Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 18:52:00 -0800 (PST), "John H."
wrote:

On Friday, January 10, 2014 8:10:13 PM UTC-5, KC wrote:
On 1/10/2014 7:28 PM, Tim wrote:

On Friday, January 10, 2014 7:59:27 AM UTC-6, John H. wrote:

On Thu, 9 Jan 2014 21:19:12 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:







A "LAWS" wouldn't hurt either. Well, depends on which end your on...







Their effective range is pretty short, well within AK-47 range.



Colonel William Prescott "Don't fire till you see the whites of their eyes!"





The problem with fighting back with small arms or rockets, is they can

stand off a ways and sink you with theirs a lot easier than you can hit

them in their tiny boats... or run a cable and disable you, then hit you

with the rockets...That is what I heard anyway, as a reason why the

bigger ships just can't fight them off with small arms....

The .50 cal machine gun can shoot a mile off. Being a machine gun, it
can put a lot of rounds on target. Why they don't put one on every ship is beyond me.

===

It seems to work for the Coast Guard.

Lots of countries have anti gun laws.

On Friday, January 10, 2014 11:38:21 PM UTC-6, Califbill wrote:
Wayne.B wrote:

On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 18:52:00 -0800 (PST), "John H."

wrote:



On Friday, January 10, 2014 8:10:13 PM UTC-5, KC wrote:

On 1/10/2014 7:28 PM, Tim wrote:



On Friday, January 10, 2014 7:59:27 AM UTC-6, John H. wrote:



On Thu, 9 Jan 2014 21:19:12 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:















A "LAWS" wouldn't hurt either. Well, depends on which end your on...















Their effective range is pretty short, well within AK-47 range.







Colonel William Prescott "Don't fire till you see the whites of their eyes!"











The problem with fighting back with small arms or rockets, is they can



stand off a ways and sink you with theirs a lot easier than you can hit



them in their tiny boats... or run a cable and disable you, then hit you



with the rockets...That is what I heard anyway, as a reason why the



bigger ships just can't fight them off with small arms....



The .50 cal machine gun can shoot a mile off. Being a machine gun, it

can put a lot of rounds on target. Why they don't put one on every ship is beyond me.



===



It seems to work for the Coast Guard.



Lots of countries have anti gun laws.

That's why you arm up in int'l water.

Tim wrote:
On Friday, January 10, 2014 11:38:21 PM UTC-6, Califbill wrote:
Wayne.B wrote:

On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 18:52:00 -0800 (PST), "John H."

wrote:



On Friday, January 10, 2014 8:10:13 PM UTC-5, KC wrote:

On 1/10/2014 7:28 PM, Tim wrote:



On Friday, January 10, 2014 7:59:27 AM UTC-6, John H. wrote:



On Thu, 9 Jan 2014 21:19:12 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:















A "LAWS" wouldn't hurt either. Well, depends on which end your on...















Their effective range is pretty short, well within AK-47 range.







Colonel William Prescott "Don't fire till you see the whites of their eyes!"











The problem with fighting back with small arms or rockets, is they can



stand off a ways and sink you with theirs a lot easier than you can hit



them in their tiny boats... or run a cable and disable you, then hit you



with the rockets...That is what I heard anyway, as a reason why the



bigger ships just can't fight them off with small arms....



The .50 cal machine gun can shoot a mile off. Being a machine gun, it

can put a lot of rounds on target. Why they don't put one on every ship is beyond me.



===



It seems to work for the Coast Guard.



Lots of countries have anti gun laws.

That's why you arm up in int'l water.

The problem is you have enter a port sometimes. Maybe the answer is a Ma
deuce rental service. Pick up your .50 as you reach international waters
and turn it in before entering port. Business opportunity.

On Saturday, January 11, 2014 9:03:29 PM UTC-6, Califbill wrote:
Tim wrote:


That's why you arm up in int'l water.



The problem is you have enter a port sometimes. Maybe the answer is a Ma

deuce rental service. Pick up your .50 as you reach international waters

and turn it in before entering port. Business opportunity.

That's what I was meaning. Have a contract securities comp[any that boards in the in'tl- Rides shotgun with the host cargo carrier, then before reaching the destination port, depart the vessel. and wait for return ship.

The securities craft could float off the coast for quite an extended period of time just waiting for a hire.

People may say that the project would cost a tremendous amount of money, but then again. Millions of tribute paid to terrorists costs far more. Besides- sooner or later (probably sooner) the pirates would get life figured out and quit.

On 1/11/2014 10:56 PM, Tim wrote:
On Saturday, January 11, 2014 9:03:29 PM UTC-6, Califbill wrote:
Tim wrote:


That's why you arm up in int'l water.



The problem is you have enter a port sometimes. Maybe the answer is a Ma

deuce rental service. Pick up your .50 as you reach international waters

and turn it in before entering port. Business opportunity.

That's what I was meaning. Have a contract securities comp[any that boards in the in'tl- Rides shotgun with the host cargo carrier, then before reaching the destination port, depart the vessel. and wait for return ship.

The securities craft could float off the coast for quite an extended period of time just waiting for a hire.

People may say that the project would cost a tremendous amount of money, but then again. Millions of tribute paid to terrorists costs far more. Besides- sooner or later (probably sooner) the pirates would get life figured out and quit.


But when you think about it, what are the odds of "your" ship being
pirated? How many thousands of dollars a load are you going to pay to
protect yourself from something that is almost statistically, not going
to happen?

On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 23:27:56 -0500, KC wrote:

On 1/11/2014 10:56 PM, Tim wrote:
On Saturday, January 11, 2014 9:03:29 PM UTC-6, Califbill wrote:
Tim wrote:


That's why you arm up in int'l water.



The problem is you have enter a port sometimes. Maybe the answer is a Ma

deuce rental service. Pick up your .50 as you reach international waters

and turn it in before entering port. Business opportunity.

That's what I was meaning. Have a contract securities comp[any that boards in the in'tl- Rides shotgun with the host cargo carrier, then before reaching the destination port, depart the vessel. and wait for return ship.

The securities craft could float off the coast for quite an extended period of time just waiting for a hire.

People may say that the project would cost a tremendous amount of money, but then again. Millions of tribute paid to terrorists costs far more. Besides- sooner or later (probably sooner) the pirates would get life figured out and quit.


But when you think about it, what are the odds of "your" ship being
pirated? How many thousands of dollars a load are you going to pay to
protect yourself from something that is almost statistically, not going
to happen?

Shippers would have a choice of buying or not buying the insurance.
--

Hope you're having a spectacular day!

On 1/11/2014 11:27 PM, KC wrote:
On 1/11/2014 10:56 PM, Tim wrote:
On Saturday, January 11, 2014 9:03:29 PM UTC-6, Califbill wrote:
Tim wrote:


That's why you arm up in int'l water.



The problem is you have enter a port sometimes. Maybe the answer is
a Ma

deuce rental service. Pick up your .50 as you reach international
waters

and turn it in before entering port. Business opportunity.

That's what I was meaning. Have a contract securities comp[any that
boards in the in'tl- Rides shotgun with the host cargo carrier, then
before reaching the destination port, depart the vessel. and wait for
return ship.

The securities craft could float off the coast for quite an extended
period of time just waiting for a hire.

People may say that the project would cost a tremendous amount of
money, but then again. Millions of tribute paid to terrorists costs
far more. Besides- sooner or later (probably sooner) the pirates would
get life figured out and quit.


But when you think about it, what are the odds of "your" ship being
pirated? How many thousands of dollars a load are you going to pay to
protect yourself from something that is almost statistically, not going
to happen?

Same reasoning could be applied to concealed carry, but concealed carry
seems to be working.

On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 23:38:21 -0600, Califbill wrote:

Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 18:52:00 -0800 (PST), "John H."
wrote:

On Friday, January 10, 2014 8:10:13 PM UTC-5, KC wrote:
On 1/10/2014 7:28 PM, Tim wrote:

On Friday, January 10, 2014 7:59:27 AM UTC-6, John H. wrote:

On Thu, 9 Jan 2014 21:19:12 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:







A "LAWS" wouldn't hurt either. Well, depends on which end your on...







Their effective range is pretty short, well within AK-47 range.



Colonel William Prescott "Don't fire till you see the whites of their eyes!"





The problem with fighting back with small arms or rockets, is they can

stand off a ways and sink you with theirs a lot easier than you can hit

them in their tiny boats... or run a cable and disable you, then hit you

with the rockets...That is what I heard anyway, as a reason why the

bigger ships just can't fight them off with small arms....

The .50 cal machine gun can shoot a mile off. Being a machine gun, it
can put a lot of rounds on target. Why they don't put one on every ship is beyond me.

===

It seems to work for the Coast Guard.

Lots of countries have anti gun laws.

Most of them don't have pirates. Look at how much Detroit and Chicago have been helped by allowing
guns!
--

Hope you're day is spectacular!

On 1/11/14, 8:44 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 23:38:21 -0600, Califbill wrote:

Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 18:52:00 -0800 (PST), "John H."
wrote:

On Friday, January 10, 2014 8:10:13 PM UTC-5, KC wrote:
On 1/10/2014 7:28 PM, Tim wrote:

On Friday, January 10, 2014 7:59:27 AM UTC-6, John H. wrote:

On Thu, 9 Jan 2014 21:19:12 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:







A "LAWS" wouldn't hurt either. Well, depends on which end your on...







Their effective range is pretty short, well within AK-47 range.



Colonel William Prescott "Don't fire till you see the whites of their eyes!"





The problem with fighting back with small arms or rockets, is they can

stand off a ways and sink you with theirs a lot easier than you can hit

them in their tiny boats... or run a cable and disable you, then hit you

with the rockets...That is what I heard anyway, as a reason why the

bigger ships just can't fight them off with small arms....

The .50 cal machine gun can shoot a mile off. Being a machine gun, it
can put a lot of rounds on target. Why they don't put one on every ship is beyond me.

===

It seems to work for the Coast Guard.

Lots of countries have anti gun laws.

Most of them don't have pirates. Look at how much Detroit and Chicago have been helped by allowing
guns!
--

Hope you're day is spectacular!



I'm hoping you know this, and your misuse of "you're" is deliberate. If
not, someone should have been kind enough to tell you by now that
"you're" is the contraction of "you are." The word you want is "your."

Hope *your* day is spectacular.

Have a nice day.

--
I’ll be delighted to stop my war on religion when the Republicans stop
their war on women, workers, unions, teachers, textbooks, gays, voting
rights, minorities, science, the environment, the separation of church
and state, the poor, the unemployed, the middle class, common decency
and common sense.

On 1/11/2014 8:55 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
I'm hoping you know this, and your misuse of "you're" is deliberate. If
not, someone should have been kind enough to tell you by now that
"you're" is the contraction of "you are." The word you want is "your."

Hope *your* day is spectacular.

Have a nice day.

--
I’ll be delighted to stop my war on religion when the Republicans stop
their war on women, workers, unions, teachers, textbooks, gays, voting
rights, minorities, science, the environment, the separation of church
and state, the poor, the unemployed, the middle class, common decency
and common sense.

Forever the asshole. You have back taxes dating back to the mid nineties.

FYI
Jane Lynch is getting a divorce from her husband, wife, significant
other, partner. or whatever you want to call it. The other party is
seeking 100K monthly alimony. I suppose that's as legitimate as the
sanctity of gay marriage. Right?