On 1/16/14, 1:03 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 12:47:08 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 1/16/14, 12:43 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 12:24:14 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 1/16/14, 12:20 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 11:45:25 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 1/16/14, 11:22 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:30:55 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 1/16/14, 10:12 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 09:24:30 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 1/16/14, 8:52 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 19:37:39 -0500, KC wrote:

On 1/15/2014 4:18 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 12:54:09 -0800 (PST), True North wrote:

Well Johnny,
The money you waste on one handgun should buy a small fleet of those RC helicopters.

Isn't that the truth!! Luckily, I can do both.


Don't let him get to you John... you worked your ass off for that ****

He doesn't stand a chance.

Why he wishes to act like a fool is beyond me. Maybe Harry will enlighten him using Luddite's
technique.


Why are you making personal and disparaging comments about other posters
here?

Read his posts and you'll understand the comment.



I'm not asking about *his* posts, I am asking why *you* continue to make
personal, disparaging remarks about other posters.


Are you feeling like I've been personally disparaging towards you? Or others? Perhaps you'd care to
show me? Given your background, and Don's background, I'd say I've been pretty damn cordial.


I asked why you are continuing to make personal, insulting remarks about
other posters here. The question was not about my feelings or my
background or another poster's background.

You implied you wanted to be shown an example of one of your personal,
disparaging remarks about another poster.

When you claim another poster is acting like a fool, you are making a
personal, disparaging remark.


And when you asked why, I told you to read his posts. You can figure it out from there.


So, what you might be saying is that you believe someone else is
responsible for what you post here? Interesting.

That would not be fair. Someone else's comment prompted mine. To hold them 'responsible' would be
silly. That would be like holding you responsible for being called the names you've been called.


So, then, *you* are responsible for what you post here, and when you
personally insult someone here with a disparaging remark, it is your
responsibility alone. Okay. So, why are you continuing to make personal,
disparaging remarks about other posters, such as:

"Why he wishes to act like a fool is beyond me."



I am absolutely responsible for what I post here, just as you are for your posts. When one uses the
word 'continuing', one is normally referring to a series of some sort. You referred to 'one' post. I
made that post in response to a couple posts Don made. If you don't like it, well...cry a river,
build a bridge, and get over it!

Go back to telling me all about the Sig Sauer P226 X5 you 'owned'.

I've told you all you need to know. I bought it for competitive
shooting. The P226 you bought certainly isn't suitable for concealed
carry, nor is it accurate or fast enough for competition. Is it to be a
safe queen?