On 1/11/2014 6:47 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 6:36 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 2:33 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 1:35 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 10:47 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:

No, FlaJim. I have no idea who Jane Lynch is, and if you can't figure
out if what you post is personally insulting, then I am afraid I
cannot
help you.

Since you obviously are familiar with Ms. Lynch, perhaps you will tell
us all who she is and why she is important to you.

She is googleable just like everything else. If you are insulted by the
mention of your sketchy financial history then you deserve no less than
a daily dose of reminders. Serves you right for being a low life.

So, might we presume that *you* won't be one of those in the future
whining about the "tone" and name-calling and suchlike in rec.boats, eh?

You might presume anything you like.

And I will, based upon your recent behavior in here.

Are you looking for an excuse to fall back to your old ways?
Historically, you haven't needed one after your short term act of
playing nice.

On 1/11/14, 7:02 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 6:47 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 6:36 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 2:33 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 1:35 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 10:47 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:

No, FlaJim. I have no idea who Jane Lynch is, and if you can't figure
out if what you post is personally insulting, then I am afraid I
cannot
help you.

Since you obviously are familiar with Ms. Lynch, perhaps you will
tell
us all who she is and why she is important to you.

She is googleable just like everything else. If you are insulted by
the
mention of your sketchy financial history then you deserve no less
than
a daily dose of reminders. Serves you right for being a low life.

So, might we presume that *you* won't be one of those in the future
whining about the "tone" and name-calling and suchlike in rec.boats,
eh?

You might presume anything you like.

And I will, based upon your recent behavior in here.

Are you looking for an excuse to fall back to your old ways?
Historically, you haven't needed one after your short term act of
playing nice.

No, FlaJim, I'm simply commenting on your recent behavior in here. It's
all about you. My presumption is that based upon your behavior, you
won't be complaining about a negative "tone" here, as you are one of the
ones setting it.

As always, have nice day.

On 1/11/2014 7:07 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 7:02 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 6:47 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 6:36 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 2:33 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 1:35 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 10:47 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:

No, FlaJim. I have no idea who Jane Lynch is, and if you can't
figure
out if what you post is personally insulting, then I am afraid I
cannot
help you.

Since you obviously are familiar with Ms. Lynch, perhaps you will
tell
us all who she is and why she is important to you.

She is googleable just like everything else. If you are insulted by
the
mention of your sketchy financial history then you deserve no less
than
a daily dose of reminders. Serves you right for being a low life.

So, might we presume that *you* won't be one of those in the future
whining about the "tone" and name-calling and suchlike in rec.boats,
eh?

You might presume anything you like.

And I will, based upon your recent behavior in here.

Are you looking for an excuse to fall back to your old ways?
Historically, you haven't needed one after your short term act of
playing nice.

No, FlaJim, I'm simply commenting on your recent behavior in here. It's
all about you. My presumption is that based upon your behavior, you
won't be complaining about a negative "tone" here, as you are one of the
ones setting it.

As always, have nice day.

Let the record show that Krause disavows any responsibility for the tone
of this newsgroup.

On 1/11/14, 7:12 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 7:07 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 7:02 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 6:47 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 6:36 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 2:33 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 1:35 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 10:47 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:

No, FlaJim. I have no idea who Jane Lynch is, and if you can't
figure
out if what you post is personally insulting, then I am afraid I
cannot
help you.

Since you obviously are familiar with Ms. Lynch, perhaps you will
tell
us all who she is and why she is important to you.

She is googleable just like everything else. If you are insulted by
the
mention of your sketchy financial history then you deserve no less
than
a daily dose of reminders. Serves you right for being a low life.

So, might we presume that *you* won't be one of those in the future
whining about the "tone" and name-calling and suchlike in rec.boats,
eh?

You might presume anything you like.

And I will, based upon your recent behavior in here.

Are you looking for an excuse to fall back to your old ways?
Historically, you haven't needed one after your short term act of
playing nice.

No, FlaJim, I'm simply commenting on your recent behavior in here. It's
all about you. My presumption is that based upon your behavior, you
won't be complaining about a negative "tone" here, as you are one of the
ones setting it.

As always, have nice day.

Let the record show that Krause disavows any responsibility for the tone
of this newsgroup.

My comment was about your behavior this year to date, and going forward.
Nothing more, nothing less.

F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 7:12 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 7:07 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 7:02 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 6:47 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 6:36 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 2:33 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 1:35 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 10:47 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:

No, FlaJim. I have no idea who Jane Lynch is, and if you can't
figure
out if what you post is personally insulting, then I am afraid I
cannot
help you.

Since you obviously are familiar with Ms. Lynch, perhaps you will
tell
us all who she is and why she is important to you.

She is googleable just like everything else. If you are
insulted by
the
mention of your sketchy financial history then you deserve no less
than
a daily dose of reminders. Serves you right for being a low life.

So, might we presume that *you* won't be one of those in the future
whining about the "tone" and name-calling and suchlike in
rec.boats,
eh?

You might presume anything you like.

And I will, based upon your recent behavior in here.

Are you looking for an excuse to fall back to your old ways?
Historically, you haven't needed one after your short term act of
playing nice.

No, FlaJim, I'm simply commenting on your recent behavior in here. It's
all about you. My presumption is that based upon your behavior, you
won't be complaining about a negative "tone" here, as you are one of
the
ones setting it.

As always, have nice day.

Let the record show that Krause disavows any responsibility for the tone
of this newsgroup.

My comment was about your behavior this year to date, and going
forward. Nothing more, nothing less.
Quick response. You treat this group like a chat room. Too bad you
don't have other interests or friends.

Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 7:07 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 7:02 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 6:47 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 6:36 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 2:33 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 1:35 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 10:47 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:

No, FlaJim. I have no idea who Jane Lynch is, and if you can't
figure
out if what you post is personally insulting, then I am afraid I
cannot
help you.

Since you obviously are familiar with Ms. Lynch, perhaps you will
tell
us all who she is and why she is important to you.

She is googleable just like everything else. If you are insulted by
the
mention of your sketchy financial history then you deserve no less
than
a daily dose of reminders. Serves you right for being a low life.

So, might we presume that *you* won't be one of those in the future
whining about the "tone" and name-calling and suchlike in rec.boats,
eh?

You might presume anything you like.

And I will, based upon your recent behavior in here.

Are you looking for an excuse to fall back to your old ways?
Historically, you haven't needed one after your short term act of
playing nice.

No, FlaJim, I'm simply commenting on your recent behavior in here. It's
all about you. My presumption is that based upon your behavior, you
won't be complaining about a negative "tone" here, as you are one of the
ones setting it.

As always, have nice day.

Let the record show that Krause disavows any responsibility for the
tone of this newsgroup.
And plagiarizes the catch-phrase of the returning FPS Russia.

On 1/11/2014 9:16 PM, Earl wrote:
Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 7:07 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 7:02 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 6:47 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 6:36 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 2:33 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 1:35 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 10:47 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:

No, FlaJim. I have no idea who Jane Lynch is, and if you can't
figure
out if what you post is personally insulting, then I am afraid I
cannot
help you.

Since you obviously are familiar with Ms. Lynch, perhaps you will
tell
us all who she is and why she is important to you.

She is googleable just like everything else. If you are insulted by
the
mention of your sketchy financial history then you deserve no less
than
a daily dose of reminders. Serves you right for being a low life.

So, might we presume that *you* won't be one of those in the future
whining about the "tone" and name-calling and suchlike in rec.boats,
eh?

You might presume anything you like.

And I will, based upon your recent behavior in here.

Are you looking for an excuse to fall back to your old ways?
Historically, you haven't needed one after your short term act of
playing nice.

No, FlaJim, I'm simply commenting on your recent behavior in here. It's
all about you. My presumption is that based upon your behavior, you
won't be complaining about a negative "tone" here, as you are one of the
ones setting it.

As always, have nice day.

Let the record show that Krause disavows any responsibility for the
tone of this newsgroup.
And plagiarizes the catch-phrase of the returning FPS Russia.

All you guys gotta' do is ignore his trolls, starting to think you all
enjoy making a fool, out of an idiot... I don't get the appeal.

On 1/11/14, 9:21 PM, KC wrote:
On 1/11/2014 9:16 PM, Earl wrote:
Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 7:07 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 7:02 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 6:47 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 6:36 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 2:33 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 1:35 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 10:47 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:

No, FlaJim. I have no idea who Jane Lynch is, and if you can't
figure
out if what you post is personally insulting, then I am afraid I
cannot
help you.

Since you obviously are familiar with Ms. Lynch, perhaps you will
tell
us all who she is and why she is important to you.

She is googleable just like everything else. If you are
insulted by
the
mention of your sketchy financial history then you deserve no less
than
a daily dose of reminders. Serves you right for being a low life.

So, might we presume that *you* won't be one of those in the future
whining about the "tone" and name-calling and suchlike in
rec.boats,
eh?

You might presume anything you like.

And I will, based upon your recent behavior in here.

Are you looking for an excuse to fall back to your old ways?
Historically, you haven't needed one after your short term act of
playing nice.

No, FlaJim, I'm simply commenting on your recent behavior in here. It's
all about you. My presumption is that based upon your behavior, you
won't be complaining about a negative "tone" here, as you are one of
the
ones setting it.

As always, have nice day.

Let the record show that Krause disavows any responsibility for the
tone of this newsgroup.
And plagiarizes the catch-phrase of the returning FPS Russia.

All you guys gotta' do is ignore his trolls, starting to think you all
enjoy making a fool, out of an idiot... I don't get the appeal.


How pleasant.

On 1/11/2014 7:02 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 6:47 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 6:36 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 2:33 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 1:35 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 10:47 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:

No, FlaJim. I have no idea who Jane Lynch is, and if you can't figure
out if what you post is personally insulting, then I am afraid I
cannot
help you.

Since you obviously are familiar with Ms. Lynch, perhaps you will
tell
us all who she is and why she is important to you.

She is googleable just like everything else. If you are insulted by
the
mention of your sketchy financial history then you deserve no less
than
a daily dose of reminders. Serves you right for being a low life.

So, might we presume that *you* won't be one of those in the future
whining about the "tone" and name-calling and suchlike in rec.boats,
eh?

You might presume anything you like.

And I will, based upon your recent behavior in here.

Are you looking for an excuse to fall back to your old ways?
Historically, you haven't needed one after your short term act of
playing nice.


Come on Jim ... give him a chance. He's been pleasant since his return.
Maybe his trip to Africa cleared his mind. If he goes back to his
old ways, that's one thing, but so far, so good.

On 1/11/2014 7:47 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 1/11/2014 7:02 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 6:47 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 6:36 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 2:33 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 1:35 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 10:47 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:

No, FlaJim. I have no idea who Jane Lynch is, and if you can't
figure
out if what you post is personally insulting, then I am afraid I
cannot
help you.

Since you obviously are familiar with Ms. Lynch, perhaps you will
tell
us all who she is and why she is important to you.

She is googleable just like everything else. If you are insulted by
the
mention of your sketchy financial history then you deserve no less
than
a daily dose of reminders. Serves you right for being a low life.

So, might we presume that *you* won't be one of those in the future
whining about the "tone" and name-calling and suchlike in rec.boats,
eh?

You might presume anything you like.

And I will, based upon your recent behavior in here.

Are you looking for an excuse to fall back to your old ways?
Historically, you haven't needed one after your short term act of
playing nice.


Come on Jim ... give him a chance. He's been pleasant since his return.
Maybe his trip to Africa cleared his mind. If he goes back to his
old ways, that's one thing, but so far, so good.



OK I'll give him another chance. ;-)