On 7/27/14, 8:24 AM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, July 27, 2014 4:59:10 AM UTC-7, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 7/27/14, 7:55 AM, Tim wrote:

On Saturday, July 26, 2014 9:22:51 AM UTC-7, F*O*A*D wrote:

...and calls in to a congressman on an open line:







https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXNTaXAT5Ko







"A little less Fox News and a little more C-SPAN please..."







Priceless.



I thought the caller went on a bit so I can see her asking 'whats your point?' but the congressman still didn't answer any topic. but instead, he gave the guy an bit of an indirect insult, did a little dance ,blabbed a bit, didn't answer a thing on the topic list, and that was it. Nothing impressive.







The impressive part was the caller's impersonation of Ingerfool, except,

of course, he didn't use any curse words.

Like Richard would say{

"Wow"


Indeed, when Ingerfool posts one of his long psychotic rants here, the
appropriate response is "wow."

On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 08:32:06 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

The impressive part was the caller's impersonation of Ingerfool, except,

of course, he didn't use any curse words.

Like Richard would say{

"Wow"


Indeed, when Ingerfool posts one of his long psychotic rants here, the
appropriate response is "wow."

===

So Harry, what is the correct response to one of your long psychotic
rants?

On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 08:58:25 -0400, Wayne.B wrote:

On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 08:32:06 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

The impressive part was the caller's impersonation of Ingerfool, except,

of course, he didn't use any curse words.

Like Richard would say{

"Wow"


Indeed, when Ingerfool posts one of his long psychotic rants here, the
appropriate response is "wow."

===

So Harry, what is the correct response to one of your long psychotic
rants?

Doggie bag?

On 7/27/2014 9:25 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 08:58:25 -0400, Wayne.B wrote:

On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 08:32:06 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

The impressive part was the caller's impersonation of Ingerfool, except,

of course, he didn't use any curse words.

Like Richard would say{

"Wow"


Indeed, when Ingerfool posts one of his long psychotic rants here, the
appropriate response is "wow."

===

So Harry, what is the correct response to one of your long psychotic
rants?

Doggie bag?


What the **** is wrong with you assholes... you play with krause all day
long, have no problem playing when my real name is in the title of the
post?

On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 09:25:26 -0400, KC wrote:

On 7/27/2014 9:25 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 08:58:25 -0400, Wayne.B wrote:

On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 08:32:06 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

The impressive part was the caller's impersonation of Ingerfool, except,

of course, he didn't use any curse words.

Like Richard would say{

"Wow"


Indeed, when Ingerfool posts one of his long psychotic rants here, the
appropriate response is "wow."

===

So Harry, what is the correct response to one of your long psychotic
rants?

Doggie bag?


What the **** is wrong with you assholes... you play with krause all day
long, have no problem playing when my real name is in the title of the
post?

Whatever the intent of that post was, calling folks 'asshole', a la Krause, will surely not help.

On 7/27/2014 10:48 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 09:25:26 -0400, KC wrote:

On 7/27/2014 9:25 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 08:58:25 -0400, Wayne.B wrote:

On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 08:32:06 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

The impressive part was the caller's impersonation of Ingerfool, except,

of course, he didn't use any curse words.

Like Richard would say{

"Wow"


Indeed, when Ingerfool posts one of his long psychotic rants here, the
appropriate response is "wow."

===

So Harry, what is the correct response to one of your long psychotic
rants?

Doggie bag?


What the **** is wrong with you assholes... you play with krause all day
long, have no problem playing when my real name is in the title of the
post?

Whatever the intent of that post was, calling folks 'asshole', a la Krause, will surely not help.


Sorry, not what I like to wake up to.... I understand that you all are
cool with using me as a ball in your games with krause, but wtf???

On 7/27/14, 11:24 AM, KC wrote:

Sorry, not what I like to wake up to.... I understand that you all are
cool with using me as a ball in your games with krause, but wtf???

You don't have the balls to be used as a ball.

On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 11:24:36 -0400, KC wrote:

On 7/27/2014 10:48 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 09:25:26 -0400, KC wrote:

On 7/27/2014 9:25 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 08:58:25 -0400, Wayne.B wrote:

On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 08:32:06 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

The impressive part was the caller's impersonation of Ingerfool, except,

of course, he didn't use any curse words.

Like Richard would say{

"Wow"


Indeed, when Ingerfool posts one of his long psychotic rants here, the
appropriate response is "wow."

===

So Harry, what is the correct response to one of your long psychotic
rants?

Doggie bag?


What the **** is wrong with you assholes... you play with krause all day
long, have no problem playing when my real name is in the title of the
post?

Whatever the intent of that post was, calling folks 'asshole', a la Krause, will surely not help.


Sorry, not what I like to wake up to.... I understand that you all are
cool with using me as a ball in your games with krause, but wtf???

I've not responded to a Krause post in many weeks. Now, who is using you? I see Krause calling you
names, as usual, but sure don't see anyone else using your name or a facsimile thereof.

You should pay as much attention to Krause as you would a pile of dog ****.

On 7/27/2014 11:24 AM, KC wrote:
On 7/27/2014 10:48 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 09:25:26 -0400, KC wrote:

On 7/27/2014 9:25 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 08:58:25 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 08:32:06 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

The impressive part was the caller's impersonation of Ingerfool,
except,

of course, he didn't use any curse words.

Like Richard would say{

"Wow"


Indeed, when Ingerfool posts one of his long psychotic rants here,
the
appropriate response is "wow."

===

So Harry, what is the correct response to one of your long psychotic
rants?

Doggie bag?


What the **** is wrong with you assholes... you play with krause all day
long, have no problem playing when my real name is in the title of the
post?

Whatever the intent of that post was, calling folks 'asshole', a la
Krause, will surely not help.


Sorry, not what I like to wake up to.... I understand that you all are
cool with using me as a ball in your games with krause, but wtf???


You're giving yourself way too much credit. Nobody "uses" you. You've
established your persona all by yourself.

On 7/27/14, 10:48 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 09:25:26 -0400, KC wrote:

On 7/27/2014 9:25 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 08:58:25 -0400, Wayne.B wrote:

On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 08:32:06 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

The impressive part was the caller's impersonation of Ingerfool, except,

of course, he didn't use any curse words.

Like Richard would say{

"Wow"


Indeed, when Ingerfool posts one of his long psychotic rants here, the
appropriate response is "wow."

===

So Harry, what is the correct response to one of your long psychotic
rants?

Doggie bag?


What the **** is wrong with you assholes... you play with krause all day
long, have no problem playing when my real name is in the title of the
post?

Whatever the intent of that post was, calling folks 'asshole', a la Krause, will surely not help.