On Sunday, July 27, 2014 4:59:10 AM UTC-7, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 7/27/14, 7:55 AM, Tim wrote:

On Saturday, July 26, 2014 9:22:51 AM UTC-7, F*O*A*D wrote:

...and calls in to a congressman on an open line:







https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXNTaXAT5Ko







"A little less Fox News and a little more C-SPAN please..."







Priceless.



I thought the caller went on a bit so I can see her asking 'whats your point?' but the congressman still didn't answer any topic. but instead, he gave the guy an bit of an indirect insult, did a little dance ,blabbed a bit, didn't answer a thing on the topic list, and that was it. Nothing impressive.







The impressive part was the caller's impersonation of Ingerfool, except,

of course, he didn't use any curse words.

Like Richard would say{

"Wow"

On 7/27/14, 8:24 AM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, July 27, 2014 4:59:10 AM UTC-7, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 7/27/14, 7:55 AM, Tim wrote:

On Saturday, July 26, 2014 9:22:51 AM UTC-7, F*O*A*D wrote:

...and calls in to a congressman on an open line:







https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXNTaXAT5Ko







"A little less Fox News and a little more C-SPAN please..."







Priceless.



I thought the caller went on a bit so I can see her asking 'whats your point?' but the congressman still didn't answer any topic. but instead, he gave the guy an bit of an indirect insult, did a little dance ,blabbed a bit, didn't answer a thing on the topic list, and that was it. Nothing impressive.







The impressive part was the caller's impersonation of Ingerfool, except,

of course, he didn't use any curse words.

Like Richard would say{

"Wow"


Indeed, when Ingerfool posts one of his long psychotic rants here, the
appropriate response is "wow."

On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 08:32:06 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

The impressive part was the caller's impersonation of Ingerfool, except,

of course, he didn't use any curse words.

Like Richard would say{

"Wow"


Indeed, when Ingerfool posts one of his long psychotic rants here, the
appropriate response is "wow."

===

So Harry, what is the correct response to one of your long psychotic
rants?

On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 08:58:25 -0400, Wayne.B wrote:

On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 08:32:06 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

The impressive part was the caller's impersonation of Ingerfool, except,

of course, he didn't use any curse words.

Like Richard would say{

"Wow"


Indeed, when Ingerfool posts one of his long psychotic rants here, the
appropriate response is "wow."

===

So Harry, what is the correct response to one of your long psychotic
rants?

Doggie bag?

On 7/27/2014 9:25 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 08:58:25 -0400, Wayne.B wrote:

On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 08:32:06 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

The impressive part was the caller's impersonation of Ingerfool, except,

of course, he didn't use any curse words.

Like Richard would say{

"Wow"


Indeed, when Ingerfool posts one of his long psychotic rants here, the
appropriate response is "wow."

===

So Harry, what is the correct response to one of your long psychotic
rants?

Doggie bag?


What the **** is wrong with you assholes... you play with krause all day
long, have no problem playing when my real name is in the title of the
post?

On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 09:25:26 -0400, KC wrote:

On 7/27/2014 9:25 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 08:58:25 -0400, Wayne.B wrote:

On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 08:32:06 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

The impressive part was the caller's impersonation of Ingerfool, except,

of course, he didn't use any curse words.

Like Richard would say{

"Wow"


Indeed, when Ingerfool posts one of his long psychotic rants here, the
appropriate response is "wow."

===

So Harry, what is the correct response to one of your long psychotic
rants?

Doggie bag?


What the **** is wrong with you assholes... you play with krause all day
long, have no problem playing when my real name is in the title of the
post?

Whatever the intent of that post was, calling folks 'asshole', a la Krause, will surely not help.

On 7/27/2014 10:48 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 09:25:26 -0400, KC wrote:

On 7/27/2014 9:25 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 08:58:25 -0400, Wayne.B wrote:

On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 08:32:06 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

The impressive part was the caller's impersonation of Ingerfool, except,

of course, he didn't use any curse words.

Like Richard would say{

"Wow"


Indeed, when Ingerfool posts one of his long psychotic rants here, the
appropriate response is "wow."

===

So Harry, what is the correct response to one of your long psychotic
rants?

Doggie bag?


What the **** is wrong with you assholes... you play with krause all day
long, have no problem playing when my real name is in the title of the
post?

Whatever the intent of that post was, calling folks 'asshole', a la Krause, will surely not help.


Sorry, not what I like to wake up to.... I understand that you all are
cool with using me as a ball in your games with krause, but wtf???

On 7/27/14, 10:48 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 09:25:26 -0400, KC wrote:

On 7/27/2014 9:25 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 08:58:25 -0400, Wayne.B wrote:

On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 08:32:06 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

The impressive part was the caller's impersonation of Ingerfool, except,

of course, he didn't use any curse words.

Like Richard would say{

"Wow"


Indeed, when Ingerfool posts one of his long psychotic rants here, the
appropriate response is "wow."

===

So Harry, what is the correct response to one of your long psychotic
rants?

Doggie bag?


What the **** is wrong with you assholes... you play with krause all day
long, have no problem playing when my real name is in the title of the
post?

Whatever the intent of that post was, calling folks 'asshole', a la Krause, will surely not help.

On 7/27/2014 6:58 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 08:32:06 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

The impressive part was the caller's impersonation of Ingerfool, except,

of course, he didn't use any curse words.

Like Richard would say{

"Wow"


Indeed, when Ingerfool posts one of his long psychotic rants here, the
appropriate response is "wow."

===

So Harry, what is the correct response to one of your long psychotic
rants?

WOWZER?

--
"I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the
government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of
taking care of them".
Thomas Jefferson

On 7/27/2014 11:29 AM, H*a*r*r*o*l*d wrote:
On 7/27/2014 6:58 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 08:32:06 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

The impressive part was the caller's impersonation of Ingerfool,
except,

of course, he didn't use any curse words.

Like Richard would say{

"Wow"


Indeed, when Ingerfool posts one of his long psychotic rants here, the
appropriate response is "wow."

===

So Harry, what is the correct response to one of your long psychotic
rants?

WOWZER?



Please keep me and my name out of your games with krause...