On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 15:35:59 -0500, Poco Loco wrote:

On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 14:55:21 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 1/11/14, 1:23 PM, thumper wrote:
On 1/11/2014 5:49 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 19:37:01 -0800, thumper wrote:
Poco Loco wrote:

Why start the ****, Harry?

Wow, talk about sensitive...

Why go out of your way to look for trouble?

Keep reading, Thumper. I suppose Harry's thinly disguised religious
sarcasm, part of his 'war on
religion' (in his own words), went over your head.

More evident is your hyper-sensitivity, how about giving it a break.


I don't think it is snarky to point out that it apparently is "ok" with
some of the "hypersensitive," as you call them, if their buddies behave
badly in here and "go after" other posters. As far as I can tell, so far
this year, it is only the posters on the rightwing side of the political
spectrum who are exhibiting that sort of behavior. What is ironic is
that when some of those same posters complain about the behavior of
others here, they tend not to include their own examples of what they
consider bad behavior, or those of their fellow rightwingers.

Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi, as the saying goes.

You should really spend some more time reading the posts.

If one were to be 'snarky', one might consider you're little anti-religious sarcasm to be somewhat
inappropriate, no?

'your'
--

Hope you're having a spectacular day!

On 1/11/14, 3:55 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 15:35:59 -0500, Poco Loco wrote:

On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 14:55:21 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 1/11/14, 1:23 PM, thumper wrote:
On 1/11/2014 5:49 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 19:37:01 -0800, thumper wrote:
Poco Loco wrote:

Why start the ****, Harry?

Wow, talk about sensitive...

Why go out of your way to look for trouble?

Keep reading, Thumper. I suppose Harry's thinly disguised religious
sarcasm, part of his 'war on
religion' (in his own words), went over your head.

More evident is your hyper-sensitivity, how about giving it a break.


I don't think it is snarky to point out that it apparently is "ok" with
some of the "hypersensitive," as you call them, if their buddies behave
badly in here and "go after" other posters. As far as I can tell, so far
this year, it is only the posters on the rightwing side of the political
spectrum who are exhibiting that sort of behavior. What is ironic is
that when some of those same posters complain about the behavior of
others here, they tend not to include their own examples of what they
consider bad behavior, or those of their fellow rightwingers.

Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi, as the saying goes.

You should really spend some more time reading the posts.

If one were to be 'snarky', one might consider you're little anti-religious sarcasm to be somewhat
inappropriate, no?

'your'
--

Hope you're having a spectacular day!

"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 1/11/14, 12:38 AM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 1/10/14, 6:03 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 17:26:08 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

. . .the Fisherman, retired.

http://tinyurl.com/kvpwwbt

Found these gems in the back of my closet. Provenance indicates they
were worn 2000 years ago by a fellow fishing next to the Sea of Galilee,
but that provenance may be a hoax.

Thinking of selling them on eBay for about $100,000. They're broken in,
they've been in several oceans, they're holy, and they have an original,
never-duplicated aroma.

Why start the ****, Harry?
--

Hope you're day is spectacular!





What ****?

These are my shoes. I wore them when I went fishing. I have retired from
fishing. Ergo, they are the Shoes of the Fisherman, Retired.

Not only have I worn these shoes while fishing in the Atlantic, Pacific
and Carib, I also wore them while on a trip to northern Israel about six
years ago and, guess what, I likely had them on my feet while we were at
the Sea of Galilee. On the other hand, I didn't fish there.

Earlier today, I noticed that your boy Wayne made a nasty reference to a
poster here, the first I saw upon my return to U.S.A., and, of course,
rec.boats. I must have missed you asking him to "not start the ****."

I haven't made one negative comment so far this year about any other
poster here. I haven't looked through the posts I missed while I was
away, but I wonder, can you make the same claim?

2000 years ago? Not just the shoes stink.


I'm sorry for you.

http://www.youtube.com/results?searc...r+old+man&sm=1


Oh bull****. Mel Brooks movie and your reference of a 2000 year old
fisherman have zero in reference relationships regards your post!

On 1/11/14, 10:03 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 1/11/14, 12:38 AM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 1/10/14, 6:03 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 17:26:08 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

. . .the Fisherman, retired.

http://tinyurl.com/kvpwwbt

Found these gems in the back of my closet. Provenance indicates they
were worn 2000 years ago by a fellow fishing next to the Sea of Galilee,
but that provenance may be a hoax.

Thinking of selling them on eBay for about $100,000. They're broken in,
they've been in several oceans, they're holy, and they have an original,
never-duplicated aroma.

Why start the ****, Harry?
--

Hope you're day is spectacular!





What ****?

These are my shoes. I wore them when I went fishing. I have retired from
fishing. Ergo, they are the Shoes of the Fisherman, Retired.

Not only have I worn these shoes while fishing in the Atlantic, Pacific
and Carib, I also wore them while on a trip to northern Israel about six
years ago and, guess what, I likely had them on my feet while we were at
the Sea of Galilee. On the other hand, I didn't fish there.

Earlier today, I noticed that your boy Wayne made a nasty reference to a
poster here, the first I saw upon my return to U.S.A., and, of course,
rec.boats. I must have missed you asking him to "not start the ****."

I haven't made one negative comment so far this year about any other
poster here. I haven't looked through the posts I missed while I was
away, but I wonder, can you make the same claim?

2000 years ago? Not just the shoes stink.


I'm sorry for you.

http://www.youtube.com/results?searc...r+old+man&sm=1


Oh bull****. Mel Brooks movie and your reference of a 2000 year old
fisherman have zero in reference relationships regards your post!


Bill, the clip I posted of Mel and Carl's gag routine in the
2000-year-old man wasn't from a movie. To whom do you think I was
referring?

"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 1/11/14, 10:03 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 1/11/14, 12:38 AM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 1/10/14, 6:03 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 17:26:08 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

. . .the Fisherman, retired.

http://tinyurl.com/kvpwwbt

Found these gems in the back of my closet. Provenance indicates they
were worn 2000 years ago by a fellow fishing next to the Sea of Galilee,
but that provenance may be a hoax.

Thinking of selling them on eBay for about $100,000. They're broken in,
they've been in several oceans, they're holy, and they have an original,
never-duplicated aroma.

Why start the ****, Harry?
--

Hope you're day is spectacular!





What ****?

These are my shoes. I wore them when I went fishing. I have retired from
fishing. Ergo, they are the Shoes of the Fisherman, Retired.

Not only have I worn these shoes while fishing in the Atlantic, Pacific
and Carib, I also wore them while on a trip to northern Israel about six
years ago and, guess what, I likely had them on my feet while we were at
the Sea of Galilee. On the other hand, I didn't fish there.

Earlier today, I noticed that your boy Wayne made a nasty reference to a
poster here, the first I saw upon my return to U.S.A., and, of course,
rec.boats. I must have missed you asking him to "not start the ****."

I haven't made one negative comment so far this year about any other
poster here. I haven't looked through the posts I missed while I was
away, but I wonder, can you make the same claim?

2000 years ago? Not just the shoes stink.


I'm sorry for you.

http://www.youtube.com/results?searc...r+old+man&sm=1


Oh bull****. Mel Brooks movie and your reference of a 2000 year old
fisherman have zero in reference relationships regards your post!


Bill, the clip I posted of Mel and Carl's gag routine in the
2000-year-old man wasn't from a movie. To whom do you think I was referring?

Did not watch your clip. But I think it was Mel who did a movie on a 2000
yo man