On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:04:48 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 2/16/14, 12:00 PM, Poco Loco wrote:


BTW, Dunn was found guilty. Could get up to 60 years. Jury got hung on the 'murder' rap. Must be
'bad Republican jury', eh?


He was not found guilty of murder. He should have been.

You liberals are strange. You want lenient punishments, but are so quick to pronounce guilt.

On 2/16/14, 12:44 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:04:48 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 2/16/14, 12:00 PM, Poco Loco wrote:


BTW, Dunn was found guilty. Could get up to 60 years. Jury got hung on the 'murder' rap. Must be
'bad Republican jury', eh?


He was not found guilty of murder. He should have been.

You liberals are strange. You want lenient punishments, but are so quick to pronounce guilt.


Lenient punishment? What sort of right-wing chicken bone are you choking
on now? And who is talking about punishment? You are. You are the one
who brought up the possibility of a 60-year sentence. I wanted him
convicted for the crime he committed: murder.

On 2/16/2014 3:00 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 2/16/14, 12:44 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:04:48 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 2/16/14, 12:00 PM, Poco Loco wrote:


BTW, Dunn was found guilty. Could get up to 60 years. Jury got hung
on the 'murder' rap. Must be
'bad Republican jury', eh?


He was not found guilty of murder. He should have been.

You liberals are strange. You want lenient punishments, but are so
quick to pronounce guilt.


Lenient punishment? What sort of right-wing chicken bone are you choking
on now? And who is talking about punishment? You are. You are the one
who brought up the possibility of a 60-year sentence. I wanted him
convicted for the crime he committed: murder.


Didn't that charge result in a hung jury? Last I heard the prosecutors
planned on a new trial on the murder charge.

On 2/16/14, 3:13 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/16/2014 3:00 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 2/16/14, 12:44 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:04:48 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 2/16/14, 12:00 PM, Poco Loco wrote:


BTW, Dunn was found guilty. Could get up to 60 years. Jury got hung
on the 'murder' rap. Must be
'bad Republican jury', eh?


He was not found guilty of murder. He should have been.

You liberals are strange. You want lenient punishments, but are so
quick to pronounce guilt.


Lenient punishment? What sort of right-wing chicken bone are you choking
on now? And who is talking about punishment? You are. You are the one
who brought up the possibility of a 60-year sentence. I wanted him
convicted for the crime he committed: murder.


Didn't that charge result in a hung jury? Last I heard the prosecutors
planned on a new trial on the murder charge.

Even weirder than the Zimmerman verdict. The bozo shot at the kids in
their car and killed one of them. Second-degree murder at the least. My
guess is that the white members of the jury voted not to convict him of
the murder charge, thus resulting in a hung jury on that charge.

On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:20:20 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 2/16/14, 3:13 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/16/2014 3:00 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 2/16/14, 12:44 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:04:48 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 2/16/14, 12:00 PM, Poco Loco wrote:


BTW, Dunn was found guilty. Could get up to 60 years. Jury got hung
on the 'murder' rap. Must be
'bad Republican jury', eh?


He was not found guilty of murder. He should have been.

You liberals are strange. You want lenient punishments, but are so
quick to pronounce guilt.


Lenient punishment? What sort of right-wing chicken bone are you choking
on now? And who is talking about punishment? You are. You are the one
who brought up the possibility of a 60-year sentence. I wanted him
convicted for the crime he committed: murder.


Didn't that charge result in a hung jury? Last I heard the prosecutors
planned on a new trial on the murder charge.

Even weirder than the Zimmerman verdict. The bozo shot at the kids in
their car and killed one of them. Second-degree murder at the least. My
guess is that the white members of the jury voted not to convict him of
the murder charge, thus resulting in a hung jury on that charge.

Ah, racism. Should have known. But, even the white folks found him guilty of the other charges.
Maybe they aren't as racist as you think? They could have voted 'innocent' of everything, you know.

On 2/16/2014 3:31 PM, Poco Loco wrote:


Even weirder than the Zimmerman verdict. The bozo shot at the kids in
their car and killed one of them. Second-degree murder at the least. My
guess is that the white members of the jury voted not to convict him of
the murder charge, thus resulting in a hung jury on that charge.

Ah, racism. Should have known. But, even the white folks found him guilty of the other charges.
Maybe they aren't as racist as you think? They could have voted 'innocent' of everything, you know.



I fail to understand why you would even address such a ridiculously
childish and just plain stupid comment...

On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:13:26 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:

On 2/16/2014 3:00 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 2/16/14, 12:44 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:04:48 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 2/16/14, 12:00 PM, Poco Loco wrote:


BTW, Dunn was found guilty. Could get up to 60 years. Jury got hung
on the 'murder' rap. Must be
'bad Republican jury', eh?


He was not found guilty of murder. He should have been.

You liberals are strange. You want lenient punishments, but are so
quick to pronounce guilt.


Lenient punishment? What sort of right-wing chicken bone are you choking
on now? And who is talking about punishment? You are. You are the one
who brought up the possibility of a 60-year sentence. I wanted him
convicted for the crime he committed: murder.


Didn't that charge result in a hung jury? Last I heard the prosecutors
planned on a new trial on the murder charge.

Yes, and yes.

But, there's no need, in the minds of some, for a trial or a jury. He's guilty. Amen.

On 2/16/14, 3:29 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:13:26 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:

On 2/16/2014 3:00 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 2/16/14, 12:44 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:04:48 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 2/16/14, 12:00 PM, Poco Loco wrote:


BTW, Dunn was found guilty. Could get up to 60 years. Jury got hung
on the 'murder' rap. Must be
'bad Republican jury', eh?


He was not found guilty of murder. He should have been.

You liberals are strange. You want lenient punishments, but are so
quick to pronounce guilt.


Lenient punishment? What sort of right-wing chicken bone are you choking
on now? And who is talking about punishment? You are. You are the one
who brought up the possibility of a 60-year sentence. I wanted him
convicted for the crime he committed: murder.


Didn't that charge result in a hung jury? Last I heard the prosecutors
planned on a new trial on the murder charge.

Yes, and yes.

But, there's no need, in the minds of some, for a trial or a jury. He's guilty. Amen.



The bozo shot into a car of teenagers and killed one of them. There is
no disputing that. There is NO evidence whatsoever that any of the teens
were armed with a weapon or even that any of them got out of their car.
Hey, one of them might have said, "**** you, whitey," and I suppose in
Florida that is enough for "whitey" to shoot at them, eh?

On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:34:27 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 2/16/14, 3:29 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:13:26 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:

On 2/16/2014 3:00 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 2/16/14, 12:44 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:04:48 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 2/16/14, 12:00 PM, Poco Loco wrote:


BTW, Dunn was found guilty. Could get up to 60 years. Jury got hung
on the 'murder' rap. Must be
'bad Republican jury', eh?


He was not found guilty of murder. He should have been.

You liberals are strange. You want lenient punishments, but are so
quick to pronounce guilt.


Lenient punishment? What sort of right-wing chicken bone are you choking
on now? And who is talking about punishment? You are. You are the one
who brought up the possibility of a 60-year sentence. I wanted him
convicted for the crime he committed: murder.


Didn't that charge result in a hung jury? Last I heard the prosecutors
planned on a new trial on the murder charge.

Yes, and yes.

But, there's no need, in the minds of some, for a trial or a jury. He's guilty. Amen.



The bozo shot into a car of teenagers and killed one of them. There is
no disputing that. There is NO evidence whatsoever that any of the teens
were armed with a weapon or even that any of them got out of their car.
Hey, one of them might have said, "**** you, whitey," and I suppose in
Florida that is enough for "whitey" to shoot at them, eh?

Don't know. The jury, all racists as you say, was hung.

But, shouldn't you have him filtered, if he is what you say?

And, just 'cause there's no gun, doesn't mean it wasn't chucked out the window, right?

On 2/16/2014 4:28 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:34:27 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 2/16/14, 3:29 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:13:26 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:

On 2/16/2014 3:00 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 2/16/14, 12:44 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:04:48 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 2/16/14, 12:00 PM, Poco Loco wrote:


BTW, Dunn was found guilty. Could get up to 60 years. Jury got hung
on the 'murder' rap. Must be
'bad Republican jury', eh?


He was not found guilty of murder. He should have been.

You liberals are strange. You want lenient punishments, but are so
quick to pronounce guilt.


Lenient punishment? What sort of right-wing chicken bone are you choking
on now? And who is talking about punishment? You are. You are the one
who brought up the possibility of a 60-year sentence. I wanted him
convicted for the crime he committed: murder.


Didn't that charge result in a hung jury? Last I heard the prosecutors
planned on a new trial on the murder charge.

Yes, and yes.

But, there's no need, in the minds of some, for a trial or a jury. He's guilty. Amen.



The bozo shot into a car of teenagers and killed one of them. There is
no disputing that. There is NO evidence whatsoever that any of the teens
were armed with a weapon or even that any of them got out of their car.

Sure there is, there is testimony... why do you always have to ask
questions filled with lies? Can't support your point any other way?

Hey, one of them might have said, "**** you, whitey," and I suppose in
Florida that is enough for "whitey" to shoot at them, eh?

Don't know. The jury, all racists as you say, was hung.

But, shouldn't you have him filtered, if he is what you say?

And, just 'cause there's no gun, doesn't mean it wasn't chucked out the window, right?