On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 09:41:11 -0700, jps wrote:

One hundred children
died in unintentional shootings in the year after Newtown, which
breaks down to two every week.


===

One hundred sounds like a large number until you look at all the other
things that cause accidental death with children. This is yet another
case of raising the emotional cry of "what about the children?" when
the real purpose is to advance a personal anti gun agenda.

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 09:41:11 -0700, jps wrote:

One hundred children
died in unintentional shootings in the year after Newtown, which
breaks down to two every week.


===

One hundred sounds like a large number until you look at all the other
things that cause accidental death with children. This is yet another
case of raising the emotional cry of "what about the children?" when
the real purpose is to advance a personal anti gun agenda.

So what? Some people rail about Bill and Hillary Clinton. Some about
Sarah Palin and Ted Cruz.
People always bitch about something.
Besides, swimming pools don't kill, people kill.
So be wary of a man with a swimming pool in his hand.

On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 13:45:05 -0400, Wayne.B wrote:

On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 09:41:11 -0700, jps wrote:

One hundred children
died in unintentional shootings in the year after Newtown, which
breaks down to two every week.


===

One hundred sounds like a large number until you look at all the other
things that cause accidental death with children. This is yet another
case of raising the emotional cry of "what about the children?" when
the real purpose is to advance a personal anti gun agenda.

I wonder if that includes all the under 18 year-olds in Chicago and elsewhere. Oh, wait, they don't
count, and it's 'racist' to mention them.

On 7/15/14, 4:32 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 13:45:05 -0400, Wayne.B wrote:

On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 09:41:11 -0700, jps wrote:

One hundred children
died in unintentional shootings in the year after Newtown, which
breaks down to two every week.


===

One hundred sounds like a large number until you look at all the other
things that cause accidental death with children. This is yet another
case of raising the emotional cry of "what about the children?" when
the real purpose is to advance a personal anti gun agenda.

I wonder if that includes all the under 18 year-olds in Chicago and elsewhere. Oh, wait, they don't
count, and it's 'racist' to mention them.


It's quite telling that right-wing assholes like Herring and W'hine so
easily dismiss the death of children killed by firearms.

--
Republicans . . . the anti-immigrant, anti-contraception, anti-student,
anti-middle class, pro-impeachment party that shut down the government
last year for no reason.

F*O*A*D wrote:
On 7/15/14, 4:32 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 13:45:05 -0400, Wayne.B wrote:

On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 09:41:11 -0700, jps wrote:

One hundred children
died in unintentional shootings in the year after Newtown, which
breaks down to two every week.


===

One hundred sounds like a large number until you look at all the other
things that cause accidental death with children. This is yet another
case of raising the emotional cry of "what about the children?" when
the real purpose is to advance a personal anti gun agenda.

I wonder if that includes all the under 18 year-olds in Chicago and
elsewhere. Oh, wait, they don't
count, and it's 'racist' to mention them.


It's quite telling that right-wing assholes like Herring and W'hine so
easily dismiss the death of children killed by firearms.


I do not think they dismiss the killings. I think we, as a society, have
become inured to drug dealers, killing other drug dealers. We do cry about
the innocents killed, but overall why really care? The local neighborhood
will not testify, or even get up a vigilante committee. As long as they
keep it local to their neighborhood, we will ignore it for the most part.
Until we change the War on Drugs, there will be no stopping the killings.
If it turned in to a Mexico type drug war, then all those people with legal
guns will get riled up.

On 7/15/14, 4:43 PM, Califbill wrote:
F*O*A*D wrote:
On 7/15/14, 4:32 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 13:45:05 -0400, Wayne.B wrote:

On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 09:41:11 -0700, jps wrote:

One hundred children
died in unintentional shootings in the year after Newtown, which
breaks down to two every week.


===

One hundred sounds like a large number until you look at all the other
things that cause accidental death with children. This is yet another
case of raising the emotional cry of "what about the children?" when
the real purpose is to advance a personal anti gun agenda.

I wonder if that includes all the under 18 year-olds in Chicago and
elsewhere. Oh, wait, they don't
count, and it's 'racist' to mention them.


It's quite telling that right-wing assholes like Herring and W'hine so
easily dismiss the death of children killed by firearms.


I do not think they dismiss the killings. I think we, as a society, have
become inured to drug dealers, killing other drug dealers. We do cry about
the innocents killed, but overall why really care? The local neighborhood
will not testify, or even get up a vigilante committee. As long as they
keep it local to their neighborhood, we will ignore it for the most part.
Until we change the War on Drugs, there will be no stopping the killings.
If it turned in to a Mexico type drug war, then all those people with legal
guns will get riled up.


Herring and the other right-wing assholes don't give a damn about the
mass murders of kids in schools.

--
Republicans . . . the anti-immigrant, anti-contraception, anti-student,
anti-middle class, pro-impeachment party that shut down the government
last year for no reason.

F*O*A*D wrote:
On 7/15/14, 4:43 PM, Califbill wrote:
F*O*A*D wrote:
On 7/15/14, 4:32 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 13:45:05 -0400, Wayne.B wrote:

On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 09:41:11 -0700, jps wrote:

One hundred children
died in unintentional shootings in the year after Newtown, which
breaks down to two every week.


===

One hundred sounds like a large number until you look at all the other
things that cause accidental death with children. This is yet another
case of raising the emotional cry of "what about the children?" when
the real purpose is to advance a personal anti gun agenda.

I wonder if that includes all the under 18 year-olds in Chicago and
elsewhere. Oh, wait, they don't
count, and it's 'racist' to mention them.


It's quite telling that right-wing assholes like Herring and W'hine so
easily dismiss the death of children killed by firearms.


I do not think they dismiss the killings. I think we, as a society, have
become inured to drug dealers, killing other drug dealers. We do cry about
the innocents killed, but overall why really care? The local neighborhood
will not testify, or even get up a vigilante committee. As long as they
keep it local to their neighborhood, we will ignore it for the most part.
Until we change the War on Drugs, there will be no stopping the killings.
If it turned in to a Mexico type drug war, then all those people with legal
guns will get riled up.


Herring and the other right-wing assholes don't give a damn about the
mass murders of kids in schools.


Mass murders in school are less than years past, and are a minor notation
on death by shooting. Even excluding suicides. We, especially those with
a good relationship with their children, do care about school shootings.
But seems as if society, especially the very liberal side, do not like
questioning someone's mental status.

On 7/15/14, 7:51 PM, Califbill wrote:
F*O*A*D wrote:
On 7/15/14, 4:43 PM, Califbill wrote:
F*O*A*D wrote:
On 7/15/14, 4:32 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 13:45:05 -0400, Wayne.B wrote:

On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 09:41:11 -0700, jps wrote:

One hundred children
died in unintentional shootings in the year after Newtown, which
breaks down to two every week.


===

One hundred sounds like a large number until you look at all the other
things that cause accidental death with children. This is yet another
case of raising the emotional cry of "what about the children?" when
the real purpose is to advance a personal anti gun agenda.

I wonder if that includes all the under 18 year-olds in Chicago and
elsewhere. Oh, wait, they don't
count, and it's 'racist' to mention them.


It's quite telling that right-wing assholes like Herring and W'hine so
easily dismiss the death of children killed by firearms.


I do not think they dismiss the killings. I think we, as a society, have
become inured to drug dealers, killing other drug dealers. We do cry about
the innocents killed, but overall why really care? The local neighborhood
will not testify, or even get up a vigilante committee. As long as they
keep it local to their neighborhood, we will ignore it for the most part.
Until we change the War on Drugs, there will be no stopping the killings.
If it turned in to a Mexico type drug war, then all those people with legal
guns will get riled up.


Herring and the other right-wing assholes don't give a damn about the
mass murders of kids in schools.


Mass murders in school are less than years past, and are a minor notation
on death by shooting.


Oh. How nice.


--
Republicans . . . the anti-immigrant, anti-contraception, anti-student,
anti-middle class, pro-impeachment party that shut down the government
last year for no reason.

On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 13:45:05 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 09:41:11 -0700, jps wrote:

One hundred children
died in unintentional shootings in the year after Newtown, which
breaks down to two every week.


===

One hundred sounds like a large number until you look at all the other
things that cause accidental death with children. This is yet another
case of raising the emotional cry of "what about the children?" when
the real purpose is to advance a personal anti gun agenda.

So, the logic is: Kids die, why be concerned with how.

On 7/15/14, 7:01 PM, jps wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 13:45:05 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 09:41:11 -0700, jps wrote:

One hundred children
died in unintentional shootings in the year after Newtown, which
breaks down to two every week.


===

One hundred sounds like a large number until you look at all the other
things that cause accidental death with children. This is yet another
case of raising the emotional cry of "what about the children?" when
the real purpose is to advance a personal anti gun agenda.

So, the logic is: Kids die, why be concerned with how.



Despite all the noise "Repubnants" make about "right-to-life," once the
fetus pops out, they really don't give a **** about the kids that are in
the "here and now."

--
Republicans . . . the anti-immigrant, anti-contraception, anti-student,
anti-middle class, pro-impeachment party that shut down the government
last year for no reason.