On 7/14/2014 8:00 AM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 7/14/14, 9:55 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 7/14/2014 8:04 AM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 7/14/14, 7:22 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:



He also ignores the fact that the Bush administration used the same
arguments in support of taking military action against Iraq that Bill
Clinton and his administration had used. In fact, it was Bill Clinton
who signed the Iraq Liberation Act (voted on and passed by the United
States Congress) that established a US policy calling for regime
change
in Iraq. Reasons were the continued and increasing defiance of UN
Resolutions by Saddam Hussein.

Bush and Co. executed that policy.


Clinton was smart enough not to. Got it?



But fully supported the decision when Bush did.

Clinton lobbed 400 cruise missiles into Iraq for the same reasons.
Didn't change anything.

Bush finished what Clinton started.

Got it?




Of course Clinton supported it, just like presidents once out of office
either support or say next to nothing about their successors. Politics
and courtesy.

Clinton did not invade Iraq, no matter how many ways you try to spin it.



No doubt O'Bama will be blaming his failures on Bush. Bama is a CYA kind
of guy. He'll break courtesy and protocol, just watch.

--
"I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the
government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of
taking care of them".
Thomas Jefferson