Federal Judge Overturns Virginia’s Same-Sex Marriage Ban

By ERIK ECKHOLMFEB. 14, 2014
NY Times


A federal judge on Thursday evening declared that Virginia’s ban on
same-sex marriage was unconstitutional, in the strongest legal reversal
yet of restrictive marriage amendments that exist throughout the South.

“Our Constitution declares that ‘all men’ are created equal,” wrote
Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen of United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Virginia, in Norfolk. “Surely this means all of us.”

The ruling, which overturned a constitutional amendment adopted by
Virginia voters in 2006 as well as previous laws, also said that
Virginia must respect same-sex marriages that were carried out legally
in other states.

But opponents of same-sex marriage have vowed to appeal the decision to
the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Richmond,
and Judge Wright Allen stayed the execution of Thursday’s ruling pending
the appeal.

This week, a federal judge in Kentucky ruled that the state must honor
same-sex marriages legally performed in other states, but the ruling did
not address Kentucky’s own ban on such marriages.

If the Court of Appeals upholds Thursday’s decision, the repercussions
in the South could be wide. Similar amendments limiting marriage to a
man and a woman would most likely be voided in other states of the
Fourth Circuit, including North Carolina, South Carolina and West
Virginia. (Maryland, the fifth member, approved same-sex marriage in 2012.)
--
Sarah Palin is watching the Sochi Olympic Games from the front porch of
her house.

On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 07:25:52 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Federal Judge Overturns Virginia’s Same-Sex Marriage Ban

....but that shouldn't interfere with your attempts to get into Palin's pants.

What did you think of the Nagin stories?

Here, in case you missed it.

http://tinyurl.com/ltun7ff

And, another question. When you talk about how stupid the folks in the southern states are, do you
include all the Democrats? A couple of us were wondering. Atlanta's mayor is black. Is he stupid?
Are all the Democrats who voted for him stupid?

On 2/14/2014 7:25 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
Federal Judge Overturns Virginia’s Same-Sex Marriage Ban

By ERIK ECKHOLMFEB. 14, 2014
NY Times


A federal judge on Thursday evening declared that Virginia’s ban on
same-sex marriage was unconstitutional, in the strongest legal reversal
yet of restrictive marriage amendments that exist throughout the South.

“Our Constitution declares that ‘all men’ are created equal,” wrote
Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen of United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Virginia, in Norfolk. “Surely this means all of us.”

The ruling, which overturned a constitutional amendment adopted by
Virginia voters in 2006 as well as previous laws, also said that
Virginia must respect same-sex marriages that were carried out legally
in other states.

But opponents of same-sex marriage have vowed to appeal the decision to
the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Richmond,
and Judge Wright Allen stayed the execution of Thursday’s ruling pending
the appeal.

This week, a federal judge in Kentucky ruled that the state must honor
same-sex marriages legally performed in other states, but the ruling did
not address Kentucky’s own ban on such marriages.

If the Court of Appeals upholds Thursday’s decision, the repercussions
in the South could be wide. Similar amendments limiting marriage to a
man and a woman would most likely be voided in other states of the
Fourth Circuit, including North Carolina, South Carolina and West
Virginia. (Maryland, the fifth member, approved same-sex marriage in 2012.)
Why is this important to you above most all other current event?

On 2/14/2014 8:40 AM, HanK wrote:
On 2/14/2014 7:25 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
Federal Judge Overturns Virginia’s Same-Sex Marriage Ban

By ERIK ECKHOLMFEB. 14, 2014
NY Times


A federal judge on Thursday evening declared that Virginia’s ban on
same-sex marriage was unconstitutional, in the strongest legal reversal
yet of restrictive marriage amendments that exist throughout the South.

“Our Constitution declares that ‘all men’ are created equal,” wrote
Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen of United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Virginia, in Norfolk. “Surely this means all of us.”

The ruling, which overturned a constitutional amendment adopted by
Virginia voters in 2006 as well as previous laws, also said that
Virginia must respect same-sex marriages that were carried out legally
in other states.

But opponents of same-sex marriage have vowed to appeal the decision to
the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Richmond,
and Judge Wright Allen stayed the execution of Thursday’s ruling pending
the appeal.

This week, a federal judge in Kentucky ruled that the state must honor
same-sex marriages legally performed in other states, but the ruling did
not address Kentucky’s own ban on such marriages.

If the Court of Appeals upholds Thursday’s decision, the repercussions
in the South could be wide. Similar amendments limiting marriage to a
man and a woman would most likely be voided in other states of the
Fourth Circuit, including North Carolina, South Carolina and West
Virginia. (Maryland, the fifth member, approved same-sex marriage in
2012.)
Why is this important to you above most all other current event?

The dems think it's the only tool they have left... The "war on women"
has been pretty much debunked...

On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 08:40:54 -0500, HanK wrote:

On 2/14/2014 7:25 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
Federal Judge Overturns Virginia’s Same-Sex Marriage Ban

By ERIK ECKHOLMFEB. 14, 2014
NY Times


A federal judge on Thursday evening declared that Virginia’s ban on
same-sex marriage was unconstitutional, in the strongest legal reversal
yet of restrictive marriage amendments that exist throughout the South.

“Our Constitution declares that ‘all men’ are created equal,” wrote
Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen of United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Virginia, in Norfolk. “Surely this means all of us.”

The ruling, which overturned a constitutional amendment adopted by
Virginia voters in 2006 as well as previous laws, also said that
Virginia must respect same-sex marriages that were carried out legally
in other states.

But opponents of same-sex marriage have vowed to appeal the decision to
the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Richmond,
and Judge Wright Allen stayed the execution of Thursday’s ruling pending
the appeal.

This week, a federal judge in Kentucky ruled that the state must honor
same-sex marriages legally performed in other states, but the ruling did
not address Kentucky’s own ban on such marriages.

If the Court of Appeals upholds Thursday’s decision, the repercussions
in the South could be wide. Similar amendments limiting marriage to a
man and a woman would most likely be voided in other states of the
Fourth Circuit, including North Carolina, South Carolina and West
Virginia. (Maryland, the fifth member, approved same-sex marriage in 2012.)
Why is this important to you above most all other current event?

Any state trying to preserve the normal marriage is screwed up. Same sex unions should be encouraged
if only as a population control measure. In fact, I'm thinking we should provide a 'same sex union
tax credit' for those folks who form a union in which the two people *cannot* reproduce. However, If
a male transvestite and female transvestite form such a union, they cannot get the tax credit.
However, they may ask for pink booties and pantaloons for their baby boy.

On 2/14/14, 9:32 AM, KC wrote:
On 2/14/2014 8:40 AM, HanK wrote:
On 2/14/2014 7:25 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
Federal Judge Overturns Virginia’s Same-Sex Marriage Ban

By ERIK ECKHOLMFEB. 14, 2014
NY Times


A federal judge on Thursday evening declared that Virginia’s ban on
same-sex marriage was unconstitutional, in the strongest legal reversal
yet of restrictive marriage amendments that exist throughout the South.

“Our Constitution declares that ‘all men’ are created equal,” wrote
Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen of United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Virginia, in Norfolk. “Surely this means all of us.”

The ruling, which overturned a constitutional amendment adopted by
Virginia voters in 2006 as well as previous laws, also said that
Virginia must respect same-sex marriages that were carried out legally
in other states.

But opponents of same-sex marriage have vowed to appeal the decision to
the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Richmond,
and Judge Wright Allen stayed the execution of Thursday’s ruling pending
the appeal.

This week, a federal judge in Kentucky ruled that the state must honor
same-sex marriages legally performed in other states, but the ruling did
not address Kentucky’s own ban on such marriages.

If the Court of Appeals upholds Thursday’s decision, the repercussions
in the South could be wide. Similar amendments limiting marriage to a
man and a woman would most likely be voided in other states of the
Fourth Circuit, including North Carolina, South Carolina and West
Virginia. (Maryland, the fifth member, approved same-sex marriage in
2012.)
Why is this important to you above most all other current event?

The dems think it's the only tool they have left... The "war on women"
has been pretty much debunked...


Bull****.

--
Sarah Palin is watching the Sochi Olympic Games from the front porch of
her house.

On 2/14/14, 9:45 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 08:40:54 -0500, HanK wrote:

On 2/14/2014 7:25 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
Federal Judge Overturns Virginia’s Same-Sex Marriage Ban

By ERIK ECKHOLMFEB. 14, 2014
NY Times


A federal judge on Thursday evening declared that Virginia’s ban on
same-sex marriage was unconstitutional, in the strongest legal reversal
yet of restrictive marriage amendments that exist throughout the South.

“Our Constitution declares that ‘all men’ are created equal,” wrote
Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen of United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Virginia, in Norfolk. “Surely this means all of us.”

The ruling, which overturned a constitutional amendment adopted by
Virginia voters in 2006 as well as previous laws, also said that
Virginia must respect same-sex marriages that were carried out legally
in other states.

But opponents of same-sex marriage have vowed to appeal the decision to
the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Richmond,
and Judge Wright Allen stayed the execution of Thursday’s ruling pending
the appeal.

This week, a federal judge in Kentucky ruled that the state must honor
same-sex marriages legally performed in other states, but the ruling did
not address Kentucky’s own ban on such marriages.

If the Court of Appeals upholds Thursday’s decision, the repercussions
in the South could be wide. Similar amendments limiting marriage to a
man and a woman would most likely be voided in other states of the
Fourth Circuit, including North Carolina, South Carolina and West
Virginia. (Maryland, the fifth member, approved same-sex marriage in 2012.)
Why is this important to you above most all other current event?

Any state trying to preserve the normal marriage is screwed up.

Perhaps you can explain how extending marriage rights to gays impacts
what you believe is "normal" marriage.

On 2/14/2014 9:52 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/14/14, 9:45 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 08:40:54 -0500, HanK wrote:

On 2/14/2014 7:25 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
Federal Judge Overturns Virginia’s Same-Sex Marriage Ban

By ERIK ECKHOLMFEB. 14, 2014
NY Times


A federal judge on Thursday evening declared that Virginia’s ban on
same-sex marriage was unconstitutional, in the strongest legal reversal
yet of restrictive marriage amendments that exist throughout the South.

“Our Constitution declares that ‘all men’ are created equal,” wrote
Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen of United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Virginia, in Norfolk. “Surely this means all of
us.”

The ruling, which overturned a constitutional amendment adopted by
Virginia voters in 2006 as well as previous laws, also said that
Virginia must respect same-sex marriages that were carried out legally
in other states.

But opponents of same-sex marriage have vowed to appeal the decision to
the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Richmond,
and Judge Wright Allen stayed the execution of Thursday’s ruling
pending
the appeal.

This week, a federal judge in Kentucky ruled that the state must honor
same-sex marriages legally performed in other states, but the ruling
did
not address Kentucky’s own ban on such marriages.

If the Court of Appeals upholds Thursday’s decision, the repercussions
in the South could be wide. Similar amendments limiting marriage to a
man and a woman would most likely be voided in other states of the
Fourth Circuit, including North Carolina, South Carolina and West
Virginia. (Maryland, the fifth member, approved same-sex marriage in
2012.)
Why is this important to you above most all other current event?

Any state trying to preserve the normal marriage is screwed up.

Perhaps you can explain how extending marriage rights to gays impacts
what you believe is "normal" marriage.
There is no correlation between gay marriage rights and normal marriage.
How can you think otherwise?

On 2/14/2014 9:49 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/14/14, 9:32 AM, KC wrote:
On 2/14/2014 8:40 AM, HanK wrote:
On 2/14/2014 7:25 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
Federal Judge Overturns Virginia’s Same-Sex Marriage Ban

By ERIK ECKHOLMFEB. 14, 2014
NY Times


A federal judge on Thursday evening declared that Virginia’s ban on
same-sex marriage was unconstitutional, in the strongest legal reversal
yet of restrictive marriage amendments that exist throughout the South.

“Our Constitution declares that ‘all men’ are created equal,” wrote
Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen of United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Virginia, in Norfolk. “Surely this means all of
us.”

The ruling, which overturned a constitutional amendment adopted by
Virginia voters in 2006 as well as previous laws, also said that
Virginia must respect same-sex marriages that were carried out legally
in other states.

But opponents of same-sex marriage have vowed to appeal the decision to
the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Richmond,
and Judge Wright Allen stayed the execution of Thursday’s ruling
pending
the appeal.

This week, a federal judge in Kentucky ruled that the state must honor
same-sex marriages legally performed in other states, but the ruling
did
not address Kentucky’s own ban on such marriages.

If the Court of Appeals upholds Thursday’s decision, the repercussions
in the South could be wide. Similar amendments limiting marriage to a
man and a woman would most likely be voided in other states of the
Fourth Circuit, including North Carolina, South Carolina and West
Virginia. (Maryland, the fifth member, approved same-sex marriage in
2012.)
Why is this important to you above most all other current event?

The dems think it's the only tool they have left... The "war on women"
has been pretty much debunked...


Bull****.

That's right. There has never been a shortage of underhanded means for
Democrats to sway elections.

On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 09:52:29 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 2/14/14, 9:45 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 08:40:54 -0500, HanK wrote:

On 2/14/2014 7:25 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
Federal Judge Overturns Virginia’s Same-Sex Marriage Ban

By ERIK ECKHOLMFEB. 14, 2014
NY Times


A federal judge on Thursday evening declared that Virginia’s ban on
same-sex marriage was unconstitutional, in the strongest legal reversal
yet of restrictive marriage amendments that exist throughout the South.

“Our Constitution declares that ‘all men’ are created equal,” wrote
Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen of United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Virginia, in Norfolk. “Surely this means all of us.”

The ruling, which overturned a constitutional amendment adopted by
Virginia voters in 2006 as well as previous laws, also said that
Virginia must respect same-sex marriages that were carried out legally
in other states.

But opponents of same-sex marriage have vowed to appeal the decision to
the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Richmond,
and Judge Wright Allen stayed the execution of Thursday’s ruling pending
the appeal.

This week, a federal judge in Kentucky ruled that the state must honor
same-sex marriages legally performed in other states, but the ruling did
not address Kentucky’s own ban on such marriages.

If the Court of Appeals upholds Thursday’s decision, the repercussions
in the South could be wide. Similar amendments limiting marriage to a
man and a woman would most likely be voided in other states of the
Fourth Circuit, including North Carolina, South Carolina and West
Virginia. (Maryland, the fifth member, approved same-sex marriage in 2012.)
Why is this important to you above most all other current event?

Any state trying to preserve the normal marriage is screwed up.

Perhaps you can explain how extending marriage rights to gays impacts
what you believe is "normal" marriage.

The union of two men or two women or two transsexuals or same-sex transvestites, or whatever, can
only *help* those folks in a normal marriage. Population reduction would be a good thing. Reduced
population would reduce the global warming trend, school crowding, welfare to families with
dependant children, and on and on. The 'Same Sex Union Tax Credit' (SSUTC) is a great idea!