| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#16
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 7/14/2014 1:44 AM, Tom Nofinger wrote:
On Sunday, July 13, 2014 8:17:10 AM UTC-7, wrote: On Sun, 13 Jul 2014 09:13:06 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: Precisely. Clinton talked about the problems with Iraq but was smart enough not to invade it and stick around, while Bush was dumb enough to be talked into invading Iraq and sticking around. Clinton was smart while Bush was...Bush. BTW, I don't *hate* Bush. Why do you conservatives toss that "hate" word around so much? I think Bush was a total failure, a moron, and a man easily manipulated by the neocons, but I don't hate him. 400 cruise missiles fired into suspected weapons facilities by Clinton wasn't exactly "talking" about the problem. Plus, it wasn't just Clinton. It was most of Congress and Clinton's entire Cabinet that were warning of WMDs in Iraq and Hussein's increasing refusal to adhere to the UN Resolutions agreed to after the Gulf War. Clinton called Saddam "the greatest threat to peace" and, by signing the "Iraq Liberation Act" in 1998, officially established a US policy calling for regime change in Iraq. Seems to me that the seeds for the invasion of Iraq were planted long before Bush took office and the reasons for planting the seeds were pretty much the same ones that you complain about so often today. Harry keeps forgetting that his sweety, Hillary, was one of the biggest supporters of that invasion, along with the rest of the neocon democrats. The vote in congress was bi-partisan and very lopsided. Krause is a *true believer* that cannot be convinced differently, regardless of any sound presentation of truthful evidence. He also ignores the fact that the Bush administration used the same arguments in support of taking military action against Iraq that Bill Clinton and his administration had used. In fact, it was Bill Clinton who signed the Iraq Liberation Act (voted on and passed by the United States Congress) that established a US policy calling for regime change in Iraq. Reasons were the continued and increasing defiance of UN Resolutions by Saddam Hussein. Bush and Co. executed that policy. You are correct. It's a religious experience for Harry. History and facts don't matter if they offend or are at odds with his worship of everything liberal and Democratic. |