that must
make you what, a member of HAMAS and card-carrying member of the KKK?

On 8/6/14 1:39 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 06 Aug 2014 06:22:21 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 8/5/14 11:48 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 05 Aug 2014 20:10:56 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

World NutCase Daily is a birther, teabagger, conspiracy drenched site
for mindless right-wingers, a site with even less credibility than Fox
News, hard as that is to imagine. If you read and believe that site, it
is no wonder you are so ****ed in the head.

The ironic thing is the article advances the same basic opinion you
gave us in the other thread about Israel ... along with Scottie.

You see what strange bedfellows this issue makes?

You are a neocon now. Is that a Cheney sticker on your bumper?



Nonsense.

You are demonstrating the first step of your grief about being a
neocon.
(the Kübler-Ross model)
Denial.

I admit anger is a constant state with you and you seem depressed most
of the time. Your acceptance of Hillary put you firmly in the neocon
column. You are just missing "bargaining" but that may be the bargain
with the devil you made to join the gang.



You're hysterical. You support the destruction of Israel, so that must
make you what, a member of HAMAS and card-carrying member of the KKK?


Hillary never found a middle east war she didn't like.



That's not true and even it it were, I'd still vote for Hillary over any
of the announced or flirting with announcement GOP 2016 wannabes.
The ones that aren't bat**** crazy will only further destroy what little
remains of our social compact.

I see there's talk of retreading Romney.

F*O*A*D wrote:
On 8/6/14 1:39 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 06 Aug 2014 06:22:21 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 8/5/14 11:48 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 05 Aug 2014 20:10:56 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

World NutCase Daily is a birther, teabagger, conspiracy drenched site
for mindless right-wingers, a site with even less credibility than Fox
News, hard as that is to imagine. If you read and believe that site, it
is no wonder you are so ****ed in the head.

The ironic thing is the article advances the same basic opinion you
gave us in the other thread about Israel ... along with Scottie.

You see what strange bedfellows this issue makes?

You are a neocon now. Is that a Cheney sticker on your bumper?



Nonsense.

You are demonstrating the first step of your grief about being a
neocon.
(the Kübler-Ross model)
Denial.

I admit anger is a constant state with you and you seem depressed most
of the time. Your acceptance of Hillary put you firmly in the neocon
column. You are just missing "bargaining" but that may be the bargain
with the devil you made to join the gang.



You're hysterical. You support the destruction of Israel, so that must
make you what, a member of HAMAS and card-carrying member of the KKK?


Hillary never found a middle east war she didn't like.



That's not true and even it it were, I'd still vote for Hillary over any
of the announced or flirting with announcement GOP 2016 wannabes.
The ones that aren't bat**** crazy will only further destroy what little
remains of our social compact.

I see there's talk of retreading Romney.

I understand your love for social programs. Being a 2 time bankrupted, and
failure to pay taxes. You love leeching off society.

On Wednesday, August 6, 2014 1:45:05 PM UTC-4, F*O*A*D wrote:

That's not true and even it it were, I'd still vote for Hillary over any

of the announced or flirting with announcement GOP 2016 wannabes.

The ones that aren't bat**** crazy will only further destroy what little

remains of our social compact.


krause the slug likes Hillary cause she actually has a set of nuts..

On 8/6/2014 6:26 PM, wrote:
On Wednesday, August 6, 2014 1:45:05 PM UTC-4, F*O*A*D wrote:

That's not true and even it it were, I'd still vote for Hillary over any

of the announced or flirting with announcement GOP 2016 wannabes.

The ones that aren't bat**** crazy will only further destroy what little

remains of our social compact.


krause the slug likes Hillary cause she actually has a set of nuts..


Brass ones.

--
"I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the
government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of
taking care of them".
Thomas Jefferson

On 8/6/14 3:26 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 06 Aug 2014 13:45:05 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

Hillary never found a middle east war she didn't like.



That's not true and even it it were, I'd still vote for Hillary

If it is not true, tell me which war it was.

I know you will vote for hillary, even if what you say your beliefs
are do not conform to what you do.


I'm not a mindless rightie...I don't expect my candidates and I to be in
lockstep agreement on all the issues. You seem to have a hard time with
that sort of thinking.

On 8/6/2014 2:33 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 8/6/14 3:26 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 06 Aug 2014 13:45:05 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

Hillary never found a middle east war she didn't like.



That's not true and even it it were, I'd still vote for Hillary

If it is not true, tell me which war it was.

I know you will vote for hillary, even if what you say your beliefs
are do not conform to what you do.


I'm not a mindless rightie...I don't expect my candidates and I to be in
lockstep agreement on all the issues. You seem to have a hard time with
that sort of thinking.

List the top ten issues of Hilary's you disagree with.

--
"I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the
government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of
taking care of them".
Thomas Jefferson